L. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

[Pages:39]DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

March 14, 2013

Beverly L. O'Toole The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. beverly.otoole@

Re: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

Incoming letter dated January 16, 2013

Dear Ms. O'Toole:

This is in response to your letters dated January 16, 2013, February 25, 2013, and February 26, 2013 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to Goldman Sachs by the Needmor Fund. We also have received a letter on the proponent's behalf on February 21, 2013. Copies of all of the correspondence on which this response is based will be made available on our website at action/14a-8.shtml. For your reference, a brief discussion of the Division's informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals is also available at the same website address.

Sincerely,

TedYu Senior Special Counsel

Enclosure

cc: Timothy Smith

Walden Asset Management

tsmith@

March 14, 2013

Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance

Re: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Incoming letter dated January 16, 2013

The proposal requests that the board authorize the preparation of a report on lobbying contributions and expenditures that contains information specified in the proposal.

We are unable to concur in your view that Goldman Sachs may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(10). Based on the information you have presented, it does not appear that Goldman Sachs' public disclosures compare favorably with the guidelines of the proposal. Accordingly, we do not believe that Goldman Sachs may omit the proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(10).

We are unable to concur in your view that Goldman Sachs may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(12). In our view, the proposal does not deal with substantially the same subject matter as the proposals included in the company's 2009 or 2010 proxy materials. We express no position on whether the proposal deals with substantially the same subject matter as the proposals included in the company's 2011 or 2012 proxy materials. Accordingly, we do not believe that Goldman Sachs may omit the proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(12).

Sincerely,

Jessica Dickerson Attorney-Adviser

DIVISION OF COizyORATiON FINANCE

INFORMAL PROCEDURES REGARDING SII.Al.lliHOLDER PROPOSALS.

The Division of Corporation Finance believes that its responsibility wi~ respect to matters arising under Rule 14a-8 [17 CFR240.14a,.8], as with other matters under th ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download