Changing from Level 4 to Level 5: The Key Principles of ...



The difference between writing at level 4, 5 and 6

Starting Out: Writing at Level 4

Rule 1: Don’t rely totally on what you have learnt before!

Writing at level 4 is a whole new world. It doesn’t matter what background you come from, whether you have a degree, A Levels, GCE/GCSE’s, NVQ’s or Access qualifications, one of the most important things to recognize is that there are new rules to think about and new requirements for writing at this level. It is essential that you understand what these are first, before you try writing any assignment.

You may think that you already know all about writing essays. If you got good marks in any of your coursework, (before you started this programme) you might feel that you already know how to write at Level 4. Be careful. Writing styles that got you good marks before, may not do so now, unless you understand exactly what we are looking for.

Rule 2: Make sure you meet the learning outcomes

In the every module descriptor you will find a list of learning outcomes. These are a list of what you should have achieved, (in terms of knowledge, insight and understanding), by the end of your module. It is essential to appreciate that all your assessments will be based on checking whether you have achieved these outcomes. Therefore, you need to be very certain of what you should be achieving for each module and make sure that the content of any essays (or other theoretical assignments you write) meet these outcomes.

Rule 3: Use your tutors

The tutors/lecturers who teach you on your module are the people who will be marking your assessments at the end of the module. They are responsible for ensuring that all the content they teach, enables you to achieve the required learning outcomes. While you are being taught by them, make sure that you understand how what you are taught relates to the requirements of the assessment. Ask your lecturer/tutor’s advice on what they are looking for in the assignment. Take the opportunity to discuss how key points you have learnt in the lesson could be used in your assessment.

The tutors cannot write your coursework for you, but they are valuable resources in terms of understanding the requirements of the assessment. It is essential that you do not just sit back and expect everything to be taught to you. Take an active part in class. Keep focused on the learning outcomes and check with your tutors that you have fully understood the key issues. Your lecturers can provide invaluable guidance and can be depended upon to be more “user-friendly” than a textbook or internet web-site. Use them.

Rule 4: Make sure you understand the marking criteria

There are different criteria for Level 4, 5 and 6. This is because the requirements for academic writing become harder and more exacting as you progress up the levels.

Every level, however, is judged by the same key components of academic writing. These are:

• organisation and coherence,

• content,

• level of analysis and synthesis,

• use of literature and quality of referencing

• clarity of expression.

Organisation and Coherence

The way that you structure your assignment is very important. There are rules about this that you must understand. It’s simple: follow the rules and you gain marks. Ignore the rules and you will probably fail your assessment.

Rule 1: Every assignment must have an introduction

Writing a good introduction is quite an art. Don’t rely totally on your past experience of writing essays. Check with your tutor/lecturer on your module how they like the assignment to start. Each assignment will have slightly different requirements. Some of these will be explained in the assessment section of the module study guide, but it is always best to check with the teachers who will be marking your assessments to see what they prefer.

There are some general requirements for an introduction though:

• Make sure you identify the key issues that you will be discussing in the essay

• Make sure you provide definitions for the key terms that you introduce, whether they are professional, physiological , medical or even general (e.g. the nursing process, homeostasis, congestive cardiac failure, responsibility)

• Make sure you focus immediately on the exact requirements of the essay. Waffle may have helped you pass assessments in the past, but it will definitely not help you in this programme. There is key knowledge, understanding and insight which it is essential.

Rule 2: The main body of the assignment must be logical and make sense

You will be judged on coherence. Something is coherent if it is intelligible and “holds together”. This means that you must put your information down logically, so that the sentences connect together in a way that makes sense. This means that you should not submit the first draft that you write. Get the information down and then check whether it is in the right place. You should spend time rearranging the main points until you are quite sure that they are in a logical order that makes sense, instead of jumping about all over the place. Logical thought is an essential academic requirement. It is worth taking time at this point in the programme to think about how to present the information in the clearest way, which will be easy for the marker to follow and will get you the best possible marks.

Rule 3: Always take care to write a properly constructed conclusion

Like the introduction, writing a good conclusion is an art. It is also an essential academic skill. This is because the conclusion is your opportunity to present, and comment, on what you believe are the most important points. Many students lose valuable marks in the conclusion, because they fail to understand how important it is to get it right.

A common error is to simply write what you have done.

For example: “Therefore, in conclusion, this essay has looked at the needs of a patient with congestive cardiac failure and talked about the Activities of Daily Living Model. The patient had many needs and the model identified what needed to be done. I think the patient got good care and it was a good experience for me.” This is a missed opportunity to show what you have learned and the insight you have gained.

A better conclusion would be:

“In conclusion, the Roper Activities of Living Model helped to identify that the key need for this patient was to relieve the distress caused by both her breathlessness and immobility. The Roper model encourages nurses to assess patients from a biopsychosocial perspective and this enabled insight into the fact that this patient’s social problems were considerably exacerbating her anxiety and resulting dyspnoea and immobility. This case study, therefore, has highlighted the importance of using an appropriate nursing model to ensure that the holistic needs of patients are addressed, resulting in good nursing care and a good experience for both the patient and the nurse.

The final sentence in this conclusion also highlights another key factor in the construction of a conclusion: the “aah” factor. It is important to appreciate that your lecturers aim to teach in a way that inspires insight and understanding into the way nursing should be and the standards nurses should aspire to. The last sentence of the conclusion, should display a final pleasing insight that shows that you have grown and developed regarding your appreciation of what nursing is about. It should make the marker feel good about you as a person and as a nurse, generating an “aah, isn’t that nice” reaction.

Do not underestimate the power of the “aah” factor. The last sentence of the assignment may well influence the final mark. A careless ending suggests laziness and lack of appreciation of the relevance and importance of the assignment. It creates a poor impression. A carefully worded sentence at the end should lift the marker’s spirits and even encourage generosity in allocation of marks. Don’t dash it off in a hurry five minutes before you are due to hand in your assignment. Think about it.

Content

The key to success in achieving high marks in the content section is that you have followed the assessment guidelines. This may sound simplistic, but so many students lose valuable marks because they have failed to appreciate that the assessment has certain key characteristics that the markers are expecting and must be fulfilled.

For example, if the essay requires you to write on professional, legal and ethical issues and you choose only to concentrate on professional and ethical, then you will almost certainly fail. Miss out key content and you could lose a substantial number of marks. Again, the rule is “don’t rely totally on what you have done in the past”. Many of the assignments that you have to complete on this course will be different from anything that you have encountered before. Your responsibility is to make sure that you fully understand exactly what is required of you, before you start writing.

The other element to writing assignments is an essential requirement to apply theory to practice. You need to demonstrate that, not only do you understand the theory, but you understand the extra implications, or difficulties of implementing this in practice. (For example, knowing about the dangers of smoking is a very different issue to actually empowering a patient to give up smoking for the good of their health).

Another aspect which will gain you marks in the content section is the use of originality and creativity. Originality means having new ideas, or interpreting old ideas in a new and different way. Creativity is judged by your ability to apply these new ideas to practice.

You need to be careful, however, in how you demonstrate this. Your first priority is to demonstrate that you fully understand the theory. Once you have done this, you can then make suggestions of different ways this could be applied in practice, or show a new interpretation of an established theory.

Don’t worry if new ideas do not spring to mind. Creativity and originality in academic writing is a skill that develops with practice. It is not an essential quality in Level 4 writing, although displaying some evidence that you are thinking of different ways of applying what you have learnt will gain you higher marks in this section.

Level of Analysis and Synthesis

At this level (4), it is best to consider analysis as your ability to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of the information you have found. For example, diuretics are very useful drugs in the treatment of cardiac failure, because they reduce the circulating blood volume and therefore strain on the heart, enabling it to operate at a lower pressure. This is the great strength of these drugs in treating heart disease. Their weakness, however, is that they cause the flushing out of the body of vital electrolytes such as potassium which are needed for the efficient contraction of the heart muscle.

In nursing studies it is possible to find strengths and weaknesses in all our nursing care and in the related psychology, sociology and physiology that supports it. By showing your appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of an issue, you are showing an holistic understanding, which is fundamental to nursing (i.e. that you are able to appreciate all the related elements, not just some).

Synthesis, at Level 4, is the way you are able to develop your ideas from the information you have found (just like photosynthesis is the development of energy from light).

The other element that is looked for is integration. This is the quality that has already been talked about, which is the way that you are able to apply theory to practice. Sometimes, you may be asked in your assignment to use reflection in this process. In this way, you can use personal experiences to help to demonstrate how the theory is applied in reality. (For example, describing how an individual patient reacted when you first approached him about the need to stop smoking).

Use of literature and referencing

So far, in these guidelines you have been encouraged to think about ideas and views that you can write. This is an important part of academic writing, being able to demonstrate your own interpretation of the available theory. However, you have to be extremely careful about the way that you present these ideas.

At this level (4), it is much safer to make sure that you provide the examples from the literature first and carefully reference these before you go on to make your own comments, or describe your own reflections.

For example writing something like this will gain you very few marks.

“Communication in nursing is the most important thing of all. When I approach the patients on the ward I am very careful to make sure that I establish eye contact first and hold their hand to show that I care about them. Non verbal communication is just as important as verbal communication”.

There is nothing wrong at all in the sentiments shown in this passage. They show a caring person, who understands the importance of using both verbal and non-verbal communication. However, there has been no demonstration of where this information has come from, so no marks can be given for use of literature or referencing.

A much better way would be as follows:

“Many authors, such as Burnard (2003), Kemp and Smith (2004) and Jones (2001), agree that communication is the most important therapeutic skill in nursing. However, Brown (2005) emphasizes that nurses must appreciate that non-verbal communication, through eye contact and touch particularly, is an essential pre-requisite to establishing a rapport and trusting relationship with patients, before verbal communication commences. In my own experience, on my most recent placement on a surgical ward, I found that patients responded positively to me (when I wanted to give them information about their operations), if I established eye contact first and also reached out to touch their arm or hold their hand.”

You could then go on to explore the pro’s and con’s of using touch (e.g. cultural and gender differences in the acceptability of using touch to communicate). Again, it would be essential to do your reading first to get examples of different authors views on the matter, before you give your own or describe your own experiences.

To gain maximum marks for referencing, you must follow the guidelines provided by TVU. These explain how to reference authors in your essay and in the reference list at the end of the essay. Take time to learn the rules. Check with your tutors if you are unsure.

Please be advised that the markers take referencing very seriously. Any inaccuracies will immediately lose you marks. One of the common mistakes, is that students will cite a reference in their essay (e.g. Jones (2001) and then forget to put the full reference for Jones in the reference list. The markers will check that all authors cited are fully referenced at the end of the essay, so don’t take a chance.

Clarity of expression

The key to good academic writing is the use of clear English, containing correct spelling, grammar and punctuation. Your writing style must not be colloquial. For example:

“When we have done the obs and done lots of walking with him he was well chuffed”.

The use of English must be professional:

“After performing routine observations for blood pressure and pulse, (to check the patient was not tachycardic or hypotensive), we were able to help the patient to mobilise. He was able to walk for a significant distance and was extremely pleased with his achievement”.

Words like “done” and “lots” and “well chuffed” are inappropriate. All these concepts can be rephrased into more correct English.

Make use of the ‘spell check’ and grammar check on your computer. However, be aware that the Word programme uses an American dictionary and may ask you to change words unnecessarily, because the English version varies from the American. The green line on the Word programme (for grammatical errors), however, is useful. It can often warn you that your sentences are overlong. The use of punctuation, (particularly full stops to make shorter sentences) can greatly improve the clarity of your writing.

Proof reading is essential before submitting your assignment. This is because the computer may not pick up a spelling error, if your error is an actual word. Also, it is sometimes easier to see an error on paper, rather than on screen, so printing off a copy and checking it before submission is always sensible.

A fresh eye is often a good idea. After a while you may not be able to see your own mistakes, but a friend or relative may notice them as they read your assignment. Be warned, however, that in submitting your assignment you sign a declaration that the work is entirely your own. Do not allow your proof readers to become co-authors, or you could risk being disciplined for cheating.

If you are aware that you have difficulties in academic writing, because of dyslexia or any other problem, please approach our support services as early as possible, where trained professionals will be able to provide individual advice to meet your learning needs. The earlier you approach them, the more time they will have to help you through the programme.

The last rule of all is to give yourself enough time to write your assignments. Don’t leave them to the last minute. Again, this “write it the night before it’s due in” tactic may have been a successful practice that you have used in the past, but it’s a dangerous one to use now. All your assignments are demanding and are made more so by the fact that you will often be working full time on your clinical placements, while being required to write your theoretical assignments.

Start as early as you can. Be prepared to write more than one draft. You need to adjust your work until you are quite sure it has met all the requirements and that your academic style is correct.

Good luck in all your Level 4 work.

Moving from Level 4 to Level 5: A Guide to the Key Principles of Writing

When you move from Level 4 to Level 5 the expectations of the tutors, who are marking your assignments, change. The next sections in this guide should give you some clues as to how your academic writing needs to develop, as you move from Level 4 to 5.

Organisation and Coherence:

At Level 4, you would have been learning how to structure your essay properly by writing an appropriate introduction and following with the main body and conclusion. Because this is not an easy skill, recognition is given at Level 4 for the degree of learning and the effort required to structure your essay and present it clearly (organisation) and present your arguments logically, so that they make sense (coherence).

At Level 5, however, the expectations have changed. It is expected that at this level, you already know how to structure an essay, so the marks awarded simply for putting your facts in the right order and ensuring you have an introduction, main body and conclusion are reduced.

However, be warned, these are not easy marks to get at Level 5. Your aim should be stated in the first sentence of your essay and you should clearly identify what you are attempting to achieve in your essay: (e.g. The overall aim of this essay is to discuss the implications of using the Orem model to deliver nursing care for a patient suffering from a stroke).

You then need to clearly state how you intend to achieve this aim, by stating your objectives: (e.g. This will be achieved by using the Orem model as a framework to identify the biopsychosocial needs of an 89 year old patient recovering from a left sided hemiplegia).

You should then identify the key issues that you intend to address within your essay: (The key issues that will be explored/investigated/discussed/analysed (you choose the most appropriate word) are the physiological complications following arterial occlusion, body image and the role of the family in rehabilitation).

Your module leaders will give you guidance concerning the aim and objectives they wish you to achieve. These are determined by the learning outcomes that are clearly stated in the early section of your module study guide for each module. The entire point of your theoretical assessments is to check that you have achieved these outcomes, so you need to gain advice from the lecturers during your study weeks to check exactly how they would like you to achieve these learning outcomes in your essay.

Please remember that you need to structure your conclusion correctly to gain full marks for organisation and coherence. Your conclusion should clearly and concisely summarise the key issues you have presented in your essay. There should be no use of references in this section, because it should be your personal interpretation of the arguments you have presented in your essay.

Content

By the time you reach Level 5, it is not the selection of the content alone which is the most important factor, but rather the way you analyse the material you have selected. For this reason the marks for your ability to analyse increase significantly at Level 5. This will be explained more in the analysis section later.

To get good marks for content at Level 5, you must show an improved ability to apply theory to practice. As you get better at doing this, (as you move from level 4 to level 5) we would expect you to start displaying more originality and creativity in the way you use the literature (you have selected) to try to explain the nursing care (you have witnessed), or the nursing issue under discussion. This means you are not just simply copying information from books, but using your own critical skills to try to make a link between what you have read and what you have seen in your clinical placements.

Clarity of Expression

Never underestimate the importance of writing clearly, using correct sentence construction, grammar and punctuation. This is because clear academic writing is an essential skill and this starts at these lower levels (4 and 5) with using correct English.

Marks in this section are easy to gain, but also very easy to lose. Any typing errors will cause you to lose marks, even if your English is otherwise good. Careful proof reading, therefore, is essential. Don’t rely on the spell-check facility in your word processing package, because it will not always recognize errors. Ask someone you trust to proof read your assignment carefully, so you can correct basic errors.

Too many mistakes in spelling, grammar or punctuation can cause an essay, which would otherwise scrape a borderline pass mark (40-45%) on the basis of its content and analysis etc, to fail. Don’t risk it. Check your English carefully.

Level of Analysis and Synthesis

This ability must show significant improvement at Level 5, compared to Level 4. This is why the marks for it suddenly jump up from Level 4 to level 5. The key requirements to gain these marks are evidence of analysis, integration and synthesis and evaluation.

The best way to think about how to achieve this at Level 5, is to think about creating an academic jigsaw puzzle. Choosing the pieces of your puzzle is part of the analysis process. You will have read the literature and pulled out the pieces of information that you believe you can use to build your essay. This is the first stage in building your academic argument.

The bringing together of pieces of theory and pieces of practice is known as integration. At Level 4, the key requirement is that, in putting the pieces together, you show knowledge and understanding. At Level 5 this changes to being able to begin to comment on the relevance the pieces of theory have (in other words whether they should be applied in practice, or not).

At Level 4, the placing of the theory and practice information together logically is what is mostly expected. At Level 5, you start commenting further, not just explaining what each piece means, but making links with other literature you have read, looking for confirmation in other references, or perhaps finding out where different authors disagree with one another.

In this process of integration, you are choosing where you believe the pieces of your academic jigsaw puzzle fit together. In doing so, you are growing your own version of the facts. This “growing” is known as synthesis. This is the picture (or argument) you are making with your interpretation of the facts. The next stage is then to evaluate what you have found and make a decision as to what is important.

This evaluation is an important part of the conclusion, where you summarise your interpretation of the facts, in your own words and then decide the best way forward, by highlighting key implications for practice or making recommendations. A well written conclusion, therefore, is very important in gaining both organization and coherence and (especially) analysis and synthesis marks.

In your conclusion, at Level 4, you might get away with just restating simply what you have done in the essay. At Level 5 this is not acceptable. Instead, in your conclusion you must show an ability to write your own summary of your interpretation of the facts, rather than just repeating word for word extracts of the essay that you have already written.

Use of literature showing knowledge and understanding

During Level 4 you will be gradually using your database and literature searching skills to identify appropriate literature. This is a difficult skill, so it would be unfair at this stage to expect you to be expert in accessing appropriate literature. By Level 5, however, you are expected to be more able to identify and utilize a wide range of sources of information, so the expectations concerning the use of literature increase.

These marks are allocated according to the range of literature you have chosen within your essay. You need to demonstrate that you have read widely and can provide a good variety of references to support the points that you are trying to make. You should be able to show that you have a sound understanding of the available literature on the subject, by using references to support every piece of theory that you present.

This literature can be presented using a direct quote (i.e. simply copying word for word from the author). These direct quotes should be used sparingly at level 5 and beyond, as they involve little mental processing.

A better approach is paraphrasing. This involves more interpretation on your part. The first stage of this is choosing a linking word between the author you are citing and the summary of what he said:

e.g. Jones (2004) defines/explains/believes/suggests/indicates/ argues/ states etc.

Choose a linking word that best expresses the nature of the information presented by the author. If it is simply a statement, “states” is appropriate, if it is a suggestion use “suggests”. If the author is revealing his own personal belief, use “believes”. If it is an argument use “maintains” or “argues”. In this way, you are presenting your assessment of the weight and value of the literature you are using. The paraphrase will then summarise the key information from that author. In this case, the author should be cited at the beginning of the sentence, to show that you are paraphrasing exactly what the author has said.

Sometimes, in an essay, you may need to use an attribution. This is where the author/authors are cited at the end of the sentence. By placing the authors name and date at the end of the sentence, you are telling the reader that the statements

made in that sentence were influenced by that author, but they are not a direct quote or paraphrase of exactly what these authors said.

e.g. There is evidence to suggest that leadership styles vary according to the situation the leader is faced with (Girvin, 1997).

Attributions will help you to gain marks for use of literature, because they give you an opportunity to show the reader that, although you are making a general statement, it is still based on something you have read in the literature. Without this attribution, the reader has no evidence where the opinion came from and your writing may be accused of being “descriptive” by the marker.

Quality of Referencing

Referencing marks are easy to gain by following the rules carefully, but also very easy to lose, through silly avoidable mistakes. Do not make the mistake of leaving the reference list to the last minute. Losing referencing marks can make the difference between a pass or a fail in an essay that is otherwise at borderline pass level.

These valuable marks are easily achieved if you follow the Referencing Guide exactly. Marks will be deducted if any errors are made. For example, if you use a direct quote, within your essay, you should provide author, date and the page number. Failure to do all this could lose you marks.

When you cite your literature in the reference list you should ensure that the authors’ names are typed correctly, in alphabetical order, and that correct punctuation is used. Please remember also that marks will be lost if an author cited in your essay does not appear in the reference list.

Basically, any deviation from the required format for the Harvard referencing system (explained in your guide) will cost you marks. This may seem unreasonable, but you need to appreciate that correct academic referencing is an essential discipline, which needs to be adopted in your academic writing as soon as possible.

Once the referencing format is learnt it remains a constant throughout Level 6 (degree) and onwards to Masters and Doctorate (PhD) study, so it is a skill that will last you throughout your lifelong learning process, whatever academic stage you choose to progress to.

It is worth getting into good referencing habits early, especially as it is the easiest set of marks to get of any in your essay, whether you are writing at Level 4, Level 5, or level 6.

Good Luck in all your Level 5 modules.

Achieving the academic requirements of Level 6

Analysis, analysis, analysis

If you look at the theoretical marking grids, you will see that the key requirement that changes between level 5 and 6 is that of analysis. It is necessary, therefore, to understand the change in writing style that distinguishes Level 5 writing from that at Level 6.

Remember that the achievement of a degree is the launching point for higher study at Masters or Doctorate level. Gaining a degree, therefore, represents the achievement of fundamental academic writing skills that enable you to present a coherent academic argument. Don’t worry though that all of this is beyond your capability. There are certain tricks of the trade in terms of degree level writing and once you understand these, the prospect of level 6 writing will not seem so unnerving.

Writing academically

Some students make the mistake of thinking that degree level writing means using complex English and the longest words possible in order to show just how clever they are. A typical example of this may be a statement like this:

“It is intuitive, therefore, that the fundamental dichotomy in theory and practice is inevitably exacerbated and irrevocably confounded by the underlying quixotic nature of nursing lecturers”.

Is this a clever way of showing your knowledge? Will this style get you good marks at Level 6? No and no again. Using long words on their own does not show your understanding of them, or (most importantly) the derivation of these concepts in literature. All you are saying in posh words is:

“It seems obvious that the theory practice gap is always going to be made worse and become dreadfully confused by nursing lecturers who don’t live in the real nursing world”

If you want to use the long words, you need to explain them and show where the ideas came from and how you have developed your own ideas from these roots.

A better version would be something like this:

“Jones (2005) recently traced the theory practice gap in nursing. He argues that authors such as Brown (2001) and Raymond (1998) had identified the difficulty between the understanding of nursing theory and its actual implementation in clinical areas as being a divide which had existed from the time of Florence Nightingale’s early interventions in the 1800’s. It seems, therefore, that this is a true dichotomy, a division between what is intended in theory and what actually occurs in practice.

Fletcher (2004) argues that a possible source of this dichotomy may be nursing lecturers who retreat into academic environments and lose contact with the real world of the clinical environment. Hamilton (2001: 200) accused these lecturers of being “quixotic”, meaning that they were tilting uselessly at windmills like the confused hero of the story “Don Quixote”. This seems to suggest that these lecturers are actually confusing an already difficult situation by being unrealistic in their expectations and the focus of their attacks on the health system. Indeed, Worthing (2005) argues that a lecturer who does not also actively practice the nursing profession can make no useful contribution to the reduction of the theory practice gap”.

Now, that is Level 6 writing. It has all the essential elements:

• Careful explanation, showing understanding of the complex terminology used

• Extensive use of literature to support the ideas being presented

• A linking, “conversational” style, which shows the students own interpretation of what they have read and how it informs the argument being presented.

Writing conversationally

This is perhaps the most difficult achievement at Level 6. Up until now, your voice may not have come out very strongly in your academic assignments. You would have been, quite rightly, concentrating on using the right literature to make your points and just throwing in a few comments to show your point of view.

In Level 6 though this changes. Your voice has to be heard all the way through. This means that your presentation of the literature becomes much more a multi-decker sandwich, (literature/comment/literature/interpretation/literature/comment) rather than a solid piece of meat (literature/literature/literature) with a little bit of dressing (comment/interpretation).

At Level 6 your thoughts and your beliefs have to interlace with the literature, so you are truly presenting an academic argument (meaning your individual interpretation of the available literature).

Let’s take a Level 5 piece of writing:

“Brown (2005) maintains that leadership is an essential quality in nursing. This is confirmed by the recent requirements of the NHS Plan (DOH, 2002). This Plan has emphasized the importance of introducing the transformational model of leadership. Smith (2001) explains that this is a leadership which involves the use of charisma and interpersonal skills to enable achievement. Jones (2004) argues that the key characteristic of transformational leadership is empowering others to achieve. In my own experience, a leader with transformational qualities can make any team member feel that they have a useful part to play in the organization. This is confirmed by Fea (2001) who argues that transformational leadership increases feelings of self-worth and capability in their team members”.

This is a perfectly decent piece of level 5 writing. There is good use of literature to make points and the student is using reflection and then finding confirmation for some of her own feelings in the existing literature.

Level 6, however, requires a higher level of processing and more extensive use of supporting literature:

“A review of the available literature provides a wealth of examples of authors advocating leadership as an essential quality in nursing. For example, as early as 1950 Shackleton emphasized that nursing needed strong leadership and recommended a strong transactional approach of reward and punishment to get results and promote teamwork. More recently, however, authors have been moving towards the concept of charismatic and transformational leadership. These qualities are also an integral part of the new recommendations laid down in the NHS Plan (DOH 2002).

Charisma appears to be a complex phenomenon to define. Davidzhar (1991) suggests that it is an aspect of personality which makes the individual irresistible to others, in terms of their ability to persuade and empower others. However, other authors, such as Romano (1996) and Harvey (2000) highlight the intangible nature of charisma and emphasise the frustrating point that individuals know charisma if they see it, but find it difficult to define.

It appears problematic, therefore, to identify exactly how charisma can become an integral part of developing transformational leadership in nursing, if it is a quality which, in itself, is difficult to define. For example, Smith (2001) maintains that transformational leadership uses a combination of charisma and interpersonal skills to enable achievement. However, identifying potential transformational leaders may be a difficulty if the pre-requisite for identifying charismatic individuals is an integral part of this selection process.

Jones (2004) argues that the key ability of a transformational leader is the ability to empower others, while Fea (2001) maintains that their key strength is to increase feelings of self-worth and capability in their team members. On reflection, my own experience of transformational leadership appeared to be based principally on being persuaded, by the sheer force of personality of the individual, that I had the potential to contribute and achieve. It seemed to me that it was their apparent faith in me and their power of persuasion that enabled me to become an effective team member.

This requirement for charisma in transformational leadership, therefore, may indeed be based on individual personality factors that enable others to feel good about themselves and their achievements. There is some evidence that this is the case. Jones (2003), for example, argues that transformational leaders are born and cannot be made. Regisara (2003) also maintains common key personality traits can be identified in effective transformational leaders, which have probably been present since childhood. It seems, therefore, that the key requirement of the NHS Plan (2002) for the training of transformational leaders is not going to be as straightforward as they first envisioned, as the available literature suggests that these leaders are born, rather than made”.

The key differences in level 6 are:

• Individual issues are explored in considerably more depth. (It is essential, therefore, in Level 6 writing to focus on a few key issues, so that they can be explored in sufficient depth within the available word allowance).

• The student should constantly be trying to find answers in the literature, particularly finding different definitions and interpretations of key issues

• Once the literature is presented, the student puts their own “spin” (interpretation) on it

• Personal thoughts and reflections are always followed up by attempts to find supporting evidence (substantiation) in the literature

• The complexity of the issue is recognised. Things are not presented simplistically as “black and white”. Instead, shades of grey are acknowledged.

• The student’s “voice” is heard throughout, trying to make sense of what they have read and comparing it with what they have experienced.

In this way, level 6 builds on the skills you have developed at level 4 and 5. Your literature searching skills and use of referencing should be well established now and you should be skilled in using literature to support your academic writing. Having gone through the drudgery of learning these skills at level 4 and 5, level 6 allows you considerably more personal freedom to start giving a very personal interpretation of what you have read. This is in preparation for taking even more initiative in searching more widely for answers in the literature and finally aiming to add to that literature by individual research (which occurs in a limited way at Masters level and is consolidated at doctorate (PhD) level).

Therefore, developing good level 6 skills will provide a good foundation for studying at Masters and Doctorate level later. Don’t think it’s impossible. You can do it.

Good luck in all your modules at Level 6.

Reference:

Bysshe, J (2006) Rationale for Development of Academic Writing Guidelines Thames Valley University [Online] Available:

[Access date: 6.11.13]

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download