Castellow, W



East Carolina University

Department of Psychology

[pic]

Citations of Wuensch’s Research on Jury Decisions

Here is a list of citations of my articles on jury research. This should give a head start to the person who wants to review the literature in this area.

Physical Attractiveness and Social Desirability

Castellow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547-562.

was cited by:

1. Wuensch, K. L., Castellow, W. A., & Moore, C. H. (1991). Effects of defendant attractiveness and type of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 713-724.

2. Egbert, J. M., Jr., Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., & Castellow, W. A. (1992). The effect of litigant social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 569-579.

3. McKelvie, S. J., & Coley, J. (1993). Effects of crime seriousness and offender facial attractiveness on recommended treatment. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 265-277.

4. Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715-730.

5. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

6. Alcorn, S. (1995). Symbolic seduction in the workplace. Administration and Society, 27, 400-426.

7. Frazier, P. A., Cochran, C. C., & Olson, A. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 21-37.

8. Salekin, R. T., Ogloff, J. R. P., McFarland, C., & Rogers, R. (1995). Influencing jurors’ perceptionsof guilt – expression of emotionality during testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 293-305.

9. Tesser, A. (1995). Advanced social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

10. Popovich, P. M., Gehlauf, D. N., Jolton, J. A., Everton, W. J., Godinho, R. M., Mastrangelo, P. M., & Somers, J. M. (1996). Physical attractiveness and sexual harassment: Does every picture tell a story or every story draw a picture? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 520-542.

11. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

12. Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 71-93.

13. Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 877-901.

14. Knapp, D. E., Faley, R. H., Ekeberg, S. E., & Dubois, C. L. Z. (1997). Determinants of target responses to sexual harassment: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 687-729.

15. Solomon, D. H., & Williams, M. L. M. (1997). Perceptions of social-sexual communication at work: The effects of message, situation, and observer characteristics on judgments of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 196-216.

16. Johnson, J. D., Benson, C., Teasdale, A., Simmons, S., & Reed, W. (1997). Perceptual ambiguity, gender, and target intoxication. Assessing the effects of factors that moderate perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1209-1221.

17. Burian, B. K., & Yanico, B. J. Group gender composition effects on judgments of sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 465-480.

18. Smith, S. M., McIntosh, W. D., & Bazzini, D. G. (1999). Are the beautiful good in Hollywood? An investigation of the beauty-and-goodness stereotype on film. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 69-80.

19. Farley, S. D., Chia, R. C., & Allred, L. J. (1998). Stereotypes about attractiveness: When beautiful is not better. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 479-492.

20. Nunez, N., McCoy, M. L., Clark, H. L., Shaw, L. A. (1999). The testimony of elderly victim/witnesses and their impact on juror decisions: The importance of examining multiple stereotypes. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 413-423.

21. Sheets, V. L., & Braver, S. L. (1999). Organizational status and perceived sexual harassment: Detecting the mediators of a null effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1159-1171.

22. LaRocca, R. A., & Kromrey, J. D. (1999). The perception of sexual harassment in higher education: Impact of gender and attractiveness. Sex Roles, 40, 921-940.

23. Hurt, L. E., Wiener, R. L., Russell, B. L., & Mannen, R. K. (1999). Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 413-433.

24. Golden, J. H., Johnson, C. A., & Lopez, R. A. (2001). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Exploring the effects of attractiveness on perception of harassment. Sex Roles, 45, 767-784.

25. Gueguen, N., & Jacob, C. (2002). Solicitation by e-mail and solicitor’s status: A field study of social influence on the Web. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 5, 377-383.

26. Wuensch, K. L., Campbell, M. W., Kesler, F. C., & Moore, C. H. (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587-600.

27. Lieberman, J. D. (2002). Head over the heart or heart over the head? Cognitive experiential self-theory and extralegal heuristics in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2526-2553.

28. Gueguen, N. (2003). The effect of shoplifter’s status on reporting a crime: An evaluation in a natural setting. Studia Psychologica, 45, 221-228.

29. Ferguson, T., Berlin, J., Noles, E., Johnson, J., Reed, W., & Spicer, C. V. (2005). Variation in the application of the " promiscuous female" stereotype and the nature of the application domain: Influences on sexual harassment judgments after exposure to the Jerry Springer show. Sex Roles, 52, 477-487.

Wuensch, K. L., Castellow, W. A., & Moore, C. H. (1991). Effects of defendant attractiveness and type of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 713-724

was cited by:

1. Mazella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 1315-1344.

2. McKelvie, S. J., Mitchell, M., Arnott, R., & Sullivan, M. (1993). Effects of offenders’ and victims’ characteristics on severity of punishment. Psychological Reports, 72, 399-402.

3. McKelvie, S. J., & Coley, J. (1993). Effects of crime seriousness and offender facial attractiveness on recommended treatment. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 265-277.

4. Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715-730.

5. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

6. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

7. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

8. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2004). Social psychology (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

9. Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Social psychology (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

10. Przygotzki, N., & Mullet, E. (1997). Moral judgment and aging. European Review of Applied Psychology - Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 47(1), 15-21.

11. Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1998). Psychology and law: Truthfulness accuracy and credibility. London: McGraw-Hill.

12. Watkins, L. M., & Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 76-84.

13. Wolf, Y. (2001). Modularity in everyday life judgments of aggression and violent behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 1034.

14. Abwender, D. A., & Hough, K. (2001). Interactive effects of characteristics of defendant and mock juror on US participants' judgment and sentencing recommendations. Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 603-615.

15. McKelvie, S. J. (2002). Effects of sex of judge and sex of victim on recommended punishment of a male murderer in a mock scenario. Psychological Reports, 91, 533-536.

16. Lieberman, J. D. (2002). Head over the heart or heart over the head? Cognitive experiential self-theory and extralegal heuristics in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2526-2553.

17. Gueguen, N. (2003). The effect of shoplifter’s status on reporting a crime: An evaluation in a natural setting. Studia Psychologica, 45, 221-228.

18. Bergeron, C. E., & McKelvie, S. J. (2004). Effects of defendant age on severity of punishment for different crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 75-90.

19. Conti, R. P., & Conti, M. A. (2004). Mock jurors' perceptions of facial hair on criminal offenders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1356-1358.

20. Abel, M. H., & Watters, H. (2005). Attributions of guilt and punishment as functions of physical attractiveness and smiling. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 687-702.

21. Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (2006). Social psychology (11th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Egbert, J. M., Jr., Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., & Castellow, W. A. (1992). The effect of litigant social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 569-579.

was cited by:

1. Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715-730.

2. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

3. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

4. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

5. Gowen, M. A., & Zimmerman, R. A. (1996). Impact of ethnicity, gender, and previous experience on juror judgments in sexual harassment cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 596-617.

6. Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The effects of gender, legal standard, and ambivalent sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 71-93.

7. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33-57.

8. Aiken, J. H. (1997). Sexual character evidence in civil actions. Wisconsin Law Review, (6), 1221-1273.

9. Sheets, V. L., & Braver, S. L. (1999). Organizational status and perceived sexual harassment: Detecting the mediators of a null effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1159-1171.

10. Hurt, L. E., Wiener, R. L., Russell, B. L., & Mannen, R. K. (1999). Gender differences in evaluating social-sexual conduct in the workplace. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 413-433.

11. Wuensch, K. L., Campbell, M. W., Kesler, F. C., & Moore, C. H. (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587-600.

12. Gueguen, N. (2003). The effect of shoplifter’s status on reporting a crime: An evaluation in a natural setting. Studia Psychologica, 45, 221-228.

13. Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (2004). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee’s allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 207-217.

Wuensch, K. L., Chia, R. C., Castellow, W. A., Chuang, C.-J., & Cheng, B.-S. (1993). Effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and type of crime on mock juror decisions: A replication with Chinese students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 414-427.

was cited by:

1. Mazella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24: 1315-1344.

2. Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715-730.

3. DeSantis, A., & Kayson, W. A. (1997). Defendants’ characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions. Psychological Reports, 81, 679-683.

4. Hahn, P. W., & Clayton, S. D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 533-554.

Moore, C. H., Wuensch, K. L., Hedges, R. M., & Castellow, W. A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness and social desirability on judgments regarding a sexual harassment case. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 715-730.

was cited by:

1. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1997). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

2. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

3. Bryden, D. P., & Lengnick, S. (1997). Rape in the criminal justice system. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 87, 1194-1384.

4. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33-57.

5. Burian, Y. K., & Yanico, B. J. (1998). Group gender composition effects on judgments of sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 465-480.

6. Wuensch, K. L., Campbell, M. W., Kesler, F. C., & Moore, C. H. (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587-600.

7. Gueguen, N. (2003). The effect of shoplifter’s status on reporting a crime: An evaluation in a natural setting. Studia Psychologica, 45, 221-228.

8. Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (2004). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee’s allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 207-217.

Racial Bias

Wuensch, K. L., Campbell, M. W., Kesler, F. C., & Moore, C. H. (2002). Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 587-600.

was cited by

1. Guilmette, T. J, & Paglia, M. F. (2004). The public's misconceptions about traumatic brain injury: A follow up survey. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 183-189.

2. Sargent, M. J., & Bradfield, A. L. (2004). Race and information processing in criminal trials: Does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 995-1008.

3. Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (2004). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluations of a male employee’s allegation of sexual harassment by his female employer. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 207-217.

4. Mitchell, T., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621-637.

5. Bothwell R. K., Pigott M. A., Foley L. A., & McFatter, R. M. (2006). Racial bias in juridic judgment at private and public levels. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2134-2149.

6. Guilmette, T. J., Kennedy, M. L., Weiler, M. D., & Temple, R. O. (2006). Investigation of biases in the general public in evaluating mild head injury using neuropsychological and CT scan results: Forensic implications. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 305-314.

Verdict Selections

Poulson, R. L., Braithwaite, R. L., Brondino, M. J., & Wuensch, K. L. (1997). Mock jurors' insanity defense verdict selections. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 743-758.

was cited by:

1. Poulson, R. L., Wuensch, K. L., Brown, M. B, & Braithwaite, R. L. (1997). Mock jurors' evaluations of insanity defense verdict selection: The role of death penalty attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 1065-1078.

2. Poulson, R. L., Wuensch, K. L., & Brondino, M. J. (1998). Factors that discriminate among mock jurors' verdict selections: Impact of the guilty but mentally ill verdict option. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 366-381.

3. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

4. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2004). Social psychology (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Poulson, R. L., Wuensch, K. L., Brown, M. B, & Braithwaite, R. L. (1997). Mock jurors' evaluations of insanity defense verdict selection: The role of death penalty attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 1065-1078.

was cited by

1. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

2. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2004). Social psychology (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

3. Guy, L. S., & Edens, J. F. (2003). Juror decision-making in a mock sexually violent predator trial: Gender differences in the impact of divergent types of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 215-237.

4. Edens, J. F., Desforges, D. M., Fernandez, K., & Palac, C. A. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology Crime & Law, 10, 393-412.

5. O'Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S, D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 10, 443-470

Poulson, R. L., Eppler, M. A., Satterwhite, T. N., Wuensch, K. L., & Bass, L. A. (1998). Alcohol consumption, strength of religious beliefs, and risky sexual behavior in college students. Journal of American College Health, 46, 227-232. Also available in J. K. Davidson & N. B. Moore (eds.). (2001). Speaking of sexuality: Interdisciplinary readings. Los Angeles, Roxbury Publishing.

was cited by:

1. Keeling, R. P. (1998). Acculturation and cultural reframing: Society and health behavior. Journal of American College Health, 47, 7-9.

2. Davidson, J. K., & Moore, N. B. (1999). Age at first contraceptive information and risk taking among college women. American Journal of Health Behavior, 23, 292-302.

3. Chatters, L. M. (2000). Religion and health: Public health research and practice. Annual review of Public Health, 21, 335-367.

4. Turrisi, R., Wiersma, K. A., & Hughes, K. K. (2000). Binge-drinking-related consequences in college students: Role of drinking beliefs and mother-teen communications. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 342-355.

5. Wyatt, G. E., Carmona, J. V., Loeb, T. B., Guthrie, D., Chin, D., & Gordon, G. (2000). Factors affecting HIV contraceptive decision making among women. Sex Roles, 42: 495-521.

6. Spratt, J. T., & Turrentine, C. G. (2001). The leader factor: Student leadership as a risk factor for alcohol abuse. Journal of College Student Development, 42, 59-67.

7. Baer, J. S. (2002). Student factors: Understanding individual variation in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Suppl. 14, 40-53.

8. Brown, R. T. (2002). Risk factors for substance abuse in adolescents. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 49, 247-.

9. Fierros-Gonzalez, R., & Brown, J. M. (2002). High-risk behaviors in a sample of Mexican-American college students. Psychological Reports, 90, 117-130.

10. Kim, Y., & Seidlitz, L. (2002). Spirituality moderates the effect of stress on emotional and physical adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1377-1390.

11. Perkins, H. W. (2002). Surveying the damage: A review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Suppl. 14, 91-100.

12. Kaly, P. W., Heesacker M., & Frost H. M. (2002). Collegiate alcohol use and high-risk sexual behavior: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 838-850.

13. McCree, D. H., Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R., Davies, S., & Harrington, K. F. (2003). Religiosity and risky sexual behavior in African-American adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 2-8.

14. Davidson J. K., Moore N. B., & Ullstrup, K. M. (2004). Religiosity and sexual responsibility: Relationships of choice. American Journal of Health Behavior, 28, 335-346.

15. Gil, S. (2005). Personality traits and coping styles as mediators in risky sexual behavior: A comparison of male and female undergraduate students. Social Behavior and Personality, 33, 149-158.

16. Suris, J. C, Nebot, M., & Parera, N. (2005). Behaviour evaluation for risk-taking adolescents (BERTA): An easy to use and assess instrument to detect adolescent risky behaviours in a clinical setting. European Journal of Pediatrics, 164, 371-376.

17. Abbey, A., Saenz, C., Buck, P. O, Parkhill, M. R, & Hayman, L. W. (2006). The effects of acute alcohol consumption, cognitive reserve, partner risk, and gender on sexual decision making. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 113-121.

18. Dawson, K. A., Schneider, M. A., Fletcher, P. C., & Bryden, P. J. (2007). Examining gender differences in the health behaviors of Canadian university students. Journal of The Royal Society For The Promotion of Health, 127, 38-44.

19. Gallup, G. G., Burch, R. L., & Mitchell, T. J .B. (2006). Semen displacement as a sperm competition strategy - Multiple mating, self-semen displacement, and timing of in-pair copulations. Human Nature-An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 17, 253-264 2006

20. Newman, I. M., Shell, D. F., Li, T., & Innadda, S. (2006). Buddhism and adolescent alcohol use in Thailand. Substance Use & Misuse, 41, 1789-1800.

21. Weeden, J., & Sabini J. (2007). Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 79-88.

Wuensch’s Research Interests Page

Updated 1. December 2007

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download