የእንኳን ደህና መጣችሁ ንግግር



-523875139700-901065252349000????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? 26-27 ?? 2006 ?.? ?????????? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ????????? ????? ????? ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ????????? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? 26 ??? ?? 27 ?? 2006 ?.? ???? ??? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ???????? ??????????????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ????????????????????????????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ???? ?????- ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???????????? ??????? ???-??? /???? ???/??????? ???? ???? ?????- ????? ????? ?????????? ?? ????? ?????????? ?/?? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ??????????? ???????? ????-??? 26 – 27 ?? 2006 ?.? ????????? ??? ???? ???? ? ?/? ???? ?/???? ???? ?????? ??????-19875517780????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ????????? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ????????? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???-?? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ???????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?????????? ?? ???? ???????? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ????? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ??????? ???? ??? ???????????! -490855194310???? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?/?? ????? ???? ?/?/??????? ?/? ???? ?/??? ???? ?????? ????????????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ????????????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????????????? ?? ???????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ????!! ????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ??????????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?????? ???????? ????????????? ????????? ?????? ??-???? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ????????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ?????????? ??????? ???? ????? ???????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????????? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ??????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??????????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ? ??? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ???????? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ??? ???? ??? ????? (?????) ???? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ????????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ? 9.2 ???? ???? ???? 56?? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?8.7 ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ?2.2 ???? ?? ???? ??? 311 ????? ?? ????? (???? ??? ????? ?? ?????) ?? 4 ????? ?? ?????? (???? ??? ????? ?? ?????) ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ??? ????? ??????? ?? ????? ?????? ????????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???? (???? ??????)?????? ???? ??? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ???????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ?? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?? ????? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ?????????? ??? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??????? ??????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ??????? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??? ??? ????? ??? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ??????????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ????????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ??????????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ???????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ???-???????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ???????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ?????????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ????-?????? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???? ????? ????????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ?1.5 ???? ?? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ????????? ????? ?????? ???????????? ?? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ???? ???????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? ???? ??????????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ????????? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ????????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ????????? ???? ????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?????????????????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?????????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???????? ????? ??????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??????????? ?? ???? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ??????? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ?? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ??????? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??????????? ???? ???????? ??? ?????? ???????? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ??????? ??? ?? ?? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????? ????????????? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???? ??? ???? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ??????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ???????? “????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??????! ?????????!!!!!??????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?????????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???????(???????) ??? ????? ??? ????? ??? ??????? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???????The Experience Of Oromiya Coffee Farmers’ Cooperative Union from 1994 – 2014. By Ato Tedesse Meskella, Manager.The Experience of Embeba Haya Saving and Credit Cooperatives. Southern Tigray, Tigray. By Ato G/kidan, chairman.The Experience of Tsehay Multipurpose Cooperative Union. North Gondar, Amhara. By Ato Endalkachew Abe, Manager.The Experience of Agar Consumer Cooperative Union. Addis Ababa. By Ato Tadesse Demissie, chairman.The Experience of Lidet saving and Credit Cooperative union .South Gondar?The experience of Becho woliso Multipurpose Farmers’ Cooperative Union. South western Shoa, Oromiya. By Ato Dejene Hirpha.2256155290830-93345287655???? ???? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? ??? ? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ?? ?? ???? ?? ?? ????????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ?? ?????????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?????????????????? ????(???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ???????????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ???? ????????? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ??????????? ?????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ???????? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ???????? ????????? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????????????? ???? ???? ??????????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ???? ??? ?????-Cooperative Movement in Ethiopia; Development, Challenges and proposed intervention. By Kifle Tefamariam, Mekelle University.Assessment of Managerial Efficiency and Effectiveness of Multipurpose Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia. By Asfaw Temesgen, Wollega University. The Role Of Cooperatives In Poverty Alleviation: The Case Of Tigray, Ethiopia. By Seifu G/hiwet, Mekelle University.Economic Contribution of Coffee Cooperatives towards their members in Yirga Cheffe woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPR. By Muhabie Mekonen, Mizan-Tepi University.Consumer Cooperatives: Institutionalization, Participation and Roles in Distribution of Essential Commodities. By Afework G.Kassa, Arba Minch University.Distribution Channel System Management In the Case of Consumer Cooperatives, South West Ethiopia. By Geremew Teklu, Jimma University.Challenges and Prospects of Saving and Credit Cooperatives in Kalu Woreda. By Ergete Temeche, Gondar University.Audit Practices and Problems on Selected Saving and Credit Cooperatives in South Wollo Zone, Amhara Regional State. By Messele Kebede, Wollo University.1 ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? 27/2006 ?.?.?????? ????? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? 26/2006 ?.?. ??? ?? 27/2006 ?.?. “????? ?? ????? ??? ??????” ??? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ?150 ??? ???? ?????? ????????????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?/? ???? ?/???? ????? “????? ??? ????” ????? ????????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ???????????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ?????????? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ?????/????? ???????? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ??????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ???? ??????? ???? ?????? ?? ???????? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ??? ????? ????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ?????? ????? ???????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ????????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ?? ?????? ???????? ????? ????????8318517145?????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?? ??????????? ???????? ???? ?? ??????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ????????????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ??? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ??????? ????? ?? ????????????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???????? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ?? ???? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ???? ???????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ?????????????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??/ ?/??? ??? ?? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????????????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?????????????????? ??????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????? ???????? ????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ??????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ????????????? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ????????????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ?????????????? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ??? ??? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????????? ????? ??? ???????????? ?? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ????? ?? ????????? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ???????????? ?? ????? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ??? ??? ?? ????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ?????????????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ???? ????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ???? ???????????? ?? 27/2006?.?.??????? ???(?/?) ???? ?????? ?????? ?/??????????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ????????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ????? ?? ??? ????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ?????? ?? ?????????? ?? ???? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ??????? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ???????? ??? ??? ????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ?????????? ????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ????? ???? ???? ?? ????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?????????? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ?????????? ???? ?? ????Mekelle University – NoradACDI/VOCA-CDPACDI/VOCA-AMDe ????? ??? ??? ????? - AGP????? ??? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?? ????? ???? ????? ????????????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ????????????????? ??????? ???(?/?)?????? ?/??????Edited and compiled by:Tekeste Berhanu (PhD)Tafesse WeldegzinaKifle TesfamariamDepartment of Cooperative Studies, Mekelle UniversityFebruary 25, 2015Cooperative Movement in Ethiopia:Development, Challenges and Proposed InterventionKifle TesfamariamAssistant Professor, Department of Cooperative Studies, Mekell UniversityE-mail:kifletesfamariam@A paper presented at the National Conference Organized by Mekelle University and Federal Cooperative Agency (FCA) AbstractCooperatives in Ethiopia are playing an active role in the fields of banking, input and output marketing, agro-processing, storage, dairy, and many other social and economic activities. Performance analyses of the sector indicate that the number of cooperatives has increased from 26,672 in 2009 to 56,044in May 2014 showing a double-digit growth rate of 22% per year. The aggregate number of members during the same period increased from 5.8 million to 9.2million (10% of the population) and their capital increased from 1.2 billion birr to 8.8 billion birr. These figures indicate that cooperatives have had the support of the people in undertaking activities contributing to their economic development. Cooperatives have inherent advantages in tackling the problems of poverty alleviation, food security and job creation. They are also considered to have immense potential to deliver goods and services in areas where both the state and the private sector have failed. Serious efforts are being made to strengthen capital of cooperatives base through increasing members’ subscription, mobilization of savings and value addition.The objective of this paper is to examine the current status and challenges of cooperatives in Ethiopia. The study is based on review of pertinent literature on cooperative in Ethiopia, policy and regulatory framework documents as well as secondary data. The paper identifies challenges such as, absence of cooperatives policy, weak institutional capacity, over-dependence on government and lack of professionalism. Finally, it suggests that the evolving strong communication and public relations strategies which can promote the concept of cooperation among the people of the country.Keywords: Cooperative, job creation, mobilization of savings, value additionIntroductionAgriculture is the foundation for Ethiopian economy, and the overall economic growth of the country is highly linked to the success of the agriculture sector. In 2012/13, real GDP growth was 9.7% moderately lower than the 11.4% growth a year earlier. Accordingly, agriculture accounts for about 43% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), 90% of export, and 85% of employment (NBE, 2013).As agriculture continues to be an important to the Ethiopian economy, the cooperative sector providing vital support services and play a crucial role for the transformation of the agriculture sector. It play an active role in the fields of banking, input and output marketing, agro-processing, storage, dairy, and many other social and economic activities. Cooperatives have played a significant role towards achieving the growth and poverty reduction strategy by promoting income generating activities and improving access to banking services to rural and urban households. In response to the changing needs of farmers-members with in today`s dynamic business environment, the government instituted an overarching strategy of Agricultural Cooperative Sector Development Strategy (ACSDS). One of ACSDS’s derivative features is to improve smallholder farmers` productivity and income by leveraging a cooperative sector; hence the promotion of cooperative movement is in line with the national strategy. Moreover, in the growth and transformation plan (GTP) due emphasis was given for the cooperative sector as the driving force for savings mobilization. Based on the savings mobilized domestically a resource will be generated to finance the various investment opportunities from time to come. The extent to which their contributions could be realized partly depends on the expansion and growth of coops which in turn depends on the environment they operate and delineated by the legal and policy framework. However, there is little understanding of what the current status and contribution of cooperatives in Ethiopia. Whatever the cooperative does should be analyzed in terms of its contribution on the economic development. Such a holistic approach to the study of the current status and challenges is necessary for understanding the contribution of cooperatives on the economic development. What is the social reach of cooperation? Have cooperatives generated employment? Many such issues need to be addressed for a holistic assessment of the social and economic contribution of cooperatives. Therefore, the driving force for initiating this study is that very little is known about the current status of cooperatives in Ethiopia on the one hand and the recognition of cooperatives plays in the socio-economic development on the other. Therefore, this paper examines the current status of cooperatives in Ethiopia and its implication for the growth and sustainability.Study approach The study is based on review of pertinent literature on cooperatives in Ethiopia, policy and regulatory framework documents, past study reports; cooperatives annual reports,international experiences from different countries on cooperativesas well as secondary data obtained from Federal Cooperative Agency. The most important documents reviewed include Federal Cooperative Proclamation No 147/1998, Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Proclamation No 402/2004 and Council of Ministers Regulation. How important is the cooperative sector?What contribution ithas made in the past to economic development? Data compiled by the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) reveal that the cooperative movement brings together over 1 billion people around the world. The United Nations estimated in 1994 that the livelihood of nearly 3 billion people, or half of the world's population, was made secure by cooperative enterprise. These enterprises continue to play significant economic and social roles in their communities.Here is a brief overview showing just how important cooperatives are to the economies of most countries. Their relevance and contribution of cooperative movement to economic and social development can be seen from the evidences given belowLarge segments of the population are members of cooperativesIn Canada, four out of every ten Canadians are members of at least one cooperative. In Quebec, approximately 70% of the populations are members ofcooperatives.While in Saskatchewan 56% are members.In Malaysia, 6.78 million people or 27% of the total population are members of cooperatives in 2009.In Norway out of the population of 4.8 million people, 2 million are members of cooperatives.In Paraguay, 783,000 people or 18% of the population are members of 1,047 cooperatives. These coops have a direct impact on the livelihoods of over 6 million people.In Spain, 15 % of the population or 6.7 million people are members of cooperativesin 2008.In Ethiopia,9.2 million people or 10% of the population are members of cooperatives in 2014.Assume the total population of Ethiopia is 90 millionCooperatives create and maintain employmentIn France, 21,000 cooperatives provide over 1 million jobs representing 3.5% of the active working population in 2010.In Kenya, 63% of the population derives their livelihoods from cooperatives. Approximately 250,000 Kenyans are employed or gain most of their income from cooperatives in 2009.In Colombia, the cooperative movement provides137, 888 jobs through direct employment and an additional 559,118 jobs as worker-owners in workers cooperatives- providing 3.65% of all jobs in the country.In Indonesia, cooperatives provide jobs to 288,589 individuals in 2004In the United States, 30,000 cooperatives provide more than 2 million jobs.In Ethiopia, 50% of the population directly benefited from the service of cooperatives. Exactly805 thousandEthiopian are employed or gain most of their income from cooperatives in 2014. That means a member on average may have 5 family,cooperatives serving for 45million of the population.Cooperatives are significant economic factors in national economiesIn Denmark, consumer cooperatives in 2007 held 36.4% of consumer retail market.In Japan, the agricultural cooperative report statesoutputs of USD 90 billion with 91% of all Japanese farmers are in membership. In 2007 consumer cooperatives reported a total turnover of USD 34.048 billion with 5.9% the food market share.In Mauritius, in the agricultural sector, cooperatives play an important role in the production of sugar, vegetable, fruit and flower, milk, meat and fish. Nearly 50% of sugar-cane planters are grouped in cooperatives.In C?te d`Ivoire, cooperatives invested USD 26 million in to setting up schools, building rural roads and establishing clinics in 2002.In New Zealand, 3% of the gross domestic product (GDP) is generated by cooperative enterprise in 2007.In Uruguay, cooperatives are responsible for 3% of the GDP. They produce 90% of the total milk production, 34% of honey and 30% of wheat. 60% of the production is exported to over 40 countries in the world.The International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) represents close to 1billion individual members. This statistics have beencalculated from 94 ICA`s member countries (as of October, 2013). Accordingly, the country with the largest number of individual members indirectly represented by the ICA is the United States with 256 million members. There are nearly 30,000 cooperatives in the US. The next countries are in Asia, with India following next behind the US with 93.7 million individual members. And then Japan with 77 million individual members. The fourth largest number of members is in Iran with 36.9 million individual members. All in all, five of the top ten countries, by membership, that the ICA represents- are in Asia. Italy is the first European country with 22.5 million individual members, represented through their organizations by ICA.Historical development of cooperatives in EthiopiaThe historical development of cooperatives in Ethiopia is briefly discussed under three perspectives. These are (i) during the imperial regime, (ii) during the military rule, and (iii) under thepresent government.Cooperatives during the Imperial Regime (Before 1974)In Ethiopia, successive regimes, starting from the Imperial period to the EPRDF government, gave due recognition to the role of coops and made deliberate effort to promote the same. However, the principles and approaches followed were markedly different, reflecting the political thinking and ideology of the regimes. In its Five Year Development Plan, the Imperial regime envisaged an important role for coops in transforming smallholding agriculture. Thus, it set the stage by providing the first legal framework (the Farmer Workers Cooperative Decree No. 44 later replaced by the Cooperative Societies Proclamation No. 241/1966). The legal framework was relatively comprehensive and contained most of the essential contents of the legal framework issued more than three decades later in 1998 and coops were rightly viewed as primarily voluntary undertakings. However, success was limited during the period.Cooperatives in the Military Regime (1974-1991)The Military regime, which viewed coops as a key instrument to build a socialist economy pursued the cooperatives agenda more aggressively. The approach followed combined coercion with extensive support including priority access to resources, goods and services (such as land, irrigation, bank loans at lower interest rate, capital goods, inputs and extension services, and consumer goods). Whereas number of coops and membership size were relatively large, it is not regarded as a particular success for a number of reasons (for details see Partners Consultancy and Information Services, 2006). Coops were so unpopular that following the demise of the Dergregime in 1992 most of them disappeared quickly. What is worse is that they dissolved in such a disorderly manner (e.g. bank loans and other obligations were not settled; no distribution of assets between members; etc.) that it created a lasting suspicion and distrust of cooperatives the stigma of which is haunting cooperatives until today. In an attempt for a fresh start with promotion of cooperatives, the incumbent government issued a new legal framework (Proclamation No. 147/1998 and 402/2004). In addition to being comprehensive it incorporated universally accepted principles of cooperatives. In the history of cooperative movement in Ethiopia, the government has taken serious measures after 1996. The measures include, organizing and reorganizing different types of agricultural cooperativesand establishingCooperative Promotion Bureaus in regions. At the Federal structure the government has been established the cooperative promotion desk under the Prime Minister office. A proclamation No. 147/ 1998 to provide for the establishment of cooperative societies had also declared by the Federal Government to bring all types of cooperative societies under one umbrella. TheFederal Cooperative Commission (currently Federal Cooperative Agency) based on proclamation No. 274 / 2002 was established in 2002. More over to correct the short comings in the proclamation 147/1998andamendment 402/2004 and regulation number 106/2002 became an important instrumental document in the cooperative movement of the country. Cooperatives under the present Government (Since 1991)The present government provided a legal framework which is both comprehensive in many respects (including its ability to accommodate coops in various sectors/sub-sectors) and incorporates universally accepted principles of cooperatives including voluntary membership (Proclamation No. 147/1998 and 402/2004). As a result some improvements have been seen in cooperative societies in the country. Cooperative societies started todistribute inputs, provide loan to their members, market produces of members in the domestic and foreign market, Unions (secondary cooperatives) were formed with the assistance of Cooperative Union Project (CUP) funded by VOCA/Ethiopia/USAID), dividend payments were made by the unions as well as primary cooperatives. The number of Primary and secondary cooperatives of different types with significant increase in number of member beneficiaries is achieved.Both ADLI (the government's development programme) and the Marketing Strategy explicitly envisage cooperatives to play a critical role in the development and poverty reduction efforts of the country (see Ministry of Finance and Economic Development 2003, 2003; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development 2005). In line with this a general legislation setting out the formal rules and procedures by which the development and activities of all types of co-operatives in the country are to be guided (Proc. Nos. 147/1998 and 402/2004) was issued. As such, it constitutes the incentive structure that shapes the behavior of Co-operatives and their members. According to the proclamation, the objectives of Co-operative Societies are to create savings and mutual assistance among its members by pooling their resources, knowledge and property, to enable them to actively participate in the free market economic system (Proc. No. 147/1998).Growth of cooperative sector in Ethiopia Ethiopia is an agrarian economy, 80% of its total population reside in rural areas and the rest in urban areas. The rural people require many services in daily life which are met by village cooperative societies. The village cooperative societies provide necessary strategic inputs for the agricultural sector (such as fertilizer, improved seeds, pesticide, etc.) and consumable goods (such as edible oil, sugar, flour, etc.) to members and non-members to meet at concessional rates, cooperative processing units help in value addition. The sectors are promoted, supervised and supported from every angle by the Cooperative Promotion Agency at regional and federal levels. The cooperative movement is functioning through important sectors like saving and credit, coffee, beekeeping, seed multiplication, sugarcane, livestock, dairy, mining, marketing, consumer, fisheries and construction etc. Thus, cooperatives in Ethiopia are playing multi-functional roles in rural and urban areas.Through vigorous efforts of cooperative promotion agency, cooperatives have established themselves in various segments of the Ethiopian economy. Performance analyses of the sector indicate that thenumber of cooperatives has increased from 26,672in 2009 to 556,044 in May 2014 showing a double-digit growth rate of 22% per year. The aggregate number of members during the same period increased from 5.8 million to 9.2million (10% of the population) and their capital increased from 1billion birr to 8.8 billion birr. These figures indicate that cooperatives have had the support of the people in undertaking activities contributing to their economic development. The government continuous commitment to cooperative development is a reflection of confidence in cooperative movement in the country. Financial cooperatives are considered to have immense potential in financing short term loans for agricultural production technologies and undertake off-farm and non-farm income generating activities in areas where both the state and the private sector have failed.Serious efforts are being made to strengthen capital of cooperatives base through increasing members’ subscription, mobilization of savings and value addition.According to the information obtained from Federal Cooperative Agency (FCA), from the year 2006 to 2008cooperatives weresole importer and distributer of fertilizer to the extent of 70% of the total fertilizer consumption in the country and staring from 2010onwards they involved in distributing government imported fertilizer to farmers and pastoralists to the extent of 90-95% in the country. Coffee is the most significant agricultural products in the Ethiopian in which millions of farmers grow the commodity for a living, hundreds of thousands of middlemen are involved in the collection of the commodityfrom farmers and supply to the export and domestic market, and a sizable amount of foreign exchange accounting up to 30 percent of the total yearly export income is derived from. It is thus a very important agricultural commodity with a significant contribution to the growth and functioning of the economy and the social stability of the country as the main source of income to tens of millions of small-scale farmers. In this regards, the contribution of coffee cooperatives in the export market is greater. They enabled Ethiopia to attain seventh largest producer of coffee in the world and top producer in Africa. They have exported several grades of organic coffee likeHarar,Yirgacheffe and Sidamo grades, which have carved out competitive edge not only in Africa but also in the world. The foreign exchange earned over the past seven years 2007-2013 by seven cooperative unions has been on the rise, where the export volume rose from 6,967 metric tons(MTs) in 2007 to 11,532 MTs in 2013, and the export value grew considerably to456.38million birr(USD24.02 million)in 2007 from 1.44 billion birr (USD 75.60 million) in 2013. Generally, coffee export performance and value recorded for the last seven years by seven cooperative unions were 61,632 MTs and 6.37 billion birr (USD335.30 million) respectively.Considering the rise in demand for sesame seed in the international market, many cooperatives involved in the sesame export business, the export performance during 2013 reaches at 4,034 MTs and revenue generated more than 130.9million birr (USD6.89 million). Apart from their economy contribution, cooperatives also playing a significant role in improving socio-economic condition of the weaker sections of society as reflected in beekeeping, livestock and handicraft etc.They are also operating through retail price shops, which supply essential agricultural and non-agricultural commodities to the rural and urban society at concessional rates. Various development activities in agriculture, small-scale industry marketing and processing, distribution and supplies are now carried on through cooperatives. They have made an all-round progress and their role in, and contribution to agricultural progress has been highly significant.Trends and progress of membership and capital in cooperativesDespite the ups and downs experienced, cooperatives movement in Ethiopia has registered numerical growth over the past decade both in terms of membership and capital. However, membership is still much smaller against the huge potential. The table below indicates that cooperative have been constantly growing in terms of number, membership and capital mobilized over the period.Table1.Trends in membership and capitalYearNo. of CoopsNo. of members(million)Capital(in Billion birr)200926,6725.91.002014(May)56,0449.28.8Growth 11055780Source: Federal Cooperative Agency, June 2014As can be noted from the abovetable, the number of cooperatives has increased by 110 percent between 2009 and 2014from26,672to 56,044. Similarly, the aggregate membership has increased from 5.9 million to 9.2millionover the same period representing nearly two-fold increase (accounts55%). The capital of the society has also shown an increase of 780 percent over the same period.Geographical distribution of cooperativesDue to non-availabilityof sufficient and latest information about the sector, it is difficult to analyze the financial performance of cooperatives. In general, table2 presented the regional distribution of cooperatives, their membership size and capital as of May2014 indicated that:In Addis Ababa, there were 12,130 of cooperatives with 1,359 members and capital of 5 billion birr. The City accounts for 21.6 percent of cooperatives and 9.8 percent of membership;In Oromiya, there were 16,419 cooperatives with 3 million membersand capital of 1.3 billion birr. The region accounts for approximately 29.3percent of cooperatives and 31.6 percent of membership;In Tigray, there were 4,539 cooperatives (exactly 8 percent of the total) with membership of 815 thousands(8.6 percent); In Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s (SNNP) region, there were 11,702 of cooperatives with 1.7million members. The region accounts for 20.9 percent of cooperatives and 18.7 percent of membership;In Amhara, there were 7,412 cooperatives with 2.8 million members. The region accounts for exactly 13 percent of cooperatives and 29.8 percent of membership; andIn the remaining five regions (Somalia, Afar,Gambella,Beneshangul andHarar) and one city administration’s (Dire Dawa) there were a total of 3,842cooperatives with 133,139 members. These collectively accounted for 6.86 percent of cooperatives and 1.4 percent of the total membership in the country.Table2.Geographical distribution of cooperativesRegionNo. of coopsMembershipCapital Addis Ababa12,130940,9915,014,148,620Oromiya16,4193,011,0191,334,726,531Tigrai4,539815,255766,960,753SNNP11,7021,784,756746,448,895Amhara7,4122,840,370730,313,611Somalia 1,82146,66890,255,720Afar77727,69323,993,029Gambella51611,67318,992,021Beneshangul34922,19417,153,085Harar17811,0408,246,881Diredawa20113,8714,336,865Total56,0449,165,2678,755,576,011Source: Federal Cooperative Agency, June 2014Number of cooperative unionsThe existence of clear and accommodating governmental policy and all-inclusive structures and the government’s commitment to transform the subsistence economy have created conducive environment for the development of voluntary based cooperatives in the country. In response to the prevailing favorable environment, the number and the diversity of cooperatives mushroom very rapidly. Accordingly, there are 294 cooperative unions with a total membership of 8,433 and a capital amount of 1.5 billion birr. Out of this number 139(47.3 %) are multi-purpose cooperatives followed by saving and credit cooperatives 76(25.9%) and consumer cooperatives 20 (6.8 %). Thus, multipurpose cooperatives currently constitute the first most common type of coops in the country in terms of number, membership and capital.Table3.Number of cooperative unions in Ethiopia by typeType of cooperatives No. of CoopsNo of coop affiliated to unionsCapital(in million birr)Multi-purpose1394031751Dairy6634.1Beekeeping3330.2Saving and Credit762442348Food processing2300.9 Grain purchasing5815.4Coffee12563276Forestry2160.4 Livestock4362.8Sugarcane178.8Mining73860.8Fruits and Vegetables818113Consumer2043223Fisheries1100.1Construction2441.3Seed multiplication3552.3Irrigation3231.5Total294 84331439.6Source: Federal Cooperative Agency, 2013Challenges of Cooperative Movements in Ethiopia Despite rapid growth the overall progress of cooperative movement during the last 50 years of its existence is not very impressive. According to different document analysis and field reports results indicate that the cooperative movement in Ethiopia is beset with several challenges related to over dependence on government, absence of cooperative policy and weak institutional capacity. The major challenges of cooperatives include the followings.Lack of awarenessPeople are not well informed about the objective of the movement, the contributions it can make in rebuilding the society and the rules and regulations of cooperative institutions. Regrettably, no special efforts have been made in this direction. People look upon these institutions as means for obtaining facilities and concessions from the government. So long as people expect to get something from the government, they see to it that societies somehow continue to function.Weak governanceManagement committee members have no knowledge about cooperative business transaction. In most cases cooperatives are unable to employ high caliber management staff and the burden of due diligence is left to members who may have limited education on management. The committee members elected by the general assembly to lead the affairs of the societies for fixed period do not have the necessary capacity to bring good governance, not undergone in skill upgrading. Thus, good governance is the main and crucial weakness of cooperatives. Inadequate support and weak regulation and supervisionThe capacity of FCA and regional cooperative promotion agency to effectively promote, regulate and supervise cooperatives is severely constrained for the following reasons:-Absence of separate specialized units at the federal, regional and woreda levels in charge of promoting, supervising and regulating different type of cooperatives; andLimited mobility of staff due to shortage of vehicles and motorbike andhigh costs associated.Accountability of the cooperative agency and regional officesThe Federal Cooperative Agency and the Regional Cooperative Agency are accountable to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. However, saving and credit cooperatives are part and parcel of the financial sector the authorities that regulate them require prudential standards that are relevant to financial institutions operations. Hence, the FCA requires to develop these standards which must be complied with by the SACCOs and their unions in their daily operations and mitigate various financial risks.Lack of differentiated productsApart from the above stated problems, cooperatives have not yet provided demand driven products that could address the needs of their members in spite of their older age and better outreach to the grass roots level and unbanked community. It has been observed that there is no clearly articulated and defined product development and revision policy within. If it happens it is either by chance or arbitrarily; it is not done in a systematic organized manner and by experts but rather by interested individuals or group of people (professionals or otherwise) and does not follow the necessary steps. It arises simply from a felt need or a problem prevailing in cooperatives. In general, there are no planned and structured ways of developing new products or revising the existing. Differences in interpretation of the cooperative legislation at various levelsIn some cases the demarcation of authorities between federal and the regional states are not clearly understood. A typical example would be the formation of cooperative federation. According to the FCA strategic plan, the country follows four tier vertical structures: primary, union, federation and league. In practice some regions like SNNP and Tigrai regions have establishing federation at regional level backed by the irrespective regional level cooperatives law. If cooperatives continue to integrate vertically, the federations established/ would be established at regional levels are expected to form another layer before joining the league or the league will be established including the regional level federations. It is believed that such misunderstanding emanated from misinterpretation of the grand federal cooperative law and such confusions need to be cleared.Operation areasThe federal cooperative law proclamation No.147/1998, amendment No.402/2004 and regional states cooperative proclamations and cooperative agency SACCO guideline do not define operational areas for SACCO unions. What is stated both in the federal and national regional states’ cooperative proclamations and the guideline is that any two and primary SACCOs may establish SACCO unions.The SACCO unions in urban areas established on the bases of work areas and community based organization. The Addis Ababa SACCO union is established by employed workers’ saving and credit cooperatives while Women in self-employment SACCO union is established by individual self-employed members organized at community level. However, in the case of rural SACCO unions, they are established on the bases of geographical proximity which covers one woredain the minimum and up to eight woredasas a maximum.Proposed InterventionBased on the results and experiences of the cooperatives movement, and not to repeat the problems encountered, the major solutions that should be undertaken are stated below:Conduct cooperatives education and training in organized manner As we have seen the past experience there was no continuous organized cooperatives education and training programs conducted, thus in a country like Ethiopia the consciousness of the people is very low it is indispensable in designing and providing cooperatives education and training to promote different types of cooperatives. Therefore it is important to establish training centers in regional states and provide the appropriate training for management committee and employees. In addition to this trainings and education will be designed transmitted thorough the government media and formal educational programs. Strategies should be designed to minimize capital and infrastructural problems of cooperatives It is vivid that the main capital source of cooperatives is member`s share capital. However the current situation clearly shows that cooperative is not in a position to collect sufficient capital from their members. This is mainly due to capital base/background and low income of members. Moreover, cooperatives are not in a position to get a credit from financial institutions due to collateral problems. Hence a financial capacity building system should be designed in a short period of time. Some of the majors to be undertaken are state below:- Establishment of a cooperative bank is the best and sustainable means to combat the problem. Saving and credit cooperatives (SACCO) and different types of cooperatives are the main potential resources for the establishment. More over government support is vital. Since there is a shortage of financial institutions, government should establish refinancing institutions, like the experience in national Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development (NABARD) and Small Industries Development Bank (SIDB) of India.To improve cooperatives involvement in the rural development programs cooperatives storage and infrastructure (road, telecommunication etc.) should be included in the rural development policy.Diversify membership Expand membership to include diverse groups rather than being limited to specific income groups such as the poor. Doing so allows coops to diversify their products/services and portfolio, thereby improving their capacity to serve the poor and their sustainability. Diversity in membership will also lead to diversity in interests which have to be met thereby forcing coops to provide diversified products and services. Specially, SACCO products are basically limited to savings and loans. Yet, in many cases there are opportunities for them to provide additional services both to members and others including handling transfer of payments such as remitances, supplying consumer itmes, etc. Rolling out the credit life insurance that some urban SACCOs have already introduced may be another important measure by which SACCOs improve thier services. Enabling legislation and regulationA sound cooperative sector needs an enabling legislation and regulation. Thus, laws governing cooperatives should be continuously revised to keep up with the country’s dynamic economic system. In this regard, a special legislation that specifically focuses on SACCOs based on recognition that SACCOs are financial institutions and hence treats and nurtures them as such is required. However, in view of the large number and dispersed location of the financial coops, formally regulating them may be demanding in terms of capacity. The National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE) cannot be expected to handle this on top of its current responsibility of regulating and supervising banks and Microfinance Institutions (MFIs). Specific recommendation regarding the regulatory arrangement should be based on a careful consideration of a number of issues including capacity issues as well as the effects of different arrangements on the growth and sustainability of financial cooperatives which is beyond the scope of this study. ReferenceAgricultural cooperative sector development strategy 2012-2016. National Bank Of Ethiopia (NBE). 2013. Annual Report.Federal cooperative agency .2014. Annual Publication, Vol1,No11BEST, J. R. 2005. Market-Based Management: Strategies for Growing Customer Value, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall of India. journal of marketing.ETHIOPIA, I. G. O. 1960. Commercial Code of the Empire of Ethiopia of 1960, NegaritGazeta - Extraordinary Issue No. 3 of 1960, Addis Ababa.NEGARITGAZETA, F. 1998a. Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Proclamation No. 402/2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.NEGARITGAZETA, F. 1998b. Cooperative Societies Proclamation No. 147/1998, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.SERVICES, P. C. A. I. 2006. Developments in Saving and Credit Cooperatives in Ethiopia: Evolution, Performances, Challenges and Interventions with Particular Emphasis on RUSACCOs (September): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Assessment of Managerial Efficiency and Effectiveness of Multipurpose Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in East Wollega Zone, Oromia, EthiopiaBy Asfaw Temesgen BariWollega University, College of Business and Economics, Department of Cooperative,e-mail asfaw.tembari@, P.O. Box 596 Nekemte, ETHIOPIANational conference organized on Cooperative Movement in Ethiopia by Mekelle University, College of Business and Economics in collaboration with Federal Cooperative Agency July 3-4, 2014, Mekelle 585216044767500AbstractA study was designed to examine the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leaders of primary multipurpose agricultural cooperative in serving their member in East Wollega Zone. 245 individual respondents were selected from ten primary multipurpose cooperative societies from three districts using systematic sampling technique for primary data collection; 12 key informants and five focus group discussion were administer; and structured scheduled questionnaires, open ended in-depth interview and checklist data collection tools were used respectively. The secondary data were collected from documents of sample cooperatives societies such as annual reports and minutes of the management and other committees of the cooperative.The result of the research indicated that the cooperative leaders in the study are managerially inefficient and ineffective because it is found that the services delivered were inadequate, with no quality, the fail to minimize cost of operation, service are not timely provided as per member need and weak capital mobilization generally the overall management performance of the leader are low consequently resulted in low member satisfaction. The main factors that affect the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders negatively are commitment and competency of management committee; market information and market research, cooperative training, incentive.For improving the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders it is recommended that the cooperative need to provide programed training and elect leaders with relatively educated and committed; the leaders need to be hunt market information and conduct member need assessment to provide demand driven services so as satisfying members in service. And also cooperative promotion office or the cooperative policy maker required to device motivational schemes which would be inspire the leader for their striving efforts to serve members efficiently and effectively.IntroductionCooperative societies are member owned and controlled organization formed by people of similar problem. Cooperatives are business enterprise established mainly for providing service for members. This entails that unlike corporate business organization,cooperatives are service motive organization. Cooperatives must maintain effective interactive and collaboration between leaders, members, employees and marketing operators so as enhancing its business performance which need management dedication as one measure of managerial efficiency. This is due to that managerial efficiency and effectiveness in cooperative is indispensible for providing sufficient services for members and determining sustainability of the cooperative in the market. As it is indicated by Ariyaratneet. al(2000) efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative is a critical for future individual cooperative endeavor.Thus, Cooperative leaders, most importantly management committee required to be competent in identifying main members’ demand and needs, the key markets and marketing agents and planning accordingly, to use the limited cooperative resources effectively for producing goods or providing services in order to accomplishing the organizational goals and objectives of the cooperative for satisfying members’ need for which the cooperatives are established (Krishnaswami and Kulandaiswamy, 2000). Vibrant cooperative leaders are effective in delegation of authority and communicating internal and external stakeholders planning based on members’ need and exploiting the market and policy opportunities for producing intended result that satisfying members need through efficient cooperative resource utilization and formulating strategies and policies (Boldenet.al, 2003).Purpose and objective Present research on “Assessment of Managerial Efficiency and Effectiveness of Multipurpose Primary Agricultural Cooperatives in East Wollega Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia” is designedtoexamine the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leaders of primary multipurpose agricultural cooperative in serving their member in east Wollega zone.The general objective of the study is examining managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leaders of primary multipurpose agricultural cooperative in serving their member in east Wollega zone.Specific objectivesTo study efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leaders in serving membersTo investigate the indicators of managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperatives leaders.To identify factors related to managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperatives leadersBrief literature review Efficiency and effectiveness are mutually exclusive things. For a manager, they are both fundamental preconditions (Drucker, 2005). From this being effective manager is able to properly analyze the evolving environment and selecting the right things as the areas of strategic focus for the enterprise performance. On the other hand, being efficient requires a carefully carved cultural and operational framework which helps the manager to achieve a particular degree of success, given the level of resources applied to a particular objective (Halager, 2008). However, efficiency in cooperative cannot be measured by this yardstick (index) because cooperatives are service oriented rather than financial returns for member on their investment in their cooperative (Krishnaswami and Kulandaiswamy, 2000). Instead, managerial efficiency in cooperative is measured by the extent of effective timely and adequate service rendered by the cooperative for their members, membership coverage and member users’ satisfaction. To be competitive, cooperatives have to offer efficient services at attractive prices. In cooperative, efficiency increased through minimizing business operation costs while maintaining quality of services(Rouse and Von Pischke 1997). This can be achieved through improved management practices; management training programs,member education andimplementing democratic control intelligently all help toimprove the efficient use of available resources.These are consistent with efficient operations and long-run sustainability of cooperative society. Therefore, managerial efficiency is essential in cooperative business to produce a goods or service that primarily satisfies members and then earns fair margin to survive in competitive market so as providing sustainable services. Cooperative leaders would be effective in serving members by their striving efforts as a work team (Schermerhorn et. al 2010) for achieving the goal of the cooperative in satisfying member-owners needs and sustaining the cooperative in the competitive market through providing goods and services of member need timely, mobilizing adequate capital internally and practicing democratic control by members.From all these, leaders of the cooperative as a managerial teams at each hierarchy should be set objectives based on the need and demand of members, dedicating for serving members need, communicating each other for evaluating the business performance as how far it satisfying the need and demand of members so as creating viable cooperative. This is for the fact that cooperative managerial efficiency is measured in terms of securing members benefit and creating the feasible society in the long-term. And also it is about effective in resource utilization for realization of maximum services for members.Research MethodologyThe target population for the present study is the members of primary cooperative societies in East Wollega zone. There are 238 are multipurpose farmers’ cooperatives whose members are 110,440 and capital of 42,810,934.35 (East Wollega Zone Cooperative Promotion Office 2013). Ten primary multipurpose cooperative societies with members of 4895were selected from three districts using random sampling procedure. 245 individual respondents were selected using systematic sampling technique from sample societies proportionally. This accounts for 5% of members of cooperative societies under study. Table 3.1 presents the sample distribution. Twelve (12) key informants were selected; threefrom the Zone, six from the districts and from farmers’ cooperative union (3) for which the sample cooperatives are affiliated using purposive sampling technique and five focus group discussions were managed with management committee of the sample societies.Table 3.1Sample distributionsample WoredasNo of sample coopMembers Sample respondents MaleFemaleTotal MaleFemaleTotal Guto Gida 42114358247210816124Gobu Sayo31195187138260969Sasiga 3910131104145752Total 104219676489521431245Present study used both primary and secondary data. The primary data were collected from individual respondents, key informants and focus group discussion using structured scheduled questionnaires, open ended in-depth interview and checklist respectively. The secondary data were collected from documents of sample cooperatives societies such as annual reports and minutes of the management and other committees of the cooperative. The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS Version 20 and presented in frequencies, descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics used for generalizing the findings from sample cooperative to the all similar cooperative in the study area.Result and discussion Managerial efficiency and effectiveness Managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leadersThe respondents have asked their views about the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of their cooperative leader and found out that 11.0% of the respondents are agreed, however 85.3% of the respondents are argued that the leaders of cooperative under study are inefficient and ineffective in serving members need, mean of respondent is 4.04 and standard deviation 0.960 (table 4.1).Table 4. 1 Cooperative leader are managerial efficient and effectiveCategories Frequency Percentage Mean SDStrongly agree 62.44.04.960Agree 218.6Neutral 93.7Disagree 13153.5Strongly Disagree 7831.8Total245100.0Computed from field survey, 2013This implies that majority of the respondents agreed that leaders of cooperative under study area are inefficient and ineffective in serving members. Results from Key informant interview also support this finding; however, the result from focus group discussion revealed that the cooperative under study are managerially, efficient and effective. Based on the result from individual respondents and key informants, cooperative leaders in the study area are managerial inefficiency and ineffectiveness. Indicators of managerial efficiency and effectivenessManagerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders is justified by use of indicators. The opinion of respondents, the mean and standard deviation are shown in the table 4.2. From the result it is found that the service by sample cooperatives is inadequate (76.6% of respondents) as compared to members’ needs, the quality of most of the services are not good (66.5% of respondents) and cost of operation is relatively high (58.7% of respondents). However cooperative in the study are good in providing service with lower than market price (63.7% of respondent).In similar way, it is found that the overall service performance of the cooperatives are low (64.5% of respondents), leaders are not serving members on time when members need (72.7% of respondents), capital mobilized from member is inadequate (61.6% of respondents), and generally members are not satisfied with the service of the cooperatives (66.9% of respondents). Table 4.2 indicators of managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperative leadersEfficiency and effectiveness Categories Responses Frequency Percentage MeanSDEfficiency Service adequacy Adequate 5723.31.770.423Inadequate 18876.7Total245100.0Service quality Good 8233.51.670.473Bad 16366.5Total245100.0Price of serviceLower than market price 15663.71.510.739At market price 5321.6Higher than market price3614.7Total245100.0Relative Cost of operationHigh 14458.71.410.493Low101 41.3Total245100.0EffectivenessOverall cooperative performance High 8735.51.640.480Low 15864.5Total 245100.0Service delivery timeTimely6727.31.730.447Not timely17872.7Total 245100.0Capital mobilizing from members Adequate 9438.41.620.487Inadequate 15161.6Total245100.0Member satisfaction on serviceHigh8133.11.670.471Low16466.9Total245100.0Computed from field survey, 2013Thus, all of these indicators justify that cooperative leaders in the case are managerially inefficient and ineffective for they were not achieving the goal of the cooperatives as per members’ needs. The result from KI also support most of these finding such as service inadequacy, high cost of operation, low overall performance of cooperative, and less member satisfaction.Factors for managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leadersDescriptive analysisManagement factors Management factors for managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders are grouped into two as commitment and competence of cooperative leaders. Accordingly, as indicated in the table 4.3 below, 18.0% of the respondents perceived that cooperative management committee (leaders) are committed nevertheless 79.6 of the respondents are responded that the cooperative leaders in the study area are not committed to service the members efficiently and effectively. On the other hand 62.04% of respondents are said that cooperative leaders are not competent to perform cooperative societies’ business. Table 4. 3 Cooperative leaders are committed and competent ?Categories Frequency Percentage Management factorsCommitment of cooperative leaderCommitted 4418.0Neutral 62.4Mean 3.74Not committed 19579,6SD 1.139Total245100.0Competent of the cooperative leaderCompetent 9337.96Mean 1.62Not competent 15262.04SD 0.486Total245100.00Computed from field survey, 2013The data collected from the Key Informant also confirmed the results from the respondents. However result from FGD argued it. Educational level of the management committee is low that affect the competency.Thus, these management factors are affecting managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders negatively. That means the result indicates that primary multipurpose agricultural cooperatives leaders in the study are have little leadership and managerial capacity to pass efficient decision and effective resource allocation and utilization to the best of members interests. These results are in concurrent with findings by Bezabih (2012), which stated as cooperatives in Ethiopia are low in leadership and management capacity because of low interest and literacy gap from the cooperative leaders. Market factors As depicted in the table 4.5 below, 82.4% (62.8% disagree and 19.6% strongly disagree) of the respondents disagree that cooperative leaders in the study area are unable to collect and use market information and 73.8% of the respondents agree that the cooperative under study fail to conduct market research to identify market need and members need to plan members’ service. Table 4. 5 uses of market information and market research by cooperative leaders Categories Frequency Percentage Marketing factoryCollect and using market information Strongly agree124.9Agree 3112.7Mean 3.80Neutral 00.0SD 1.052Disagree15462.8Strongly disagree 4819.6Total80100.0Conduct market research and use it Yes 6526.2Mean 1.73No 18073.8SD 0.442Total245100.0Computed from field survey, 2013The results from KII are also agreed with such views of the respondents. Hence, these market factors also negatively affecting managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders. This result also agreed with finding of Asfaw (2011) that indicated management committee of primary multipurpose agricultural cooperatives in East Wollega zone failed to collect and use market information for undertaking marketing activities to serve member effectively.Cooperative factors As revealed in the table 4.6 below, 82.4% of the respondents agree that the multipurpose primary agricultural cooperative societies in the study area were not providing training for the leaders to capacitate the leader and 75.1% of them said the cooperative failed to provide incentive for leaders due to low profit from the business so as the leaders are not motivated to serve members in addition to these, 76.3% of the respondents agreed that the cooperative operate business with low capital.Table 4.6 provision of training and incentive and capital adequacy of cooperatives ?Categories Frequency Percentage Provision of training for leaders Yes 4317.6Mean 1.82No 20282.4SD 0.381Total245100.0Provision of incentive for leaders Yes 6124.9Mean 1.75No 18475.1SD 0.433 Total245100.0Capital of the cooperative ?Adequate 5823.7Mean 1.76Not adequate 18776.3SD 0.426Total 245100.0Computed from field survey, 2013Results from the KII and focus group discussion are also support these views of respondents. As well as the data from the sample cooperative shows that there is no continuous training, no any incentive for the leaders and the cooperative operated business with weak financial status. Therefore, lack of training and incentive for leaders and operating business with inadequate capital are cooperative organizational factors affecting cooperative managerial efficiency and effectiveness negatively. This is in harmony with the finding of study by Chambo, (2009) in Africa and Prakash (2000) in Japanwhich pinned out that agricultural cooperative in Africa are not yet cultivated committed and qualified leadership and management due to lack of objective based training and incentive which attracts them.Conclusion and RecommendationsConclusionThe study is focusing on assessment of managerial efficiency and effectiveness of primary multipurpose agricultural cooperative and identifying critical factors that affecting cooperative managerial efficiency and effectiveness. Hence from this investigation the following conclusions have been made.The result of the study clearly shows that the managerially the elected cooperative leaders in the study area are inefficient and ineffective. The indicators of the managerialinefficiency and ineffectiveness according to the finding are the cooperative management committee are low in educational level even most of them are with primary education. Business planning and services were not adequate and also not diversified. At the same time not based on members demand and not, as well as services were not supplied timely. According to the finding of the study, none commitment and low competence of cooperative leaders from management factors; fail to use market information and conduct market research from marketing factors and lack of consistent leaders’ training and lack of incentive for management committee are found to be factors that negatively affecting the elected cooperative leaders to serve the member effectively and efficiently.RecommendationBased on the study, the following points are suggested for consideration in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the multipurpose agricultural cooperatives in the study zone.For serving members efficiently and effectively, cooperative leaders required to plan services and diversify services to meet members’ needs; deliver in time of their need especially those services which are time bounded such as agricultural inputs. Thus, it is recommended that professionalize the business through employing trained paid staff and delegate the employed professional staff to undertake routine business activities and technically advice management committee of the mitment and competence of cooperative leaders are most important aspects of the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of the cooperative leaders. So that it is advised that the cooperatives need to elect relatively educated leaders among the members and providing training and education for elected cooperative leaders to build competence and commitment of leaders to increase sense of ownership of the leaders and effectively serving members. Market information and market research are significantly important for improving managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperatives. Therefore, cooperative in the study area need to gather market information and utilize it and conduct market survey for identifying what members of the cooperatives need so as implement it for efficiently and effectively serving members. For doing such, cooperative promoters and cooperative extension agents required to assist the cooperative management committees and recommended to take leading role in improving the managerial efficiency and effectiveness of cooperatives.Policy issues the policy makers in the cooperative sector required to provide policy framework for professionalizing primary cooperative societies’ business management through recruiting skilled in cooperative at least technical and vocational training college graduates. The policy makers also required to provide training and education schemes for building the capacity of the elected cooperative and device the system for electing leaders relatively with higher education level among the members. ReferencesAriyaratne B. Chatura, Featherstone M. Allen, Langemeier R. Michael, and Barton G. David 2000. Measuring X-Efficiency and Scale Efficiency for a Sample of Agricultural Cooperatives Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2912(October 2000) 198-207. Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics AssociationAsfaw, Temesgen (2011). Grain Marketing Performance, Problems and Prospects of Cooperative: A Study on Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives in East Wollega Zone, Oromia National Regional State. Ethiopia. Lambert Academic Publisher, Germany.Bezabih Emana 2012, Cooperative Movement in Ethiopia:Workshop on perspectives for Cooperatives in Eastern Africa October 2-3, UgandaBolden R., Gosling J., Marturano, A. and Dennison, P. 2003. A Review of Leadership Theory and Competency Frameworks. Centre for leadership studies.Chambo Adam Suleiman 2009. Agricultural Co-operatives: Role in Food Security and Rural Development. Wollega Zone Cooperative Promotion Office, 2013. Annual Report. (Unpublished) Nekemte, EthiopiaHalageri Sadananda 2008 Efficient Versus Effective. accessed on July, 2013 Drucker Peter 2005 Efficient Versus Effective. druker-efficient-effectivem accessed on July, 2013 Krishnaswami V. and Kulandaiswamy O.R . (2000). Cooperation Concept and Theory. Tamilnadu: Arudra Academic Publisher.Prakash Daman, 2000. Development of Agricultural Cooperatives. Relevance of JapaneseExperiences to Developing Countries.uwcc.wisc.edu/info/intl/daman_japan.pdf Accessed on July 06, 2009Rouse G. John and Von Pischke D.J. 1997. Mobilizing Capital in Agricultural Service Cooperatives.FAO publicationSchermerhorn, John R. Jr. Hunt, G James, Osborn N Richard and Uhl-Bien Mary anizational Behavior 11th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Distribution Channel System Management (The Role of Consumer Cooperatives): A look at The Practice of some Selected Fast Moving?Consumer Goods (FMCG) in South West?Ethiopia(Research Paper submitted to Symposium organized by Mekele University; Business and Economics College; In Collaboration with Federal Cooperatives Agency (FCA)) The theme: Agricultural Production and MarketingResearchers Address Geremew Teklu ( PhD candidate): Jimma University; Business and Economics College; Management Department Mail: geremewt@ Telephone (mobile): 0911-116559Tariku Dejene (Asst. Professor): Jimma University; College of Public health and Medical Science; Department of Epidemiology Mail account: tariku_dejene@Telephone (mobile) 0911-727342 Abstract Consumer coops play pivotal role as channel members that adds time and place value to customers. Fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) pass through different channel paths and these channel members perform different distribution channel functions. FMCG are those goods which have short shelf life and high turnover. Ethiopian governments used to issue enactments to govern the behavior of channel players and protect end users rights. Decree No. 44/1960, proclamation No.138/1978 and Proclamation No.147/1998 state how citizens can form a cooperative society to protect their common economic and social interests.The main objective of this paper was to identify the roles channel members play in the distribution activities of the selected FMCG in South West Ethiopia. The goods considered in this study are cooking oil, Sugar, and Wheat flour. The study tried to look the network of distribution channel in three different areas (Jimma Zone - Jimma Town, Illu Ababora – Gambela and Bonga – Mizan – Tepi). The study followed exploratory and descriptive research design. Data were collected from the distribution channel members: consumers, Consumer Coops, wholesalers, retailers and concerned government officials through structured and unstructured questionnaire, interview schedule and observation. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques were employed to convert the raw data into information. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS. Factors were rated to see their magnitude of significance to overall channel distribution performance. The major findings show that Consumer Coops played week role and thus there is availability problem on the products in the area considered. Having the Coops in the market system, the price used to fluctuate time and again that hampered end consumers’ daily living. Product availability and price influenced customer’s satisfaction most out of the variables considered in this study. Consumer Coops in ‘kebeles’ and public organizations played their part in minimizing the market problem but their effort was found less than was expected.In the short run the government should take market settlement measures whereas in the long run it has to limit its role to facilitation and law enforcing. Wholesalers and retailers should cooperate with the government to solve the market problem. Consumer Coops administration and implementation capacity needs to be strengthened through training and support.Keywords: distribution channel system; customer satisfaction; fast moving consumer goods; channel functionality, Consumer Coops, and South West Ethiopia.Statement of the ProblemHistory witnessed consumer cooperatives play pivotal role in the economies endeavor to bounce back from the economic recession of 1930. Wars the world experienced before and after the recession hampered economic performances of countries. However, countries used cooperative societies to regain back the lost statute. Cooperative societies served as a means of equitable resources distribution among citizens and thus combating poverty; (Johnston; 2004). He further notes that cooperative societies contribute much to the endeavor to achieve Millennium Development Goals (MDG) of eradicating poverty and hunger.Decree No. 44/1960, 241/1966 proclamation No. proclamation No.138/1978, Proclamation No.147/1998 and Proclamation No.402/2004 state how citizen can form a cooperative society to support and protect their common economic and social interests. According to Dagnachew and Addissie (2009); the attempt was futile as it never brought about change of fortune for the members. Because all the necessary pre-requisites for the formation of cooperatives were absent. The whole process was simply a change in form rather than in substance. Stanton (1996) explains, FMCG are those goods which have short shelf life and high turnover. He further argues that these items demand special treatment in their distribution process. As companies producing these items have very wide range of business operations and large number of products, it is neither effective nor efficient for them to sell directly to the final consumers. Thus, different players come in as either as cooperatives or private traders. FMCG are products that have short shelf life thus replaced within a year and are low priced. Among diverse mixtures of FMCG, this study considered Sugar, Cooking oil and Wheat flour. The Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector is a corner stone of Ethiopian Economy. This sector touches every aspect of citizens’ life. It constitutes a large part of consumers’ budget in all aspects. Hence, Consumer Cooperatives play pivotal role to safeguard members’ common economic and social interests. Ethiopian governments used to issue policies and procedures to govern the behavior of channel players and protect end users rights. Cooperative societies used to be supported by lows and enactments. Ethiopia has faced recurrent ups and downs in product shortages in this industry. Product price has fluctuated now and then that jeopardized consumers’ life. This affected consumer behavior expressed in different ways like purchased decision postponing, switching to low quality products, lowering purchase quantity, and many others. Thus, the cause of the problem needs to be investigated.Therefore the main intention of this paper was to identify the roles played by the channel members (Wholesalers, Retailers, Cooperatives and Public administration) and the level of consumers’ satisfaction. The items considered for this study were Cooking oil, Sugar, and Wheat flour. The study tried to look the network of distribution channel in three different areas (Jimma Zone - Jimma Town, Illu Ababora – Gambela and Bonga – Mizan – Tepi). The guiding research questions for this study were:What does the distribution network of the selected FMCG looks like?What are the roles played by the members in the selected FMCG distribution channel in South West Ethiopia?What are the factors that contribute to Customer Satisfaction with regard to the distribution system of the selected FMCG SW Ethiopia?Objective of the Study The basic objective of this study was to assess the role of channel members and the level of customer satisfaction. Specifically this study tried to address the following objectives:To examine the distribution network of the selected FMCG.To identify the functions performed by the distribution channel members in the selected FMCG distribution system in SW Ethiopia?To assess the factors those influence Customer Satisfaction on distribution channel system of the selected FMCG.3. Research Design & MethodsThis part the report deals with the research design & methods that were used while sample selection, collecting data, and ethical grounds maintained in accomplishing the research objectives.3.1 Research Design The study used exploratory and descriptive research designs that enabled to identify and elaborate on the FMCG distribution network and the roles played by the channel members. Survey research method was applied to assess the existing distribution network in the industry specified and to examine its role to the existing level of product accessibility. 3.2 Instruments and Data collection techniques The necessary primary data were gathered through questionnaire, interview schedule and observation. Structured and unstructured questionnaire were administered to the explored distribution channel members and their customers. Statements that represent variables determining product accessibility were designed and converted into items which then were placed on scale (5-point Likert-type) and used in developing the questionnaire for final study. Interview was conducted with the appropriate government officials and major wholesalers. In addition, the researchers used their and data collectors’ observation to explore the existing distribution network. The suitability of the question statements for the study, however, was judged by applying appropriate statistical techniques (reliability and factor analysis) and check they are fit for the study. Items pertaining to satisfaction with overall services and experiences with past channel members performance were also introduced. Additionally, the questionnaire tried to maintain a section on organizational (demographic) profile to further study the association of organizational variables (e.g. Capital, Service year, and Profit sought) with overall channel member performance/activities.Table 1: Factors/Items Determining Customer Satisfaction and product availabilityDimension/ItemProduct availability/channel accessibilityChannel member CompetitivenessPrice chargedProduct quality Organizational structure and objectives Order receiving and Delivery time Value added by channel membersProduct line carried ( length, width, depth, & consistency)3.3 Sampling Technique and Sample sizeThe population of the study consisted of FMCG distribution channel members and final consumers which constituted wholesalers, retailers, Consumer Coops and consumers. Selection of study units was carried out at different stages. Initially, after obtaining the list of whole sellers found in SW Ethiopia (Jimma zone – Jima town, Bonga - Mizan-Tepi, and Illu Ababora - Gambella) from Jimma area “JIN_AD”, 18 whole sellers, three from each study area, were selected using a stratified random sampling technique, strata was formed based on the product type under study. From these wholesalers, 103 retailers (Including the coops) were selected using simple random sampling technique and finally 384 consumers were interviewed (4 consumers from each retailer) by using convenience sampling technique with the approach of systematic random sampling technique based on the daily flow of customers at regular interval.To obtain the required sample size of retailers and end users, satisfaction of customers was considered as a main variable of interest. Sample size determination formula (Cochran, 2003) (Single proportion formula)38100002432054000020000n=sample sizeP=the degree of satisfactiond= margin of tolerable errorZ=reliability coefficient 3.4 Data analysis techniques The collected data were edited, coded and entered into a computer using SPSS 16 for windows. Descriptive analysis together with multivariate (factor and logistic regression techniques) analyses was made. All the scale items with a factor loading of 0.5 and above were accepted for final analysis. Significance was declared if p-value is less than 0.05. Tables and graphs were used to present the result of analysis.3.5 Definition of termsFMCG: Fast moving consumer goods include sugar, cooking oil and wheat flour. Discussion 4.1 Networking Dagnachew and Adissie (2009) states that coops in the previous regimes did not play their role for different reasons. Johnson (2004) supports this stance as, in fact; cooperatives – as autonomous member-owned businesses - had rarely been tried. Likewise, the coops we have to date in the area are not doing their job properly. The findings also show that the distribution network of the items under study is totally controlled by the government. The Ministry of Trade and Ministry of Finance jointly agreed to cooperate and manage the existing distribution problem of these products. The Ministry of Trade took over the importing process while the Ministry of Finance is financing it. Jin-ad takes care of the distribution of sugar and cooking oil while Ethiopian Grain Trade Enterprise manages the distribution of wheat flour to regions based on the quotas stated by the Ministry of Trade. The Ministry of Trade divides the imported items on quota bases to regions. According to the senior officer of the Ministry of Trade, the quotas are set based on population size and consumption pattern. Regional trade and market development bureaus again divide their share to their zones and towns on quota bases. According to the respective regional trade bureau officers, quotas to zones and towns are decided based on their population size and past consumption pattern. Prices of these products are primarily set by the Ministry of Trade at national level. Respective regional trade bureaus calculate their costs of transportation, loading unloading and proposed profits to wholesalers and retailers and set the prices. Thus, prices at all levels of the distribution channel are stated and hence not competitive. Ethiopian Grain Trade Enterprise and Jin-ad have different branches at different localities. Through these branches they distribute the items to the selected wholesalers and consumer cooperatives. The selected wholesalers in return distribute what they are given to their assigned retailers based on the quotas stipulated to retailers. The regional trade bureaus assign the selected and reported retailers by zones and town trade offices to wholesalers. In addition to these privately owned wholesalers and retailers, the government is distributing these products through the use of consumer associations formed in different public organizations like schools, municipalities etc and government administrative structure such as “kebele”. 4.2 Market Characteristics 4.2.1 Consumer Market Consumers are characterized by their demographics. Both male and females equally participate in the purchase of these items. Age wise the young and adult participates in this market. Almost half of the respondents are government employees. This can be attributed to the reason that the data was collected from towns. Average family size is 4.3 which is equal to Ethiopian Central Statistics Agency (CSA) report, 2005.The average monthly income is reported 1600 Birr. All the items were basically purchased by consumers for personal and/or family consumption. These items were mainly purchased form convenience/ ordinary shops. Local brands of sugar and wheat flour were used most while foreign brands of cooking oil were used most by consumers. This was justified by poor production capacity of cooking oil in the country. Most consumers used to buy these products monthly. This can be attributed to consumer respondents were government employees who earn their income monthly. 4.2.2 Retailer Market An average number of retailers stayed in the business for four (4) years. This implies that the retailing business for the items under study is emerging. The working capital has more than doubled in this short life span in the business. This implies that there is an excellent opportunity of prosperity in the industry in shorter period of time. The majority of respondents produced the starting capital by their own and all were running licensed business in the stated area. It can be inferred that the role of credit providing institutions in this business is weak. The high magnitude increment in the working capital should have encouraged more retailers to the business. It did not happen implying there is some problem in the licensing procedures and requirements.4.2.3 Wholesaler Market The wholesaling market structure was characterized by government policy, functions performed, networking and profit sought. With the exception of profit, the rest implied there is poor wholesaling market structure. This is a market where few play significant role and there is frequent change of government policy and absolute government control that put the market in turmoil. Profit sought registered positive result because it is decided centrally by government. Government decides not only the price but also the distribution direction. The role of wholesalers in the market is to transfer the possession value to the retailers. That is why wholesalers were reported to hide the items to create artificial shortage to manipulate the price and earn more than the stated profit margin. The explicit emergence of the government in the market after 2010 aggravated the shortage problem and the extent of price fluctuation. Government lacked wisdom in managing the market that the problems still persists in the society. Half of the wholesaling respondents were new to the business. Only few existed for more than five (5) years. This implies that there were few monopoly wholesalers in the area. Some of the wholesalers joined the business after the market has been observed to fail frequently recently. The government devised different supportive strategies to motivate business personalities to engage in this business recently. The majority of the respondents produced the working capital by their own and there is a substantial increase in their working capital. This implies the role of financial institutions in facilitating and stimulating this industry is weak. According to the existing literature, the substantial increase in the working capital observed was supposed to invite more competitors to the business but actually that did not happen. This can remark that there is some problem in licensing procedure and requirements by the government. All used to run a licensed wholesaling business. Half of the respondents engaged in wholesaling all the three items that made them multi dimensional businesses. There are researchers who recommend business to be multi dimensional in stocking these items against specialization as it helps to retain customers with variety of needs. 4.3. Satisfaction 4.3.1 Consumer Satisfaction A considerable percentage of consumer respondents were not happy on overall service quality of sugar and cooking oil retailers. This was evidenced by their less interest to use their previous retailer and week interest in recommending their retailer to others. This is a big threat to retailers as their customers may shift away from them and produce a negative word of mouth against them that erodes their competitiveness. Product availability, line carried and price have significantly influenced consumers’ satisfaction. The recurrent shortage and frequent price fluctuations observed in the market caused consumers to be dissatisfied. Some of the consumer associations and “kebeles” were reported to previlagize their relatives and neighbors while dividing the items. This partial treatment could cause some social problems such as conflict.4.3.2 Retailer Satisfaction Eight satisfaction dimensions were raised to characterize retailers’ satisfaction on wholesalers’ services. These were product availability, competitiveness of wholesalers, price product quality, organizational structure, order submitting and delivery time, value added and product line carried. Among these, only product quality is found to satisfy its expected score. This is so because wholesalers did not interfere with the quality of the items produced in their manufacturers. Even if the remaining factors found below the expected score for a positive result, customer handling, product line carried and quality influenced retailers’ satisfaction most. These factors failed to meet the expectation because the wholesaling business used to be run traditionally for a longer period of time by few players and hence it lacked competitive behavior. Thus, significant number of retailing respondent was not happy on the services of wholesalers.Service qualities of wholesalers were not complete as significant percentage of respondents was not happy about it. Even if the services were not to the expected, retailers were ready to come again and recommend their previous wholesalers to others. This implies that retailers have no better option to consider as alternative, as the competitiveness was found to be poor above. Thus, with all their dissatisfaction they came back to their previous wholesaler.4.3.3 Wholesaler Satisfaction Wholesalers were not happy basically for the government intervention and quota policy. Some wholesalers did not trust the government administration structure. They claim the administration is corrupt and weak. There were zone or town trade bureaus those were reported to provide more than one trade license for their relative wholesalers. The administrative problems observed in the government structures aggravated the problem. Some zones or towns were not ready in terms of experts and office facilities to implement what the central government has planned. Thus, wholesalers agree government is responsible for the problem created. On the contrary, the Ministry of Trade senior expert on this regard insists that the government imports these items and distribute on big subsidy. Thus, our market price is lower than the neighboring countries’ market price. Some wholesalers were found to export these items to the neighboring countries market.Conclusions and Recommendations5.1 Conclusion The finding shows that the distribution network in the area is controlled by the government. Even thought regimes enacted and decreed policies and laws, cooperatives in general and consumer cooperatives in particular did not play eminent role to solve the problem. Channel members did not add functional value on the items but time and place. Consumers were not happy on the services of the retailers. In return retailers were not happy on the services of the wholesalers. The wholesalers were not happy on the role of the government in the distribution system. The role of the wholesalers was transferring the items from either Jin ad or Ethiopian Grain Trade Enterprise to retailers the stated quota at the stated price and the role of retailers was moving the product to the consumers on their demanded quantity for the stated price. However, there were times when retailers could not get the items from wholesalers and thus the items disappear from the shelves for consumers. On the contrary, some retailers used to sell the items in the back door for higher price than was stated. Despite some wholesalers and retailers has politicized it, legalizing the traditional market system has shown some improvement. As requirement wholesalers and retailers are supposed to work only on items they got license from the concerned government office. However, there were administrative problems from the government side. Zones and woredas were not ready in terms of human resource, office facility and commitment to effectively manage this market.5.2 Recommendation Based on the findings obtained from the result the following recommendations are forwarded to the concerned stakeholders of the distribution system.The biggest problem observed in the market is supply shortage and channel members misbehavior. Importing more quantity can solve this problem in the short run and massification of local production of the items solves the problem in the long term.According to Dagnachew and Addissie (2009); cooperatives are built on such noble values as self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity, freedom, mutual responsibility and togetherness. Cooperatives are, therefore, the outcome of the coming together of citizens for a common good and the need to support oneself as well as those who are part of the public at large. Therefore, supporting financially and enabling the administration capacity of the cooperative would have not only social but also economic return. Thus, the ministry of finance and/or the ministry of trade at both federal and regional level should strengthen the existing support to the consumer cooperative societies. Wholesalers should update their working system in a way that fits with the contemporary business requirements and the government should support this endeavor. Traditional process and family and blood tied system will not help them succeed in the long run. Therefore restructuring their work process professionally starting from their thinking towards their customers, other wholesalers, consumers, the government and their own should be interwoven in good faith for multilateral benefit. Honesty should be their best policy in networking the distribution system. Cheating and partiality will not help them maintain their long term objectives, if they have any.Retailers too, like wholesalers need to develop community service providing attitude than only profit collection. They need to build trust in their customers. Hiding the items in their back side won’t enable them to cultivate their long run stay with their customers. Thus they need to be long run sighted in their endeavors.Consumers should strengthen their association as consumer cooperatives. Members should contribute their knowledge and time for the betterment of protecting their right and securing their benefits. Otherwise it will remain simply symbolic with no observable effect. Unless the association is run free from the influence of politics, it will attain the objectives and purpose will be mixed. This is what is observed in some consumer associations; role confusion. References Ajzen and Fishbein, (1980), “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived ????????Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies”, Decision?Sciences, Vol.28, ????????No.3, pp. 557–582.Atwong, C.T. and Rosenbloom, B. (1995), “A Spatial Approach to Measuring Functional Spin-????offs in Marketing Channels”, Journal of Marketing Theory and?Practice, Vol.3, No.4, pp. 58–????72.Bartels, Robert (1965), “Development of Marketing Thought: A Brief History. In Science in ????Marketing,” Schwrtz, G. (ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.Birchall Jonston, (2004) Cooperatives and Millennium Development goals; Geneva, International Labor Office?Bucklin, Louis P. (1966), “ A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure,” Berkeley, Caiber ???Special Publications Coughlan, A.; Anderson, E; Stern, L.; EL-Ansary A. (2001), “Marketing ?Channels.” New ????York: Prentice Hall.Dagnachew Asrat (LL.B.) & Addissie Shiferaw (LL.B.) (2009); Law of Public Enterprises and Cooperatives; Unpublished teaching material. Frazier, Gary L. (1983), "Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A ???Broadened Perspective," Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 68-78.Front Matter; Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Fall, 2005); ??American ?Marketing AssociationGagnon Joseph L. and Chu Julian J., 2005, Retail in 2010: a world of extremes, ??? ??????STRATEGY & LEADERSHIP, VOL. 33 NO. 5, pp. 13-23, ISSN 1087- 8572Gustafsson Anders, Johnson Michael D., & Roos Inger, 2005, ’The Effects of Customer ????Satisfaction, Relationship Commitment Dimensions, and Triggers on Customer ??Retention’, American Marketing Association, ISSN:0022-2429 (print),1547-7185 ??? ????(electronic). ; (10/09/03; 07:17); Heide, Jan B. and George John (1994), "Interorganizational Governance in Marketing ????Channels," Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 71-85.Heide, Jan B. and George John and Kenneth H. Wathne (2006), "Friends, Businesspeople, ??????????and Relationship Roles: A Conceptual Framework and a Research Agenda," Journal of ??????????Marketing, 70(2), 90-103.?Hill, Charles W.L. (1990), "Competition, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: ??????????Implications for Transaction Cost Theory," The Academy of Management Review, 15(3), ??????????500-513.Jain, S. (2000), “Marketing: Planning & Strategy”. 6.ed. Cincinnati: Thomson Learning.Jap, Sandy D and Erin Anderson (2003), "Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance ?????????????and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism," Management Science, 49(12), 1684-1701.Jap, Sandy D. and Shankar Ganesan (2000), "Control Mechanisms and the Relationship ?????????????Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing ?????????????Commitment," Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 227-45.Philip Kotler, (2002): Marketing Management: 10th ed. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, IncKotler, Philip, (2004). Principles of Marketing, 10th Ed. Prentice-Hall Inc, New DelhiLambe, C Jay, C. Michael Wittman, and Robert E. Spekman (2001), "Social Exchange ????????????Theory and Research on Business-to-Business Relational Exchange," Journal of Business ????????????to Business Marketing, 8(3), 1-36.Lilien, G.; Kotler, P.; Moorthy, K. (1992), “Marketing Models.” New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Mallen, B. (1973), “Function Spin-off: A key to Anticipating Change in Distribution ????????Structure”, Journal ??of Marketing, Vol.37, No.3, pp. 18–25.March, James G. (1994), A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New ?????????????York: The Free Press.McCammon, B.C. and Little, R.W. (1965), Marketing Channels: Analytical Systems and ??????????Approaches, ??New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.M. Mohan; Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 5, No. 22 (May 30, 1970), pp. ??????????????????M59+M61+M63-M64; Published by: Economic and Political Weekly; Accessed: ??????????????????04/10/2011 ??08:17Office of Fair Trade (2009), “Governments in Market: Why competition matters – a guide ??????????for policy makers” Crown publishers.Rampersad Hubert; 2001, 75 painful questions about your customer satisfaction; ?? ?The TQM Magazine; Vol. 13, No 5, pp. 341-347.CONSUMER COOPERATIVES: INSTITUTIONALIZATION, PARTICIPATION AND ROLE IN DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIESA study on the SNNPR Region, EthiopiaBy:Afework G. Kassa (MBA)Lecturer, CBE, Arba Minch University, EthiopiaPhD Scholar, Department of Commerce and Management Studies, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India Address: Email: afitamission@, Mobile: 0911 747371Sileshi Mengistu (MA)Lecturer, College of Social Science & Humanities, Arba Minch University, EthiopiaE- mail: msileshi@AbstractThe extant literature holds that Cooperatives have basic social, economic and political motives that underscore their relevance. In Ethiopia, the cooperative organization is deep rooted, particularly in the agricultural sector. The history of consumer cooperatives however, is only at its infancy whereby most are formed following the 2008 nationwide inflation, the basic purpose being distribution of essential commodities and stabilizing market price. On the other hand, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the characteristics of consumer cooperatives and the role they have been playing. This study, therefore, was undertaken with the rationale of filling this gap. The study followed a mixed methodology and through multi-stage stratified sampling technique, 17 kebelles were taken from 6 Cities in five zones in the SNNPR. In order to analyze the data, descriptive analysis was employed. In the findings, most of the cooperatives were found to be characterized by low member base, and limited Institutional autonomy, as most are influenced by the government structure, contrasting with the conventional belief for the autonomy of cooperatives. Concerning the availability, findings show that there exist an acute shortage of commodities and only two; i.e, edible oil and sugar are mostly available to consumers. In addition, results indicate that corruption, discrimination as well as lack of consumer ethics are prevalent problems in the distribution of the commodities. Based on the findings, it is recommended that consumer cooperatives should be institutionalized independently with wide consumer base and membership and the assortment of stocks should be broadened to include the basic food items where the inflation is higher of all. Furthermore, the public should be made aware of the role cooperation might play for economic growth of same in a self help empowerment so that they can join hands to solve their own problems by themselves.Key Words: Cooperatives, Consumers, Commodities, Market stability.I: INTRODUCTION1.1 Background and JustificationThe concept of human cooperation can be traced back as early as the emergence of communal life. A formal organized cooperation started however in 1884 when a group of 28 traders in England formed a consumer (buyer) cooperative having its own business principles. Different authors and institutions defined cooperatives in different ways and meanings. For instance, Center for Cooperatives (2002) defined cooperative as a private business organization that is owned and controlled by the people who use its products, supplies or services. Although cooperatives vary in type and membership size, all were formed to meet the specific objectives of members, and are structured to adapt to members’ changing needs. Chukwu (1990) Contemplate cooperative as a democratically controlled business i.e. it is owned and controlled by the members and gives benefit to the members. The International Cooperatives alliance (ICA) defined cooperative in 1995 as an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise (ICA, 1995). The statement is often supplemented with the distinguishing features of seven principles adopted by ICA. Moreover, according to the 1995 statement, cooperatives function based on the values of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity, and solidarity. In the tradition of their founders, cooperative members believe in the ethical values of honesty, openness, social responsibility, and caring for others (ICA, 1995).In the developed world, they have had a tendency to grow and to rely more and more on professional management, which has meant their being distanced from their members and becoming more like conventional businesses (USAID, 2005; Holmen, 1990). In the developing world, they have often been used as tools of development by governments that have not allowed them to become fully autonomous, member-owned businesses. Depending on their stage of development and institutionalization, there are four tiers of cooperatives, namely primary cooperative, cooperative unions, cooperative federation and cooperative confederation. 1.2 The cooperative movement in EthiopiaThe spirit of self-help and co-operation has long been a part of the farming community in Ethiopia. There have been mutual organizations in urban areas, too. When communities face problems, they devise ways of addressing these problems based on their values, culture and beliefs. In Ethiopia, various self-help co-operatives still exist (Emana, 2009; Alema 2008, Dawit 2005). They are local level institutions with an organizational base that are indigenous, such as Debo, Mahiber, Iddir, and Iqub. These traditional informal cooperatives would be a base for formal cooperatives.Ethiopia has introduced modern types of co-operatives in various areas of endeavor after the majority of African countries, where their co-operatives were established by the Western powers during their colonization period. In fact, the first consumer co-operative was established in Addis Ababa in 1945 (ILO, 1975). However, it was after decree No. 241 of 1964 that modern or ‘Imported’ co-operatives were officially introduced (Alemayehu, 2002). The 1966 Cooperative Societies Proclamation No. 44/1966 replaced decree number 241/1964 with the aim of providing a more comprehensive situation for the formation of cooperatives of different kinds. These proclamations were indications of efforts by the side of the imperial regime to provide proper basis for the formation of cooperative societies.Formation of different types of cooperatives continued with more emphasis and rigor in the military regime and like other proclamations, the cooperative proclamation does not escape replacement. Thus proclamation No 241/1966 was replaced by proclamation No. 71/1975. This proclamation gave rise to the formation of peasant associations in which the objectives, power and duties of agricultural producers and service cooperatives were stipulated. Following this to provide for a more inclusive legal framework, proclamation number 138/1978 was issued with the aim of promoting different types of cooperative societies. According to this new proclamation, four types of cooperatives societies were to be established: (i) Producer Cooperatives; (ii) Service Cooperatives; (iii) Credit Cooperatives and (iv) Housing Cooperative. As a result of collectivization policy of the government in the era 1990s, there were 3,723 producer and 4,052 service cooperatives with a total membership of about 10 million persons. Even though the military government issued a proclamation to promote and support cooperatives, its main target was to promote the socialist ideology throughout the rural Ethiopia using cooperative as a means of attaining its objectives. The members were forced to form or join in to cooperatives (Zerihun, 1998). The first two years in the tenure of the incumbent government were totally inattentive to the development of cooperatives. Since 1993 however, the government was trying to facilitate the development of cooperatives. This was witnessed by the development of an improved legal framework. Despite this however, the frequent restructuring of government institutions involved in cooperative promotion has quite often hindered the growth and development of cooperatives (Emana, 2009). In the meantime, many cooperative proclamations and policies have been formulated, including a five year cooperative development plan. In addition to this, the Federal Cooperative Agency was established with branches at Regional and local levels, providing for the development of cooperatives. Emana (2009) reviewed secondary data from Chalchissa (2000), Lemma (2009), (FCA 2007), and found that there were approximately:149 cooperatives in the imperial regime up to 1974,10,524 primary cooperatives during Derg regime (1974-1991), 7,366 cooperatives in 1991 in the fall of the derg regime,8,009 primary cooperatives up to 2004, 14,081, cooperatives in 200519,147 cooperatives in 2006. Hence, the total number of primary cooperatives rise in the incumbent government and the capital base of cooperatives expand to ETB 1.475 billion (USD 147.94 million) The number of primary cooperatives further increased from 19,147 in 2006 to 24,167 in 2007(Emana, 2009). Proclamation no 147/1998 provided a new legal framework with a more detailed manner for the formation of different cooperative associations. The emphasis is evidenced particularly in the policy documents envisaged in this decade. 1.2.1 Consumer CooperativesConsumer cooperatives are enterprises owned by consumers and managed democratically which aim at fulfilling the needs and aspirations of their members (Sheffin, 2003). They operate within the market system, independently of the state, as a form of mutual aid, oriented toward service rather than pecuniary profit (Peter, 1950). Consumers' cooperatives often take the form of retail outlets owned and operated by their consumers, such as food co-ops (Euro Coop., 2010). However, there are many types of consumers' cooperatives, operating in areas such as health care, insurance, housing, utilities and personal finance (including credit unions).Until 2008, consumer cooperatives were least emphasized in Ethiopia. An exceptional increase however, was observed in the number of consumers’ cooperatives formed in Addis Ababa in 2008. This was primarily in response to the high prices of goods and services that occurred in commodity markets in 2007/08. Within a year approximately 115 new consumers’ cooperatives were registered in Addis Ababa, which brought the number of consumers’ cooperatives in the metropolitan to 159 in 2008. Altogether, these consumers’ cooperatives had 251,423 members and a capital of ETB 39,204,266 (USD 3,932,223). These consumers’ cooperatives were established mainly to stabilize the market and supply consumable goods at fair prices for members and other consumers (Emana, 2009).1.3 Rationale for this study An ILO statement (2002), states that many cooperatives in Africa are not “genuine”, because they served the state, a political party or individuals instead of their members. The Ethiopian cooperatives in the previous regime were typical cases to this. An improvement however is made by proclamation No. 85/1994, which restricts the government from unfavorable interference in the internal affairs of co-operatives and initiates the organization of free, autonomous and independent cooperatives. Studies in the area of cooperatives in the country (Alema, 2008; Dawit 2005, Emana 2009, Alemayehu 2002 ),enumerated the different problems ; institutional capacity, inadequate qualified personnel , low entrepreneurial skill, lack of financial resources, lack of market information , poor member participation in the different activities , which are undermining the capacity of cooperatives to serve their member’s interests and contribute to development.Consumer cooperatives are in their stage of infancy in this country of ours and the empirical evidence regarding their role and characteristics is very much limited. Despite the researchers’ attempt to get some literatures in the area, studies and statistics are least available and the very few that are reviewed say nothing about consumer cooperatives. If institutionalized and operated properly however, consumer cooperatives can make an important tool to not only short term activities of market price stabilization and commodity distribution but also to long term issues of poverty reduction. And filling the empirical gap is one important activity to making the most of consumer cooperatives. Therefore in response to the limited amount of empirical evidences in the area, this study was undertaken aiming to answer the following questions:What is the characteristic of consumer cooperatives in the study area?What is the level of membership and participation in consumer cooperatives?How effective are consumer cooperatives in distributing essential commodities? II: METHODS2.1 Design A descriptive survey method is selected as an appropriate technique to characterize the phenomenon of the consumer cooperatives. This research focuses on a real life phenomenon based on current facts and the selected design is an ideal one as supported by different authors (e.g Nachmias & Nachmias, 1996). The research report embodies both qualitative and quantitative perspectives.2.2 Population and sampling techniqueThe southern nations and nationalities region has 13 zonal administrations and 8 special woredas. A multi stage sampling technique was employed to take representative samples from five zones in the region namely; Gamo Gofa, Wolaita, Gurage, Hadiya as well as Sidama Zones which were taken judgmentally. In the second stage a purposive sampling method was employed to take 6 cities from the five zonal administrations selected in the first stage. In the third stage, 17 kebeles were taken considering proportion. In the final phase consumer cooperatives from each kebelle selected were taken judgmentally considering activeness and operation capacity and this makes a total of 24 consumer cooperatives. Thus from the total 17 kebelles included in the final sample, 1500 respondents were included in the study.2.3 Materials and instrumentsBoth qualitative and quantitative data in the form of primary and secondary manner were collected for the consumption of the study. Demographic characteristics as well as opinions of members and non-members regarding the activities of the consumer cooperatives in distributing essential commodities and the different problem they face made an important portion of the material for the study. An opinion of administrators was also used along with. In this study multi item questionnaire are selected as one data gathering tool. The questionnaires were employed particularly to the members and non-member respondents. In addition to questionnaires, an interview was made with officials of cooperatives and local administrators. Secondary data were also are explored to substantiate the study.2.4 Data Analysis and Presentation TechniquesDescriptive analysis was employed in this study, using a general analytical strategy based on previous theories and studies. These theories and studies provided the foundation for the collection, analysis and comparison of data. As part of the data analysis, validity and reliability tests were done using empirically supported techniques.III: RESULTS3.1 Demographics Valid questionnaire provides 48 % male and 52% female respondents and it is found that there is a religion distribution of 439 (32.7%), 384 (28.6%), 179(13.3%), 341 (25.4%) for Orthodox, Muslim, Catholic, and Protestant followers respectively. The data regarding marital status of respondents indicates that the majority of them are married, accounting to 47% of the total. The rest is shared by singles, divorced and widowed for 19.4%, 14.45, and 19.1% respectively. Among the total respondents in the valid questionnaires, 31 % are government employed. On the other hand, 15.5%, 21.6%, and 31.8% of the respondents are NGO employed, Self-employed as well as Farmers respectively in that order. As far as income is concerned, responses indicated that the majority of the respondents lie in the income range of 500 to 1000, accounting for 60% of the total respondents included in the survey. Comparatively, only less than 10% of the total respondents get a monthly total income of 3500 to 4500. In addition to this, 20% of the respondents are found to be in the income range of 1000 up to 2000 total monthly income. Average business experience in years was found to be 1.203.Table: Descriptive statistical values of the continuous variables VariablesMember (N=578)Non-member(N=976)Totalp-valuet-valueMeanSDMeanSDMeanSDRespondents age 42.5 7.6745.37.2643.87.010.01***10.456Family size 4.583.453.42.983.984.020.002**11.567Income level 1435.617061898.72018156819870.01***9.786Average expenditure on basic commodities 0.560.2580.350.290.3981.020.000*** 7.015Business experience in years 1.560.3451.061.1531.2030.5670.000***8.034Level of education 14.28.7915.37.9813.759.070.000***5.477*significant at 10% level of significance**significant at 5% level of significance ***significant at 1% level of significanceSource: SPSS output (2012)As shown on the above table, independent samples t-test for all the continuous variables revealed a mean difference between members and non-members with a significance level of 1%.3.3 Characteristics of cooperatives 3.3.1 Institutional arrangements Among the 24 consumer cooperatives considered in this study, only 5 were found to be independently established based on the proclamation with professional structure and management. The rest were found under kebelle administrations, undermining their autonomy. Furthermore findings show that the studied cooperatives are characterized by organizational and structural problems, lack of resource and capacity, huge interference of the political tier in the functioning of the cooperatives and the like. These findings are consistent with other studies in the country (e.g Veerakumaran, 2007). Interview with cooperative administrators revealed the following characteristics:Absence of professional management: with the exception of the five cooperatives (2 of them are in higher educational institutions, 1 a condominium cooperative and the other two neighborhoods cooperative), the rest do not have a proper organizational structure and dedicated management as well as hired professional workers.Lack of strategic plans: a cooperative is one type of legal form of business, requiring for proper planning with a growth orientation. However, out of the 24 cooperatives included in this study, 19 of them do not have proper planning document.Lack of entrepreneurial and marketing skills: with the exception of 3 cooperatives, the rest do not have any clear marketing strategy that guides growth oriented product introduction and marketing mix plan. They just receive limited products (mainly sugar and edible oil) from the ministry of trade following the government’s distribution scheme and distribute to consumers based on government regulation. This limits their ability to grow by their own entrepreneurial ability.Previous Studies in the area of cooperatives in the country (Alema, 2008; Dawit 2005, Emana 2009, Alemayehu 2002),state that most of the cooperatives in our country are characterized by ; limited institutional capacity, inadequate qualified personnel , low entrepreneurial skill, lack of financial resources, lack of market information , poor member participation in the different activities. The findings in this study are consistent with the other similar studies.3.3.2 Respondents Awareness Regarding Consumer cooperativesAssessment of respondent’s awareness about consumer cooperatives reveals that nearly ninety percent of the respondents are aware of at least the existence of consumer cooperatives. Comparatively only 10.7 % of the respondents are unaware of the existence of consumer cooperatives. However, most respondents do not have the favorable awareness and attitude towards consumer cooperatives; E.g nearly 65% respondents believe that cooperatives are affiliated to the political structure. consistent with this finding , Veerakumaran(2007) state that in many developing countries people feel that a cooperative is a government organization. Furthermore, nearly 71% are not well aware of the economic and social benefit of consumer cooperatives. On the other hand, cooperatives found in educational institutions and large organizations have a better awareness and attitude towards cooperatives and their benefits to the members. 3.3.3 Membership to Consumer CooperativesResponses show that the vast majority i.e. 78.7% of the respondents were non-members to consumer cooperatives. This is an astonishing result given the fact that 89.3% of the same sizes of respondents were aware of the existence of consumer cooperatives. From this, one might ask ‘why are the vast majority of the respondents not members of consumers cooperatives, while they are aware of the existence of the associations?’ which is a logical question to ask. Building on the premises of the results, the researchers asked the non member respondents regarding their reason of not joining consumer cooperatives. The findings from the open ended question provide several reasons. But, the common ones include; low awareness regarding the benefits of consumer cooperatives, hesitation, low regard to the proper administration by cooperative management, discrimination and the like. Some also indicated that they have never thought of the idea at all.3.4 level of participation The study examined the level of participation of members by analyzing the distribution of cooperative shares among members. Accordingly it was found within the 24 cooperatives included in the study only 18% of the members own more than 75% of the shares. On the other hand, 50%, 9.5% and 16.5% of the members hold 10%, 7.5% and 6% of the total shares respectively. The rest 1.5% of the shares go to 6% of the respondents. This shows an unbalanced distribution of shares and therefore poor participation of the majority of the members. 3.5 Commodities Most in stock Among other things, consumer cooperatives are meant to provide consumers the most basic commodities that are consumed very frequently in the most affordable manner. The researchers try to identify the most basic commodities that are supposed to be consumed very frequently and include them in the survey. In addition to the listed items; respondents were asked to state other commodities that are frequently available if there are any at all. The researchers tallied the responses to identify the most available commodities based on respondents’ opinions. In addition to the listed items for choice by respondents, those identified by consumers are also included in the analysis. Accordingly, as it is shown in the above table, the most available items are only sugar and edible oil. On the ‘sometimes available’ list are found the likes of wheat flour, wheat, vegetables as well as detergents. Fruits on the other hand are identified by respondents as rarely available. Items like teff, meat and corn were included in the list but none were identified as even to be rarely available in the consumer cooperatives in the study areas.3.7 Availability of supply of Commodities The explanations provided in the section above witnesses that only two of the various basic commodities are mostly in stock by consumer cooperatives. Now, it is very logical to ask how often these are available. This is simply to know that how often customers get the commodities when they need them the most. Accordingly, respondents show that commodities are not abundantly available all the time. According to the responses, just half of the respondents agree that commodities are rarely available when they need them. On the other hand 6.4% of the respondents state that they find commodities most of the time and 42.2 % state that they sometimes found. In an open ended question, respondents were asked to list the possible reasons for the frequent shortage of commodities. Based on the responses, the most common reasons identified by respondents are tallied and summarized on the table below.Table: Common Reasons for Shortage of CommoditiesFrequency of PrevalenceMost prevalent Sometimes prevalentRarely prevalentCategory of respondents Member Non- Member Member Non- Member Member Non- Member Common reasons Identified for Shortage of CommoditiesCorruption 38%42%40%40.8%22%18.2%Supply shortage 18%15%32.5%32%45.5%50%Discrimination 28%38%40%32.6%32%29.4%Consumer discipline 35%38%45.7%47%19.3%15%Source: Researchers Survey (2012) Notwithstanding the above explanations to the shortage of commodities, most consumers commonly state that there really exists supply problem .Building on this premise therefore respondents were asked as to when commodities are most available. The responses from the open ended question are tallied to identify the most common responses and it is found that commodities are most available during holidays, during price hacks as well as during certain political events like election.IV: CONCLUSIONSConsumer cooperatives are enterprises owned by consumers and managed democratically to fulfill identified needs of members and non-members (ICA, 2005; Proclamation no 147/1998, Sheffin, 2003). They operate within the market system, independently of the state, as a form of mutual aid, oriented toward service rather than pecuniary profit (Peter, 1950). Consumers' cooperatives often take the form of retail outlets owned and operated by their consumers, such as food co-ops (Euro Coop., 2010). They are very important tools to solve commodity shortage problems particularly at times of price hacks in the market place. Furthermore, they help in distribution of wealth to the wider community by pooling members together for self help and growth. The main objective of a consumer store is to serve its members and customers with goods required by them for household consumption. They are also expected to provide goods at a reasonable price and to protect the interest of the members. These stores are also expected to stabilize the price line and check the exploitation of the consumers by the private businessmen. This study was undertaken with the basic purpose of characterizing consumer cooperatives and investigating the roles they have been playing in distributing essential commodities and cooperating a pool of members in the case of the SNNPR region, Ethiopia. The revised literature informed this study that there was significant movement to use consumer cooperatives to help distribute essential commodities at affordable and fair prices throughout the country. This is evident particularly after the 2008 nationwide inflation. The findings in this study indicated that the consumer cooperatives are characterised by weak institutional capacity, lack of market and entrepreneurial ability as well as limited application of strategic planning. Moreover, the cooperatives included in the study have limited member base despite good consumer awareness regarding their existence. Regarding participation in holding shares, it is shown that the majority i.e. around 75% of the shares are hold by nearly 18% of the members, indicating poor participation.In addition, the cooperatives are characterised by limited assortment of stocks and seasonal availability of commodities. The study also shows that there is frequent shortage of commodities and the reason indicated for this include; corruption of cooperative officials, discrimination, lack of consumer ethics as well as shortage of supplies.V: RECOMMENDATIONSThe researchers recommend the following points for consideration by the concerned parties.Consumer cooperatives should be established as independent voluntary organizations with strong member base and consciously designed management body as per the proclamation. And they should be free from the influence of kebele administrations.In this study it is indicated that even though most consumers are aware of the existence of cooperatives, very few are members. Strong member base is one factor for the establishment and operation of strong consumer cooperatives which can effectively address such issues of distributing essential commodities and stabilizing market price. Thus consumer cooperatives should be promoted and consumers should be encouraged to join forces in to such associations for their mutual benefit. Furthermore mechanisms should be designed to have balanced distribution of shares to protect cooperatives from taking the form of share companies.Market price instability and shortage of essential commodities will affect the low income consumers more than any party. Hence, family size as well as income level should be taken into consideration in distribution of commodities by consumer cooperatives.Awareness should be created by both consumer cooperative managers and consumers for the ethical standards that each part should follow for the fair and equitable distribution of commodities.By and large the government and all concerned should create awareness by the side of consumers that there is a relevant legal framework for the establishment of independent, voluntary, member owned and administered consumer cooperatives with autonomous entity from government bodies and encourage consumers to join hands and form consumer cooperatives according to the proclamation.Similar other studies should be conducted with a more rigorous scope including the analysis of institutionalization and autonomy of consumer cooperatives for a better result.V: BIBLIOGRAPHYAlema Woldemariam ,(2008). Analysis of the role of cooperatives in agricultural input and output marketing in southern Zone of tigray. Mekelle , Ethiopia.Alemayehu, Z. (2002) “Co-operatives in Ethiopia: Past Experiences and Future Trends” in Self- help Initiatives in Ethiopia: Prospects and Challenges, Redie, A. and Hinrichsen, I. 2002.Bezabih Emana ,(2009). Cooperatives: A path to economic and social empowerment in Ethiopia. International Labor Organization (ILO) Geneva, Swizerland.Chukwu, S.K., (1990). Economics of the Cooperative Business Enterprise. Marburg, Germany. Dawit Alemu, (2005). The status and challenges of agricultural marketing in Ethiopia, Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, EARO Paper presented at a panel discussion organized by the Ethiopian Association of Agricultural Professionals (EAAP), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Euro Coop. "Consumer Co-operatives: Democracy - Development - Employment". p.?4. Retrieved 2011-06-07.?Warbasse, James Peter (1950). Co-operative Peace.?FCA (Federal Cooperative Agency), (2007). Cooperative annual magazine. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Nachmias & Nachmias 1996: Research methods in the social science, 5th edition. New York St.Martin’s Press.Negarit Gazeta, (1966). The Imperial Government of Ethiopia Ministry of Pen. Co operative Societies Proclamation No. 241, 3rd September. 1966, Addis Ababa.Negarit Gazeta, (1998). The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Co-operative Societies Proclamation No.147, 29th December, 1998, Addis Ababa.Holman, H.: State, Cooperatives and Development in Africa, Scandinavian Institute of African Studies (Uppsala 1990).International Co-operative Alliance (ICA),(1995). Statement on the Co-operative identity, in review of internationalcooperation,Vol.88,No.30. International Labor Organization (ILO) (2002) The Promotion of Cooperatives. Geneva, Switzerland.Steven M. Sheffrin (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458: Pearson Prentice Hall. p.?203. ISBN?0-13-063085-3.?USAID /Ethiopia, (2005). Evaluation of Agricultural Cooperatives in Ethiopia (ACE) Statement on the Cooperative Identity.?International Cooperative Alliance. The UN's official website at? retrieved on 25 Feb 2012.?Veerakumaran G.(2007). Ethiopia cooperative movement-An explorative study. Mekele University. Mekelle Ethiopia.Zerihun Alemayehu. (1998). Cooperatives Movement in Ethiopia, Unpublished paper presented in the National Workshop in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. AUDIT PRACTICES AND PROBLEMS ON SELECTED SAVING AND CREDIT COOPERATIVES IN SOUTH WOLLO ZONE, AMAHARA NATIONAL REGIONAL STATEBy : Mesele Kebede (Msc)Wollo UniversityCollege of business and EconomicsDepartment of cooperatives Contact address: cell phone +251-912-14-48-80 Email:- mesiyek2002@Pobox-1145Wollo UniversityDessie, Ethiopia1. Introduction 1.1. Statement of the problemThe aim of this paper is to give some information from well experienced countries about audit practices to the cooperatives and to throw new light on the above mentioned problems and discuss them from different angles (appointments, due professional cares, program, routine checking, vouching receipts and payments, verification and valuation, audit report classification and audit control system). Today it is quite clear that saving and credit cooperatives are facing serious and fundamental problems. Issues at the center of such problems such basic concepts as the nature and aim of cooperatives, as well as its structural and the principles on which it operates. Saving and credit cooperatives were formed as social organizations and did not operate their cooperatives as businesses.(ILO, 1995). A second problem, which existed people were scared to take up leadership positions to control and follow up in each primary cooperative activity. The problem of non-viable saving and credit cooperatives still existed so that this condition was creating gap between the management and external auditors (updated: D.de Jong, 2006). Cooperative societies have no internal auditors because of their limited financial capacity. Thus the absence of internal auditor in each primary cooperatives create difficulty to control day to day activities and ready to external auditors in a given period of time.(ILO,1995). Auditing has numerous advantages but has certain limitations too. At the time of auditing, auditors have to depend on the books of accounts and records produced before they prepared by the staff of the organization staff without intention or in convince with the management law misrepresentation of such records. Auditor’s management is in a position to bring them to light uncover all sorts of manipulations. In other words, audit may not trace out all type of errors misappropriations or manipulations.(Chandier and et al, 1996). Though the cooperative proclamation No. 147/98 and its amendment proclamation No. 402/2004 of Ethiopia gives due attention to dealing with the audit, inspection, keeping audit and inspection results and actions to be taken to avoid different problems, challenges and to keep fund of the society, there are unsolved problems. So, the study try to identify major problems and good practices of cooperative auditing based on selected saving and credit cooperatives in South Wollo Zone.1.3. Objectives of the StudyThe researcher, so, has inspired to investigate problems in cooperative auditing practices in the selected saving and credit cooperatives. The general objective of the study is to investigate the problems of cooperative auditing practices in selected saving and credit cooperatives in south Wollo Zone. Specific objectives To study the audit practices in selected saving and credit cooperatives in south Wollo Zone.To investigate the problems related to audit of selected saving and credit cooperatives in South Wollo Zone.To identify mechanisms to overcome the problems of cooperative auditing practices in the selected study units. Part II: Methodology 3.1. Methods of Data collection and Sampling Study designThe survey would conducted on woreda promoters, audit and inspection case team, senior and junior auditors, members and key informants of selected saving and credit cooperatives in south Wollo zone. Sampling:-Since the study objective is to investigate problems of cooperative auditing practices. A representative sample is taken from the woredas of south Wollo administrative Zone. Cluster sampling procedures were followed along with purposive sampling in order to select the study area and respondents. Selection of respondentsThe study is intended to analyze the problems of Cooperative auditing practices in the selected saving and credit cooperatives. The study respondents were selected from the committees of saving and credit cooperatives; Woreda audit promotion bureaus and the members of the saving and credit cooperatives. The respondents from committees of the saving and credit cooperatives and auditors and promoters from the woredas promotion bureaus were the key informants. The members as a group of the saving and credit cooperatives were used for focus group discussion (FGD). Sources of DataThe organization of this paper was based on two sources (primary and secondary sources). The main source of primary data were the questionnaire has closed and open-ended questions from the respondents and interview (FGD). Besides, secondary data was collected from Books, published and unpublished reports, journal articles, audit reports, etc. Data collectionThe researcher had gathered data from the respondents through both open-ended and closed-ended questionnaires.3.4. Method of Data analysisBoth method of data analysis were used (i.e. qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods would used in the study). Because the research is survey type, which is basically designed to examine the extent of problems of cooperative auditing practices in selected saving and credit cooperatives in south wollo zone; descriptive survey method were employed in this study. Results and Discussion: Cooperative audit practices 3.1.1. Audit programDuring the survey, all the respondents of the selected woredas auditors said that there is an audit program when they are auditing the saving and credit cooperatives.On the contrary, 100% (25) of the respondents of the saving and credit cooperatives said that since the auditors that came from each woredas are constant, the full audit program contents do not set and revised each year. As result of these the saving and credit cooperatives simply accept whatever any content including in the program because of dependency of audit fees from the government. On the other hand, auditors doing the audit program through experience rather than drafting and modifying the content each year. As we can understand from the responses of the saving and credit cooperatives respondents, audit program, which is designed by auditors, is constant procedures from year after year. 3.1.2 Verification and Valuation of balance sheet and income statementAccording to Ravinder Kumar and Virender Sharma (2001:147), the term “Verification” implies providing the truth or confirmation. To “verify” means to ascertain whether the actual facts are in conformity with those reported or asserted.Financial statement audit contains balance sheet, trial balances, and loss and profit statements and bank reconciliation should incorporate. Table 6. Verification and valuation of balance sheetTransactions Source documents Current assetsCash memos, cashiers summaries, bank slipPetty cashCash in bankOutstanding check, deposit checkSupply Purchase invoice, purchase requisitionAccounts receivableCredit notes, promissory note Fixed assetsBuildingPurchase invoices, cost of purchase or purchase requisitionsMachines Liabilities Current liabilities Members contributionsPersonal ledger , pass bookUndistributed profitProfit and loss statementAccount payablePersonal ledger , loan purchase invoiceSource: based on the survey data, 2012Method of verifications and auditors duties According to all respondents (sub woredas auditors) Said that the method to verification and valuation of financial statement in cooperatives is as follows: Existence or occurrence ,Completeness,Right and obligation,Valuation and allocations Presentation and disclosure Duties related to verification and valuation elaborated as follows:To verify petty cash auditors doing test for evidence of arithmetical check on petty cash records, examine evidence of independent check of petty cash balance and test petty cash vouchers for approval. Cash in bank also verified through bank reconciliation in order to check the amount of cash in bank reconcile the book of the society.Saving and credit cooperatives purchase supplies for operational either in cash or in account. In this case the auditors verify purchase invoice and purchase requisitions how much amount of quantity purchased, unit price and from whom it purchased, who ordered and approved. The other part of assets is receivables form members’. Auditors verify the amount of receivables that will be collected from members through promissory notes in which the maturity value, maturity date, interest and proceed should be examined and evaluated by auditors. On the other hand, fixed assets like building and machinery are verified through purchase invoice and their initial costs by considering this and their initial costs by considering this, auditors valued the book value of fixed assets through straight-line depreciation methods.Table 11 indicated that there are liabilities mostly current liabilities such as member contribution, account payable and undistributed dividend. Likewise, assets the auditor’s duty each liability elaborated as follows:Auditors verify members’ contribution in which total amount of money paid by new members during registration not only this but also date of registration, amount paid, by whom it was paid is verified and valued correspondence with personal ledgers. Sometimes saving and credit cooperatives purchase items on account without immediate payment. In this situation, the auditors verify how much amount of quantity purchased, from whom it was purchased; when it will be paid should also checked through purchase and credit invoices. The other type of liability indicated in table (11) is undistributed dividend. According to all respondents (auditors), investigating and evaluating whether 70% of the surplus distributed to the members based on their participation. This is verified through financial statements of saving and credit cooperatives with personal ledgers. According to the respondents of all selected saving and credit cooperatives respondents said that the above method of verification and valuation is applicable in their cooperatives. From the above result, it can be concluded that auditors applied the five financial statement assertions like other business in cooperatives. Problems faced during verification and valuation According to auditors, they have faced several problems when doing verification and valuation along with the absence of sufficient source documents. These are the lack of existing and recurrence of assets and liabilities at a given date, transferability of account receivables and payable (dividend) from year to year and the depreciation expenses of fixed assets exceeds the book value of that assets. In order to tackle these problems from the saving and credit cooperatives, auditors give suggestions, ways, methods and opinions to the members.From this analysis, one can understand that above problems generated due to lack of trained labor that records transactions on time and attached source documents on its own separate files. 3.1.3 Audit report and classificationAccording to S.K. BASU, on completion of audit work, the auditor issues a written report containing his or her opinion and submits report with relevant details to the board of directors. The report classified based on the criteria, which is established by Ethiopian federal democratic republic cooperative agency commission saving and credit cooperatives promotion. Therefore, the detail of classification elaborated in the following table:Table.7. Criteria for audit report classification MeasurementKind of audit reportColor Rank certificationAbove and equal to 70%UnqualifiedGreen high satisfactory50_69%qualifiedBlueSatisfactory30_49%AdverseYellowBelow satisfactory1_29%DisclaimerRed Unsatisfactory Source: Amahara national regional cooperative promotion bureau, 2012According to Amahara National regional cooperative promotion office, auditors express their opinion about the fairness of financial statements of saving and credit cooperatives by using the color of green, Blue, yellow, and Red. The above analysis indicated that there are criteria or standard in which auditors express their opinion about saving and credit cooperatives performances in order to evaluate their efficiency and effectiveness operations. 3.2.1 Performance Audit Problems The performance of saving and credit cooperatives is measured by audit report that is prepared by auditors. The following table indicates performance audit problems in saving and credit cooperatives.Table 8. Audit report classification based on performance in selected saving and credit cooperativesName of sub woredasAchievementkind of audit reportcolorrank certificationDessie ZuriaDibbile ager saving and credit coopearative50_69%qualifiedWhite blueSatisfactoryDade kuyu saving and credit cooperative39_40%AdverseBlueBelow satisfactoryDadji saving and credit cooperative30_49%AdverseBlueBelow SatisfactoryKalu woreda Selam saving and credit coopeartives30_49%AdverseBlueBelow satisfactoryKalu saving and credit coopeartives50_69%qualifiedWhite BlueSatisfactory Source: Based on Survey Data, 2012As we can understand, from the above table the three selected saving and credit cooperatives (dade kuyu, dadji and selam saving and credit cooperatives, their audit report is adverse and their certificate below satisfactory (30_49 %). According to the respondents, this is due to Lack of trained manpower especially in the area of cooperative accounting, Lack of proper account and record keeping, weak internal check and lack of responsibility among the members, particularly executives.On the other hand, dibbile agere saving and credit cooperatives From Dessie Zuria Woredas and kalu saving and credit cooperatives from kalu woredas said that their audit report is qualified and their certificate is Satisfactory for the previous consecutive years.The main reason for this according to them, they have better internal control, and accounting record system as compared to the others. From this, one can conclude that poor account keeping, recording system and weak internal check are the causes of poor audit performance in the cooperatives. 3.1.2. Submission of audit report According to all respondents, audit report is submitted to the general assembly as per proclamation No 97 Article 36-39. During the meeting, those who members are not comfortable with the report they can able to ask the audit promotion bureau to be re-audited in order to examine more evidence. So, one copy of the report given to the saving and credit cooperatives and the other copy is given to the audit promotion bureaus. According to the auditors, there is an audit report problem during the annual meeting. Members are not fully aware about cooperative audit and they do not ask during the meeting rather simply accepted what it said. On the other hand, information obtained from (FGD) revealed that members do not know how what cooperative audit means. Beside to this, before submitted to the annual audit, the post audit activities through audit team and inspections do not practice.One can understand from the above analysis members awareness is one of the main problems of cooperative audit.3.1.3 Responsible Bodies to Audit Saving and Credit CooperativesAll respondents (selected woredas auditors) along with evidences that gathered from focus group Discussion (FGD) said that the managements are responsible to audit the society; because they are the prominent stakeholders. But they do not ask the cooperative promotion bureaus to be audited.According to the cooperative proclamation, each and every society should be audited at least once in a year. There is no such a regular audit system or they are failing to follow the legal provision, this is because, saving and credit cooperatives are perceived that auditors are faultfinders and if the auditors get some faults, cooperatives are liable to that mistake. Therefore, primary saving and credit cooperatives are not willing and are not responsible to ask auditors to audit.According to them (selected woredas auditors), the accounting system adopted by the selected cooperatives is not good. It is not in accordance with Double entry system; even if it has given all the details of the business transaction during the audit period. This is due to, some of the selected cooperatives; they do not have such an, employee or accountant and they have no knowledge in maintaining the accounts of the society. They said also the source documents are not entered in the first cashbook, then recording in appropriate ledgers, journals are not followed. Regarding the cash receipts, they said, at present these are prepared by the cashier, but not preparing daily, they are accumulating for a week or 10 days, then one day they are preparing all vouchers by the cashier, without authorization of his or her superior.As they said that, the most serious issue in the society at present, the auditor is responsible for the preparation of the account balances, trial balances, financial statements and audit report. This is a big exercise for the auditor appointed by the cooperative promotion office. The auditor is admitting or engaging this work as part of their work, due to lack of accounting knowledge of the society's accountant. The auditors are playing Dual role one as an auditor of the cooperative and another role is an accountant of the society. 3.1.4. Auditors due professional cares in Cooperatives “Due professional care should be used in conducting the audit and in preparing the audit report.”(GAS (1994 revision). Beside to the above literature evidences auditors due professional care problems according to the respondents’ response elaborated in the following table (6) as follows: Table. 9. Auditors due professional cares according to saving and credit cooperativesBasis of evaluationYes NoPercentage numberpercentnumberpercentTotal Qualified &experienced10401560100Follow procedure & locating mistakes7301870100Gather reliable and effective evidence10401560100Source: Based on survey data, 2010.From the above table one conclude that, even if,the government gives free audit services to the saving and credit cooperatives but the auditors are not sufficiently trained or equipped to carryout audit tasks related to cooperative by law and requirements and also they are failed to follow procedures for locating mistakes and gathering reliable and effective information. 3.1.6. Auditor’s familiarities with saving and credit cooperatives accounting, procedure and by-laws100 %( 25) of respondents (selected saving and credit cooperatives) said that, auditors are not familiar with cooperative accounting. Not only auditors but also accountants do not know what cooperative accounting means and how it is applied in the cooperatives. According to them even, the selected saving and credit cooperatives most of they used double entry bookkeeping system. Auditors give suggestions to the saving and credit cooperatives to use double entry when they are preparing their financial statements because auditors use double entry system.The main reason of this fact is that, there are no qualified accountants and auditors who did take cooperative account as a course. Therefore, they are doing whatever they know from their experience. As we can understand from the responses of the respondents, auditors due professional care with familiarity of cooperative accounting system, all respondents said that auditors have no know how what cooperative accounting means and how to apply during the audit processes. Cooperative accounting is formulated for the simplicity and easy understanding of the members for the cooperatives but still not applicable for saving and credit cooperatives due to lack of trained man power in the area of this field.Table 11. Auditor’s familiarity with saving and credit cooperatives rule and proceduresRespondents responsesProper knowledge of relevant lawnumberpercentAgree 520Strongly agree--Disagree2080Strongly disagree--Total 25100Source: based on survey data, 2012As we can observe the above table, 20 %( 5) of the respondents said that auditors know cooperative by laws through experience. Even if; they did not learn cooperative legal system as a course, they are reading and using as a reference material during their performance. On the other hand, 80%(20) of the respondents said that since they are using like other businesses , auditors do not know the right cooperative bylaws, procedures and rules even the accounting system and emphasis only the accounting documents rather than the non-financial audit aspects in which the performance, rule, and regulation included.Therefore, the above findings indicated that the proclamation 147/91 is not fully applicable by the auditors for the time being. RecommendationsBased on finding result the researcher put some of the recommendations, which assists those who faced audit problems particularly the selected saving and credit cooperatives and other external users. This recommendation is also important to the auditors to know their weaknesses and strength in order to take improvements for their future careers.Signal to their audit teams that providing high quality audit services is a top audit priority and that the office does not view such services as a commodity; the office can do this by emphasizing the importance of audit quality in training programs and annual performance reviews.Encourage all personnel to maintain an attitude of professional skepticism that focuses on the importance of the auditor’s role in protecting the public interest and maintaining strong capital markets. Beside to this the number of auditors with sufficient training in each sub Woreda should increases in order to balance the number of cooperatives so that there are graduated students those who have taken the course cooperative accounting along with its legal system, therefore, the government has to train these manpower collaborate with cooperatives to solve the challenges.Cooperatives have to prepare their financial statement on time through cooperative accounting system that focus on transactions. It should provide a complete audit or transaction trial for each transaction. challenges and prospects of saving and credit cooperatives (the case of Kalu Woreda)By: Ergetie Temeche (Instructor)Gondar University Department of managementFaculty of business and economicsMain Advisor: DR. Abebaw k. (Asst. Professor)Co-Advisor: Gedif T. (mBA)Gondar, Ethiopia2014ABSTRACTEven though SACCOs are the main financial solution of the people who have low income level, they have their own challenges that retard their financial solution to their members and the economical contribution to a country. In Kalu Woreda, it is difficult to organize new SACCOs. The organized SACCOs are dissolute than being grown due to the existence of challenges the challenges (inadequate initial capital, limited capacity of mgt committees, poor participation of members, existence of low interest rate, lack of transparency and accountability, biasness during credit provision, delay of loan repayment, dependence on external support, lack of knowledge about rights & duties, influence of other financial institutions, religious believes, low awareness creation). Additionally, Passive members’ participation(during attending annual meeting, electing mgt committees, approving annual plan & budget, hearing of audit report, determining share values, sharing responsibilities, buying additional share capital, and approving & bylaw/ amendment ) is observed as another challenge for their growth retardation. Having seen such factors or factors in Kalu Woreda initiates the researcher to do this research. Hence, this study will try to explore the challenges and prospects of ten SACCOs to introduce feasible SACCOs to Kalu Woreda people in general and the members of ten selected SACCOs in particular. Cross sectional research design will be practice. Primary and secondary data sources were employed. Data questionnaires and interviews were the tools to collect the primary sources of data. Secondary sources of data was collected from different publishes. The total population of the study was the members of ten SACCOs’ members. 218 sample respondents (103 males and 105 females were selected by stratified random probability sampling method. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistical methods and SPSS computer software program (correlation and regression tools). The findings of the study were illiteracy problems, negative perception of members on awareness of management committees, unfair dividend distribution and non satisfaction on the service areas of SACCOs such as creation of job opportunity, timely loan collection and non diversified service of SACCOs were their dissatisfaction areas, governance challenges and lack of awareness about the prospects of SACCOs.Chapter One: IntroductionThe first SACCO Society, in Africa, was introduced in Ghana in 1959. Most of the Non-English speaking nations in Africa started appreciating SACCOs in 1960s, with major influx into SACCO community in 1970s (Mwakajumilo, 2011).Cooperative as a legal institution first came into being in Ethiopia in 1960s/1953 E.C by cooperative proclamation number 44/1961/1953E.C. The first savings and credit co-operative in Ethiopia was established in 1964 by employees of Ethiopian Airlines. During the same period, credit cooperatives were established by employees of the Ethiopian Road Authority and the Telecommunication Agency (SIDA, 1996).Poor internal control which is a result of the system failure to prevent and detect fraud or error, corruption and nepotism caused by granting loans to unworthy borrowers (members), risky investment done without making the fully required analysis, lack of training among the members and the Board of management committees, and lack of the decentralized financial system which can provide financial services to the SACCOs (KWCOPO report, 2013).Hence, this study will try to explore the challenges and prospects of Admas, Andinet and Kalu SACCOs (AAKSACCOs) to introduce feasible SACCOs to Kalu Woreda people in general and the members of AAKSACCOs in particular. Consequently, policy makers and other stakeholders will be the beneficiaries of the study result for their informed decision making; especially it can be helpful to the establishment of new SACCOs. 1.2. Statement of the ProblemLack of awareness and poor saving culture, weak governance, policy and regulatory environment, weak institutional capacity, low capital base, inappropriate loan security requirements, and threats from other financial institutions (MFIs) were among the challenges affecting the outreach and sustainability of SACCOs (Tesfamariam, 2011). The existing prospects like Weak private sector, the Support of NGOs and government, or its exploitative nature urges farmers to act in an organized manner, are not appropriately known and exploited by the SACCOs due to the existence of different challenges such as lack of awareness and capital inadequacy (Bezabih, 2012).In Kalu Woreda, it is difficult to organize new SACCOs. The organized SACCOs are dissolute than being grown due to the challenges (inadequate initial capital, limited capacity of mgt committees, poor participation of members, existence of low interest rate, lack of transparency and accountability, delay of loan repayment, lack of knowledge about rights & duties, influence of other financial institutions, religious believes, low awareness creation). Additionally, Passive members’ participation(during attending annual meeting, electing mgt committees, approving annual plan & budget, hearing of audit report, determining share values, sharing responsibilities, buying additional share capital, and approving & bylaw/ amendment ) is observed as another challenge for their growth retardation. Having seen such factors in Kalu Woreda initiates the researcher to do this research. On the bases of these concepts, it is possible to raise questions about the main challenges constraining the performance of ten Saving and Credit Cooperative Societies, the challenge affecting the participation of members, the possible prospects in SACCOs, and the level of challenges and prospects. For this matter, ten saving and credit cooperatives are taken as a case study area. These cooperative societies are found in Kalu woreda of South Wollo Zone.1.3. Objectives of the Study1.3.1. General ObjectiveThe general objective of the study is to assess the challenges and prospects of saving and credit cooperatives the case of Kaku Woreda, South wollo Zone of Amhara region.1.3.2. The Specific Objectives To identify the main challenges constraining the performance of Kalu Woreda SACCOs, To assess the challenges affecting the participation of members of Kalu Woreda’s SACCOs, To assess the possible prospects of Kalu Woreda SACCOs , To determine the level of challenges and prospects of them.1.4. Research Questions This study will address the following questions: What are the main challenges constraining the performance of KWSACCOs?What are the challenges affecting the participation of members in KWSACCOs What are the possible prospects of KWSACCOs?Up to what extent the level of challenges affect SACCOs?1.5. Scope of the Study This study will be took place in saving and credit Cooperatives of Kalu Woreda, South Wollo Zone of Amhara regional state. The study will investigate the challenges and prospects of SACCOs using ten SACCOs as the case study. The study will cover the period from 2008 /2000 E.C up to 2014/2006 E.C. 1.6. Significance of the study The study will point out some of the challenges of SACCOs in Ethiopia face and the untapped potential and opportunities waiting. Besides, the study will be expected to serve: as a service for further study in the sector; the results will be inputs for the concerned bodies and policy makers and future researchers; and the findings of this study will provide the necessary information to the AAKSACCOs movement and its various stakeholders for the purpose of meeting their current and long-term regulatory demands. 1.7. Definition of Terms and Concepts Saving: means the accumulation of money regularly or irregularly by the members of saving and credit cooperative societies to secure or to gain interest rate or both. Saving can be defined simply as holding something back from today’s consumption.Credit: means the taking of money from SACCOS for consumption or investment based on the saving amount of the saver to repay after a long period of time or after a short period of time.Cooperatives: are the cooperative Societies who are eligible and be organized in saving and credit form of cooperative societies to achieve their common objectives under the federal cooperative society’s proclamation. No 147/98.Saving and credit cooperative societies are different from other micro finance enterprises. In SACCOS, the members should save first to get a credit but in micro finance the customers should take the credit and then they can save. Management committees: are the committees who are elected by the members from the membersFinancial institution:?is an?institution?that provides?financial services?for SACCOs members.?Challenges: are the hindrance factors that limits the expected services of SACCOsProspects: the opportunities, chances, expectations etc… that help the success of SACCOs.1.8. Limitations and Problems of the StudyThere were some challenges and problems facing to do this study. Sufficient documents concerning to the subject under study this were lacking. Time constraint had prevented proper and thorough review of empirical and theoretical data that are related to the study. 1.9. Organization of the ReportThe thesis has five chapters. The first chapter deals with the introduction. In the second chapter theoretical and empirical researches are presented through reviewing related literature. The third chapter is the methodology part. The fourth chapter is about discussion and data analysis part which shows the discussion and interpretation of the questionnaires collected, and at the last. The fifth and the last chapter presented the summery of findings, conclusions and recommendations of the paper. A references and questionnaire are following from chapter five.Chapter Two: Literature Review Under this topic different theoretical and empirical studies which are compatible with the objectives of the study are expressed in standard form.Chapter Three: Methodology Research Design: Moreover, this study was utilized cross sectional descriptive research in the sense that all relevant data will be collected at a single point in time. Population: The total members of the selected SACCOs are the population of this study. The total numbers of these ten SACCOs are 483 (245 males & 238 females). Sample size and Sampling Technique: Based on age, monthly income, Gender, and location difference, ten (10) SACCOs were selected from 25 SACCOs by using stratified random sampling technique. From each stratum, sample respondents will be selected proportionally by simple random sampling technique (table 1). n = N = 483 = 219 1+N (e) 2 1+483 (.05) 2Types and Sources of Data: Primary (direct source of information) and secondary sources (books articles, journals, SACCOs’ documents and other related publishes) were considered as a source of data for this study. Primary data was collected by using personal interview for cooperative leaders and to illiterate SACCOs’ members and self administered questionnaire for the sample respondents.Data Collection Methods: structured questionnaires and interviews were employed to collect the primary (the quantitative and qualitative) data. While secondary source was collected from books, articles, journals, magazines and other related publishes. The questionnaires were prepared both in English (to officers who are members of the sample SACCOs) and in Amharic version (to the other sample respondents) in order to administer all sample respondents.Method of data analysis: The collected data was edited first to identify the items that would have been wrongly responded to and any blank spaces left unfilled, the information was categorized into topics. Responses received were thereafter coded and processed by computer through the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS 20.0) software. Inferential statistics (correlation and regression) were taken from this tool. Data was also analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Variables in the StudyThe dependent variable (Yi) : is Members’ Participation The Independent Variables: areSex of the members, Family size of members, Age of the members, Marital Status, Religion, Education level of the members, Occupation, Duration of Membership, Perception of Members’ to the SACCOs Management Committees, Perception of Members Satisfaction, Challenges, Prospects, Support of Cooperative Promoters and NGOs.Chapter Four: Data Analysis Result Interpretation4.1. Introduction As it was indicated in the methodology part, all 218 sample respondents returned the distributed questions. The challenges and prospects of the SACCOs determine the active participation of the members. The soul of the SACCOs in particular and any cooperative societies in general depends on the active participation of the members. The challenges of SACCOs and the futures prospects have their own impact to the performance of cooperatives. These conditions will be analyzed through this paper as follow.4.2. Demographic Characteristics of Respondents 4.2.1. Sex of the RespondentsAmong the female members 66.7% of the active participants and 33.3% of them were passive participants. Among the male members only 16.8% males were active participants and the rest 83.2% of them were passive participants. 51.8% members were males and 48.2% of the members are females. Hence, there was no significance difference between male and female in terms of gender equality. But females were more active participant than males. 88.3% of males and 33.3% of females were passive participant. 4.2.2. Age of the RespondentsGenerally, the young age group respondents have lack of awareness about SACCOs since their participation was lower than the adult age group respondents. As well as the elders who have above 60 years old were not trained well participated even though they have the highest age limit.4.2.3. Family Size of the respondentsThe above table 4.4 shows that 75% of the active respondents and 56.9% passive participants have a family size 0-2. 30.2% active respondents and 69.8% of passive respondents have a family size ranged from 3 up to 5. 25% active respondents and 75% passive respondents family size ranges from 6-8. As the result shows that when the family size increases, the level of the members participation is decrease. As the respondents view point, the highest family size increases their consumption expenditure.4.2.4. Marital Status of Respondents100% of the single respondents were passive participants. 37.4% of the active respondents and 62.6% of the passive participants were married respondents. 100% of the divorced respondents were active participants.75%. of the widows were also favored because of the sympathy the community usually has for them as they were bread winners for their families. The single are less favored because they were looked to be unstable and the divorced were taken as untrustworthy and unable to control funds.4.2.5. Religion of the respondentsMuslim members have a religious prescription not to take a credit and not to use the interest rate what they will have in the SACCO. They have dominant in number (88.1%) in the SACCOS but their participation was passive. Therefore, the SACCOs have been challenged by the religious factors in Kalu Woreda. 4.2.6. Educational Status of the respondentsThis result indicated that, almost the respondents’ have illiteracy problems and have being a member of SACCOs by their own interest. Having 52.3% of illiterate member in the SACCO is a great challenge for the SACCOs performance. Hence, as educational level increases, the level of the participation increases. 4.2.7. Occupational status of the RespondentsSACCOs have not favor the agriculture sector still now and this may be due to the fact that they would not to be aware in line with the main aim for the prosperity for all programs improving the standards of rural people through SACCOs and where the most are involved in agriculture. 4.3. Membership Duration or Experience in Number of years? From the respondents’ majority of the active participants were those who have a better membership experience. 4.4. Members’ participationTable 4.10: Members’ participation in SACCOs59.2% of the members of the SACCOs are passively participated either rarely or not at all. But 40.8% of the members are active participant.Generally, sharing responsibility, hearing an audit report, and buying an additional share are the main challenging areas of member’s participation. Attending annual meeting, approving bylaw and annual plan and budget, determining share value, and electing management committees are the next challenging area. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download