Www.cdss.ca.gov
County:01 AlamedaQTR 1 for FY 2015-16 Reporting Quarter and State Fiscal Year:QTR 1 for FY 2016-1702 AlpineQTR 2 for FY 2015-16Date Completed:03 AmadorQTR 3 for FY 2015-1604 ButteQTR 4 for FY 2015-16Section I. Fraud Complaints05 CalaverasQTR 1 for FY 2016-17ATotal Number of Complaints Received 106 ColusaQTR 2 for FY 2016-17A.1. Number of Complaints Received By Source 07 Contra CostaQTR 3 for FY 2016-17Recipient 208 Del NorteQTR 4 for FY 2016-17Provider309 El DoradoQTR 1 for FY 2017-18Family member410 FresnoQTR 2 for FY 2017-18County staff511 GlennQTR 3 for FY 2017-18Neighbor612 HumboldtQTR 4 for FY 2017-18Data matches713 ImperialAnonymous- phone814 InyoAnonymous- mail915 KernAnonymous- website1016 KingsOther (Explain in Comments- section VI.1.)1117 LakeA.2.Number of Complaints By Outcome - Initial Review 18 LassenReferred for county investigation1219 Los AngelesReferred for state investigation 1320 MaderaReferred for administrative action1421 MarinReferred to APS/CPS1522 MariposaDropped, no action1623 Mendocino24 MercedSection II. Early Detection Savings25 ModocATotal Number of Cases Terminated/Reduced1726 MonoA.1.Number of Cases Terminated/Reduced as a Result of: 27 MontereyData matches1828 NapaEntirely overstated disability1929 NevadaPartially overstated disability2030 OrangeHousehold composition/proration 2131 PlacerMisrepresented program eligibility 2232 PlumasBTotal Number of Hours Terminated/Reduced2333 RiversideB.1.Number of Authorized Hours Terminated/Reduced as a Result of: 34 SacramentoData matches2435 San BenitoEntirely overstated disability2536 San BernardinoPartially overstated disability2637 San DiegoHousehold composition/proration 2738 San FranciscoMisrepresented program eligibility 2839 San Joaquin40 San Luis ObispoSection III. Fraud Investigations - Completed 41 San MateoATotal Number of Investigations Completed2942 Santa BarbaraA.1.43 Santa ClaraCollusion (Provider & Recipient)3044 Santa CruzProvider fraud3145 ShastaRecipient fraud3246 SierraCounty staff3347 SiskiyouOther (Explain in Comments - section VI.2.)3448 Solano49 Sonoma50 StanislausA.2.Number of Investigations By Outcome51 SutterDropped, no action3552 TehamaReferred for admin. action to IHSS3653 TrinityReferred for prosecution to County DA3754 TulareReferred for prosecution to DOJ3855 TuolumneA.3.Amount Estimates by Outcome ($)56 VenturaEstimated amount referred for admin. action to IHSS3957 YoloEstimated amount referred for prosecution4058 YubaSection IV. Prosecutions - CountyATotal Number of Cases Received for Prosecution 41A.1.Number of Cases by OutcomeCases declined by DA42Plea deal, no conviction 43Cases dismissed 44Number of cases - with convictions45Number of felony convictions 46Number of misdemeanor convictions 47Number of defendants prosecuted 48Number of Referrals to suspended and ineligible list 49Section V. Totals ($)ALoss Identified to IHSS Program 50BTotal Amount Identified for Collection through Court Ordered Restitution51CTotal Amount Identified for Collection through County Overpay Recovery52Section VI.1. Comments 53Section VI.2. Comments 54 ................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.