Aromatherapy and Essential Oils: A Map of the Evidence

?

Evidence Synthesis Program

Aromatherapy and Essential Oils:

A Map of the Evidence

September 2019

Prepared for:

Department of Veterans Affairs

Veterans Health Administration

Health Services Research & Development Service

Washington, DC 20420

Authors:

Michele Freeman, MPH

Chelsea Ayers, MPH

Carolyn Peterson, PhD

Devan Kansagara, MD, MCR

Prepared by:

Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) Center

Portland VA Medical Center

Portland, OR

Devan Kansagara, MD, MCR, Director

?

PREFACE

The VA Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) was established in 2007 to provide timely and accurate

syntheses of targeted healthcare topics of importance to clinicians, managers, and policymakers as they

work to improve the health and healthcare of Veterans. These reports help:

?

Develop clinical policies informed by evidence;

?

Implement effective services to improve patient outcomes and to support VA clinical practice

guidelines and performance measures; and

?

Set the direction for future research to address gaps in clinical knowledge.

The program is comprised of four ESP Centers across the US and a Coordinating Center located in

Portland, Oregon. Center Directors are VA clinicians and recognized leaders in the field of evidence

synthesis with close ties to the AHRQ Evidence-based Practice Center Program and Cochrane

Collaboration. The Coordinating Center was created to manage program operations, ensure

methodological consistency and quality of products, and interface with stakeholders. To ensure

responsiveness to the needs of decision-makers, the program is governed by a Steering Committee

comprised of health system leadership and researchers. The program solicits nominations for review

topics several times a year via the program website.

Comments on this evidence report are welcome and can be sent to Nicole Floyd, Deputy Director, ESP

Coordinating Center at Nicole.Floyd@.

Recommended citation: Freeman M, Ayers CK, Peterson C, and Kansagara D. Aromatherapy and

Essential Oils: A Map of the Evidence. Washington, DC: Evidence Synthesis Program, Health Services

Research and Development Service, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans

Affairs. VA ESP Project #05-225; 2019. Available at:

.

This report is based on research conducted by the Evidence Synthesis Program (ESP) Center located at the VA

Portland Healthcare System, Portland, OR, funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health

Administration, Health Services Research and Development. The findings and conclusions in this document are

those of the author(s) who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent

the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. Therefore, no statement in this

article should be construed as an official position of the Department of Veterans Affairs. No investigators have any

affiliations or financial involvement (eg, employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert

testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties) that conflict with material presented in the report.

i

Aromatherapy and Essential Oils

Evidence Synthesis Program

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This topic was developed in response to a nomination by the Office of Patient Centered Care and

Cultural Transformation (OPCC&CT) to guide the use of aromatherapy and essential oils in the

VHA. The scope was further developed with input from the topic nominators (ie, Operational

Partners), the ESP Coordinating Center, the review team, and the technical expert panel (TEP).

In designing the study questions and methodology at the outset of this report, the ESP consulted

several technical and content experts. Broad expertise and perspectives were sought. Divergent

and conflicting opinions are common and perceived as healthy scientific discourse that results in

a thoughtful, relevant systematic review. Therefore, in the end, study questions, design,

methodologic approaches, and/or conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of

individual technical and content experts.

The authors gratefully acknowledge Robin Paynter, MLIS, and the following individuals for

their contributions to this project:

Operational Partners

Operational partners are system-level stakeholders who have requested the report to inform

decision-making. They recommend Technical Expert Panel (TEP) participants; assure VA

relevance; help develop and approve final project scope and timeframe for completion; provide

feedback on draft report; and provide consultation on strategies for dissemination of the report to

field and relevant groups.

Ben Kligler, MD, MPH

National Director, Integrative Health Coordinating Center

VA Central Office, Washington, DC

Peter A. Glassman, MBBS, MSc

Chair, Medical Advisory Panel, Pharmacy Benefits Management Services

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Technical Expert Panel (TEP)

To ensure robust, scientifically relevant work, the TEP guides topic refinement; provides input

on key questions and eligibility criteria, advising on substantive issues or possibly overlooked

areas of research; assures VA relevance; and provides feedback on work in progress. TEP

members are listed below:

Leila Kozak, PhD

Whole Health National Champion, OPCC&CT ¨C IHCC, VA Puget Sound HCS

Director, Integrative Palliative Care Institute (IPCI)

Angie Lillehei, PhD MPH RN

Chief Integrator, Minnesota Personalized Medicine

Owner and Principal, Noctilessence LLC

ii

Aromatherapy and Essential Oils

Evidence Synthesis Program

Linda L. Halcon, PhD, MPH, RN

Associate Professor Emerita, University of Minnesota School of Nursing

Margo A. Halm, RN, PhD, ACNS-BC

Associate Chief Nurse Executive, Nursing Research/ EBP & Magnet Director, Portland VAHCS

Peer Reviewers

The Coordinating Center sought input from external peer reviewers to review the draft report and

provide feedback on the objectives, scope, methods used, perception of bias, and omitted

evidence. Peer reviewers must disclose any relevant financial or non-financial conflicts of

interest. Because of their unique clinical or content expertise, individuals with potential conflicts

may be retained. The Coordinating Center and the ESP Center work to balance, manage, or

mitigate any potential nonfinancial conflicts of interest identified.

iii

Aromatherapy and Essential Oils

Evidence Synthesis Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... II

ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 2

Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2

Methods....................................................................................................................................... 2

Results ......................................................................................................................................... 4

Figure. Map of the evidence from systematic reviews of inhaled and topical essential oils for

targeted health conditions/populations ....................................................................................... 5

Discussion ................................................................................................................................... 6

Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 6

Abbreviations Table .................................................................................................................... 7

INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 9

METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 10

Topic Development ................................................................................................................... 10

Search Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 10

Study Selection ......................................................................................................................... 11

Data Abstraction ....................................................................................................................... 12

Quality Assessment ................................................................................................................... 12

Data Synthesis ........................................................................................................................... 13

Rating the Body of Evidence .................................................................................................... 14

RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 15

Literature Flow.......................................................................................................................... 15

Key Question: What evidence is available that examines the effectiveness of aromatherapy or

essential oils for health-related indications? ............................................................................. 16

Inhaled EO interventions - Psychological outcomes ............................................................ 21

Inhaled EO interventions ¨C Nausea/vomiting ....................................................................... 25

Inhaled EO interventions ¨C Pain and other physical signs/symptoms .................................. 26

Inhaled EO interventions ¨C Sleep quality ............................................................................. 30

Inhaled EO interventions ¨C Global outcomes ....................................................................... 32

Inhaled EO interventions ¨C Adverse effects ......................................................................... 32

iv

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download