IDDT Measurement and Evaluation Workgroup
IDDT Measurement and Evaluation Workgroup
Proposed Measurement System
Draft: Rev. 5.5.05
Purpose: Implementation and effective management of evidence based practices depends on measurement of structure, processes, and outcomes of care. The measurement grid is designed to provide a comprehensive set of tools that are reported by experts to provide valuable information when implementing and managing integrated, evidence-based programs for people with co-occurring disorders. The purpose of the grid is not to imply that all measurement tools must be implemented. Rather, the purpose is to provide a catalogue of tools that might be useful to providers and managers at different phases of implementation of evidence based practices, and from which a few essential tools can be selected for assessing fidelity and outcomes across the state.
Measures Key:
Phase I Phase II Phase III
| |State |PIHP |Program |Consumer/Clinician |
|Structure |1. Contractual agreements |1. COFIT |1. consumer/ clinician ratio |Integrated person-centered plan |
| |2. Policy changes |2. credentialing |2. COMPASS | |
| |3. Training/TA evaluation | | | |
|Process |1. Identification (prevalence) |1. identification (prevalence) |1. IDDT/GOI fidelity |Person-centered plan progress (IPOS |
| |2. duration of treatment |2. assessment (w/i 14 days) |2. number/percentage of consumers being treated using the|progress) |
| |risk adjustment |(screening for mental health and |model | |
| |3. model fidelity |addictive disorders) | | |
| | |3. engagement | | |
| | |4. IDDT/GOI fidelity | | |
|Outcome |1. Utilization |1. Utilization |1. Utilization |Generic tools: |
| |Hospital (MI and/or SA) |Hospital (MI and/or SA) |Hospital (MI and/or SA) |1. Functional status/ symptomatology |
| |ER |ER |ER |(clinician report vs. consumer report) |
| |Outpatient |Outpatient |Outpatient |2. Satisfaction |
| |2. Criminal justice involvement |2. Criminal justice involvement |2. Criminal justice involvement |3. Quality of life |
| |3. Employment/ education |3. Employment/ education |3. Employment/education |4. duration of treatment |
| |4. Housing/living situation |4. Housing/living situation |4. Housing/living situation |5. stage of SA treatment |
| |5. Cost |5. Cost |5. Cost | |
| | | |6. Stage of SA treatment |Diagnosis-specific tools |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- measurement and significant figures worksheet
- measurement and significant figures chemistry
- educational measurement and evaluation pdf
- assessment measurement and evaluation pdf
- measurement and evaluation in teaching
- measurement and evaluation
- test measurement and evaluation
- measurement and evaluation pdf
- program measurement and evaluation guide
- measurement and evaluation in education
- difference between measurement and assessment
- measurement and significant figures practice problems