Clarification on requirement for EPC (commercial property)



1. Introduction

1. LACORS has been asked to clarify whether EPCs for commercial properties are required in the following circumstances.

2. Do properties that the lessor is intending to let require an EPC given that:

• the properties are not fitted with a heating system at the time they are placed on the market for renting;

• the landlord does not know what the eventual use of the properties will be?

3. These properties are existing properties that have previously been leased but are now available to be re-leased. The properties do not have heating systems installed at the time they are placed on the market (but do have service connections to gas/electricity). The properties may have been leased under an agreement whereby the lessee installed the heating system and has removed the system upon termination of the lease (a common practice).

4. Therefore the responsibility for installing a heating system (if required) may fall to either the lessee or lessor. It is not clear at what stage a heating system (if required) would be fitted i.e. before or after the property is leased (although it probably depends on which party is contracted to fit the system, if required).

5. CLG guidance suggests that if the premise is intended to be fitted with heating then it should have an EPC and details how the EPC should be produced. The problem here is that the lessor may not know what the intention is when s/he places the property on the market. Therefore depending on the use of the property, it may not require an EPC e.g. if it falls within the scope of 'industrial sites and workshops with low energy demand'.

2. LACORS’ response

1. LACORS sought views from its specialist property advisers and Communities and Local Government. LACORS recommends that CLG’s publications on EPCs are duly referred to when Trading Standards respond to enquiries about EPCs for non-dwellings.

2. In offering this advice LACORS wishes to make it clear that legislation may change over time and the advice given is based on the information available at the time the opinion was produced. It is not necessarily comprehensive and is subject to revision in the light of further information.  Only the courts can interpret statutory legislation with any authority.  This advice is not intended to be a definitive guide to, nor substitute for, the relevant law. Independent legal advice should be sought where appropriate.

3. When properties without a heating system are placed on the market, consideration needs to be given as to whether such properties are classed as a building i.e. does it use energy to condition the indoor climate? Buildings that may not require an EPC are likely to be industrial sites and workshops with low energy demand (see glossary in CLG’s non-dwelling guidance).

4. LACORS suggests that in a situation where properties are not fitted with a heating system at the time they are placed on the market for renting both of the following sections of CLG’s guidance are considered, in particular the fourth (italicised) bullet point below.

5. Section 1.2 states:

'1.2 Buildings requiring an energy performance certificate

‘...Where a building is expected to have heating, mechanical ventilation or air conditioning installed, it will require an EPC based on the assumed fit out in accordance with the requirements in Part L of the Building Regulations….

Use of energy to condition the indoor climate and the requirement for an EPC

▪ fixed services are any part of, or any controls associated with, fixed systems for heating, mechanical ventilation or air conditioning i.e. those services attached to the fabric of the building

▪ if there is no intention of having fixed services and no ability to include fixed services to condition the indoor climate, then an EPC will not be required

▪ if a building is to be let with fixed services, the EPC for the building should reflect the fixed services actually installed

▪ if a building is to be let without fixed services, but there is an intention that fixed services will be installed, the EPC should be based on the building's use class under the planning legislation. This applies whether fixed services have ever been installed previously in the building, or whether the building is newly constructed on a "shell and core" basis. For the purposes of producing the EPC, the activity within the building should be specified in line with business activity typical of the use class and the most energy intensive fit-out adopted in line with Part L of the Building Regulations in force when the building was built

▪ energy used directly for heating or cooling a process is not taken to mean conditioning the indoor climate. Those buildings without any other conditioning would not require an EPC...”.

6. Section 4.2.5 states:

4.2.5 Shell and core buildings

For shell and core buildings not all the services will be installed (especially lighting, mechanical ventilation and cooling) at the point where the building is sold or let.’

In the case of units that are let as bare structures without services at all, but where they will be fitted out and there is the expectation that energy will be used to condition the indoor climate, an EPC should be provided.

7. The guidance then refers to compliance with Part L of the Building Regulations (in respect of the building’s use class in planning legislation). Where no services are installed, Part L defaults to the ‘worst’ energy rating allowed under Part L.

8. CLG has advised LACORS that their current thinking is that if a property has services connections to gas/electricity then the default position is that an EPC is required.  Furthermore, if the building is for retail or office use then it follows that the indoor climate will be conditioned and an EPC will be required.

9. Notwithstanding this, an EPC may not be required if the vendor/landlord can demonstrate by way of specific marketing usage or planning permission restrictions etc that a property falls within one of the exemptions (paragraph 1.5 of CLG’s guidance). NB in Scotland the regulations and exemptions differ – see .

10. LACORS appreciates that a seller will not enquire too deeply about the proposed use, and the seller/landlord may not know how the buyer/tenant will use the building. Nonetheless, the seller/landlord will know its use class and LACORS suggests that ascertaining the property's use class (i.e. if it is retail (A1-A5) or offices and whether people would be employed in the property) will assist in determining whether a building requires an EPC.

3. Conclusion

1. Each case must be determined on an individual basis. For properties that are not fitted with a heating system at the time they are placed on the market, it will depend on its usage and/or property use class as to whether an EPC is required. Where a landlord does not know what the eventual use of the property will be, the use class should provide a guide as to whether an EPC is required.

LACORS would like to thank the following for their contribution to this response: Fife Council, Leicestershire County Council, Peterborough City Council and Communities, Sunderland City Council and Communities & Local Government.

Name: Cheri Lloyd

Organisation: LACORS (Local Authorities Co-ordinators of Regulatory Services)

Address: Local Government House

Smith Square

London SW1P 3HZ

Tel no: 020 7665 3888

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download