“IS THERE HOPE FOR AMERICA #1-THE NEW TOLERANCE”
“IS THERE HOPE FOR AMERICA #1-THE NEW TOLERANCE”
ISAIAH 5:20
INTRO: Proverbs 14:34 says, “Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a
reproach to any people.” Friends, our nation has strayed far from its
Christian roots. In their book, What If America Were A Christian Nation
Again?, D. James Kennedy and Jerry Newcombe present a sweeping
analysis of American from its inception to the present day. They
challenge many of today’s beliefs, which have strayed from those of our
founding fathers and are impacting each of our lives in detrimental
ways. Our nation was founded upon the principles of the Bible and
a reliance upon Almighty God! As George Washington said in his first
inaugural address, “[I]t would be peculiarly improper to omit in this
first official act my fervent supplications to the Almighty Being who
rules over the universe, Who presides in the council of nations, and
whose providential aids can supply every human defect.” Sadly, we
have now turned our backs on the God of our founding fathers.
George Washington warned that “reason and experience both forbid us
to expect that national morality can prevail in the exclusion of
religious principles.” Yet America has chosen to exclude religious
principles. (D. James Kennedy with Jerry Newcombe. What If America
Were A Christian Nation Again? p. 41).
On July 9, 1776, upon receiving a copy of the Declaration of
Independence from the Continental Congress, General George
Washington issued orders from his headquarters in New York
authorizing the Continental Army to appoint and pay chaplains in
every regiment.” Washington declared that these chaplains were there
“to see that all inferior officers and soldiers pay them a suitable respect
and attend carefully upon religious exercises.” Why? “The blessing
and protection of Heaven are at all times necessary but especially so in
times of public distress and danger…” (D. James Kennedy with Jerry
Newcombe. What If America Were A Christian Nation Again? p. 41).
Folks, one of the ways in which American has strayed from its
Christian beginnings is the idea of tolerance. The word “tolerance”
simply means “freedom from bigotry or from racial or religious
prejudice.” (Funk & Wagnalls Standard Desk Dictionary. Volume 2. N-
Z. p. 712). Our founding fathers came to this country so that they
might enjoy the freedom of worshipping God in the manner they saw
fit without interference from the government. But the idea of tolerance
has taken on a whole new meaning today. Folks, have you ever
noticed that those people who shout the loudest for tolerance are some
of the most intolerant people you will every meet? They clamor for
freedom of speech but their view of freedom of speech is that you have
complete freedom of speech IF you agree with their views and toe their
line! But woe be unto to you if you dare say that whatever they stand
for is sin according to the Bible.
I want to begin a new series of messages today on the subject, “Is
There Hope for America?” If America is ever going to become a
Christian nation again we MUST go back to the traditional definition of
tolerance and promote it. We also must discern and declare the
difference between good and evil. God says in Isaiah 5:20—“ Woe unto
them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and
light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” God
will not take lightly those who rename evil things good and good things
evil! I want us to see today how THE NEW TOLERANCE manifests
itself in our society and what our Lord and Savior taught about
tolerance:
(1) THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH
ISAIAH 5:2Oa—“ Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil…”.
A. THE BLIGHT OF MODERN REASONING. A myth which is very prevalent
in our society today is “there are no absolutes. All truth is relative.”
ILLUS: Social analysts point out that people turn to religion in times of
crisis and instability. The terrorist attacks on September 11
certainly shattered the stability and comfort of American's lives,
leading to a surge in church attendance and Bible sales
immediately after the attacks. But what is the lingering effect of
the attack and continued tension on people's religious beliefs and
practices? The most startling shift has been in people's views
about moral truth. Given the nature of the terrorist attack, one
might have expected Americans to become more convinced of the
presence of good and evil, and that there are absolute moral
principles that exist regardless of cultural realities and personal
preferences. However, Barna's research showed exactly the
opposite outcome. Prior to the attacks the most recent inquiry
concerning truth views was in January 2000, some 20 months
prior to the terrorist activity. At that time, people were asked if
they believed that "there are moral truths that are absolute,
meaning that those moral truths or principles do not change
according to the circumstances" or that " moral truth always
depends upon the situation, meaning that a person's moral and
ethical decisions depend upon the circumstances." At the start of
2000, almost four out of ten adults (38%) said that there are
absolute moral truths that do not change according to the
circumstances. When the same question was asked in the just-
completed survey, the result was that just two out of ten adults
(22%) claimed to believe in the existence of absolute moral truth.
The people groups least likely to believe in absolute moral truth
were Baby Busters (i.e., those 36 and younger - only 13% embrace
absolute truth), Catholics (16%) and adults who are not born again
Christians (15%). The groups most likely to endorse the existence
of absolute moral truths include Baby Boomers (i.e., people 37 to
55 years of age - 28% of whom embrace absolute truth), adults
who attend non-mainline Protestant churches (32%) and born
again individuals (32%). Interestingly, when people were further
queried as to the source of the principles or standards on which
they base their moral and ethical decisions, the post-attack
survey discovered that only one out of eight adults - just 13% -
cited the Bible. The most common sources of guidance regarding
moral decisions trusted by Americans are feelings (25%) and the
lessons and values they remember from their parents (14%). (How
America's Faith Has Changed Since 9-11. November
26, 2001).
B. THE BACKLASH OF MORAL RELATIVITY. There were millions of
Americans who awoke on 9-11 believing there were no absolutes. They
believed there wasn’t any objective right or wrong. But many of these went
to bed convinced that what the hijackers did was wrong! These people
rallied around President Bush when he declared that the unprovoked
attack was evil. God in His Word has given us the standard to gauge what
is good and what is evil! It is not based upon our own ideas, preferences,
or desires but solely and wholly upon His Word!
ILLUS: “Every word of God is pure: He is a shield unto them that put their
trust in Him.” Proverbs 30:5
Postmodernism tells us that there is no absolute truth. What you
believe is okay. What I believe is okay, too. Whether they agree or
not doesn’t matter. But, in this age of postmodern thought we
must contend with this basic truth: Truth stands alone. It doesn’t
require human interpretation. And let me add that in discussing
Christian Truth, there is a divine disturbance that occurs. I don’t
believe we can be neutral about real truth. If Jesus is God, then
we must bow down and worship. If Jesus is not God, we ought to
boot Him out the door as a liar and a lunatic. You must decide.
There is no neutral ground. Either you are with Him, or you are
against Him. --Adrian Rogers (Bible Illustrator For Windows.
Version 3.0f. Copyright 1990-1998 by Parsons Technology, Inc.
All Rights Reserved).
ILLUS: Dr. Paul Vitz, professor at New York University, observes that the
moral decline in America is directly related to the widespread
acceptance of this myth [moral relativity]: “One of the major
characteristics of moral decline in the United States in recent
decades has been the rapid growth of moral relativism” (D. James
Kennedy with Jerry Newcombe. What If America Were A Christian
Nation Again? p. 74).
But friends, moral relatively has a problem, a snag: “If there
aren’t any absolutes, if everything is relative to our circumstances, if
everything is culturally initiated, if we cannot impose our culture upon
another culture, then how dare we condemn and declare the Nazis were
wrong for killing millions of people?” See folks, there’s the backlash! When
we “call evil good and good evil,” we are faced with a dilemma. That’s where
THE NEW TOLERANCE comes in.
(2) THE NEW TOLERANCE
ISAIAH 5:20b—“ Woe unto them…that put darkness for light, and light for
darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
A. A CONCRETE DEFINITION. Probably all of us know the definition of
tolerance. It means “to put up with or bear with those who hold differing
views, beliefs, values, or lifestyles than what we agree with.” If you are a
Christian, you will try to be kind and tolerant to these people even though
you don’t hold their viewpoint. This has been the definition that almost all
have held to until recently. When something is concrete it means “specific”
(Funk & Wagnalls Standard Desk Dictionary. Volume 1. A-M. p. 131). The
concrete definition of tolerance is motivated by what we call The Golden
Rule—“ Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you,
do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.” (Matthew 7:12).
B. A CULTURAL DECISION. It seems that very quickly our society and
culture has decided to redefine the meaning of tolerance. The definition of
tolerance has gone through a dramatic change. According to Josh McDowell
and Bob Hostettler in their book, The New Tolerance: “The new tolerance is
that we are not only to put up with values, habits, lifestyles, and beliefs
differing from our own, but we are to accept those values, those lifestyles,
those beliefs as absolutely equal to, as valid as, our own.” This new
tolerance is being pounded in to the minds and hearts of scores of millions
of students each week. So your religious beliefs are not better than anyone
else’s since, after all, every thing is relative. And your since your beliefs are
not any better than theirs, and since your moral views are not superior to
their moral views—no matter if they are little more than alley cats in their
sexual life—you cannot impose your view upon them. And if you don’t
accept their lifestyles, their beliefs, their habits, you are an intolerant bigot.
Kids by the millions have been called that in front of their classmates in the
classrooms of this country. Most them, indeed quake, before such an
assault. Well, any person who gives up a belief in moral absolutes and the
absolute truth of the faith will be incapable of distinguishing right from
wrong, and will, as McDowell and Hostettler say, be powerless to resist
temptations and choose the right. This is what is happening in our schools
today. We have moved from respect for a person to accept of wrong. (D.
James Kennedy with Jerry Newcombe. What If America Were A Christian
Nation Again? Pp. 76-77).
Folks, all of this is taking place because our society has forsaken God and
His Word! Listen what is taking place in light of this NEW TOLERANCE:
➢ In New York City’s medical schools, effective 2002, every student has to participate in on-the-job abortion training and must perform abortions, regardless of his or her opinion on the grisly trade of the abortionist. Failure to participate results in failure to graduate. Before this, it was an elective; now it is required.
➢ In Ohio, several nurses were reprimanded and penalized because they protested participating in therapeutic abortion procedures on religious grounds.
➢ At Stanford University, the gay and lesbian alliance promotes a shorts day each spring during which people are exhorted to wear shorts to show their support for homosexual lifestyles. It just so happens that most of the students wear shorts every day, so they are put in a position of either having to change their dress or appear to support what is being done.
➢ In another college, students who indicated their disapproval of the homosexual lifestyle were forced to watch hours of XXX-rated pornographic homoerotic films while being observed by a professor. If the students showed any sings of disgust or revulsion, they were forced to watch more films. Sound like the Chinese communist’s reeducation camps? (D. James Kennedy with Jerry Newcombe. What If America Were A Christian Nation Again? Pp. 77-78).
THE NEW TOLERANCE manifests itself by declaring: THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH and THE NEW TOLERANCE justifies itself by changing the definition of tolerance but also note THE NEW TOLERANCE says…
(3) THERE SHOULD BE NO CRITICISM OR CONDEMNATION OF
HOMOSEXUALITY
ISAIAH 5:20—“Woe unto them that call evil good…”
LEVITICUS—“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
abomination.”
A. THE CHANGING FACE OF AMERICA. Even though God, in His Word,
condemns this sinful practice; our society is not only embracing it but
calling it good! God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. In
Canada, our neighbor to the north, anyone who reads Romans 1 or any
other passage of Scripture from the Bible condemning homosexuality, is
going straight to jail. And folks, if the Lord tarries, it will happen in
our country also.
ILLUS: FBI examines pastor's sermons on abortion & homosexuality
Feb 2, 2005 /By Lee Warren/
MOUNT VERNON, Ill. (BP)--Nov. 23, 2004, started out like any
other normal morning for Randy Steele, senior pastor at Southwest
Christian Church in Mount Vernon, Ill., a town about 80 miles
southeast of St. Louis. One of the longtime members of his church
was on her deathbed and he planned to spend the day consoling
her family. Then the phone rang.
It was the FBI. Steele said they wanted to meet with him
personally. After agreeing to a time later that same afternoon, he
said his first thoughts turned to his congregation. "I was
wondering what somebody in my church might have done," Steele
said. "So I was in a lot of prayer asking God to give me the right
words to say." When two FBI agents arrived at the church, Steele
said they traded small talk for a few minutes before the suspense
got to him and he asked about the nature of their visit.
Their answer stunned him.
"One guy opened a file," Steele said. "And he said, 'This is
pertaining to a sermon that you preached on Memorial Day.'"
On Memorial Day 2004, Steele was in the middle of preaching a
sermon series he called "Life Issues" dealing with controversial
cultural issues from a biblical perspective. One such sermon was
about abortion and Steele chose Memorial Day to preach about it.
"I shared the number of people who have died in wars versus the
number who had died through 'legal' abortion since 1973," Steele
said. "I stated that we are in a different type of war that is being
fought under the 'presupposition of freedom.'" Steele said that he
went on to name an abortion clinic in Granite City, Ill., a city just
outside St. Louis, and pointed out that they perform as many as
45 abortions per week. Somebody in the church that day
apparently misunderstood Steele's "different type of war" comment
to mean that he was actually calling his congregation to a physical
war against abortion clinics, so he or she placed an anonymous
phone call to the FBI.
The informant allegedly told the FBI that in addition to Steele
calling for a war against abortion clinics, he also said he was
willing to go to jail over such a cause. Steele said that he had
spoken about his willingness to go to jail, but that he made those
remarks in a different sermon that dealt with homosexuality from
the same sermon series. "I had mentioned a pastor in Canada who
had been arrested for speaking about homosexuality in his
church," Steele said. The pastor said he went on to tell his
congregation that "if speaking the truth means that we go to jail,
then by golly, that's where I'm going to be and I'm going to save
you a seat next to me." "That was the major gist of why [the FBI]
felt like they could come here and look through my sermons,"
Steele said.
Marshall Stone, FBI supervisory special agent and media
coordinator for the Springfield (Ill.) division of the FBI, was
unwilling to speak specifically about the FBI's visit to Southwest
Christian Church, but when asked to speak in general terms about
whether the FBI normally looks through pastors' sermons after
receiving anonymous tips about them being a possible danger, he
did offer a few comments. "I don't know that there's any case
where we would say, 'This is typical,'" Stone said. "Each complaint,
each investigation is followed up based upon facts and specific
circumstances of that complaint, allegation or investigation."
Since there aren't any typical cases, Stone was asked if FBI agents
would make a determination on site regarding whether to examine
a pastor's sermons. He responded in the affirmative. Steele said
that after the two FBI agents examined his two sermons in
question, they realized he was not a physical threat to abortion
clinics and apparently dropped their investigation.
When asked whether a case like this would be dropped on site,
Stone said, "We get complaint calls or allegations all the time –
whether it's over e-mail, telephone or letters. We do a lot of looking
into things on the surface to make a determination of whether
there's something we need to be doing and make determinations
all the time that there is nothing there that we need to be
concerned about or have jurisdiction over. So, technically there's
nothing to drop if it's looked into without ever opening a formal
investigation."
Steele said he was initially a little irritated that the FBI would ask
to see his sermons, especially since he had to take time away from
the grieving family in his congregation to answer questions, but he
said he has no plans to stop preaching messages that are
culturally relevant. "As a pastor I believe that as Christians we are
called to speak the truth no matter what," Steele said. "And we
have to continue to speak that truth in love to all people and to
share the message of Christ because it's the only message that's
going to change the lives of people."
Roger Lipe, senior pastor at Woodlawn Baptist Church, a Southern
Baptist Convention congregation, in nearby Woodlawn, Ill., agreed
with Steele's position of speaking the truth in love to a culture that
isn't always going to be tolerant of such a message. "Just look at
what's happening in our society and what's happening in Canada –
- the laws that have been made there -- and the pressure on
Americans today to enforce hate crime laws," Lipe said. "Obviously
it's going to mean that someday when you [as a pastor] get into
your own pulpit, your own church, among your own people to
preach against subjects like abortion and homosexuality and other
biblical things that we've got to preach on, then there's probably
going to be a price to pray."
In spite of his admitted initial irritation about being questioned by
the FBI, Steele said that after his meeting with the two agents, he
printed off the two sermons, handed them to the agents and
invited them back to his church hoping that as private citizens
they might be interested in hearing the Word of God. //Story
provided courtesy of The Pathway, news journal of the Missouri
Baptist Convention. Lee Warren is a freelance writer in Omaha,
Neb.//
Friends, the face of America is changing! But we must stand strong in our
faith and courageous in our witness. Ephesians 5:6-11 tells us, “Let no
man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the
wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore
partakers with them. For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light
in the Lord: walk as children of light: (For the fruit of the Spirit is in all
goodness and righteousness and truth;) Proving what is acceptable unto the
Lord. And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but
rather reprove them.”
B. THE CHALLENGE TO THE FAITH OF AMERICA. No only is THE NEW
TOLERANCE changing the face of America but also it is a challenge to the
faith of America. Psalm 33:12 says—“Blessed is the nation whose God is the
LORD…”. Swiftly, we see our country setting God aside and making Him
to feel as unwelcomed guest in our society and lives! Many are trying to
change the character of God to justify their sin and wickedness.
ILLUS: HOMOSEXUAL EPISCOPAL BISHOP IMPLIES THAT JESUS WAS
"GAY."
Friday Church News Notes, April 15, 2005 (Fundamental Baptist
Information Service, fbns@, 866-
295-4143) - V. Gene Robinson, the homosexual who was ordained
a bishop in the Episcopal Church in America in 2003, implied
recently that the Lord Jesus might have been "gay." Speaking at
Christ Church of Hamilton and Wenham, Mass., he said: "...this
man that we follow was single, as far as we know, traveled with a
bunch of men, had a disciple who was known as 'the one whom
Jesus loved'..." ("Rev. Gene Robinson: Jesus might be gay,"
WorldNetDaily, April 3). Undaunted by the criticism against his
ordination, he declared, "God's light and God's life ooze over me
like warm butter." The Bible identifies that "ooze" more precisely as
the spirit of the devil. "Wherein in time past ye walked according to
the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the
air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience"
(Eph. 2:2). "But there were false prophets also among the people,
even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall
bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought
them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many
shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of
truth shall be evil spoken of" (2 Pet. 2:1-2).
Advocates for political correctness have been the leading force in THE NEW
TOLERANCE. Polls have repeatedly shown that high-school students in
this country believe that you cannot criticize anything that anyone believes
without finding fault with that person. Therefore, if you have a discussion
of atheism with an atheist, you are finding fault with that man and
criticizing his views. You can’t separate the two. The same is true of a
homosexual. You cannot have a rational discussion of the rightness or
wrongness of homosexuality, because if you find any fault with it, you are
finding fault with that person, who will tell you, “What I do is what I am,”
and you cannot divide the two. (D. James Kennedy with Jerry Newcombe.
What If America Were A Christian Nation Again? p. 79).
But folks, that just isn’t true! Jesus did! He loved the sinner but hated the
sin!
THE NEW TOLERANCE manifests itself by declaring: THERE ARE NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH and THE NEW TOLERANCE justifies itself by changing the definition of tolerance, THE NEW TOLERANCE says THERE SHOULD BE NO CRITICISM OR CONDEMNATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY and finally let us see…
(4) THE LORD CONDEMNED SIN AND PRACTICED TOLERANCE
MATTHEW 9:36—“And Jesus went about all the cities and villages,
teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the
kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the
people. But when he saw the multitudes, he was moved with
compassion on them, because they fainted, and were scattered
abroad, as sheep having no shepherd. Then saith he unto his
disciples, The harvest truly is plenteous, but the laborers are few;
Pray ye therefore the Lord of the harvest, that he will send forth
laborers into his harvest.”
JOHN 8:10-11—“When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the
woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.”
A. THE LORD OPENLY CONDEMNED SIN. Can anyone question the
compassion of our Lord Jesus? Jesus loved people. Jesus loved sinners!
In fact it was for sinners that He died (John 3:16). But even though Jesus
loved people he did condone their sinful beliefs or behavior. Jesus told the
woman caught in adultery in John 8:11—“… Neither do I condemn thee: go,
and sin no more.” Jesus did not condone her sin but called for
repentance—“ go, and sin no more.” The Lord “He is very merciful, but does
not excuse sin.” (B. W. Johnson. The People’s New Testament. e-Sword.
Version 7.6.1. Copyright 2000-2005. Rick Meyers. All Rights Reserved
Worldwide). Some say that Jesus never condemned homosexuality. But
this only shows their ignorance of the Scripture. In Mark 7:20-23 Jesus
said—“ That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from
within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications,
murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil
eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within,
and defile the man.” I want you to note in v21 the word “fornications” it is
our English translation of the Greek word “porneia”. From this we get our
word “pornography.” This word stood for a laundry list of sexual sins
which every first-century Jew would understand: premarital sex, adultery,
homosexuality, incest, and bestiality. When Jesus condemned “porneia”,
He certainly condemned homosexuality. But to say things like that today
makes you intolerant in the eyes of the “political correctness” crowd.
Friends, Jesus confronted sinners, and we are to do it as well! We must
confront them with the Gospel and lay before the choice of life or death;
blessing or cursing. There is coming a day when we may suffer persecution
for doing so. But for far too long has God’s people kept silent for fear of
offending someone! It’s time for us to get involved! Christianity is not a
spectator sport! We must stand up with courage and conviction for the
things we believe and not back down from them!
B. THE LORD OFFERED COMPASSION AND SALVATION. Even though our
Lord condemned sin, He offered compassion and salvation to the sinner. In
John 8:12 Jesus said—“ I am the light of the world: he that followeth me
shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.” See friends, it
was the compassion of our Lord Jesus that moved Him to die for our
salvation! It is His grace which changes the sinner into the saint, the hell
bound into the heaven bound, and the useless into the useful.
ILLUS: “According as His divine power hath given unto us all things that
pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him that
hath called us to glory and virtue.” 2 Peter 1:3
A violinist stepped out onto stage one evening and drew the bow
across his violin. The room fell silent as out came the most
glorious music the audience had ever heard. When he finished, the
crowd leaped to their feet and gave ovation after ovation. What
happened next, shocked everyone speechless. The violinist broke
the violin on the podium into a thousand pieces. He looked at the
audience and said, “Ladies and gentlemen, don’t be dismayed. This
was only a three and a half dollar violin. It is not so much the
violin that makes the music as it is the man who draws the bow.”
Little is so much when God is in it. God can take a life that may be
comparable to a $3.50 violin and turn it into a masterpiece. –
Adrian Rogers (Bible Illustrator For Windows. Version 3.0f.
Copyright 1990-1998, by Parsons Technology, Inc. All Rights
Reserved).
God’s grace can change any sinner and deliver any soul headed for
destruction (2 Corinthians 5:17).
‘
CLOSING: THE NEW TOLERANCE manifests itself by declaring: THERE ARE
NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH and THE NEW TOLERANCE justifies itself
by changing the definition of tolerance, THE NEW TOLERANCE
says THERE SHOULD BE NO CRITICISM OR CONDEMNATION OF
HOMOSEXUALITY but THE LORD CONDEMNED SIN AND
PRACTICED TOLERANCE.
A survivor of the Holocaust said of the new tolerance, “That is what
happened to the Jews. They first ridiculed them. They laughed at
them. They drew political cartoons with Jews depicted as rats.
And then they began to condemn them, then to silence them. They
Began to persecute them. And then they began to imprison them.
Finally they began to kill them.” The new tolerance leads to
intolerance. In Madison, Wisconsin, a few years ago, militant
homosexuals surrounded a Church that dared to speak out against
the homosexual agenda…one of the protestors is yelling at the top
of her lungs, “Bring back the lions! Bring back the lions!” The
others around her clearly approved of her message: it’s time for
Christians to again be thrown to the lions. (D. James Kennedy with
Jerry Newcombe. What If America Were A Christian Nation Again? p.
80).
Folks, those who shout the loudest for tolerance are some of the
least tolerant people you will find when it comes to conservative
Christians! The only answer is found in the love, grace and mercy
of our Lord Jesus Christ to change the hearts and lives of people!
Friends, in a Christ-like way we MUST stand and witness for the
true righteousness of our Holy God! Will you do that? Will you
stand up for Jesus? The ONLY HOPE America has is JESUS!
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- is there viagra for women
- is there a deadline for the fafsa
- is there medication for schizophrenia
- male femininity page 1 the new age
- why is there suffering in the world
- why is there evil in the world
- is there a new moon tonight
- is there medical marijuana in new york
- is there a new virus
- is there whatsapp for ipad
- is there surgery for glaucoma
- is there a new version of windows