State of Utah v. R. Mont Evans and Janet Rose : Response ...

Brigham Young University Law School

BYU Law Digital Commons

Utah Supreme Court Briefs

1987

State of Utah v. R. Mont Evans and Janet Rose : Response to Petition for Rehearing

Utah Supreme Court

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Law Commons

Original Brief Submitted to the Utah Supreme Court; digitized by the Howard W. Hunter Law Library, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; machine-generated OCR, may contain errors. David Wilkinson; Attorney General; Stephen J. Sorenson, Esq.; Assistant Attorney General; Ralph L. Finlayson; Assistant Attorney General; Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant . L. Zane Gill; Biele, Haslam and Hatch; Attorneys for Defendant/Respondent Jane Rose.

Recommended Citation

Response to Petition for Rehearing, State of Utah v. R. Mont Evans and Janet Rose, No. 870454.00 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987).

This Response to Petition for Rehearing is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Utah Supreme Court Briefs by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. Policies regarding these Utah briefs are available at . Please contact the Repository Manager at hunterlawlibrary@byu.edu with questions or feedback.

CKirr no.

L. Zane G i l l Ann Wise

BIELE, HASLAM & HATCH Attorneys for Respondent Janet Rose 50 West Broadway, Fourth Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 328-1666

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH

STATE OF UTAH,

v

?

?

I

]

Plaintiff/Appellant, ]

vs.

]

R. MONT EVANS and JANET ROSE,

) Case No. 810454

Defendants/Respondents. ]

? ?" ?" -- '?

RESPONDENT ROSE'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT EVANS1 PETITION FOR REHEARING

On Appeal from the Memorandum Decision and Order of the District Court of the Third Judicial District

for Salt Lake County, State of Utah

David Wilkinson Attorney General Stephen J* Sorenson, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Chief, Litigation Division Ralph L. Finlayson Assistant Attorney General 236 State Capitol Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Attorneys for Plaintiff/

Appellant

L. Zane Gfill BIELE, HASLAM & HATCH 50 West Broadway, Fourth Floor Salt Lak^ City, Utah 84101 Attorneys for Defendant/

Respondent Janet Rose

APR 2

L. Zane Gill Ann Wise BIELE, HASLAM & HATCH Attorneys for Respondent Janet Rose 50 West Broadway, Fourth Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 328-1666

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH

STATE OF UTAH,

]

Plaintiff/Appellant,

vs.

]

R. MONT EVANS and JANET ROSE,

] Case No. 870454

Defendants/Respondents. ]

RESPONDENT ROSE'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT EVANS' PETITION FOR REHEARING

On Appeal from the Memorandum Decision and Order of the District Court of the Third Judicial District

for Salt Lake County, State of Utah

Respondent Rose hereby j o i n s i n and adopts as her own the arguments set f o r t h i n Respondent Evans p e t i t i o n f o r rehearing f i l e d w i t h t h i s court on or about A p r i l 18, 1988. In the event that t h i s court grants oral argument on the issues covered by Respondent Evans p e t i t i o n f o r r e h e a r i n g , Respondent Rose hereby requests opportunity t o present oral argument to the court.

DATED t h i s J{ day of A p r i l 1988. BIELE, HASLAM & HATCH

L. lane/Gill Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant

Ann Wise Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I hereby c e r t i f y t h a t on the ?S^ day of A p r i l 1988, I caused t o be m a i l e d , postage p r e p a i d , a t r u e and c o r r e c t copy of t h e f o r e g o i n g Respondent Rose's Response t o Respondent Evans1 P e t i t i o n f o r Rehearing i n the above-entitled matter to the following:

David L. Wilkinson Attorney General Stephen J . Sorenson Chief, Litigation Division Ralph L. Finlayson Assistant Attorney General 236 State Capitol Salt Lake C i t y , Utah 84114

Dan Berman Peggy Tomsic BERMAN & O'RORKE 50 South Main #1250 Salt Lake City, Utah 84144

/

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download