SYLABUS - University of Southern California



University of Southern California

Department of Political Science

Political Science 432

THE POLITICS OF (LOCAL) CRIMINAL JUSTICE (Rev. 01.07.2020)

Spring 2020 – 6:30 p.m. - 9:20 p.m., Tuesday, Location KDC 240

|Professors: | | |

| |George B. Newhouse, Jr. Esq. (Adjunct Prof.) |Judge William F. Fahey |

| |Tel: (213) 709-6387 (mobile) |Los Angeles Superior Court. |

| |E-mail: Gnewhous@usc.edu |Tel: (213) 633-1001 |

| |gnewhouse@post.harvard.edu |Fax: (213) 613-2730 |

| |Office Hours: Tues. @ 4:30 to 5:30 p.m., |E-mail: wfahey@ |

| |VKC 318 (other times by appointment) | |

Course Description:

The criminal justice system is a pervasive instrumentality of our political system. It affects virtually everyone at some point in their life, either as a victim, witness, juror, judge, attorney, cop or participant (i.e., defendant). Controversies abound, from the LAPD scandals (i.e., the infamous Rodney King beatings, Rampart scandal) to the more recent shootings (i.e., mass shootings, attacks on police officers as well as shootings of unarmed black men), remind us how the local criminal justice system serves as a dominating political institution in contemporary life. Race looms large in all features of our criminal justice system. This course is designed to provide the student with a broad analytical and functional overview of the American Criminal Justice System from a local and international view, to assess whether it works, in operation, to realize or impede the goal of attaining equal justice and how local politics affects that outcome. The course will examine the philosophical underpinnings of our system of justice, its history, pragmatic manifestations and problems. We will evaluate the inner workings of the essential institutions. Major focal points will also include the historical antecedents of the criminal justice system, social justice, reform, and the role played by the principal players, ranging from the police, victims (and their advocates), lawyers, judges, jurors, media, public and correctional officials.

Students will be expected to think critically about the issues and principles underlying important legal decisions and dilemmas, express and appreciate diverse views, and to consider policy ramifications in taking and defending positions. The course will be enhanced by guest speakers from the criminal justice system offering “real life” experiences and different perspectives of the criminal justice system.

Course Requirements: Midterm Examination 25%

Research Paper/ Assignments 25%

Final Examination 50% Class Participation bonus 5%

A closed book mid-term examination covering course readings, class lectures, and class discussions will be given in class on Tuesday, March 3, 2020. The Final Examination which includes a take home essay will be given in class on May 12, 2020 at 6:30 p.m. The final examination will be based on all assigned readings, lectures, films and classroom discussions. The research paper/assignment will be due on or before March 24, 2020 and will make up 25% of the grade.

Required Reading:

Course Text – Criminal Justice: An Introduction, Adler, Mueller & Laufer (McGraw Hill, 6th Ed. 2012

• Course Reader (Available at bookstore or through pdf postings on Blackboard)

• All texts will be on reserve in Leavey Library, and all excerpts in the “Reader” will be available in pdf form by email, distributed each week.

Additional materials may be placed on reserve during the semester.

Class Schedule:

Date Topic

|January 14, 2020 | |

| |Introduction [GBN]. Introduction and overview of the course. Law enforcement in Los Angeles in 2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. |

| |The historical development of the criminal justice system in America. What is “law” and how does it justify coercion by the state? |

| |What is “justice?” What do we have to sacrifice to achieve it? Theoretical underpinnings of the concept of justice: i.e., natural law |

| |and the philosophical justification for the criminal sanction; common “myths about the criminal justice system;” two competing models of |

| |the criminal process and their relation to and impact on the criminal justice system. |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 1, pp. 3-37; Reader: (1) “Two Models of the Criminal Process,” from The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Herbert L.|

| |Packer, Stanford Univ. Press (1968) |

|January 21, 2020 |The Criminal Justice System: Criminal Law, Constitutional Law and Due Process [WFF]. Basic overview of criminal process and criminal |

| |law, including contrast with civil law. Consideration of the historical and theoretical underpinnings of each system. Concise survey of|

| |criminal justice system, from crime to investigation, charge, grand jury investigation, arrest, arraignment, pre-trial proceedings, |

| |through trial. Grand jury demonstration. |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 4, pp. 107-127; Reader: (2) “The Evolution of Criminal Law, from C. Ray Jeffrey, Crime & Justice In America, Prentice|

| |Hall, 1990, pp. 3-12; (3) WSJ Articles dated Sept 12, 2018: “Happy Constitution Day If You Can Keep it”. |

|January 28, 2020 |The Criminal Justice System: Law Enforcement I [GBN]. Continued examination of Rule of Law in criminal justice system; role of U.S. |

| |Supreme Court and other federal courts in creation/evolution of constitutional law and rules of criminal procedure. Who has |

| |constitutional rights and how are they enforced? Clash of competing values and priorities. What about “victims’ rights?” Topics include|

| |Bill of Rights incorporation; and expansion of 14th Amendment rights to include Exclusionary Rule; Exclusionary Rule as it impacts |

| |police; the politics of police work in the United States. Also examine the evolution of police agencies in the United States and the |

| |nature and scope of police work. The conflict between effective law enforcement (crime control model) and civil liberties (due process |

| |model). How the courts have attempted to balance these competing interests. Police discretion. Limitations on the exercise of police |

| |power. Economics and priorities in policing. |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 7, pp. 199-225; Reader (4) Case Excerpts -- Wolf v. Colorado; Mapp v. Ohio (Case reports of two U.S. Supreme |

| |Court cases) |

|Feb. 4, 2020 |Law Enforcement II: [WFF]. Policing the police. From Rodney King to the Christopher Commission to Rampart and current issues arising |

| |from police misconduct, including corruption, scandals and antecedents, and more current local policing issues such as the war on gang |

| |violence and recent shootings involving police officers. We will also consider the politics of the big city police department and the |

| |struggle to reform the LAPD. Civilian oversight as a solution to monitoring the guardians of domestic liberty. Guest Lecturer: Richard |

| |E. Drooyan |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 5, pp. 131-155; Course Reader: (5) FBI Crime Statistics 2018, U.S. Department of Justice (available online at |

| | (20 yr); (6) Articles on Incidence of Crime In US |

| |and Locally: LA Times Article dated December 5, 2017, Article “Crime Rates Down in California, up in LA County During Period of Criminal |

| |Justice Reform”; WSJ Article, dated Oct. 7, 2019 “Arrests for Low-Level Crimes Are Plummeting, and the Experts Are Flummoxed”; (7) WSJ |

| |Article: A Yellow Light for Red Flag Laws, dated August 6, 2019; |

|February 11 & 18, |The Adversarial System: Theory and Practice. The adversary system as the cornerstone of our legal system. Sixth Amendment right to | |

|2020 |counsel & Fifth Amendment Due Process. Evidentiary privileges. Ethical dilemmas imposed on attorneys operating in our legal system. | |

| |The impact of these doctrines on the function of the trial court as a “truth seeking” machine. | |

| |February 11: Prosecutorial Functions [WFF]. The awesome investigatory power of the state and the relative powerlessness of the |

| |individual. Topics include: role of prosecutor; prosecutorial discretion, investigative priorities and allocation of resources; |

| |prosecutorial abuses; and stages of typical prosecution. Guest Lecturer: Deputy District Attorney Rebecca Goodrich |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 9, pp. 247-259, Chap. 10, pp. 272-295; Course Reader: (8) Kadish, S.H. (Ed.), Prosecutorial Discretion & U.S. |

| |Attorney; (9) Why Innocent People Plead Guilty, Article in New York Review of Books, Judge Jed R. Rakoff; (10) Justice Deferred Is |

| |Justice Denied, Article in NY Review of Books, Feb. 19, 2015, by Judge Jed R. Rakoff; (11) Article in LA Daily News, dated July 27, |

| |2018, “Prosecutors Say Mental Health Law should be scaled back” |

| |February 18: Role of the Defense Attorney [GBN]. Is the notion of the “honest lawyer” an oxymoron? What is the proper role for the |

| |legal advocate (for the defense) in our legal system? What roles do lawyers play in fact? Ethical issues arise. Does the defense |

| |lawyer participate in the process as an “officer of the court?” Does the defense lawyer have an obligation to advance the truth seeking |

| |function? and other myths. Guest Lecturer: Seema Ahmad, Esq. (Dep. FPD) |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 9, pp. 259-264; Course Reader: (12) Chapter in “Pure Legal Advocates and Moral Agents,” from Justice, Crime and |

| |Ethics; (13) Selection from Alan Dershowitz’s book, The Best Defense. (Introduction), Random House (1982); (14) WSJ Article, dated |

| |October 21, 2017, “The Case Against Prosecution” |

|February 25, |February 25: The Courts: Administration of Justice [WFF]. The House that Justice Built. A short primer on the structure of the U.S. |

|2020 |Court System. Dual state and federal systems. Jurisdiction and appellate review judicial process from investigation through trial. Do |

| |trial courts seek “truth” or other values? Foibles of the jury system. The judge's perspective on Justice. Guest Speaker: Hon. John |

| |Wiley, Justice California Court of Appeal; |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 8, pp. 227-244; Course Reader: (15) Trial by Jury In the United States from Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In |

| |America, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. (1951); (16) 2018 Annual Report of Los Angeles Superior Courts (Excerpts); (17) LADA Petition to Judge |

| |Ryan regarding Factual Innocence dated Nov. 7, 2019 |

|March 3, 2020 |Mid-Term Examination (Given in Class) |

|March 10, 2020 |Juvenile Justice [WFF]. How does the criminal justice system deal with juvenile offenders? This lecture will discuss the sociopolitical| |

| |changes in treatment and the new approach to juvenile offenders that began in the 1960’s and the perceived need to get “tough on crime.” | |

| |We will examine the impact of juvenile waiver laws, allowing juveniles to be tried as adults for crimes committed while children and | |

| |other constitutional issues raised by the justice system’s approach to juveniles. Guest Lecturer: Hon. Robert Totten (Sup. Court | |

| |Commissioner, Juvenile Court) | |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 15, pp. 396-408; (18) LA Times Editorial, Juvenile Justice and its Flaws, November 13, 2017; (19) WSJ Article dated| |

| |May 26, 2018: Judicial Tough Love Helps Addicted Moms | |

|March 15-22 |Spring Break |

| |Correctional System [GBN]. Issues confronted by penal institutions: who and how to punish; purposes of penal incarceration; prison|

|March 24, 2020 |violence, work programs, prisoner’s rights, health care in prisons, parole issues, and cost of correctional system. Alternatives |

| |the long term confinement. Impact of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Guest Lecturers: Devon Newhouse, Ph.D. Student, Brown University|

|M |and Michael Santos. RESEARCH PAPERS DUE IN CLASS. |

|M | |

| |Reading: CJ: Chaps. 12 & 13; pp. 320-365; Course Reader: (20) NY Times Article dated March 26, 2015: "The Radical Humaness of |

| |Norway’s Halden Prison;" (21) WSJ Article: Reform the prisons without going soft on crime, August 15 2018; (22) My Prison |

| |Experiment, Mother Jones article by Shane Bauer, July 2016; See also Podcast at |

| |; (35) M. Santos Article, 66 Hastings LJ 1549 “On|

| |Incentivizing Excellence in Federal Prisons” |

|March 31, 2020 |Law and Media [WFF]. Implications of the “right to a public trial” and role of the media in that process. Collision between the |

| |public’s First Amendment right to know and the accused’s right to a fair trial under the Due Process clause. Does the presence of |

| |cameras and excessive media coverage have an impact on the fairness of trial? Should the system be reformed? Guest|

| |Lecturer: Joel Rubin, Reporter Los Angeles Times. |

| |Reading: C.J.,: Chap. 10; pp. 286-287 (Court TV Box); Course Reader: (23) Outline -- "The Media's Interest In and Right to Access|

| |to the Courts," Article by Rex Heinke, Esq. |

| |Punishment: Sentencing, the Death Penalty and Public Policy [GBN]. Philosophical justification for the criminal sanction. |

|April 7, 2020 |Rehabilitation vs. punishment; notion of deterrence -- when does it work? Alternatives to incarceration. Ultimate penalty. Debate|

| |over the efficacy and morality of the Death Penalty. Guest Lecturer: Lt. Jon Perkins (Ret. Glendale PD) |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 11, pp. 297-318; Course Reader: (24) Top Pro’s & Cons: Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed (Handout); (25) |

| |Glossip v. Gross, 135 S.Ct. 2726 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2015); (26) WSJ Article dated May 31, 2017, "How To Give Capital Punishment |

| |a Reprieve" |

|April 14, 2020 |Race and Equality In Criminal Justice System [GBN]. Do we really have “equal justice” for all or is the system flawed in that |

| |certain groups are disfavored or receive unequal treatment, particularly minorities? Do the wealthy and privileged receive better |

| |representation and hence more favorable outcomes? The competing theories regarding over criminalization and mass incarceration. |

| |Reform of the bail system. Can the criminal justice system be improved? Guest Lecturer: Hon. Drew Edwards, Superior Court |

| |Judge. |

| |Reading: C.J., Chap. 10, 275-78; (27) Washington Post: “Overwhelming Evidence That The Criminal Justice System Is Racist”; (28) |

| |Constitutional Rights Foundation: “The Color of Justice”; (29) Update on Bail Reform in California Which Becomes First State in |

| |Nation to Ban Money Bail, New York Times Article 08.28.18; (30) Met News Article “Criminologists Mislead Us”, dated Sept. 24, 2019 |

|April 21, 2020 |White Collar Crime [GBN]: Crime in the board room and enterprise liability. Is such crime more or less of a threat to our society|

| |than traditional “street crime?” Are the antecedents of such crime different; should corporate “non-compliance” be handled by the |

| |criminal justice system? Use of criminal sanction vs. civil sanctions as a method of implementing sound public policies. |

| |Independent Counsel laws: strengths and limitations. |

| |Guest Lecturer: Gordon Greenberg, Esq. |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 2, pp. 51-66; Course Reader: (31) Excerpt from The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to |

| |Prosecute Executives by Jesse Eisenger, |

|April 28, 2020 |Terrorism & International Criminal Law Issues [WFF] The War on Terrorism and its impact on Civil Rights; US Patriot Act; War |

| |Crimes Prosecutions, Extradition and the extra-territorial reach of U.S. criminal laws to regulate foreign crimes. Guest Lecturer |

| |Hon. Scott Gordon (Ret.), Former International Prosecutor |

| |Reading: CJ: Chap. 2, pp. 40-45; Course Reader: (32) Article on Rendition “Long Arm of U.S. Law” by G.B. Newhouse, Jr.; (33) WSJ|

| |Article: Bosnian Serb Commander Ratko Mladic Sentenced to Life Imprisonment for War Crimes; (34) WSJ Article dated November 20, |

| |2017: “The Hague Aims for U.S. Soldiers" |

| | |

|May 12, 2020 |Final Examination: Take Home Examination (Due next day - Wednesday, May 13 COB) |

| | |

Important Note

Any student requesting academic accommodations based on a disability is required to register with Disability Services and Programs (DSP) each semester. A letter of verification for approved accommodations can be obtained from DSP. Please be sure the letter is delivered to one of your instructors as early in the semester as possible. DSP is located in STU 301 and is open from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Mon. – Fri.). Their phone is (213) 740-0076.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download