Smith v. City of Philadelphia: Memorandum of Points and ...

Mountain Top Condo., 72 F.3d at 369 (quoting In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig., 695 F.2d 494, 500 (3d Cir. 1982), in turn citing NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345, 366 (1973)). When deciding whether an applicant’s motion is timely, courts consider three factors: “(1) the stage of the proceeding; (2) the prejudice that delay may cause the ... ................
................