Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments Essay Rubric
[Pages:1]Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments
Feature Structure
Content
Research Style
Format and Mechanics
Essay Rubric
3
2
Fully Developed
Partly Developed
Interesting and effective Clear opening, body
opening, body and
and conclusion; mostly
conclusion; progresses progresses in a logical,
in a logical, easy-to-
easy-to-follow order;
follow order; all
most paragraphs seem
paragraphs seem to be to be the proper
the proper length; the length; the writer
writer consistently
rarely digresses from
supports the thesis; the the thesis with
thesis is strong and
unnecessary
engaging/interesting-- information; the thesis
combines a sense of the attempts to identify the
speech's argument and speech's argument and
the language used to
the language used to
convey it
convey it
Thesis is consistently
Thesis is mostly
developed with strong developed with
concrete details/
concrete details/
examples and
examples and
commentary; very
commentary;
thorough and
somewhat thorough
interesting
interpretation and
interpretation and
explanation; attention
explanation; insightful to audience, rhetorical
attention to audience, devices, and elements
rhetorical devices, and of argumentation
elements of
argumentation
Effective use of sources Mostly effective use of
to support and enhance sources to support and
thesis; all quotations
enhance thesis; most
well integrated and
quotations well
cited properly
integrated and cited
properly
Effective sentence variety; clear prose used to provide a unique perspective and strong voice; sophisticated diction
Some sentence variety; mostly clear prose and somewhat detectable voice; effective, but perhaps unsophisticated, diction
Few errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format
Some noticeable or distracting errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format
1 Underdeveloped Unclear or missing opening, body or conclusion; order is unclear or ineffective; some paragraphs ramble or are underdeveloped; the writer frequently digresses from the thesis; thesis is weak/ does not convincingly or accurately identify the speech's argument or language used to convey it Thesis is underdeveloped with few concrete details/ examples or commentary; limited or inaccurate interpretation and explanation; little to attention to audience, rhetorical devices, and elements of argumentation
Information from sources generally does not support and enhance thesis; quotations are not well integrated and cited properly Little sentence variety; passages of unclear prose or flat, undetectable voice; ineffective or consistently unsophisticated diction Many noticeable or distracting errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- analyzing famous speeches as arguments essay rubric
- debate 101 10 steps to successful debating
- mitch landrieu confederate monuments removal
- jessica lynch hoc testimony rhetoric
- what do students need to know about rhetoric
- speech analysis guide six minutes
- analyzing speeches assignment easy peasy all in one high
- ap language speech rhetorical analysis
- speech analysis questions
Related searches
- 10 famous speeches in english
- famous speeches by women
- famous speeches in history
- famous speeches for women s rights
- famous speeches by women in history
- short famous speeches in history
- famous speeches with rhetorical devices
- famous speeches youtube
- famous speeches in the us
- most famous speeches in history
- famous speeches about education
- famous speeches analyzed