PLANT PHYSIOLOGY - Gustavus Adolphus College



Lab 7 - INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS

By the 1930s researchers found that plant tissues produce hormones capable of regulating growth. The first substance, isolated from the tip of an oat coleoptile, was given the name of auxin (from Greek auxein, meaning ‘to grow’). Eventually, this substance was identified as indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). This hormone, present in the majority of higher plants promotes different responses depending on the organ and its stage of development. Intense research activities after WWII led to the discovery and description of several other plant growth regulators: gibberellins, cytokinins, abscisic acid and ethylene. Over the next two weeks, we will observe the effects that two growth regulators elicit in plants: IAA and GA.

Experiment 1 and 2. Apical Dominance

The apex of a shoot grows much more rapidly than axillary buds, even though the SAM is situated less favorably with regard to the supply of nutrients and photosynthate. When the apical meristem of a shoot is growing the axillary buds are strongly suppressed; this characteristic is known as apical dominance. The degree of apical dominance varies among species. Sunflowers exhibit complete dominance over the entire length of the stem while tomatoes produce bushy growth form because of growth by axillary buds. Other species express apical dominance when the plant is young, but it weakens as the plant ages or as development progresses.

The SAM is a principal site of auxin (IAA) synthesis. In this experiment, we are going to test the hypothesis that auxin is translocated downward in the stem and causes the suppression of axillary bud growth. We will test the effect of removing the apical bud and applying exogenous auxin. If auxin production by the SAM inhibits axillary bud development, predict the response when the apical bud is removed.

Experiment 1

Procedure for Apical Dominance Experiment 1

Work in pairs. Find enough pots of beans to total three plants. Label with your group’s initials. One plant will serve as one control. You will not manipulate the plant in any way. On a second control plant, remove the apical bud with a razor blade and apply plain lanolin jelly to the stump. On the third plant, your treatment, remove the apical bud and apply lanolin containing 400 ppm of IAA. Be sure to clearly differentiate the two cut plants from one another; you may want to use small rings of aluminum foil. Predict what this third treatment will demonstrate.

One week later. Record the results of this experiment in Table 1 below.

Table 1. Raw data for Experiment 1

|Control |Control |Plain lanolin control |Plain lanolin control |Lanolin + IAA |Lanolin + IAA |

|# of lateral shoots|Length of lateral shoots |# of lateral shoots |Length of lateral shoots |# of lateral shoots |Length of lateral shoots |

| |(mm) | |(mm) | | |

| | | | | | |

Use the results from this experiment to justify where auxin is produced.

How might the effect of auxin on apical and lateral buds promote survival?

How might auxin made at the shoot tip inhibit buds that are at a distant site on the stem?

How is it possible for auxin to promote growth in active shoots and yet stop growth of buds?

Apical Dominance Experiment 2

In many plants the lateral buds do not develop when the terminal meristem is active. The control of lateral bud growth by the apical meristem is called apical dominance; when the apex is removed the lateral buds grow out and form branches. This concept has long been understood by gardeners, who pinch back the growing tip to produce a bushier plant. One model for this phenomenon suggests that auxin moving down the stem from the apex prevents the outgrowth of buds in the axils of leaves near the apex. Cytokinins, moving up the stem in the transpiration stream from the roots, can enhance the growth of lateral buds.

In the following experiment, you will attempt to demonstrate that the terminal meristem may be replaced by an artificial source of auxin (naphthaleneacetic acid will be used because it is more stable in light than indoleacetic acid). In some experimental treatments, benzylaminopurine, a cytokinin, will be applied to the lateral buds to explore the possibility of an interaction of auxin and cytokinin effects. The kinds of studies performed in this experiment are called replacement studies. A plant part, such as the apex, is removed and replaced with a hormone to answer the question, “Can the hormone replace the removed organ and produce the same effect?” If the answer is yes, the results are considered good evidence that the hormone is involved in the phenomenon. Such studies are considered to be a first step in demonstrating that a hormone is the controlling factor in a particular system. Further studies would be required before the hormone is considered to be the causal agent. The hormone must be extracted from the organ (to show that it is present), then isolated and identified. If the extracted hormone, when reapplied, acts to replace the removed organ, then the hormone is considered to be of primary importance in the phenomenon.

Procedure for Apical Dominance Experiment 2

Plants will be treated with an auxin and/or a cytokinin and the length of the lateral buds determined. The plants will be placed in the greenhouse for two weeks and four additional measurements of the lateral bud length will be made.

1. Find five pots of the same species (mint or Coleus). Label each of the five pots according to the list of treatments below.

A. Control. Leave the plant intact.

B. Cut off the terminal part of the stem about 1cm above the primary node, leaving one pair of primary leaves (which have suppressed buds in their leaf axils) on each plant. Examine the buds to be sure you know what they look like. Apply lanolin to the cut end of the stem.

C. Cut off the top as in B, but smear the cut surface with lanolin containing 1% naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), an artificial auxin.

D. Leave plant intact, but apply 1.5mM benzylaminopurine (BA), which is a cytokinin, to the lateral buds of the primary node by painting it on the surface. Apply a second treatment the following day.

E. Cut off the top and apply NAA (as in C), but also apply benzylaminopurine to the lateral buds (as in D). Apply a second treatment of BA the following day.

2. Measure the length of the primary lateral buds (those in the axils of the primary leaves) for each treatment and record your measurements in Table 2.

3. Place the plants in a tray and put the tray in the greenhouse. Twice a week, measure the length of the primary lateral buds; find the average for each treatment. Continue measurements for two weeks. Plot the bud length against time.

Results for Apical Dominance Experiment 2

Table 2. Absolute and average bud length for 4 treatments and a control.

|Lateral Bud Length (cm) |

|Date |Control |Decapitated |Decapitated + NAA|BA on Buds |Decapitated + NAA + BA|

|Initial Length |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

| |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

|Average Bud Length (cm) = | | | | | |

|Week 1 (first) |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

| |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

|Average Bud Length (cm) = | | | | | |

|Week 1 (second) |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

| |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

|Average Bud Length (cm)= | | | | | |

|Week 2 (first) |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

| |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

|Average Bud Length (cm)= | | | | | |

|Week 2 (second) |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

| |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |___ ___ |

| | | | | | |

|Average Bud Length (cm)= | | | | | |

Plot the average lateral bud length as a function of time.

Questions about apical dominance

1. As you know, one effect of auxin is to increase cell wall extension in certain types of cells. In explaining auxin’s role in apical dominance, it has been suggested that nutrient diversion away from lateral buds could be brought about by auxin located in the apical bud. Considering the fundamental effect of auxin, what does it mean when it is said that auxin “attracts” nutrients away from the lateral buds?

__________________________________________________________________

2. What is the meaning of the following statement: There is a “trade-off” between auxin and cytokinin effects in apical dominance and lateral bud outgrowth. A diagram might be a suitable way to discuss this statement.

__________________________________________________________________

3. Consider the following information. A particular fern, Microgramma, displays strict apical dominance. When its shoot tip (apical bud) is removed, the lateral buds grow out. Replacement of the shoot tip with indoleacetic acid (IAA) preserves apical dominance. However, biochemical tests (extraction and diffusion techniques followed by chromatography) failed to reveal any endogenous auxin activity in the plant. Assuming the accuracy of the above results, what does this information tell you about the usefulness of the experimental protocol we used in our lab in determining the involvement of auxin in apical dominance?

__________________________________________________________________

Experiment 3. Abscission

The process by which leaves and other organs, such as fruits and flowers, fall from a plant is known as abscission. The abscission of an organ is usually achieved by the formation of a thin abscission layer near the base of the organ. The walls of these cells become soft and gelatinous, forming a weak region, which readily break under a strain such as a wind-induced movement of the leaf. Softening of the walls in the abscission layer occurs when pectic acid is methylated to form pectin.

Young leaves also synthesize large quantities of IAA (second only to SAM). As leaves age the ability to synthesize IAA declines until the auxin content of the leaf becomes less than the content of adjacent stem tissue. This is when the abscission layer forms. Therefore, a correlation exists between the initiation of the abscission layer and the auxin content of the leaf. The precise gene reading mechanism that triggers the formation of the abscission layer, however, is not well understood. An increase in ethylene or the amino acid alanine also accelerates abscission. ABA also may have a role in promoting formation of the abscission layer. The abscission process is complex and this experiment will only focus on one aspect influenced by leaf blade. Our purpose is to determine how leaf blade removal and auxin application affects abscission.

Procedure for Abscission Experiment 3

1. Select two sunflower plants that have at least 3 well-developed leaves beneath the apex.

Carefully remove the leaf blade, but not the petiole of 3 successive pairs of sunflower leaves with a razor blade. Also, select two bean plants with 2-4 leaves; remove the leaf blade, but leave the petiole intact.

2. For one half of the sunflower leaf pairs and half of cut beans, apply a small amount of plain lanolin paste to the cut surface. This is your control.

3. To the other petiole of each sunflower pair or the remaining cut bean petioles apply a small amount of lanolin containing 1,000 ppm of auxin. Make small rings of aluminum foil and hang one on each petiole treated with lanolin + auxin for identification.

4. Label the pot with your name.

5. Put your plants in the second room of the greenhouse. Check the plants in both treatments over the next week. Record the date and treatment when you notice that a petiole has abscised.

Leaf Senescence Experiment 4

Leaf senescence is most easily recognized by the loss of green color associated with the breakdown of chlorophyll and the chloroplasts. The physiological events (such as loss of membrane integrity and a decline in mRNA and protein synthesis) that occur during senescence are a controlled series of steps leading to the death of the leaf. Although the events associated with senescence in leaves are well characterized, the biochemical changes that trigger the onset of senescence are still the object of study. A variety of factors, both internal and external, may bring on leaf senescence. In deciduous trees, the leaves lose their green color with the short photoperiod and cool temperatures of autumn, indicating that senescence may be triggered by environmental cues. In some plants the leaves senesce when the fruits mature, which implies that there is competition for some factor which delays senescence. A shortage of mobile nutrients combined with competition from younger leaves will make older leaves senesce, regardless of the age of the whole plant. Detached leaves senesce more rapidly than attached leaves of the same age, but detached leaves that go on to produce roots may survive indefinitely.

The examples cited above all imply that hormonal interactions control the onset of senescence. Cytokinins (e.g., benzylaminopurine and kinetin) have long been known to delay senescence in leaves/ more recently, polyamines like spermidine have been shown to slow the onset of senescence as well. Both may act by maintaining membrane integrity; both are also known to enhance protein synthesis. Their exact biochemical role in senescence has yet to be determined. You will perform several simple experiments to test the concept that cytokinins and competition for nutrients and hormones are involved in controlling the onset of senescence.

Procedure for Leaf Senescence Experiment 4

Wheat leaves will be placed in shell vials which contain water or kinetin; changes in leaf color will be noted every two days for two weeks.

1. Label two shell vials for the treatments below and add 5ml of the appropriate solution to each vial.

a) Distilled water

b) 0.1mM kinetin

2. Cut six wheat leaves to about 5cm in length and stand three leaves in each vial, with the cut end of the leaves placed in the liquid (see diagram). Store the vials in the dark at room temperature. Be sure to replenish the solution with water or kinetin (as appropriate to the treatment) if you notice a significant drop in the level of liquid.

Results for Leaf Senescence Experiment 4 . The leaves kept in water should begin to show signs of senescence within a few days; those kept in kinetin may remain green for a while. Examine the leaves every two days for the next two weeks. Refer to a Munsell color chart (online) to classify the leaf color and determine the number of days to senescence (senescence can be defined as a color agreed upon by the class). Record you data in the table below and determine the number of days to senescence for each treatment.

Table 3. Color change of wheat coleoptiles in kinetin and water

| | |

|Senescence: color changes | |

| | | | | | | |

|Date | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Control | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Decapitated | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Decapitated + NAA | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|+ TIBA | | | | | | |

| | | | | | | |

|Decapitated + NAA | | | | | | |

|+ TIBA | | | | | | |

What do your results suggest?

Experiment 7. Dwarf pea bioassay

Each person is responsible for preparing 20 pea plants. Apply a strip of tape around each pot and label. Find the shoot apical meristem of each plant by gently pulling apart the apices. The location is not always apparent because compound leaves may obscure the SAM. Use the stem, axillary buds and leaflets as clues. Measure the height of the stem (mm) from the top of the soil to the SAM. Record the height of the plant on the strip of tape just below the plant and in the first column of Table 1. Continue measuring and recording heights for each plant. Six solutions of the plant hormone gibberellin (GA) will be available in the lab (10-4M, 10-5M, 10-6M, 10-7M, 0M and an unknown). You will be assigned one concentration for all 20 of your plants. Use the pipette to apply one drop of the solution to the shoot tip. Let the solutions dry and then return the plants to the growth chamber. Your GA concentration _________

One week later. Find your pea plants. Measure the height of each plant, paying close attention to the location of the SAM. Enter the results in Table 2. Share your results with everyone.

Table 2. Growth of dwarf peas in response to a gibberellin treatment.

|Plant |Initial height (mm) |Height after treatment (mm) |Growth(mm) = after treatment – initial hght |

|1 | | | |

|2 | | | |

|3 | | | |

|4 | | | |

|5 | | | |

|6 | | | |

|7 | | | |

|8 | | | |

|9 | | | |

|10 | | | |

|11 | | | |

|12 | | | |

|13 | | | |

|14 | | | |

|15 | | | |

|16 | | | |

|17 | | | |

|18 | | | |

|19 | | | |

|20 | | | |

Introduction Provide an overview of the experiment (variables, objective, etc).

Analysis Find average growth (+ SD) for each treatment. Construct a graph that plots the average (+SD) growth of the dwarf pea plants as a function of the log of the gibberellin concentration. Include a best-fit line between the points. You will have a problem with the zero concentration when you attempt to take its log; my suggestion is to pretend it is a very, very small number (e.g. 1x10-9M ) and take its log. Describe the results generally. Determine the concentration of the unknown using your graph.

Discussion What effect does GA have on pea plants? How does growth actually change because of GA application (physiologically)? Why are dwarf peas so sensitive to changes in the concentration of GA (think about why plants may be dwarfed in the first place)? What are the properties of a good bioassay? What controls are needed for a valid bioassay?

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download