Meineker v. Hoyts

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 899 F. Supp. 1155, 1166 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (noting “liberal construction” of intervention requirements). Here, the United States’ intervention request comfortably satisfies Rule 24(a)(2)’s requirements for intervention as of right. The United States is timely seeking to intervene in this shortly after the ... ................
................