Instructor Evaluation Form - Cuesta College



SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

CUESTA COLLEGE

FACULTY EVALUATION OF COORDINATOR/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

This form is to be used for all relevant parts of the evaluation process. The processes and procedures that govern Coordinators’ and Assistant Directors ‘ evaluations are set forth in Article VII of the District/CCFT Collective Bargaining Agreement.

|Division: |      |Dean: |      |

|Director or |      |Date: |      |

|Division Chair: | | | |

|Coordinator or |      |

|Assistant Director: | |

|INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATORS: |

| |

|The attached forms are to be used in the evaluation of the performance of a Coordinator or Assistant Director. The ratings to be utilized to rank the |

|evaluation criteria are defined below. |

| |

|Each Coordinator/Assistant Director being evaluated is expected to achieve a ranking of “satisfactory” or better. Evaluators must comment fully and |

|specifically when an evaluation of “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory” is made. |

| |

|Each Coordinator/Assistant Director will be evaluated according to the individual job responsibilities outlined in the agreement development by the |

|Coordinator/Assistant Director and the Division Chair/Director at the start of the school year. A copy of that agreement is attached. |

| |

|Comment fully and specifically on an overall rankings marked “needs improvement” or unsatisfactory” in the “Comments” portion of the last section. |

RANKING CRITERIA DEFINITIONS:

A EXCELLENT: Performance is outstanding.

B GOOD: Performance consistently exceeds standards.

C SATISFACTORY: Performance meets standards.

D NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Performance is below standards.

E UNSATISFACTORY: Performance is significantly below standards.

SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

CUESTA COLLEGE

FACULTY EVALUATION OF COORDINATOR/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

|DUTIES |

|Based upon the attached description of the Coordinator/Assistant Director duties, make comments below in sections 1-4; in section 5, make an overall evaluation |

|based on the ranking criteria definitions (A-E). |

|1. What do you feel are the strengths of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |

|      |

|2. In what areas do you feel improvement can be made in the performance of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |

|      |

|3. Describe any external factors that you feel inhibit the performance of the duties of the Coordinator/Assistant Director? |

|      |

|4. Make any other comments you would like to offer regarding the role of the Coordinator/Assistant Director. |

|      |

|OVERALL EVALUATION RANKING |A |B |C |D |E |

|5. Make an overall evaluation (A-E) of your role based upon the ranking definitions on the first page. | | | | | |

Comment fully and specifically, if the overall evaluation is marked “needs improvement” or “unsatisfactory.” Attach additional pages if necessary.

COMMENTS:      

G:\Evaluations\Faculty\Coord Asst Dir.doc

11/98 dated

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download