Threats to Internal and External Validity by Campbell and ...
Threats to Internal and External Validity by Campbell and Stanley
Threats to Internal Validity: may be an alternative explanation instead of treatment for the outcomes.
1. History (H): events occurring during the study may impact the outcome. For example, the experimenter often being late or participants struggling to get to sessions.
2. Maturation (M): processes within participants (eg, aging, recovery, etc.) may impact the outcome.
3. Testing (T): the effects of completing one test upon later tests (eg, learning, sensitization, fatigue).
4. Instrumentation (I): changes in the measure (eg, calibration, malfunction) and/or changes in the scorers (eg, measurement procedures) may impact measurements.
5. Statistical Regression (SR): the movement of post test scores toward the mean, independent of any treatment effect. Operates when group/s have been selected on the basis of their extreme scores.
6. Selection (S – Int): differences between treatment and control groups resulting from the non-random distribution of participants.
7. Mortality (M): loss of participants from a group or differential loss between groups.
8. Placebo (nocebo) effect (P): participants’ expectations of and desires for outcome may impact the outcome.
9. Contamination effect (C): participants begin activities that interact with treatment or resemble treatment, which may impact the outcome. For example, a participant may begin a new exercise regime.
10. Hawthorne effect (HA): simply receiving attention from experimenters may impact the outcome.
11. Experimenter bias (E): experimenter’s expectations of and desires for outcome my consciously or unconsciously impact the outcome.
12. Interaction Effects (Interact – Int): selection - maturation, etc. Interactions may produce effects which may be mistaken for the effect of the treatment variable.
Threats to External Validity: may impair replication of results in the real world.
1. Sample bias (S – Ext): the sample may not represent the population of interest.
2. Reactive or Interaction Effects of Testing (RT): the testing may be more frequent in study than real world, which may impair replication if there are effects of testing.
3. Reactive Effects of Arrangements (RA): the experimental environment is so different from the real world that generalization is not possible.
4. Multiple Treatment Interference (MT): multiple treatments may not be administered in the same way in the real world, which impair replication if the treatments are interacting.
5. Interaction Effects (Interact – Ext): selection – treatment, etc. the results observed in the treatment group are due in part to selection biases.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- elements components of research design
- module 3 validity matrix george mason university
- internal and external validity plausible rival hypotheses
- chapter 11 validity of research results in quantitative
- 633 validity detailed review
- sample exam questions
- understanding the evidence and evaluation requirements and
- threats to internal and external validity by campbell and
Related searches
- internal and external customer service
- identifying internal and external customers
- internal and external customers importance
- internal and external customers in healthcare
- internal and external customer relationsh
- examples of internal and external conflict
- internal and external customer satisfaction
- internal and external analysis
- internal and external conflict
- internal and external conflict pdf
- examples of internal and external customers
- internal and external customer