Twelve Angry Men Discussion Questions
Twelve Angry Men Discussion Questions
1. While Reginald Rose may in fact celebrate the “trial by a jury of your peers” system we employ as the foundation of our judicial process in the United States, he also points our many of its weaknesses. Find textual based-evidence of such weaknesses to discuss with your group and class.
2. In Twelve Angry Men race is a factor. Use text-based evidence for other biases the jurors must overcome.
3. Our constitution guarantees rights to its citizens. Use text-based evidence to show multiple constitutional rights discussed in the play and how those rights play into the verdict.
4. Twelve Angry Men takes place in a jury deliberation room after the trial arguments have been presented. Reginald Rose ends the play with “Not guilty!” Consider the author’s use of setting, and without having heard the arguments in court, consider whether the jury came to a just conclusion. Use text-based evidence.
5. At first count, 11 jurors voted “guilty” while 1 voted “not guilty” because he wanted to discuss it. In the end a unanimous vote for “not guilty” is the verdict reached. Using text-based evidence, show the different types of arguments (including ethos, pathos, logos, fallacies) presented to change jurors’ minds.
Twelve Angry Men Discussion Questions
1. While Reginald Rose may in fact celebrate the “trial by a jury of your peers” system
we employ as the foundation of our judicial process in the United States, he also points our many of its weaknesses. Find textual based-evidence of such weaknesses to discuss with your group and class.
2. In Twelve Angry Men race is a factor. Use text-based evidence for other biases the
jurors must overcome.
3. Our constitution guarantees rights to its citizens. Use text-based evidence to show
multiple constitutional rights discussed in the play and how those rights play into the verdict.
4. Twelve Angry Men takes place in a jury deliberation room after the trial arguments
have been presented. Reginald Rose ends the play with “Not guilty!” Consider the author’s use of setting, and without having heard the arguments in court, consider whether the jury came to a just conclusion. Use text-based evidence.
5. At first count, 11 jurors voted “guilty” while 1 voted “not guilty” because he wanted
To discuss it. In the end a unanimous vote for “not guilty” is the verdict reached. Using text-based evidence, show the different types of arguments (including ethos, pathos, logos, fallacies) presented to change jurors’ minds.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- determining height from bone length
- determining veteran status and eligibility for benefits u
- reconstruction common assessment anderson
- cinderella man viewing guide
- twelve angry men discussion questions
- wscc english home
- columbia university in the city of new york
- movie study guide the patriot
- africa before european arrival dbq
- los angeles mission college home
Related searches
- discussion questions about positive thinking
- discussion questions for middle schoolers
- discussion questions for ted talks
- discussion questions for teenage girls
- discussion questions for women s group
- group discussion questions for adults
- book club discussion questions printable
- good discussion questions examples
- book discussion questions websites
- free discussion questions for books
- discussion questions for eleanor oliphant
- discussion questions example