Paper Grading Guide - University of Phoenix



Government Intervention Grading Guide

ECO/561 Version 12

Economics

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.

University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.

Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.

Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices.

Individual Assignment: Government Intervention

Purpose of Assignment

The theory of market economies emphasizes freedom of choice and limited government intervention. The classic argument for government intervention is market failure – the inability of the market economy to correct itself from a dysfunctional state (such as the Great Depression). Students will examine articles from the University library to analyze real-world examples of U.S. government intervention programs and apply current week readings to make intelligent conclusions about the economic policies.

Resources Required

Tutorial help on Excel® and Word functions can be found on the Microsoft® Office website. There are also additional tutorials via the web offering support for Office products.

Grading Guide

|Content |Met |Partially Met |Not Met |Comments: |

|Analyzed the arguments for government intervention as opposed | | | | |

|to arguments for market-based solutions. | | | | |

|Examined who may be helped and who may be hurt by the selected | | | | |

|government intervention. | | | | |

|Examined externalities and/or unintended consequences of such | | | | |

|intervention. | | | | |

|Determined the cost trend of the intervention program since its| | | | |

|implementation including whether costs increased, decreased, or| | | | |

|varied with the state of the economy. | | | | |

|Evaluated the success or failure of the intervention in | | | | |

|achieving its objectives and developed conclusions. | | | | |

|Recommended whether the program should be continued as is, | | | | |

|discontinued, or modified and defended your recommendation. | | | | |

|Cited a minimum of three scholarly, peer-reviewed references. | | | | |

|The presentation is a minimum 10 slides and is appropriate for | | | | |

|the audience. Included detailed speaker notes or voiceover. | | | | |

|The presentation includes relevant media and visual aids that | | | | |

|are consistent with the content. | | | | |

| | |Total Available |Total Earned | |

| | | | | |

| | |4 |#/4 | |

|Presentation Guidelines |Met |Partially Met |Not Met |Comments: |

|Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and | | | | |

|a reference slide. | | | | |

|The presentation includes an introduction and conclusion that | | | | |

|preview and review major points. | | | | |

|Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific | | | | |

|details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically. | | | | |

|Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and | | | | |

|punctuation. | | | | |

| | |Total Available |Total Earned | |

|  | |1 |#/1 | |

|Assignment Total |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download