Bibliography - NR Consulting - NR Consulting Group Overview



Analyzing Financial Performance of HSBC USA and comparing to National Credit and Commerce Bank 685800386715038862001581150Based on a financial performance study of Year 2005 to Year 2009.Analyzing Financial Performance ofHSBC USA and comparing to National Credit and Commerce BankBased on a financial performance study of Year 2005 to Year 2009. Course Title: Financial Market & Institutions (Fin433)Prepared for:Mr. Raisul Islam (RSM)FacultySchool of BusinessNorth South UniversityPrepared by:Group-09NameIDSectionM Mostafa Al Mahmud081 – 312 - 0303Fahad Abdul Malek073 – 461 – 0303M. Mahmudul Haque061 – 296 - 0303M. Mahmudul Islam052 – 365 - 0303MD. Sabbir Hossain071 – 770 - 03031400175161290 North South University December 21, 2010ACKNOWLEDGEMENTWe would like to thank our faculty, Mr. Raisul Islam, (Lecurer, School Of Business) for providing us with a project guideline that has been extremely helpful for the preparation of this project. We are extremely grateful to him for helping me with his suggestions and advices whenever we needed. His precious opinions and continuous monitoring has made this project achievable. We would like to express our gratitude to him for guiding me during the project and helping us to make the most possible sound report.December 21, 2010Mr. Raisul IslamCourse Instructor, FIN 433North South UniversityDear Sir,We are delighted to submit the ratio analysis and performance comparison of National Credit and Commerce Bank Limited with HSBC in an attempt to arrange a group report for the course Financial Markets & Institutions. We feel fortunate as we had the option to work on such an educative assignment. The entire project was accomplished in observance of your guideline. Your kind and consistent assistance throughout the duration of this process was highly supportive. We highly appreciate the opportunity you gave us. We will always appreciate your kind advice, patience, cooperation and suggestions regarding this report. Your kind advices and suggestions will help us to ahead as a brilliant guideline. Sincerely,M Mostafa Al MahmudFahad Abdul MalekM. Mahmudul HaqueM. Mahmudul IslamMD. Sabbir HossainTable of ContentsPreface………………………………………………………………………..........................................................6PUPORSE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7METHODOLOGY…………….……………………………………………………..………………………………………………8CONSTRAINTS…………………..……….…………………………………………………………….....……………………….9 TOC \o "1-1" \u Literature Review………….. PAGEREF _Toc280664135 \h 11HSBC, at a glance PAGEREF _Toc280664132 \h 18NCC Bank, at a Glance………………………………………………………………………………………................... PAGEREF _Toc280664134 \h 19Reasons of Financial Recession20WHY HSBC WAS AFFECTD …………………………………………………………………………………………….......23COMPARISON BETWEEN HSBC AND NCC BANK………………………………… ………………………………31Conclusion: PAGEREF _Toc280664162 \h 42Bibliography PAGEREF _Toc280664167 \h 43Appendix # 1 (Financial Statement) PAGEREF _Toc280664168 \h 44Appendix # 2 PAGEREF _Toc280664169 \h 77PrefaceA bank as a matter of fact is just like a heart in the economic structure and the Capital provided by it is like blood in it. Bankers play very important role in the economic life of the nation. Nowadays modern banks are very constructive for the utilization of the resources of the country. The banks are mobilizing the savings of the people for the investment purposes.Bank industry has frequent interaction with customers, so the service quality and customer satisfaction are very important to it. Hence the bank industry has invested numerous resources to improve its service quality, because, high service quality results in customer satisfaction and loyalty. Excellent performance feature and high customer satisfaction is the important issue and challenge for banking industry. Today, service quality is considered a critical measure of organizational performance and continues to compel the attention of managers and academics. Moreover, investors are more concerned about bank’s performance now a day.Financial ratios are one of the most important tools to measure the performance of commercial banks. It facilitates to discover the movement in their performance in a specific phase of time in addition to evaluating those with parallel banks in the same industry. There are various categories of financial ratios. Liquidity, Leverage, Activity, Profitability and Market Position ratios are the most meaningful and significant among those to banks operations and state of affairs about security and future prospects. It aids the present and probable shareholder and customers to banks with additional confident.PurposeThe intention of this report is:Find out the reason for the financial recessionsLink those reason with HSBCInvestigating the execution of NCC Bank (National Credit and Commerce Bank) from the year 2005 to the year 2009.Calculating a variety of financial ratios that aids to examine the performance.Preparing time series analysis to evaluate performance whether it is enhanced or deteriorate over the time length.Preparing a cross sectional analysis to contrast the operational and financial functions of NCC bank with the operational and financial functions of HSBC in the same time interval. Indicating the improvement or fading region Determining the reflection of the fundamentals of banks on its share prices. And finally advocating the existing and prospective investor in relation to their investment decisions regarding NCC Bank and HSBC. Methodology:Source of information: To organize this report secondary data has been used. There are two sources of secondary data. This are-Internet: The websites of the both company and also several additional websites like Wikipedia, Investopedia were awfully constructive to acquire the information of the two banks.DSE library: the annual reports, collected from DSE library, were the origin of the numerical data .the income statement and balance sheet were in the main focus to analyze the putation and investigation procedure:Different ratios were the main to tool to measure the performance of the two banks.Liquidity ratio, leverage Ratio, activity (efficiency) ratio, profitability ratio, and market position ratio are the key subdivisions ratio folder that constructed the trend and cross section analysis. Graphs and diagrams were nominated as the essential choice to visualize the six years ratio assessment of the two banks.ConstraintsThe level best effort was given to construct the report with accurate information and ideal analysis procedure, yet there are some restrictions that may be considered as barrier on the way to assemble a totally flawless performance examining report. Time duration: The time frame to prepare this report was limited to a single semester. If more time were allocated, more vivid inspection and presentation the information would have been possible.Secondary source: The required records were collected from the annual reports which are the secondary sources of data. Though the reports are audited if information were collected from the primary sources, it might have more accuracy.Accounting policy: Audited reports were used to ensure the most possible accurate and applicable data. Still cross sectional analysis might be misleading if the two banks use different accounting policy. Besides, changes in accounting policy also may affect the comparison of results between different accounting years as misleading. The problem with this situation is that the directors may be able to manipulate the results through the changes in accounting policy. This would be done to avoid the effects of an old accounting policy or gain the effects of a new one. It is likely to be done in a sensitive period, perhaps when the business’s profits are low or during an economic meltdownInsignificance of Historical Cost: Since the both banks are public limited company, a lot of difficulties were encountered while gathering the historical financial information about the bank. Moreover, the use historical cost of accounting was commended to business by ASB Conceptual framework. As historical cost principle is worn, asset assessment in the balance sheet might be disingenuous. Ratios supported on this assessment will be very ineffective concerning decision making procedures. Technology: While constructing trend analysis, actions in technology obliges particular concentration as the movement in performance should be in line with the changes in technology. To adjoin, employees’ output boost does not necessarily denote that employees are more proficient now. It may occur because of hi-tech progress. Inflation or deflation: Inflation or deflation in economy does not affect the ratio analysis. Initial profit figure may be increasing. But that might nit be because of good performance, rather that might be because of inflation and in inflation money value goes down .So ratio doesn’t always show the true condition of a company.Literature ReviewA. Liquidity ratio:“Liquidity ratio indicates a bank’s ability to satisfy its short term obligations as came due. Liquidity refers to the solvency of the bunk’s overall financial position, the ease with which it can pay its bills. These ratios are leading indicators of cash flow problems. Often banks have to give up a profit portion to get enough liquid assets as liquid assets are the least profitable segment of banks’ asset.1. Cash position indicator: Cash position ratio is obtained from the calculation of cash and deposits due from depository institutions divided by total assets will give the cash position indicator.Cash Position indicator = Cash and Deposits due from depository institutions / Total Asset. A larger amount of cash means the institution is in a controlling situation to grip instant cash requirements.2. Liquid securities indicator:Liquid securities indicator is acquired through the computation of government securities are divided by total assets. Liquid Securities Indicator = Government Securities / Total AssetIt contrasts the most marketable securities an institution is able to clutch through the whole volume of its asset portfolio. The superior the section of government securities, the more liquid the depository institution’s situation is likely to be in attendance.3. Capacity ratio:Capacity ratio is stimulated from the result of net loans and leases are divided by total assets.Capacity Ratio = Net Loans and Losses / Total Asset.It is a negative liquidity indicator and tells proportion of net loans and losses in relation to total assets. 4. Hot money ratio: Hot money ratio is calculated from money market (short term) assets divided money market liabilities.Hot money ratio = money market assets / money market liabilitiesIt reveals whether the bank has approximately balanced the volatile liabilities it has issued with the money market assets it clasps that could be sold swiftly to face those liabilities.5. Core deposit ratio: Core deposit ratio is derived from dividing core deposits by time deposits.Core deposit ratio = core deposits / total assets.Core deposits are principally small-denomination checking and saving accounts that are considered unlikely to be withdrawn on short notice and so carry lower liquidity requirements.” CITATION Fin440 \l 1033 (Gitman)6. Deposit composition ratio: Deposit composition ratio is obtained by dividing demand deposit by time deposit. Demand deposits are subject to immediate withdrawal via check writing while time deposits have fixed maturities for early withdrawal. Deposit composition ratio = demand deposits / time depositsThis ratio measures how stable a funding base the bank propose, a decline suggest greater deposit stability and lesser need for liquidity. b. Financial Leverage Ratio:Financial leverage ratio identifies the magnification of risk and return introduced through the use of fixed cost financing, such as debt and preferred stock. These ratios are intended to address the bank’s long term ability to meet its obligations. The more fixed cost debt a firm uses, the greater will be its expected return and risk. Now-a-days banks prefer much debt as debt financing less costly and more profitable than equity capital. These ratios are also known as debt ratio or long term solvency measures ratio.1. Debt Ratio:The debt ratio measures the proportion of total assets financed by the bank’s creditors.Debt Ratio = Total liabilities / Total assetsIt shows the dependence on debt financing. The higher the ratio, the greater the amount of assets financed by the bank’s creditors. It does not point out any absolute excellent or poor measure. If the bank is capable of paying all the interest payment related with debts within payable time, debt is not a trouble. It is also known as the debt to capital ratio, debt to equity ratio, total debt ratio or financial leverage ratio.2. Debt to equity Ratio: It is the most admired leverage ratio and it endows with feature approximately the amount of leverage (liabilities assumed) that a bank has relative to the capital afforded by shareholders. Debt Equity Ratio = Total debt / Shareholders’ EquityOr Debt Equity Ratio = Total long term debt / Shareholders’ EquityThe lower the ratio, the less leverage that a bank is using. It presents the percentage of a bank’s assets that are financed by debt versus equity. It is a widespread quantify of the long-term capability of a company's business and, along with current ratio, a measure of its liquidity, or its ability to cover its expenses. As a result, debt to equity estimates often just takes in long-term debt instead of a company's total liabilities.” CITATION Fin440 \l 1033 (Gitman)3. Long term debt ratio: It is long term debt divided by long term debt and total equity.Long term debt ratio =Long term debt / (Long term debt + Total equity)Long term debt and total equity is sometimes called as total capitalization. Bank’s long term debt is matter of more concern than its short term debt. The higher the ratio, the greater the firms degree of long term indebt-ness and the more financial leverage it has.4. Cash Flow to Debt Ratio:It is to compare the operating?cash flow to its total debt. It is characterized as the sum of short-term borrowings, the current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt. This ratio provides an indication of a company's ability to cover total debt with its yearly cash flow from operations. Cash Flow to Debt Ratio =Total operating cash flow /total debt.The higher the percentage ratio, the better the company's ability to carry its total debt.5. Financial Leverage Multiplier: It is also known as equity multiplier (EM) financial leverage ratio or leverage ratio. It is total assets divided by common stockholder's equity. This is a judge of leverage. It reflects the leverage or financing police, the sources chosen to fund the debt or equity portion of the bank.Bank’s Equity Multiplier (EM) or financial leverage multiplier (FLM) = Total Asset/ Total Equity Capital The superior the ratio is, the more the company is depending on debt to finance its asset base. It is a way of examining how a company uses debt to finance its assets. It shows a company's total assets per taka of stockholders' equity.C. Activity (efficiency ratio):Activity ratio measures the speed with which various accounts are converted into sales or cash –inflows or out flows. In other words, it indicates the efficiency to generate income and effectiveness different activates required conduct bank’s operations.1. Operating Efficiency Ratio: It provides a measure of how effectively a bank is operating and an indication bank’s ability to manage its expense compared to total operating revenues. Operating Efficiency Ratio = Total Operating Expense / Total Operating RevenueDeclining operating efficiency designates better performance. As it evaluates the overhead structure of a financial institution, it is also referred as the "overhead burden" or "overhead efficiency ratio". D. Profitability ratio: Profitability ratios are intended to measure how efficiently the bank uses its assets and how efficiently the bank manages its operations.1. Net Interest Margin: Net Interest Margin (NIM) measures the difference between the interest income generated by bank’s interest sensitive asset such as loans and investments and the amount of interest paid out to the deposits and non deposit borrowings which are known as interest expense. The theoretical formula is given below-Net Interest Margin = (Interest Income from loans and security investments- Interest expenses on deposits and on other deposits) / Total AssetsNot all assets generate interest income .so in the real world; the assets which are sensitive to changes in interest rate and generate interest income are used to calculate NIM. These assets are called interest sensitive asset. Then the formula is –Net Interest Margin = (Interest Income from loans and security investments- Interest expenses on deposits and on other deposits) / Total Earning AssetsIn this report, the later formula of NIM has been worn. Increased NIM indicates improved performance .It is considered equivalent to the gross margin of non-financial companies.” CITATION Fin440 \l 1033 (Gitman)2. Net Non Interest margin: Net Non Interest margin explains how proficiently assets are utilized to make net non interest margin. It computes the quantity of non-interest revenues stemming from deposit service charges and other service fees the financial firm has been able to collect (fee income) relative to the amount of non-interest costs incurred (counting salaries and wages, repairs and maintenance cost of services and loan loss expenses).Net Non- interest Margin = (Non-Interest Revenues – Non-interest Expansés) / Total AssetEnlarged value of NNIM indicates better performance. Most often of the banks net non-interest margin is negative since non-interest costs commonly exceed the fee income. 3. Net Profit Margin (NPM): It is calculated using a formula and written as a percentage or a number. Margin is mostly used for internal Profit Margin (NPM) = Net Income/ Total Operating revenuesIt measures the parentage of each taka remaining after all costs and expenses, including taxes and preferred stock dividends, have been deducted. It other words reflects the effectiveness of expense management (cost control) and service pricing policies. The higher the net profit margin ratio will be the better.4. Return on Assets (ROA):Return on total Assets, often called the return on investment (ROI), measures the overall effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. It indicates how well financial management utilizes the average taka invested in the bank's assets, whether the taka came from investors or creditors. It equal to a fiscal year's earnings divided by its total assets, expressed as a percentage.Return on assets (ROA) = Net Income after Tax/ Total AssetsIncreased ROA indicates improved performance. The higher the ROA ratio will be the better.” CITATION Fin440 \l 1033 (Gitman)5. Return on Equity (ROE):ROE is equal to a fiscal year's net income (after preferred stock dividends but before common stock dividends) divided by total equity (excluding preferred shares), expressed as a percentage. Return on Equity (ROE) = Net Income after Tax/ Total equity CapitalIt is measure of how the stock holders fared during the year. It measures the rate of return on the ownership interest (shareholders' equity) of the common stock owners. It also shows the management efficiency. It measures a firm's efficiency at generating profits from every taka of equity capital Increased ROE indicates improved performance.. In accounting sense, it is a true bottom line of measure of performance.6. Earnings per Share: The EPS represents the number of taka earned during the period on behalf of each outstanding share of common stock.Earnings per Share = Net Income after Tax / Common Equity Shares Outstanding?Earnings per share?serve as a major indicator of?a company's profitability and performance improvement. The higher the EPS will be the bank will be considered the more profitable.E. Market position ratios1. Book value per share:Book value per share is the accounting value of each share recorded. To get the M/B ratio it is the first requirement.Book value per share = (Assets – Liabilities) / Number of shares Outstanding = total equity/ Number of shares Outstanding” CITATION Fin440 \l 1033 (Gitman)HSBC, at a glanceHeadquartered in London, HSBC is one of the largest banking and financial services organizations in the world. HSBC's international network comprises around 8,000 offices in 87 countries and territories in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, the Americas, the Middle East and Africa.With listings on the London, Hong Kong, New York, Paris and Bermuda stock exchanges, shares in HSBC Holdings plc are held by around 220,000 shareholders in 124 countries and territories. The shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depositary Receipts.HSBC provides a comprehensive range of financial services to around 100 million customers through four customer groups and global businesses: Personal Financial Services (including consumer finance); Commercial Banking; Global Banking and Markets; and Private Banking. NCC Bank, at a GlanceNational Credit and Commerce Bank limited primarily appeared as the “National Credit limited”. Preceding to alteration into a listed commercial bank, National Credit Limited (NCL) was integrated as an investment company in 1985 at Motijheel Commercial Area in Dhaka with preliminary authorized capital of taka 30 cores. The intention of the company was to assemble resources from within and invest them in such manner so as to grow country's Industrial and Trade Sector. It played a significant role to develop the capital market of Bangladesh. However within a small phase of time this investment company turned into a listed commercial bankBy means of the authorization from the government and Bangladesh Bank, NCL was transformed in a full fledged commercial bank and began its banking functions on in 1993, in the name of National Credit and Commerce Bank Limited. It has been registered under the company act-1913, as a private commercial bank with paid up capital of Tk.39crores to serve the nation in conjunction with 16 branches.The bank offers a diversified category of products and services, among those the vital services and products are: deposits, loans, card and remittance facilities, brokerage services, treasury services and so on. Reasons of Financial RecessionThe collapse of the housing bubble, which peaked in the U.S. in 2006, caused the values of securities tied to real estate pricing to plummet thereafter, damaging financial institutions globally. Questions regarding bank solvency, declines in credit availability, and damaged investor confidence had an impact on global stock markets, where securities suffered large losses during late 2008 and early 2009. Economies worldwide slowed during this period as credit tightened and international trade declined. Critics argued that credit rating agencies and investors failed to accurately price the risk involved with mortgage-related financial products, and that governments did not adjust their regulatory practices to address 21st century financial markets.The U.S. housing bubble and foreclosures“Between 1997 and 2006, the price of the typical American house increased by 124%. During the two decades ending in 2001, the national median home price ranged from 2.9 to 3.1 times median household income. This ratio rose to 4.0 in 2004 and 4.6 in 2006. This housing bubble resulted in quite a few homeowners refinancing their homes at lower interest rates, or financing consumer spending by taking out second mortgages secured by the price appreciation.” CITATION Wik105 \l 1033 (Wikipedia)By September 2008, average U.S. housing prices had declined by over 20% from their mid-2006 peak. Easy credit, and a belief that house prices would continue to appreciate, had encouraged many subprime borrowers to obtain adjustable-rate mortgages. These mortgages enticed borrowers with a below market interest rate for some predetermined period, followed by market interest rates for the remainder of the mortgage's term. Borrowers who could not make the higher payments once the initial grace period ended would try to refinance their mortgages. Refinancing became more difficult, once house prices began to decline in many parts of the USA. Borrowers who found themselves unable to escape higher monthly payments by refinancing began to default. During 2007, lenders had begun foreclosure proceedings on nearly 1.3 million properties, a 79% increase over 2006. This increased to 2.3 million in 2008, an 81% increase vs. 2007. As of August 2008, 9.2% of all mortgages outstanding were either delinquent or in foreclosure. CITATION Wik106 \l 1033 (Wikipedia) See: Appendix # 2, Fig-1Sub-prime lendingThe term subprime refers to the credit quality of particular borrowers, who have weakened credit histories and a greater risk of loan default than prime borrowers. The value of U.S. subprime mortgages was estimated at $1.3 trillion as of March 2007, with over 7.5 million first-lien subprime mortgages outstanding.Subprime mortgages remained below 10% of all mortgage originations until 2004, when they spiked to nearly 20% and remained there through the 2005-2006 peak of the United States housing bubble. A proximate event to this increase was the April 2004 decision by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to relax the net capital rule, which encouraged the largest five investment banks to dramatically increase their financial leverage and aggressively expand their issuance of mortgage-backed securities. Subprime mortgage payment delinquency rates remained in the 10-15% range from 1998 to 2006, then began to increase rapidly, rising to 25% by early 2008. CITATION Wik107 \l 1033 (Wikipedia) See: Appendix#2, Fig-2Mortgage underwritingMortgage underwriting standards declined gradually during the boom period. The use of automated loan approvals allowed loans to be made without appropriate review and documentation. In 2007, 40% of all subprime loans resulted from automated underwriting. The chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association claimed that mortgage brokers, while profiting from the home loan boom, did not do enough to examine whether borrowers could repay.A study by analysts at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland found that the average difference between subprime and prime mortgage interest rates (the "subprime markup") declined significantly between 2001 and 2007. The quality of loans originated also worsened gradually during that period. The combination of declining risk premium and credit standards is common to boom and bust credit cycles. The authors also concluded that the decline in underwriting standards did not directly trigger the crisis, because the gradual changes in standards did not statistically account for the large difference in default rates for subprime mortgages issued between 2001-2005 (which had a 10% default rate within one year of origination) and 2006-2007 (which had a 20% rate). In other words, standards gradually declined but defaults suddenly jumped. Further, the authors argued that the trend in worsening loan quality was harder to detect with rising housing prices, as more refinancing options were available, keeping the default rate lower. CITATION Wik108 \l 1033 (Wikipedia)Down payments and negative equityA down payment refers to the cash paid to the lender for the home and represents the initial homeowners’ equity or financial interest in the home. A low down payment means that a home represents a highly leveraged investment for the homeowner, with little equity relative to debt. In such circumstances, only small declines in the value of the home result in negative equity, a situation in which the value of the home is less than the mortgage amount owed. In 2005, the median down payment for first-time home buyers was 2%, with 43% of those buyers making no down payment whatsoever. By comparison, China has down payment requirements that exceed 20%, with higher amounts for non-primary residences. CITATION Wik109 \l 1033 (Wikipedia)Housing speculationSpeculative borrowing in residential real estate has been cited as a contributing factor to the subprime mortgage crisis. During 2006, 22% of homes purchased (1.65 million units) were for investment purposes, with an additional 14% (1.07 million units) purchased as vacation homes. During 2005, these figures were 28% and 12%, respectively. In other words, a record level of nearly 40% of homes purchases were not intended as primary residences. Housing prices nearly doubled between 2000 and 2006, a vastly different trend from the historical appreciation at roughly the rate of inflation. While homes had not traditionally been treated as investments subject to speculation, this behavior changed during the housing boom. Media widely reported condominiums being purchased while under construction, then being "flipped" (sold) for a profit without the seller ever having lived in them. Some mortgage companies identified risks inherent in this activity as early as 2005, after identifying investors assuming highly leveraged positions in multiple properties. CITATION Wik1011 \l 1033 (Wikipedia)Corporate risk-taking and leverageDebt taken on by financial institutions increased from 63.8% of U.S. gross domestic product in 1997 to 113.8% in 2007. A 2004 SEC decision related to the net capital rule allowed USA investment banks to issue substantially more debt, which was then used to help fund the housing bubble through purchases of mortgage-backed securities. From 2004-07, the top five U.S. investment banks each significantly increased their financial leverage which increased their vulnerability to a financial shock. These five institutions reported over $4.1 trillion in debt for fiscal year 2007, about 30% of USA nominal GDP for 2007. CITATION Wik1012 \l 1033 (Wikipedia) See: Appendix#2, Fig-3Why HSBC was affected?HSBC was also affected at the recent financial recession. Now we will try to find out some of the reasons behind that.Cash position indicator:The ratio indicates a bank’s ability to handle immediate cash needs. The higher the ratio the better the liquidity position of the bank. From 2005 to 2007 we are observing a decreasing trend initially and then an increasing trend in the cash position indicator ratio. The year 2009 had the most cash position. Which implies, during 2009 HSBC has increased its cash and deposit from other banks. A large cash position is often a powerful signal of a bank’s liquidity, while a small cash position is a potential warning sign.Liquid Securities indicator:Government securities are the second most liquid assets after cash. This ratio compares the most marketable securities an institution can hold with the overall size of its asset portfolio; the greater the proportion of govt. securities, the more liquid the bank. Among all other years year 2007 had the lowest one .That means HSBC has reduced its Government Securities in its’ asset portfolio.Hot money ratio:We can see that the Hot Money Ratio of HSBC is showing a mixed trend from the graph, where 2008 has seen the lowest one and 2006 was the highest one. Deposit composition ratio:The Deposit Composition ratio is fluctuating during the respective study periods. In the year 2005 it has the lowest one but after that it increased. From the year 2007 to 2008 it has stable position.Debt ratio:This ratio measures the percentage of funds that are borrowed. The higher the debt the more an institution exposed to risk.HSBC has also been able to maintain a steady debt ratio .90(average) from the year 2006 to 2008. So it is upholding its leverage position which is a good sign for the bank. The management should keep a close look in this ratio as we that leverage also contributes to risk and the expected return for the bank.Debt-equity ratio:This ratio compares the amount funds supplied and the amount of funds supplied by the owners. We know that equity is the most expensive source of funds a so an optimum debt to equity ratio is needed to maximize income.HSBC moves form equity to debt than debt to equity at a very low rate. Moreover, from the graph we can see on the year 2005 to year 2007 their debt equity portion of financing becomes more stable. Company has increased its equity.Long-term debt ratio:As the percentage gets higher, this means that a higher proportion of debt is used for the permanent financing for the firm as opposed to investor funds. In the year 2005 as the proportion of debt got higher, so HSBC had the chance of bankruptcy.Cash flow- debt ratio:This ratio compares a bank's operating?cash flow to its total debt, which, for purposes of this ratio, is defined as the sum of short-term borrowings, the current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt. The higher the percentage ratio, the better the bank's ability to carry its total debt. For HSBC in the year 2005 and 2009 had the lowest one that indicates HSBC had the less ability to carry its total debt during those years.Financial leverage multiplier:This ratio shows?a Bank's?total assets?per dollar of stockholders' equity. A higher equity multiplier indicates higher financial leverage, which means the bank is relying more on debt to finance its assets. In the year 2008 HSBC had the highest trend then a decreasing path in 2009.Operating efficiency ratio:The operating efficiency ratio was consistent throughout the six years. This implies that the bank has been successfully managed to generate adequate amount of operating revenues to cover the operating expenses. Although HSBC’s operating efficiency is almost steady, it is showing a slightly increasing trend. Net interest margin:The Net interest margin of HSBC has gone down continuously from 2005 to 2009, which means that either the net interest income decreased consistently over the period or HSBC could not manage its assets efficiently. ROA:The ROA of HSBC is fluctuating during the respective study periods. The total asset of the bank is decreasing from the year 2005 to year 2008 then it become stable, but the variations in ROA are mainly because of variations in the level of net profit after tax. Thus, the management is finding difficulties in managing their investments in assets and generating profit from these assets.ROE:We can see that the ROE of HSBC is showing a mixed trend, where 2009 has seen the lowest ROE. The main difference between 2008 and 2009 is that they have significantly reduced their provision for loans and advances/investments which affected their net income.EPS:The EPS of HSBC was also quite fluctuating but it experienced less sharp ups and downs. Except a fall in 2005 and 2006 the EPS of HSBC was more or less stable. For HSBC the maximum EPS was in 2007 and the minimum was in 2005. The EPS of HSBC increased consistently from 2007 to 2009, as the net profit after tax has increased consistently during these years.Securitization-asset:Here there is mix trend; in 2006 and 2007 HSBC has the stable path. And in the year 2009 has the lowest path.Securitization-liability:The graph shows that in the year 2006 and 2007 it has stable position and then decreasing path initially. Asset-backed securities:An Asset-backed securities is essentially the same thing as a mortgage-backed security, except that?the securities?backing it?are assets such as loans, leases, credit card debt,?a company's receivables, royalties and so on, and not mortgage-based securities. In the year 2007 HSBC had the highest path among all parison between HSBC and NCC Bank:Cash position indicatorTrend analysis: From 2005 to 2006, NCC bank’s CPI enhanced from 0.07 to 0.10. Again in 2007 to 2008 the ratio deteriorated from 0.06 to 0.05. If the ratio of year 2006 is considerd as an specail ocaurance NCC bank’c CPI is stable around .05 to .07 ,which indicates to grip the adequate immediate cash requirements NCC Bank maintains a stable CPI most often.Alternatively, HSBC usa had a continuous growing CPI over the four years from 2006 to 2009. The CPI arrived at 0.03 from .01 in these time period. There is only one exception from 2005 to 2006 in which the CPI decreases.Cross sectional analysis:While comparing NCC Bank’s CPI with HSBC usa’s CPI ,it becomes visible that NCC Bank has better CPI position in all the years. In additon,it also establish that NCC Bank maintain a bettet cash position to control its on the spot cash obligation than HSBC usa.Liquid Securities Indicator:Trend analysis:NCC Bank’s Total asset and Governments securities both increased during the time period interval but governments’ securities had increased at much lower rate than total assets and that is reflected in the deterioration of Liquid securities indicator ratio from year 2004 to 2006.In 2007, again it rose to 0.14, with a drop to 0.11 in 2008, it remained 0.14 in 2009. So the liquid securities indicators were in the range of 0.11 to 0.14 in the mentioned last five year.Cross sectional analysis:EBL’s governement securites were falled slighlty upto 2006. Finaly In 2008 and 2009, NCC Bank is much ahead than HSBC usa by holding more government securities. As the superior the section of government securities, the more liquid NCC Bank’s situation is likely to be in attendance.Debt Ratio:Trend analysis:NCC Bank had a significantly high debt ratio in 2005 which was 0.93 that means less of its funds are generated from borrowing and that causes fewer obligations. If the bank is capable of paying all the interest payment related with debts within payable time, debt is not a trouble.Increase in Total Asset was little bit higher than increase in liability which has kept the ratio stable. Since this is a negative security so Eastern bank has less and almost stable liability over last six year. Position of EBL is appreciable. Cross sectional analysis:Though debt ratio is not a good indicator of performance, but for less risk associated lesser debt, it can be said NCC Bank is probably considered to be in a good position by most of the investors.Debt-equity ratio:lefttopTrend analysis:NCC banks stock holders equity and debt both have increased from 2005 to 2009 and total debt is increasing at a rate relatively lower than stock holders equity. That gives a positive to its performance.Stock holders’ equity of HSBC usa has increased from 2005 to 2008 and debt of it has been fluctuating till 2008. In 2008 debt increased at a higher rate that equity so HSBC usa needs to decrease their debt.Cross sectional analysis:Debt to equity is a negative ratio so it is clear that HSBC USA is doing well comparing to NCC bank. In addition, NCC bank’s debt to equity ratio is deteriorating day by day. So it is improving its performance and has future potential.Long-term debt ratio:Trend analysis:NCC bank’s was increasing in 2005 to 2006 from 0.16 to 0.266, but in 2007 it dropped to 0.22 then it decreased to 0.20 till 2008, yet again increased to 0.22 in 2009.Cross sectional analysis:HSBC had a stable data in this regard.Cash flow-debt ratio:Trend analysis:Cash flow to Debt ratio of NCC bank has been stable as increase in cash flow percentage was nearly equal to increase in debt. Which means bank maintain almost same percentage of cash against its debt. HSBC USA has to improve from this position.HSBC has been fluctuating hugely from 2005 to 2009 in terms of Cash flow to Debt ratio. The ratio increased a lot in the year 2006 and then suddenly falls down to zero which means the company has insufficient cash to match its debt.Cross sectional analysis:NCC bank has been the stable performer between this two and where as HSBC is in a worse position.Financial Leverage Multiplier:Trend analysis:NCC Bank’s FLM has improved from 2005 to 2006 from 14.04 to 15.28. In 2007, again it decreased to 12.78. Then again rose to 14.15 in 2008, followed by a fall to 10.93 in 2009. There is instability in FLM.HSBCs FLM continuously increased till 2008 and then suddenly it just dropped to 18.43 in 2009. Cross sectional analysis:Between the two banks ,HSBC usa is in better position , yet it is deteriorating and needs to be stable or to be growing.Operating efficiency ratio:Trend analysis:The operating efficiency ratio was almost stale for HSBC USA from 2005 to 2009 with a decrease in 2009 compared to 2008.Similar thing happened to NCC Bank as well. Its operating efficiency ratio was stable with a slight decrease in 2009 compared to 2008.Cross sectional analysis:It seems HSBC was performing consistently better than NCC Bank but in recent years the operating efficiency of both the banks decreased compared to that of the previous Interest Margin:Trend analysis:NCC bank’s net interest margin was in fluctuating position around 2.96% to 3.91% from year 2005 to 2009. From 2007 to 2008 it slightly decreased from 3.44% to 2.91% following an increase to 3.03% in Interest Margin of HSBC is nearly stable. In 2005-2006 NIM decreased and remain constant from 2006 to 2009.Cross sectional analysis:Here, for investors NCC is showing a better performance than HSBC USA is if we consider Net Interest Margin. Return on Asset:Trend analysis:ROA of NCC Bank was almost fixed thorugh year 2005 to 2008 which was 1.35% to 1.50%. There was a dramatic improvement in 2009, signifying that the bank performed well. In 2009 ROA of 2.61% means Tk. 100 worth of asset had generated Tk. 2.61 of return in the year 2009.ROA of HSBC decreased from 2005 to 2008 and on 2008 to 2009 the bank showed some brightness as it showed an upward curve. Because of continuous decrease it can be said that company did not perform too well and need to improve their performance. Although the ROA in 2008 increased, they need to increase it further.Cross sectional analysis:So, according to ROA, NCC bank is in a better position than HSBC usa because of their excellent improvement. Return on Equity:Trend analysis:In 2005-2009, more or less stable ROE of NCC Bank up to 2008 which was averagely 22% and in 2009 it soared to 28.50%. This means for last years, around Tk. 28.50 was flowing to shareholders by Tk. 100 worth of assets where as previously on average it was Tk. 22. The ratio improved as change in Net Income after Tax was higher than change in Total EquityFrom 2005 to 2008 HSBC showed downward curve with an exception in 2007. But in 2008 to 2009 it raised from 4.70% to 5.10%.Cross sectional analysis:So, according to ROE, NCC Bank is far better and safer for investors to invest because of its high and upward return on Equity.Earning per share:Trend analysis:EPS was almost stable for NCC throughout the year 2005 to 2008. In 2009 it increased a bit thanks to the booming capital market. On the other hand, in 2007 HSBC experienced a stiff increase in earning because of the rising credit demand for housing bubble, but then it starts falling.Cross sectional analysis:NCC is in a better position in terms of EPS because it has a stable increase. But HSBC had a sharp increase and then started falling.Conclusion:HSBC was affected due subprime (low quality) loan, mortgage backed securities, off balance sheet financing. These made their profitably ratios down sizing.However in Bangladesh, NCC does not use these instruments in large manner. In reality they are not introduced here.More over NCC is not globalized in that manner.Recently NCC is investing a huge portion of its deposits in Capital market. If the market collapse NCC will affected. Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Gitman, Lawrence J. Principles of Managerial finance. San Diego State University: Pearson Education, 2007-2008.Wikipedia. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 <. 17 12 2010 < # 1 (Financial Statement)Appendix # 2Figure # 1Figure # 2Figure # 3 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download