“Feasibility Study for the use of Solar Powered Street ...



“Feasibility Study for the use of Solar Powered Street Lights on Residential Areas”Prepared by: Sasha Merced11/14/2008Abstract “Feasibility Study for the use of Solar Powered Street Lights on Residential Areas”By Sasha MercedThe high price of petroleum and our increasing demand for energy are forcing the electric rates to go up everywhere in the country. That, added to the fact that petroleum is a finite resource, made utility companies and consumers realize that we need to look for alternative sources of power. Solar panels are widely known, but they’re not cost effective when it comes to supplying large amounts of power. Solar powered lights are readily available and more affordable, and many people already use them in their yards. While they are more expensive than regular lights, they save energy, and their LED bulbs last a long time. Residential electric street light posts are very expensive, need a lot of maintenance, and do the same job a solar light does. This report studies the feasibility of using solar powered lights instead of electric street lights on some residential areas where there’s no need for high power lighting sources. Keywords: solar power, street lights, energy, utilities, electric ratesTable of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Abstract PAGEREF _Toc214557086 \h iiIntroduction PAGEREF _Toc214557087 \h 1High Pressure Sodium PAGEREF _Toc214557088 \h 2Light Emitting Diodes PAGEREF _Toc214557089 \h 4Should we switch? PAGEREF _Toc214557090 \h 5Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc214557091 \h 7References PAGEREF _Toc214557092 \h 8References PAGEREF _Toc214557093 \h 8Appendix A PAGEREF _Toc214557094 \h 10Appendix B PAGEREF _Toc214557095 \h 11Appendix C PAGEREF _Toc214557096 \h 12Appendix D PAGEREF _Toc214557097 \h 13 IntroductionWe are constantly searching for alternative sources of energy. We’ve experimented with electricity, biofuels, wind power, and solar power, and we’re still looking for other alternatives. Solar power is the most popular replacement for electric power, but it’s still not practical or affordable. The panels provide little energy compared to their size, and solar power is very expensive. The average cost per watt of a solar panel is $7.00 if it’s installed by you and $9.00 if it’s installed by a contractor. Appendix A shows how to calculate the cost of switching to 100 percent solar power. In Jacksonville, the cost of electricity for 1000 kilowatts (kW) is about $.12 per kW after taxes and surcharges. It would cost around $50,000-60,000 to install solar panels to provide a house with 1000 kW per month, and it would take 43 years in order for the system to pay for itself. However, solar lights are becoming very popular because they’re easy to install, they turn on and off automatically, and they pay for themselves over a short period of time. These lights are readily available in stores, and come in many varieties, from path lights, to floodlights. Some even come with remote solar panels so that you can place the lights wherever you want, regardless of where the sun hits. How are solar lights less expensive? They use LED (light emitting diode) lights, which use less energy than other light bulbs. This allows for the placement of a very small solar cell to power the lamp.The following table shows a comparison of LED lights with the most commonly used light bulbs: Comparison between LED, incandescent and fluorescent light bulbsIncandescentFluorescentLEDAverage Lifespan (hours)150010,00060,000Watts60146Cost$1.35$2.98$54.95kWh used (over 60k hours)3,600840360Light bulb expense(over 60k hours)$81.00$41.72$54.96The technology can easily be applied to other uses as well. LED lights are already used for traffic lights, and in some cities, for street lights. The only difference is, unlike our solar patio lights, they’re powered by electricity. The next step in saving energy would be using solar energy to power the LED street lights. On this report, we’ll study the feasibility of using solar powered street lights in residential areas.High Pressure SodiumCurrently, Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA) uses high pressure sodium (HPS) street lights on residential areas. The standard HPS street lights vary from 70 to 400 watts, and the ones used for residential areas are 70 watts. Appendix C shows the diagram of standard residential street light fixtures. Some mercury vapor street lights are used, but they are being phased out and replaced with HPS lights. Sodium vapor lamps use sodium in an excited state in order to produce an orange light. A 70 watt lamp uses about 36 kW per month and produces about 5,450 lumens. The monthly electric charge for a 70 watt light is 13.1 cents per kW, not including fuel surcharges or fees. Underground systems also require additional charges to cover the differential cost between overhead and underground systems.The operation of a high-pressure sodium lamp is illustrated in this diagram: The lamp is powered by an AC voltage that supplies current through the ballast. This increases the amalgam temperature and the gas (sodium and mercury) pressure, causing a further increase in current. This cycle keeps repeating until the amalgam is fully evaporated about 20,000 hours later. Even though HPS lights are energy efficient, they create light pollution. Light Emitting DiodesLight emitting diodes (LED) are semiconductors that convert electricity into light. The conductor material is typically aluminum-gallium-arsenide (AlGaAs) that has been doped so that additional atoms change the balance, either adding free electrons or creating holes where electrons can go. A semiconductor with extra holes is called P-type material, and a semiconductor with extra electrons is called N-type material. The free electrons in the N-type material are repelled by the negative electrode and drawn to the positive electrode, and the holes in the P-type are repelled by the negative charge and move the other way, creating a charge that produces the light we see:LED lights produce about 60 lumens of white light per watt without any light pollution. When you power the LED light with a solar cell, there’s no electricity being used, which helps to preserve our finite energy resources. Appendix D shows some pictures of installed solar LED street lights.Should we switch?LEDs produce less lumens per watt than HPS lights, but their light is much more efficient and provides better visibility. The following pictures show a street with HPS lights, and LED lights, respectively:The pictures were taken in Oakland, California, as part of an LED light assessment. There are more pictures of the study in Appendix B.This shows that you can replace HPS street lights for LED street lights with less lumens, and, less watts. The currently used 70 watt HPS street lights can be replaced with a 30-40 watt LCD solar street light. LED lights last twice as much as HPS lights, and are more resistant. HPS light bulbs break easily and need constant replacements, while LEDs are small and harder to break. The following table shows a cost comparison between HPS and LED lights, using information from previous research: Comparison of HPS and LED street lightsHPSLEDInitial Cost$400.00, plus electrical wiring*$2,000-$4000Energy cost per year$60.000Maintenance cost per year$24.00$9.00 (no replacement for the first 10 years)Lifespan30,000 hours (7 years) for light bulb only, lamp replaced when other failures occur as well60,000 hours (14 years) for light bulb only,25+ years for solar cellYearly operation cost $144.00$4.50*Electrical wiring of underground serviceThe initial cost of the solar LED street light is larger, but the HPS street light has a large installation cost for the electric wiring that could go over $40,000 for underground electric systems. The only installation cost for the LED street light would be the cost of digging and placing the pole on its designated location. On new construction, an LED street light might end up being more economical. On areas where HPS street lights are already in place, changing the lights to LED’s is too costly, and it would take about 50 years for the LED light to pay for itself. That is longer than the life span of the solar cell.ConclusionFor new construction, solar LED lights would be a great option. They are less expensive when you factor in the installation costs. They provide better lighting, which would help reduce crime in some areas. LEDs last twice as much as HPS lights, and they need less maintenance. They don’t consume any electricity, and they don’t contain any harmful gases.Changing current HPS street lights to LED street lights is not feasible because the upfront cost would be too high. The solar cell would need to be replaced before the street light pays for itself, adding to the cost. A more suitable option might be to use electric LED street lights, or to retrofit the HPS street lights to use LED light bulbs. The state of California saves over $10,000 per year after switching 200,000 old traffic lights to LED.ReferencesAnderson, Neil, et, al. LED’s: New Lighting Alternative for Greenhouses. Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota. City of Jacksonville. JEA. Electric Master Catalog. Jacksonville, Fl. November 2008.City of Jacksonville. JEA. Electric Tariff Documentation, Vol, 1. Jacksonville, FL. June, 2008.City of Oakland. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Gas & Electric by Energy Solutions. Demonstration Assessment of Light Emitting Diode (LED) Street Lighting. Oakland, Ca. January 2008.Harris, Tom. How Light Emitting Diodes ork. October 30, 2008. 08 Nov. 2008. < Completes Phase I of City Energy Program with Solar at City Hall. May 18, 2004. 10 Nov. 2008. <>Progress Energy Florida to pilot first LED outdoor area lighting in territory. October 28, 2008. 11 Nov. 2008. < Diego Regional Energy Office. Technology Assessment of Light Emitting Diodes (LED) for Street and Parking Lot Lighting Applications. San Diego, Ca. August 2003.Solar Street Light. 2008. 10 Nov. 2008. < , Alex. Iraq’s electricity-starved capital turns to?solar. Los Angeles Times. July, 14, 2008.Appendix AHow to figure the cost for 100% solar powerTake number of KWH you use every month. Divide that by 30. That gives you your average daily usage. So if you use 1000 KWH, that’s 33.3 KWH per day.Divide it by the number of full sun hours you get per day on a yearly average. So, if you get 5 hours per day, divide 33.3 by 6, that gives you 5.55 kW, or 5550 watts. Multiply that by 1.15, which gives you 6382 watts of solar panel needed.Appendix B Pictures form a study made in the City of Oakland, CaliforniaAppendix CAppendix D ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download