University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
Peer Evaluation FormProvide a score from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) for each of the presentations of your colleagues. Circle clearly the desired score. Do NOT write your own name.Presentation 1: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5Presentation 2: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5Presentation 3: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5Presentation 4: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5Presentation 5: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5Presentation 6: Presenter’s name _______________________A. Background was thorough 1 2 3 4 5B. Idea of the work was clearly presented1 2 3 4 5C. Applications were relevant 1 2 3 4 5D. Limitations and solutions were identified 1 2 3 4 5E. Ability to answer questions 1 2 3 4 5F. OVERALL 1 2 3 4 5 ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- ece regulation no 66
- foundations in early childhood education
- ece 582 group evaluation
- early childhood education lesson plan rubric
- university of illinois at urbana champaign
- checklist for evaluation of problem statement
- ecej participation programme evaluation deliveryo f ece
- team effectiveness evaluation rubric
- ece oral presentation evaluation form
- ece 511 digital system microprocessor
Related searches
- university of illinois at chicago online
- university of illinois urbana champaign online
- university of illinois at champaign
- university of illinois at urbana champaign il
- university of illinois urbana champaign graduate school
- university of illinois urbana champaign jobs
- university of illinois at urbana champaign
- university of illinois at urbana champaign ranking
- university of illinois urbana champaign address
- university of illinois at chicago
- university of illinois at springfield
- university of illinois at urbana champaign address