Title: Otto Von Bismarck – Good Statesmen or Evil Genius
Title: Otto Von Bismarck – Good Statesmen or Evil Genius?
Grade and Subject: 10th/11th World History II
Time Allotted: 48 minutes
|SOL #: |WHII.8d |NCSS Theme: |Power, Authority, and Governance |
|What is the guiding question for this lesson? |How should Otto Von Bismarck be viewed? |
|Must be presented in the lesson to students | |
|How will student understanding be assessed? |Students will be assessed by their closing comments in their notebooks, as well |
|-include assessments |as their participation in the FishBowl, their tally sheet, and their DBQ forms |
Key Concepts (no definition necessary):
Realpolitik, Unification
SWBAT (as many as required by lesson):
#1 SWBAT analyze primary source data to determine the role of Otto Von Bismarck in the Unification of Germany
#2 SWBAT reflect on the role of Otto von Bismarck in the Unification of Germany
Materials (List and attach primary sources and additional materials-ppt and question frames /concept maps/ Frames etc.):
Otto Von Bismarck DBQ
FishBowl Discussion Tally Sheet (Student and Teacher)
Just Do It (hook):
If I assigned you homework every night for the entire year, but you all finished with A’s in class, and a 600 on the SOL test. How would you view me? Explain.
|Obj # |Description of Lesson Procedure |Check for Evidence of Understanding |
|#1 |Students will be given a packet of primary sources about Otto Von |Completion of the DBQ sheets |
| |Bismarck, with the statement that Otto Von Bismarck represents | |
| |Machiavelli’s Ideal Ruler. Students will evaluate each resource, | |
| |leaving a comment after each about what they thought. | |
|Transition: “OK. I need two circles of desks, one on the inside of __ desks, and one on the outside with the rest of the desks” |
|#2 |Students will receive a tally sheet if they are on the outside of |Completion of Tally Sheet |
| |the circle. __ students will be in the inner circle, and their |Participation in the Discussion |
| |goal is to discuss the question of Bismarck’s ideal ruler status, | |
| |and his good and evil nature. Students on the outside tally their | |
| |comments and questions, which there is a low participation grade | |
| |taken for. After __ minutes, students on the outside are allowed | |
| |to make comments about the conversation. Students will then switch| |
| |out, and the process will repeat until all students have been in | |
| |the middle. | |
Closure (How does this come back to the guiding question):
After our discussion today, how do you view Bismarck? Is he good or evil? Explain with specific evidence.
Modifications/Differentiation):
Extra Time for Closer
Alternative to discussion (write a summary of the conversation you were in )
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- applied us history
- naming good and evil
- the origin of moral evil
- mr colwell s world history class home
- to live beyond good and evil
- step one—read the chapter and take notes as you go
- public service ethics and administrative evil prospects
- overcoming evil with good
- title otto von bismarck good statesmen or evil genius
- the tree of the knowledge of good and evil
Related searches
- good night or goodnight
- good night or goodnight grammar
- do good and evil exist
- good versus evil difference between
- good yes or no questions to ask
- for evil to triumph good men
- good vs evil examples
- are people good or evil by nature
- are humans evil or good
- is evil learned or inherent
- evil title generator
- evil good and good evil