AT-LARGE MEMBER
AT-LARGE MEMBER
*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence
Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Member in Good Standing (more|NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |
| |than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |
| |involvement in gifted education |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |
| | |contributions) |related fields | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)
|Name |Evidence of financial management |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |
| |experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |
| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |
| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |
| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |
| | |
| | |
GOVERNANCE SECRETARY
*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence
Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |
| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |
| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |
| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)
|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |
| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |
| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |
| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |
| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |
| | |
| | |
TREASURER
*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence
Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |
| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |
| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |
| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)
|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |
| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |
| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |
| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |
| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |
| | |
| | |
NETWORK REPRESENTATIVE
*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence
Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Member in Good Standing |NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |
| |(more than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |
| | | | | | | |
Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Track record of content |Total |
| |involvement in gifted |(books, whitepapers, other creative |recognition received in gifted or |contributions over time | |
| |education |contributions) |related fields | | |
| | | | | | |
Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)
|Name |Evidence of financial |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |
| |management experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |
| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |
| | | | | | |
|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |
| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |
| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |
| | |
SCHOOL/DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE
*General rating scale: 3=highest degree of contribution, 2=medium degree of contribution 1=minimal evidence 0=no evidence
Participation in and Support of NAGC (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Member in Good Standing (more|NAGC Convention |Presenter at NAGC |Committee, Network, Task Force, Work |Held Leadership Positions |Total |
| |than 1 year) |Attendance |Conventions |Group Participation |within NAGC | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Evidence of Competency and Experience in Gifted Education (based on your evaluation of candidate materials)
|Name |Clear evidence of PreK-12 |Substantial professional |Authored contributions to the field |Awards, certificates or other |Total |
| |school/district employment |involvement in gifted education|(chapters, curriculum, whitepapers, other |recognition received in gifted or | |
| | | |creative contributions) |related fields | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Evidence of Advocacy and Leadership Experience (based on reference letters and candidate materials)
|Name |Evidence of financial management |Demonstrated potential to contribute |Leadership positions or experience in|Board and volunteer positions |Total |
| |experience |to the Board and the organization in |gifted advocacy or related |outside of NAGC | |
| | |positive ways |organizations outside NAGC | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|Name |Demonstrated potential to contribute relevant and needed expertise—through leadership, knowledge of the field, and understanding of the professional |
| |organization--to the NAGC Board through a constructive and positive approach. Rating scale: 1 to 5 with 1 being little evidence of potential and 5 being |
| |substantial evidence of potential (Based on statement of candidacy and materials) |
| | |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- meridian health team member website
- hmh team member website
- my perfect resume member sign in
- which bts member will you marry
- hackensack meridian team member intra
- which bts member is your boyfriend
- aarp member log in
- another word for member of team
- which bts member are you
- which bts member ideal type are you
- which bts member is most like you
- which bts member is your soulmate