DRAFT: Do not copy, cite, or distribute without permission ...



DRAFT: Do not copy, cite, or distribute without permission of the author

Copyright Plus:

Fair Use and Standard Form Contracts in the Digital Age

Viva R. Moffat

© 2006

Abstract

This article concerns the many ways that business entities use adhesion contracts to contract around baseline copyright rules, fair use in particular. While many scholars and judges have addressed the question of “contracting around” the Copyright Act, almost all the discussion has focused on agreements for the sale or use of software and electronic databases. There has been little attention paid to the proliferation of contracts for other goods or services that contain provisions limiting fair use (“super-copyright” provisions). In this article, I will argue that the issue cuts across a variety of industries and deserves attention in all of its incarnations; I will further argue that state enforcement of these provisions limiting fair use should be preempted.

In addressing the propriety of super-copyright provisions, many courts and many academics focus on the normative question of what copyright law and policy should be. While valuable for Congress, this normative approach is inappropriate for a preemption analysis, which should focus on the descriptive task of examining and interpreting the statutory text and Congressional intent. This article seeks to provide an preemption analysis of super-copyright clauses that is grounded in the question of what copyright law and policy is, setting a framework that could be used by courts (also recognizing that a purely descriptive analysis is probably impossible). Applying this framework, the article concludes that super-copyright clauses conflict with current copyright law and policy, with the major caveat that current copyright policy concerning fair use and “contracting around” is far from clear.

In addition, and precisely because of this lack of clarity, this article will also make a structural argument: courts ought to preempt super-copyright clauses in order to initiate a dialogue with Congress, indicating that Congress is the institution with the capability and the mandate to make the complex policy determinations regarding the role of fair use in the federal copyright scheme. Although I argue that courts should preempt state enforcement of super-copyright provisions, it is really Congress that ought to determine and clarify federal copyright law and policy. Preemption may be “too blunt an instrument,” but it may be the only effective tool to resolve the question of which copyright rules are mere default rules and which set forth a federal policy from which there ought to be no variation.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download