AT-LARGE MEMBER



AT-LARGE MEMBER

*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence

Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Member in Good Standing (more|NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |

| |than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |

| |involvement in gifted education |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |

| | |contributions) |related fields | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)

|Name |Evidence of financial management |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |

| |experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |

| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |

| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |

| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |

| | |

| | |

GOVERNANCE SECRETARY

*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence

Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |

| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |

| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |

| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)

|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |

| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |

| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |

| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |

| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |

| | |

| | |

TREASURER

*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence

Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |

| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |

| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |

| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)

|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |

| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |

| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |

| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |

| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |

| | |

| | |

NETWORK REPRESENTATIVE

*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence

Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |

| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |

| | | | | | | |

Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |

| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |

| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |

| | | | | | |

Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)

|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |

| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |

| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |

| | | | | | |

|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |

| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |

| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |

| | |

SCHOOL/DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE

*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence

Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Member in Good Standing (more|NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |

| |than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |

| | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)

|Name |Clear evidence of PreK-12 |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Total |

| |school/district employment |involvement in gifted education|(chapters, curriculum, whitepapers, other |recognition received in gifted or | |

| | | |creative contributions) |related fields | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)

|Name |Evidence of financial management |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |

| |experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |

| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |

| | | | | | |

| | | | | | |

|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |

| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |

| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |

| | |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download