Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments Essay Rubric

[Pages:1]Analyzing Famous Speeches as Arguments

Feature Structure

Content

Research Style

Format and Mechanics

Essay Rubric

3

2

Fully Developed

Partly Developed

Interesting and effective Clear opening, body

opening, body and

and conclusion; mostly

conclusion; progresses progresses in a logical,

in a logical, easy-to-

easy-to-follow order;

follow order; all

most paragraphs seem

paragraphs seem to be to be the proper

the proper length; the length; the writer

writer consistently

rarely digresses from

supports the thesis; the the thesis with

thesis is strong and

unnecessary

engaging/interesting-- information; the thesis

combines a sense of the attempts to identify the

speech's argument and speech's argument and

the language used to

the language used to

convey it

convey it

Thesis is consistently

Thesis is mostly

developed with strong developed with

concrete details/

concrete details/

examples and

examples and

commentary; very

commentary;

thorough and

somewhat thorough

interesting

interpretation and

interpretation and

explanation; attention

explanation; insightful to audience, rhetorical

attention to audience, devices, and elements

rhetorical devices, and of argumentation

elements of

argumentation

Effective use of sources Mostly effective use of

to support and enhance sources to support and

thesis; all quotations

enhance thesis; most

well integrated and

quotations well

cited properly

integrated and cited

properly

Effective sentence variety; clear prose used to provide a unique perspective and strong voice; sophisticated diction

Some sentence variety; mostly clear prose and somewhat detectable voice; effective, but perhaps unsophisticated, diction

Few errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format

Some noticeable or distracting errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format

1 Underdeveloped Unclear or missing opening, body or conclusion; order is unclear or ineffective; some paragraphs ramble or are underdeveloped; the writer frequently digresses from the thesis; thesis is weak/ does not convincingly or accurately identify the speech's argument or language used to convey it Thesis is underdeveloped with few concrete details/ examples or commentary; limited or inaccurate interpretation and explanation; little to attention to audience, rhetorical devices, and elements of argumentation

Information from sources generally does not support and enhance thesis; quotations are not well integrated and cited properly Little sentence variety; passages of unclear prose or flat, undetectable voice; ineffective or consistently unsophisticated diction Many noticeable or distracting errors in grammar and punctuation, spelling, format

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download