Instructor Evaluation Form - Cuesta College
SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
CUESTA COLLEGE
FACULTY EVALUATION OF COORDINATOR/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
This form is to be used for all relevant parts of the evaluation process. The processes and procedures that govern Coordinators’ and Assistant Directors ‘ evaluations are set forth in Article VII of the District/CCFT Collective Bargaining Agreement.
|Division: | |Dean: | |
|Director or | |Date: | |
|Division Chair: | | | |
|Coordinator or | |
|Assistant Director: | |
|INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATORS: |
| |
|The attached forms are to be used in the evaluation of the performance of a Coordinator or Assistant Director. The ratings to be utilized to rank the |
|evaluation criteria are defined below. |
| |
|Each Coordinator/Assistant Director being evaluated is expected to achieve a ranking of “satisfactory” or better. Evaluators must comment fully and |
|specifically when an evaluation of “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” is made. |
| |
|Each Coordinator/Assistant Director will be evaluated according to the individual job responsibilities outlined in the agreement development by the |
|Coordinator/Assistant Director and the Division Chair/Director at the start of the school year. A copy of that agreement is attached. |
| |
|Comment fully and specifically on an overall rankings marked “needs improvement” or unsatisfactory” in the “Comments” portion of the last section. |
RANKING CRITERIA DEFINITIONS:
A EXCELLENT: Performance is outstanding.
B GOOD: Performance consistently exceeds standards.
C SATISFACTORY: Performance meets standards.
D NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Performance is below standards.
E UNSATISFACTORY: Performance is significantly below standards.
SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
CUESTA COLLEGE
FACULTY EVALUATION OF COORDINATOR/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
|DUTIES |
|Based upon the attached description of the Coordinator/Assistant Director duties, make comments below in sections 1-4; in section 5, make an overall evaluation |
|based on the ranking criteria definitions (A-E). |
|1. What do you feel are the strengths of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |
| |
|2. In what areas do you feel improvement can be made in the performance of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |
| |
|3. Describe any external factors that you feel inhibit the performance of the duties of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |
| |
|4. Make any other comments you would like to offer regarding the role of the Coordinator/Assistant Director. |
| |
|OVERALL EVALUATION RANKING |A |B |C |D |E |
|5. Make an overall evaluation (A-E) of your role based upon the ranking definitions on the first page. | | | | | |
Comment fully and specifically, if the overall evaluation is marked “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory.” Attach additional pages if necessary.
COMMENTS:
G:\Evaluations\Faculty\Coord Asst Dir.doc
11/98 dated
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- instructor evaluation form pdf
- instructor evaluation examples
- instructor evaluation questions
- course and instructor evaluation form
- instructor evaluation survey questions
- training instructor evaluation form
- instructor evaluation pdf
- instructor evaluation form
- instructor evaluation tool
- classroom instructor evaluation checklist
- instructor evaluation template
- instructor evaluation form template