MyWhatever.com: Multisite content management



[pic]

THE TRICENTRAL

PALLIATIVE CARE PROGRAM

TOOLKIT

Richard D. Brumley, M.D.

Kristine Hillary, M.S.N., R.N.P.

Copyright © 2002 by Brumley/Hillary. 1st edition. Copyright under the Uniform Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. No part of this toolkit may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the publishers.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Richard D. Brumley, M.D.

Dr. Richard Brumley, M.D., is the Medical Director of Kaiser Permanente Hospice and Home Health Department for the TriCentral Service Area in Downey, California. He is residency trained in Family Medicine and is board-certified in Hospice and Palliative Medicine. As an Associate Clinical Professor at the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, he has instructed Family Practice residents in the importance of hospice and home health services. He has been active in the promotion of hospice and pain and symptom control for over 20 years. He is the principal investigator for a Kaiser Permanente project, supported by the Garfield Memorial Fund, to replicate the TriCentral Palliative Care (TCPC) Program in Kaiser sites in Colorado and Hawaii. He also was principal investigator for a prior project that evaluated the effectiveness of the TCPC Program. In 2001, he and his colleague and Toolkit co-author, Kristine Hillary, were co-awarded a Faculty Scholarship by the Soros Foundation’s Project on Death in America for work in palliative care.

Kristine Hillary, M.S.N., R.N.P.

Kristine Hillary is the Director of Home Health and Hospice for Kaiser Permanente, TriCentral Service Area in Downey, California. Ms. Hillary graduated in 1971 from Lutheran Deaconess Hospital School of Nursing in Minneapolis, Minnesota. She holds a BSN and MSN from California State University at Los Angeles and returned to CSULA in 2000 for post-master’s certification as a nurse practitioner. The beginning of her nursing career was spent in acute hospital settings, both in general medical-surgical and intensive care units, as a staff nurse and supervisor. She has worked as a clinician and administrator in hospice and palliative care for the past 15 years. Ms. Hillary has participated in several research projects related to care and decision-making at the end of life and has lectured frequently on developing a home- based model of palliative care.

Contact Information

We welcome your questions, your suggestions for improvement, and your feedback regarding this manual’s usefulness. Here’s how to contact us:

Richard D. Brumley, M.D.

Kaiser Permanente TriCentral Service Area

12200 Bellflower Blvd.

Downey, CA 90242

(562) 622-4246; Fax (562) 622-4146

richard.d.brumley@

Kristine Hillary, M.S.N., R.N.P.

Kaiser Permanente TriCentral Service Area

12200 Bellflower Blvd.

Downey, CA 90242

(562) 622-4062; Fax (562) 622-4146

KAHillary@scal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgements

Chapter 1 Introducing the TriCentral Palliative Care Program

The Need for a New Model of End-of-Life Care

Kaiser Permanente and the TriCentral Service Area

TriCentral’s Palliative Care Program

About this Toolkit

Who Should Use this Toolkit

Chapter 2 Understanding Palliative Care and the TriCentral PC Program

What is Palliative Care?

Core Components of the TriCentral Palliative Care Program

How the TCPC Program is Similar to and Different from Hospice Care

Integration of the TCPC Program with the Traditional Healthcare Model

Chapter 3 Building A Palliative Care Program

Conduct a Needs Assessment

Establish Leadership

Develop Program Policies and Procedures

Identify Barriers to Implementation - and Strategies to Overcome Them

Craft a Business Plan

Chapter 4 TriCentral Palliative Care Program Operations

Staffing

Patient Enrollment

Care Planning

Patient and Family Services

Patient Discharge

Chapter 5 Quality Management Plan

Purpose and Functions of the Plan

Quality Assessment

Performance Improvement

Division and Regional Indicators and Indicator Worksheets

Chapter 6 Financing and Reimbursement

Capitated Managed Care Organizations

TCPC Program Financing

Financing for Community-Based Home Health Agencies

References

Appendix

TriCentral Palliative Care Program Brochure

Palliative Performance Scale

Telephone Screening Tool

End-of-Life Care Checklist

Kaiser Permanente Home Health Quality Management Program Description

TriCentral Palliative Care Performance Assessment and Improvement Plan

Home Health Pain Standards

Management of Pain: Home Health Indicator Worksheet

Patient Satisfaction Survey

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This toolkit is made possible through the immeasurable contributions of a collective group of expert practitioners and organizations dedicated to improving end-of-life care:

▪ Kaiser Permanente members with advanced illness

▪ Kaiser Permanente TriCentral Administration

▪ Greg Adams, Senior Vice President, Operations Improvement

▪ Martin Gilbert , M.D., Bellflower Area Associate Medical Director

▪ Debbie Anderson, R.N., M.B.A., Continuing Care Leader

▪ Kaiser Permanente TriCentral Palliative Care Staff

▪ Kaiser Permanente Aging Network

▪ Richard Della Penna, M.D., Director, Kaiser Permanente Aging Network and Elder Care

▪ Edward Thomas, Director, Garfield Memorial Fund

▪ Partners in Care Foundation

▪ W. June Simmons, L.C.S.W., Chief Executive Officer

▪ David A. Cherin, Ph.D., Statistical Consultant

▪ Susan Enguidanos, M.S.W., Research Manager

▪ Paula M. Jamison, Data Coordinator

▪ Soros Advisory Committee

▪ Joanne Lynn, M.D., Director, RAND Center to Improve Care of the Dying

• Editorial Assistance – Annie Rahman

PROJECT ON DEATH IN AMERICA

This toolkit was underwritten by a Soros Faculty Scholarship Award from the Project on Death in America of the Open Society Institute. The Project on Death in America's Faculty Scholars Program was established to identify outstanding faculty and clinicians who are making a commitment to work in end-of-life care, and to support them in disseminating existing models of good care, developing new models for improving the care of the dying, and developing new approaches to the education of healthcare professionals about the care of dying patients and their families. The mission of the Project on Death in America is to understand and transform the culture and experience of dying and bereavement through initiatives in research, scholarship, the humanities, and the arts, and to foster innovations in the provision of care, public education, professional education, and public policy.

[pic]

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCING THE

TRICENTRAL PALLIATIVE CARE PROGRAM

THE NEED FOR A NEW MODEL OF

END-OF-LIFE CARE

There is no doubt that Americans are frustrated with traditional models of end-of-life care. Frustrated and deeply conflicted, as evidenced by two polar-opposite patient-care movements in recent years.

One has been the movement led by some patient advocates to legalize physician-assisted suicide as a means of ending the suffering of terminally ill patients. This movement, which in 1994 led to a voter-approved initiative in Oregon that legalized physician-assisted suicide under certain conditions, offers an extreme solution to a widespread problem of pain control and individual choice. Gone are the days—only a few generations ago—when Grandma lingered in the back bedroom under the watchful care of the family doctor and took her final departure surrounded by family members and close friends. Although most Americans still prefer to die at home, about 75% of deaths occur in hospitals and nursing homes (Lynn, 1996). Indeed, most terminally ill Americans experience what has been called an “Invisible Death” (Nuland, 1995). Sequestered in healthcare institutions, they spend their last days—sometimes their last weeks and months—isolated from family and friends, under the care of medical strangers who have had little or no instruction in the “art of dying.” For many of the dying, quality of life is sacrificed as they undergo “heroic” treatments that too often are medically futile and inappropriate, not to mention expensive. An estimated 10% to 12% of our nation’s total health care costs each year are spent on end-of-life care (Scitovsky, 1994; Emanuel & Emanuel, 1994). “There is abundant evidence,” write physicians Meier and Morrison, “that the quality of life during the dying process is often poor, characterized by inadequately treated physical distress, fragmented care systems, poor to absent communication between doctors and patients and families, and enormous strains on family caregiver and support systems (1999:6).” These outcomes are in large part a result of our recent healthcare revolution, which has given rise to high-tech treatments that can extend life but also prolong dying, leaving some desperate souls to wonder “When is enough enough?”

The opposite movement has not been political in nature but rather represents a shift in patient use of hospice care. Medicare introduced the hospice program in 1983 as an optional benefit for achieving a “good death” that substitutes “high-touch” for high tech. Widely recognized as effective in improving quality of life for terminally ill patients, hospice programs provide a range of services to control pain and provide comfort care, primarily to individuals in their own homes. In the past decade, the number of Medicare patients receiving hospice care has more than doubled. Today, about 20 percent of patients who die in the United States receive hospice care. But average lengths of stay in hospice have been dropping, from 64 days in 1992 to 48 days in 1999 (NHO, 2000). Twenty-eight percent of Medicare patients in the hospice program receive hospice care for one week or less (GAO 2000). One reason for this shift in hospice use is patient unwillingness to forego curative care—and to abandon hope despite a poor prognosis. The Medicare hospice program pays for medical procedures necessary for pain control and other symptom management, but not those aimed at curing the patient. As a result, many seriously ill patients resist the program because “it shuns treatment and is a strong marker for imminent death (The Center to Improve Care of the Dying, 2000).” Healthcare officials speculate that with the development of new treatment options for life-threatening conditions, terminally ill patients are waiting to enroll in hospice programs until after they have exhausted all other alternatives (GAO, 2000). As one healthcare observer put it, “They are simply unwilling to promise to die on schedule.”

This see-sawing between medically inappropriate care and too little care has prompted calls for change and for blended models of care that view “relief of suffering and cure of disease…as twin obligations of a medical profession that is truly dedicated to patient care (Cassell, 1982).” One such blended model—and the basis for this toolkit—is Kaiser Permanente’s TriCentral Palliative Care Program.

KAISER PERMANENTE AND

THE TRICENTRAL SERVICE AREA

Kaiser Permanente (KP), the nation’s largest not-for-profit health plan, is an integrated health delivery system that organizes and provides or coordinates members’ care, including preventive care, hospital and medical services, and pharmacy services. Among the various managed care models, KP is considered a traditional group model HMO in that it is a not-for-profit healthcare system with its own staff and facilities, and with active involvement of physicians in the decision-making process that affects patient care.

KP’s mission is to provide affordable, high-quality healthcare services to improve the health of its members and the communities it serves. KP serves 8.2 million members in nine states—California, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Washington—and the District of Columbia.

KP serves the TriCentral area in Southern California through its medical centers in three communities: Bellflower, Baldwin Park, and Harbor City. KP TriCentral serves an estimated 630,000 members who reside in the area; its palliative care and hospice programs are available to an additional 300,000 members who reside in neighboring communities.

TRICENTRAL’S PALLIATIVE CARE PROGRAM

TriCentral’s Palliative Care (TCPC) Program was launched first as a pilot project in 1997 and then as a formal program in 1998 as a means of achieving balance in end-of-life care and helping seriously ill patients find peace and dignity between the extremes of too little care and too much. The program was initiated as an alternative to KP’s hospice program, which like other hospice programs across the country, was being underused. At TriCentral, average survival time for hospice patients was 48 days from the time of enrollment. Twenty-six percent of these patients died within the first seven days of admission to the program; another 35 percent died in the remainder of the first month. Many KP patients eligible for hospice care either refused services or were never referred to the program for a variety of reasons, including physician uncertainty in determining life expectancy, patient unwillingness to forego curative care (and hope), and other negative connotations of the word “hospice.” As a result, patients often died in acute-care hospital beds or intensive care units, sometimes following bouts of medically futile care. In 1996 at TriCentral, 63% of the patients who died in the intensive care unit and 54% of those who died in acute medical beds had a primary or secondary diagnosis of one of three commonly fatal, incurable conditions: cancer, congestive heart failure (CHF), or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Frustrated and disturbed by these trends, we established the Palliative Care (PC) program, an outpatient service housed in our Home Health Department that offers improved care to dying patients and their families. Modeled after KP’s hospice program in that it offers superb pain management and other comfort care in the patient’s home, the PC Program features three important modifications, all of them intended to promote timely referrals to the program:

Physicians are not required to give a six-month prognosis. Recognizing that it is often difficult to estimate life expectancy, we relaxed referral guidelines. Physicians are asked to refer any patient if they “would not be surprised if this patient died in the next year.” Thus, as a general rule, palliative care patients are accepted into the program with a prognosis of 12 months or less to live.

While the Palliative Care Program emphasizes much improved pain control and other symptom management, patients do not have to forego curative care, as they do in hospice programs.

• Patients are assigned a palliative care physician who coordinates care from a variety of healthcare providers, including specialists and the patients' primary care physician, thus preventing the service fragmentation that often occurs in healthcare systems.

In addition to these design improvements, the program features five core components, each of which contributes to enhanced quality of care and patient quality of life. These core components are:

• an interdisciplinary team approach, focusing on the patient and family, with care provided by a core team consisting of a physician, nurse, and social worker, all with expertise in pain control, other symptom management, and psychosocial intervention

• home visits by all team members, including physicians, to provide medical care, support, and education as needed by patients and their caregivers

• ongoing care management to fill gaps in care and ensure that the patient’s medical, social, and spiritual needs are being met

• telephone support via a toll-free number and after-hours home visits available 24 hours a day, seven days a week as needed by the patient

• advanced care planning that empowers patients and their families to make informed decisions and choices about end-of-life care

A recent external evaluation established that the TCPC Program met the complex physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs of chronically ill patients at the end of life while improving the cost effectiveness of such care. The evaluation, which compared 145 palliative care patients to a matched sample of 151 home-health KP patients, showed that the palliative care patients had comparatively fewer emergency department visits, inpatient days, skilled nursing days, and physician office visits (p ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download