A Brief History of the Army Chaplaincy



Civilian Research ProjectThe Readiness of the Army Chaplaincy: Our Sacred HonorbyChaplain (LTC) Karen MeekerUnited States Army35394905504732Under the Direction of:Professor Joseph R. Wood and Dr. Don M. SniderWhile a Fellow at:Institute of World PoliticsUnited States Army War CollegeClass of 2016DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: AApproved for Public ReleaseDistribution is UnlimitedThe views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Army War College is accredited by the Commission on Higher Education of the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, an institutional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEForm Approved--OMB No. 0704-0188The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 01-03-20162. REPORT TYPESTRATEGY RESEARCH PROJECT.333. DATES COVERED (From - To) 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Readiness of the Army Chaplaincy: Our Sacred Honor5a. CONTRACT NUMBER5b. GRANT NUMBER5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER6. AUTHOR(S) Chaplain (LTC) Karen Meeker United States Army5d. PROJECT NUMBER5e. TASK NUMBER5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Faculty Adviser: Professor Joseph R. Wood Host Institution: Institute of World Politics8.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Faculty Mentor: Dr. Don M. Snider U.S. Army War College, 122 Forbes Avenue, Carlisle, PA 1701310.SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Distribution A: Approved for Public Release. Distribution is Unlimited. Please consider submitting to DTIC for worldwide availability? YES: ?x or NO: ? (student check one) Project Adviser recommends DTIC submission? YES: ?x or NO: ? (PA check one) 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESWord Count: 5,58114. ABSTRACT Criteria established by the Department of Defense for the appointment of military chaplains helps shape theological study and the development of religious leaders in the United States. Twice in the past century, the war-time need for chaplains significantly changed such criteria for those appointments. At the turn of the 20th century, civilian religious leaders collaborated to establish degree requirements eventually producing an accredited “gold standard” for graduate theological studies for clergy. At the turn of the 21st century, however, the Armed Forces Chaplain Board (AFCB) lowered appointment standards for religious ministry professionals appointed in the military. In the first case in the 1900’s, the quality of chaplains increased. In the latter case in the early 2000’s, Army readiness declined with the lower standards. In the first instance, civilian religious leaders worked in conjunction with the military. In the second, an engaged civilian-military (civ-mil) dialogue was lacking. In today’s complex military environment nested within religious and cultural change, the need for an enhanced civ-mil partnership between the AFCB and those who endorse candidates for appointment to the military chaplaincy is paramount for achieving the necessary readiness of the Army Chaplaincy. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Ecclesiastical Endorser, Accreditation, Profession, Readiness, Chaplaincy, Religious Ministry Professional16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT SAR18. NUMBER OF PAGES2319a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON a. REPORT UUb. ABSTRACT UUc. THIS PAGE UU19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (w/ area code)Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98), Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18The Readiness of the Army Chaplaincy: Our Sacred Honor(5,581 words) Criteria established by the Department of Defense for the appointment of military chaplains helps shape theological study and the development of religious leaders in the United States. Twice in the past century, the war-time need for chaplains significantly changed such criteria for those appointments. At the turn of the 20th century, civilian religious leaders collaborated to establish degree requirements eventually producing an accredited “gold standard” for graduate theological studies for clergy. At the turn of the 21st century, however, the Armed Forces Chaplain Board (AFCB) lowered appointment standards for religious ministry professionals appointed in the military. In the first case in the 1900’s, the quality of chaplains increased. In the latter case in the early 2000’s, Army readiness declined with the lower standards. In the first instance, civilian religious leaders worked in conjunction with the military. In the second, an engaged civilian-military (civ-mil) dialogue was lacking. In today’s complex military environment nested within religious and cultural change, the need for an enhanced civ-mil partnership between the AFCB and those who endorse candidates for appointment to the military chaplaincy is paramount for achieving the necessary readiness of the Army Chaplaincy. AbstractThe Readiness of the Army Chaplaincy: Our Sacred HonorIn spring 2014, a fatal disease was spreading across West Africa. By the summer, the death toll rose along with fear Ebola was spreading to other parts of the world. As the Center of Disease Control was rushing to find a cure, in mid-September, the President ordered the military to deploy in defense of this threat to the Nation’s security. In three months, three thousand U.S. Troops were on the ground. The U.S. Army, trained to bring overwhelming lethal force to destroy an enemy, was leading the charge to eradicate a global epidemic. The U.S. Army deployed from two different continents to West Africa, a place which lacked natural ports, rail networks, an adequate airport, developed roads, clean water, and internal security. When military leaders speak of an uncertain future in a complex world, the Ebola mission exemplifies the unpredictable nature of emerging threats. The Army needs chaplains who can provide religious support for a myriad of missions around the world. First, this means chaplains need to be able to offer religious rituals to a modern Army in ways which are meaningful and relevant. The Army Chaplaincy summarizes religious support into three competencies: Nurture the living, care for the wounded, and honor the dead. Chaplains must also advise their commands on culturally sensitive issues such as religious implications in the area of cross-cultural operations, unit religious accommodation, ethics, and morale. So how ready is the Army Chaplaincy to meet these challenges? Vital to the readiness of Army Chaplains is the professional qualifications of Religious Ministry Professionals (RMPs) entering service. The Department of Defense (DOD) Instructions sets the appointment criteria for chaplains in the U.S. Armed Services. At two times in the past century, appointment criteria for military chaplains impacted quality of not only chaplains, but also more broadly, theological education in the United States. In the 1900’s, World Wars necessitated more chaplains along with the troop buildups. Leading civilian churches at the time began to standardize the developmental education of clergy. In further cooperation with the new Department of Defense (DOD), appointment standards were increased resulting in improved quality of chaplains. At the turn of the 21st century, however, the Armed Forces Chaplain Board lowered appointment standards which negatively impacted quality. Throughout this short history, the Army receives the best possible religious ministry professionals when appointment criteria are developed in concert with civilian religious leaders. Since military chaplains are not initially educated within the Services, rather in private educational institutions, civilian religious organizations prepare and endorse their religious ministry professionals to serve in the U.S. Armed Forces. The military chaplaincy is predicated on a unique and necessary civilian-military (civ-mil) relationship. This relationship is necessary not only at the time of endorsement, appointment, and throughout a chaplain’s service, but also to collaborate on larger issues such as criteria for qualifying graduate studies, appropriate professional work experience, challenges to religious liberties, chaplain misconduct or failure to adapt, and even what constitutes a religion. Thus civilian endorsers, who represent divergent beliefs and practices as they prepare aspiring chaplains, create religious harmony as they work together with DOD and the Services toward common goals for the good of the Nation. A Brief History of the Army ChaplaincySince the Minute Men “fired the shot heard round the world” on April 19th, 1775, clergy have been a part of America’s military. From the field of Lexington onward, there exists a relationship between a civilian religious body and a chaplain. This relationship was once described by Chaplain Charles W. Hedrick as a “dialectical ambiguity:” That dialectic has always belonged to the basic character of the Army Chaplaincy and it was clearly recognized by the Provincial Congress in the Revolutionary War who accepted chaplains for the Army only when they had received the “leave of their congregations.” The Provincial Congress accepted the service of chaplains as a “loan” from the churches. On July 29, 1775 Congress authorized chaplains to be assigned to regiments and hospitals. Over the next eighty years, chaplains were appointed by state adjutants or by popular vote of a regiment. During the Civil War there were complaints to Congress about the lack of quality among chaplains. President Lincoln’s assistant private secretary, William O. Stoddard recalled Lincoln saying “I do believe that our army chaplains, take them as a class, are the worst men we have in the service.” There was a push to ensure these men had the proper ecclesiastical credentials and moral character to serve as a chaplain. In the late 1800’s, Chaplain Orville Nave, a biblical scholar and renowned author, recognized several areas in which the chaplaincy could become professionalized. For one, he advocated for a higher standard of appointment. He also recommended the creation of an officer’s branch for chaplains so they could be centrally administered. In 1920, the Army Chaplaincy was authorized an Office of the Chief of Chaplains. The duties of the Chiefs of Chaplains were to be the “investigation into the qualifications of candidates for appointment as chaplain, and general coordination and supervision of the work of chaplains.” Two authorizations internal to the military, one for a school in 1918 and the other a centralized authority for oversight in 1920, led to improved quality and developed the profession of the Army chaplaincy. The unique relationship between the military Chaplaincy and external civilian religious groups spawned two organizations: the Armed Forces Chaplains Board (AFCB) and the National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces (NCMAF). These two entities, formed over several decades during the 1900’s, augmented the relationship between the military chaplaincy and the endorsers. The AFCB consists of the Chiefs of Chaplains of all the Services and NCMAF consists of civilian religious organizations who endorse RMPs for service in the military. A brief history below summarizes each entity’s development. In 1915, the Secretaries of the Army and Navy asked the Federal Council of Churches for clergy to serve as chaplains. Catholics, Episcopalians, Methodists, and Presbyterians had already formed commissions within their ecclesiastical organizations in order to select clergy for service in the military. As stated earlier, the Office of the Chief of Chaplains was created in 1920 in part to ensure the proper balance be maintained in this unique civ-mil relationship and, so it was that that office worked with the Federal Council of Churches to prepare and endorse clergy. In 1949, DOD established the AFCB to coordinate religious support efforts both internally with the military and externally with endorsers of civilian religious organizations. The members of the AFCB were the Chiefs of Chaplains from each branch of service. The composition of the AFCB remains the same today except for the addition of the Deputy Chiefs of Chaplains and an Executive Director. The Executive Director holds a position within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Military Personnel Policy (OUSD P&R MPP) and the Colonel or Navy Captain who serves in that position rotates among the Services. The Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 5120.08 outlines the duties of the AFCB:Make recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and the USD(P&R), through the DUSD (MPP), on religious, ethical, and moral matters for the Military Services, and on the following policy matters: protection of the free exercise of religion…; procurement, professional standards, requirements, training, and assignment of military chaplains; all religious support providers; procurement and utilization of supplies, equipment, and facilities for religious use; promotion of dialogue with civilian organizations regarding religious issues; and promotion of joint military endeavor for the delivery of ministry by the Military Services throughout the Department of Defense whenever practicable. The Chair of the AFCB can form advisory committees like the Personnel and Policy Advisory Group (PPAG) to provide recommendations to the board on issues such as appointment criteria, religious accommodation, and chaplain insignia. The National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces (NCMAF) traces its origins to 1902 when the military required ecclesiastical endorsements. NCMAF is a private organization formed in 1982 with an Executive Committee comprised of Endorsers who represent Buddhist, Catholic, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Orthodox, and Protestant chaplains. There are over 200 religious organizations affiliated with NCMAF. They have a full-time staff led by an Executive Director. The Executive Director coordinates with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense and the AFCB on behalf of NCMAF, whose mission is: …to recruit, endorse, and provide oversight for clergypersons who desire to serve as chaplains in any one of the branches of our armed forces. Our common vision is clergy-persons who are credible, committed to their faith, open to all persons, able to meet all military standards, and who represent the highest standards of their own faith communities. NCMAF’s vision states that it “will advocate for the First Amendment and provide a unified voice on religious freedom and religious diversity.” However, in 2004 disunity appeared as twelve endorsers broke from NCMAF and formed the new International Conference of Evangelical Chaplain Endorsers (ICECE). While there are still two groups, NCMAF has received back several of those who left. Increased religious diversity in the military toward the end of the 20th century was reflected in increased representation among endorsers. In 1975, the AFCB listed 110 endorsers mostly consisting of different sects among two major religions: Christianity and Judaism. There were two chaplain branch insignia: the cross for Christians and tablets for Rabbis. Then by 1991, there were 222 endorsers representing an increased number of religions. And by 2011, Army chaplain branch insignia included the cross, tablets, crescent, wheel, and ohm. Origins of Profession and Accreditation of Theological EducationIn the modern era, many occupations are considered professions because of their expert knowledge, specialized education, unique skills, and code of ethics. Today the professions of law and medicine both have longstanding, standardized academic requirements and certifications to become an attorney or a physician. Both require at least three years in residence graduate degrees. To practice law requires not only a Juris Doctorate, but also the passing of the bar which the American Bar Association oversees. In America, to practice medicine, the American Medical Association requires a Medicinae Doctor (M.D.), passing license exams, and completing residency. In theology, the Masters of Divinity (M.Div.) is the qualifying degree for clergy among mainline Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, and Jewish traditions. All three qualifying degrees of theology, law, and medicine are terminal degrees. These comprehensive graduate programs are designed to develop and mature candidates to practice in their chosen field. There is an expectation that clergy, lawyers, and doctors are persons of character with expert knowledge, experience, and unique skills who can be trusted to care for the soul, uphold the law, and do no harm. The military’s need for quality clergy during World War I acted as a catalyst for ecumenism and what would eventually become an accrediting association for theological study and training. “The organization that became The American Association of Theological Schools (AATS), later The Association of Theological Schools (ATS), was born in the shadow of this crisis.” The Federal Council of Churches established a War-Time Commission which in addition to its membership also included the National Catholic War Council and the Jewish Welfare Board (JWB): As a temporary and emergency body, brought into existence to help in meeting the needs of a national crisis, it is free to deal with each situation which may arise in such ways as best to fulfill the purposes of its appointment…those who serve on its committees remain directly responsible to the bodies to which they belong, and it is distinctly understood that this primary responsibility is in no way compromised by their membership on the commission…[it aims] to render the largest service to the nation and to the world in this great and critical time. Thus the First World War brought together the major religious bodies of the time for unprecedented collaboration. By World War II, religious leaders and theological schools were considering standardizing by way of accreditation: The Second World War, which required the standardization of everything from airplane parts to qualifications for the officer corps, would elevate all accredited institutions. This was particularly true of the chaplains, where the military’s task of finding officers qualified to serve as both ministers and leaders was complicated by the seemingly endless array of qualifications for ordination. Graduation from an accredited institution was an easy way to cut through the confusion and enable quick appointments. Following WWII, the Association of Theological Schools (ATS) was firmly in place accrediting theological schools who maintained a prescribed set of academic standards. Military interests were well served by the formation of this accreditation body, and the Army Chaplaincy benefited from several decades of well-educated and developed clergy serving Soldiers and their Families. Standards Lowered 2000-2004In 2000, the Army Chaplaincy considered ways to diversify the religious representation of chaplains so as to support an increase of religions represented in the Army. In 2001, the Army Chaplaincy also needed to increase the number of chaplains to support the war effort in the Middle East. Author and Historian, Chaplain John W. Brinsfield, PhD, wrote, "Force structure gains allowed the Army to reach a high of 1,323 authorized positions for active duty chaplains, the most since the drawdown began in 1991 after Operation Desert Storm." At the same time, the Armed Forces Chaplain Board recommended lowering the academic standards from ninety graduate credit hours to seventy-two hours. They decided to lower academic standards so that religious groups, for example like Islam, which did not have a formalized study of theology in the U.S. and standardized development of their religious leaders, could form a baseline of professionalism. In 2002, the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) published a memorandum no longer requiring a degree from an ATS accredited graduate school. Beginning in 2002, the qualifying graduate school for the chaplaincy needed only accreditation by a regional accrediting body recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. For instance, Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) has no interest per se or specialized requirements for the training of clergy. There is no specification for “in-residence” schooling so all graduate courses could be completed via distance education. The 2002 memorandum also dropped the qualifying graduate degree for the chaplaincy from a three-year resident Masters degree to a seventy-two hour Masters degree. Before 2002, the three-year theological Masters degree was a Masters of Divinity which previously included theology, doctrine, ecclesiastical history, scripture study, ministerial skills, internships, ethics, biblical languages, and polity. The seventy-two hour degree only had recommendations for some courses of study to be included. Many of the unique requirements for a Masters of Divinity which ATS maintained for nearly a century were lost when DOD dropped ATS for regional accreditation. The following excerpts from the Code of Federal Regulations and the Department of Defense shows the policy progression. The December 5th, 1988 Federal Register lists education requirements as:Have completed 3 resident years of graduate professional study in theology or related subjects (normally validated by the possession of a Master of Divinity degree, an equivalent degree, or 90 semester hours) that lead to ecclesiastical certification as a member of the clergy fully qualified to perform the ministering functions of a chaplain. Whereas in the 1993, Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 1304.19 allowed either a government accreditation or ATS:Have completed 3 resident years of graduate professional study in theology or related subjects at an accredited graduate school (normally validated by the possession of a Master of Divinity degree or an equivalent degree) that leads to ecclesiastical certification as a member of the clergy fully qualified to perform the functions of a chaplain. That study shall be completed at an accredited graduate school listed in reference (f) “Accredited Institutions of Post Secondary Education,” current edition or (g) Directory, Association of Theological Schools (ATS) Bulletin, Part, current edition. The Armed Forces Chaplain Board dropped ATS accreditation altogether in the 2004 DODI 1304.28 to accommodate other religions. Standards were also significantly lowered:The RMP [Religious Ministry Professional] is educationally qualified for appointment as a chaplain….A qualifying graduate degree program shall require no fewer than seventy-two semester hours (108 quarter hours) of graduate-level work. Related studies may include graduate courses in pastoral counseling, social work, religious administration, and similar disciplines when one-half of the earned credits include topics in general religion, world religions, the practice of religion, theology, religious philosophy, religious ethics, and/or foundational writings from the applicant’s religious tradition. A seventy-two hour or Masters of Arts degree were typical two-year degree programs for those being endorsed, for example, by the Church of the Latter Day Saints and Christian Scientists. This also allowed applicants to submit a Masters of less than seventy-two hours cobbled with other graduate credits to reach seventy-two hours. Further changes in the DODI 1304.28 published in 2014 reflected slight revisions to the language:…an educationally qualified applicant shall also possess a post-baccalaureate graduate degree in the field of theological or related studies from a qualifying educational institution…Related studies may include graduate courses in [same as listed above from 2004].The language in 2004 lacked the true nature of the profession of religious leaders. The language was so broad as to seem more like social work rather than the unique profession of theology and religion. The 2014 DODI returned to the language “in the field of theological and related studies.”The new standards meant more RMPs could apply for the Army Chaplaincy and help the Army meet war-time requirements. The lowered standards, however, did not immediately translate into increased diversity. In two cases, Christian Army chaplains changed endorsers to represent a different religion. One chaplain was a Baptist who became Buddhist. Another was a Pentecostal who changed to Hindu. Both had qualifying graduate degrees in the Christian tradition, but not in their new religious traditions. Degrees Designed Around the DODILiberty University seized the initiative by designing a new Masters of Divinity (M.Div.) around the lowered standards set by the 2004 DODI 1304.28. With no requirement for residency, the M.Div. could be completed entirely on-line from any location in the world where there was internet access. With no three-year requirement, the seventy-two hour degree could be completed not only in two years, but less if a student was so inclined. Academic practices not permitted under ATS standards could now be liberally applied. Graduate credits were awarded for life experience, Doctor of Ministry credits were awarded for Masters degrees, and undergraduate credits were advanced to graduate credits. Qualifying graduate credits were awarded for military schools and experiences. One applicant for the Army Chaplaincy presented a seventy-two hour Masters of Divinity which was completed in sixteen months to include three months the applicant was attending the Chaplain Basic Officer and Leader Course (CHBOLC) at the U.S. Army Chaplain Center and School (USACHCS) at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. He was awarded nine credit hours for CHBOLC. The applicant presented a degree, minus the military school, was sixty-three credit hours completed in a year. Compare that with what had been a three-year in-residence Masters with many other requisites and one might surmise how the quality of religious ministry professionals was beginning to decline. Liberty soon had several hundred students enrolled. Other schools also designed similar graduate degrees and likewise attracted students: Regent, Columbia International, Ashland Theological School, Denver Seminary, Multnomah, Brigham Young University, Dallas Baptist, Grace College and Seminary, and Baptist Bible Seminary of Summit University. Religious groups such as the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Buddhist Churches of America (BCA) which before had no formalized graduate education programs in the U.S. were now building degree programs based on the 2004 DODI 1304.28. Hartford Seminary is one of the newer theological schools with seventy-two hour programs for Muslim students who are preparing for the military chaplaincy. The appeal of a shorter, online qualifying graduate degree for the military chaplaincy created opportunities for students and schools of traditionally ATS standards to make changes to accommodate the demand. Some students of mainline denominations even switched endorsers who adopted the new standard because they could go through the process at a much quicker pace that was less expensive and did not require leaving jobs and moving to a seminary campus. Declining enrollment and rising costs have been driving factors for seminaries. For example, The United Methodist Church founded seminaries, Boston University’s School of Theology and Claremont School of Theology, developed seventy-two hour Masters degree programs and created multi-faith campuses largely for financial reasons. Decline in Readiness 2008-2010During Operation Enduring Freedom (2008-2010), reports of poor quality chaplain support began to emerge from the field of operations. There were reports of chaplains who were deployed who had never conducted a wedding ceremony or a funeral. Not that there are wedding ceremonies being officiated in combat; there is, however, plenty of marriage counseling which would assume the chaplain has conducted pre-marital and marital counseling under the close supervision and mentorship of their faith group prior to entering military service. There were reports of chaplains who were not sure how to conduct a memorial ceremony because they had never conducted a funeral before entering the military. Just as one would assume a fully qualified physician has completed his or her residency under the close supervision of qualified medical professionals, the same would be expected of a chaplain to conduct religious rites, rituals, and ceremonies. Reversing the Decline 2010-2014The Army Chaplaincy identified the need for further training and development in areas of basic pastoral skills. CHBOLC curriculum was supplemented in counseling and preaching to help incoming religious ministry professionals. Chaplaincy Professional Reinforcement Training (CPRT) was developed by the Training Directorate as a follow on to the Basic Course to augment ministerial skills again in the area of counseling. Many supervisory chaplains provided additional mentorship and training to overcome these gaps as well. In the short term, this improved the level of religious support to the troops and their families. However, in the long term, this approach would prove problematic for DOD and the Services. The responsibility for educating, training, and developing religious ministry professionals belongs to the religious organization which endorses them. By their endorsement for service as a chaplain in the Armed Forces, that religious ministry professional is certified to have performed basic pastoral functions. The responsibility of the Army Chaplaincy is to provide the unique and additional skills, education, and supervision to become a professional military chaplain. These areas of expertise include providing religious support in combat and in garrison, engaging religious leaders on behalf of combatant commanders, advising commanders on unit ethical and morale issues, communicating in a multi-cultural environment, understanding UCMJ and Rule of Law, the First Amendment, and relational issues affecting unit readiness such as suicide, sexual assault, sexual harassment, marriage and family well being, and addictions. RMPs who enter military service need to have a well formed identity as a religious leader with skills and experience in order to then be further trained, developed, and certified in the profession of the military chaplaincy. The Army Chaplaincy took steps between 2010 and 2011 to implement policy while revisions of DODI 1304.28 were staffed with the AFCB. The Army Chaplaincy would not count credit hours awarded for CHBOLC toward the qualifying seventy-two hours graduate degree for the chaplaincy. The Army Chaplaincy understood this to be an appropriate separation of church and state. CHOBLC acculturates RMPs into the Army and develops skills unique to the Army Chaplaincy. In addition, Army Chaplains recommended several revisions to the DODI. They recommended specifying that the qualifying graduate degree must be in theological or “religious” studies and that half of the seventy-two hour degree must include “religious” studies rather than “related” studies. The Army Chaplaincy also recommended that advancing undergraduate credits to graduate credits should not count toward the seventy-two hours and neither should life experience credits, military evaluation credits, and credits for a Doctorate of Ministry. The Army also required the Masters to be one degree and not a combination of degrees and/or graduate credits of seventy-two hours. And, finally, the Army Chaplaincy implemented a policy requiring applicants to have conducted at least one wedding and one funeral.In 2010, the Army Chaplaincy visited with officials at Liberty University. Liberty is the largest evangelical Christian school in the world with 46,000 students. In 2010, there were about 700 students enrolled in their military chaplaincy degree program. Liberty was one of the first and arguably the most influential theological school in the U.S. to design a Masters of Divinity to the 2004 DODI 1304.28. Since the school was providing many chaplains for the Army with hundreds more enrolled in their program, the Army Chaplaincy shared concerns about the quality of incoming chaplains. The Army needed chaplains, fit in every way, for the rigors of combat and this school had young, smart, service oriented students and alumni. As a result of the collaboration, the school increased their academic requirements for the Masters of Divinity for the Military and they began a ninety-three hour chaplaincy degree program in the Fall of 2010. The Army Chaplaincy recommended to the AFCB in August 2011 that applicants complete two years of professional work experience following the qualifying graduate degree for the chaplaincy. The Army Chaplaincy grants a waiver for when the professional work experience occurs, but it does not waive the experience. The waiver had been created to allow for those who came from faith groups like the Baptists where a pastor could have many years leading a church before completing formal theological graduate studies. Between 2008 and 2009, the Army appointed 309 chaplains for active duty in the Army. Nearly half (46%) were granted a waiver for professional work experience. Most applicants requesting a waiver were not experienced pastors but rather those who were using what would be considered a “practicum” or internship required for an ATS Masters of Divinity as professional work experience. For example, some applicants listed service as a Chaplain Assistant or a practicum as a Chaplain Candidate.Only those chaplains who apply for the Regular Army are required to have two years of professional work experience. Those applicants applying for the Army Reserve or National Guard are not required to have any professional work experience prior to commissioning. The prevailing thought behind this policy is to allow new clergy to serve in the National Guard and the Reserve to gain military experience as they are obtaining vocational experience in their civilian ecclesiastical settings. Reserve and Guard duty was seen as an “incubator” for young chaplains who after completing their civilian vocational experience could then enter active duty. The issue that arose during Operation Enduring Freedom in 2008 and Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2011 was that Reserve and Guard units were deploying to combat with newly commissioned chaplains who were appointed with little or no vocational experience. There were some chaplains who had been in the National Guard or Reserve for years who never completed professional work experience as a religious ministry professional. These were chaplains who were teachers or worked in other forms of employment. It was not until they were deployed to combat, that their professional qualifications as a RMP were questioned. Applicants for active duty during 2009-2010 listed varying levels of vocational work experience. For instance, one applicant for active duty listed “assistant to the pastor of visual arts” as fulfillment of the two year professional work experience requirement. After talking with the applicant, his duties included setting up an audio visual projector and helping with power point slides. Further, the applicant was a student at CHBOLC for three months during the two years he listed himself as the assistant pastor of audio visual. He was asked if he travelled to his congregation on the weekends during those three months he was at Fort Jackson. He had not. The applicant was commissioned in the Army Reserve and in two months, he was deployed to combat with a Reserve unit that needed a chaplain. Upon returning from deployment, he took a Reserve position at Fort Bragg as a Family Life Chaplain with no formal training or licensure in Marriage Family Therapy. Thus far, the narrative demonstrates a need for higher standards. While some improvements have been made, there is still more to be done. What follows are two recommendations to advance readiness. RecommendationsFirst, a collaborative effort by military and civilian religious leaders, like that at the turn of the 20th century, could address issues like standards for appointment and the benefit of an accreditation association. The Association of Theological Schools is discussing widening its scope of accreditation to graduate schools of theology of all religions. Other religious faith groups outside of the Jewish Christian traditions have periodically asked ATS to give an informal review of their academic standards to which ATS has provided. Dr. Daniel Aleshire, ATS Executive Director said, “I think that we are on the cusp of a lot change…In 20 years, the whole theological training landscape could be quite different.” There is consensus among seminaries and theological schools that a return to all residence Masters of Divinity degree program is unlikely. The cost of in-residence education has become prohibitive for many who seek vocational degrees. Also, there is a general belief that the Masters of Divinity degree programs will not universally return to three years, all in residence or ninety credit hours. However, Liberty, once again leading the way, established the Center for Chaplaincy and redesigned their Masters of Divinity.” According to Dr. Steven Keith, Liberty dropped the seventy-hour Masters Divinity with nine hundred candidates enrolled in the program. The new ninety-three hour Masters Divinity includes core courses on chaplain leadership, counseling, ethical advisement, preaching, pluralism, and resiliency. Those candidates enrolled in Distance Learning are required to attend six courses in residence, six hours of an internship, and have a personal mentor. Additionally, Liberty underwrites a significant portion of the financial cost so as to provide an affordable degree for those entering the chaplaincy. As AFCB communicates the academic and vocational requirements for those entering military service to endorsers, NCMAF and AFCB can collaborate with ATS and other major stakeholders of theological study in the U.S. to form a generally agreed upon theological accreditation association. A former Chief of Army Chaplains suggested developing “a military chaplaincy educational strategy led by a civilian clergy-military chaplain working group.” This initiative could create a new “platinum standard” of theological education and professional development to produce the RMP needed to serve today’s military. A “platinum standard” of theological education and religious leader development would also ultimately benefit our national security. Religious leaders who are well formed in their religious identity, are critical thinkers, can dialogue in an interfaith context, and understand the nature of religious liberty are more effective and, in those rare cases where the potential exists, less prone to radicalization. Second, to better facilitate communication and collaboration with issues facing the Chaplaincy, DOD should create a position on the AFCB for the Executive Director of NCMAF. NCMAF works with Department of Defense, Congress, and civilian religious organizations, seminaries, and congregations in ways the Chiefs of Chaplains are not designed to do. The 209 endorsers recognized by the Department of Defense are widely diverse. To bring together such a group is fraught with challenge. Extraordinary leadership is required to unite all entities toward the common goal of providing America’s best religious ministry professionals to care for the men and women of the U.S. Armed Services and their families. And a senior member of NCMAF routinely meeting with the AFCB would provide needed communications and perspective in both directions as such leadership is applied.The Present FutureWhen the President directed the military to take the lead to defeat Ebola, 1st Armored Division was ordered to provide one aviation battalion. This battalion would provide Black Hawks and Chinooks to move personnel and supplies in the area of operations. As 1st Armored Division was conducting mission analysis, they discovered a chaplain in the Division who was a native of Monrovia, Liberia. This chaplain not only knew the culture, he also knew the President of this small nation. President Sirleaf was of the same faith as the chaplain and had attended his church. The chaplain knew all of the religious leaders in the capitol of Monrovia and his brother served on the Cabinet. Though the chaplain had recently redeployed from Afghanistan, he volunteered to join the mission for as long as the Command desired. The chaplain offered to help in any way. While the Chaplain Corps would not allow him to break his dwell time and deploy on the mission, the chaplain quickly provided several briefings to the Religious Support Teams deploying to the region. The chaplain gave helpful insight and advisement to the Command and to the chaplains and chaplain assistants. If the chaplain had deployed, he could have potentially acted as a liaison between the Command and the national leaders of Liberia while at the same time performing direct religious support all along the way. This is the present future of the Army Chaplaincy. The Chaplaincy cannot on its own develop a chaplain to meet the demands of today’s Army. Religious ministry professionals must have completed thorough theological education and professional work experience at the time of their appointment. Only then can the Chaplaincy develop them into the professional chaplain ready to support any mission. A civ-mil relationship engaged in a dynamic partnership could once again achieve this lofty and noble goal. It is complicated and it will not be easy, but it is our sacred honor. Endnotes ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download