School of Government Legal Citation and Style Guide

School of Government

Legal Citation and Style Guide

Contents

Introduction

NORTH CAROLINA CASES 2 Case Reporters 3 OFFICIAL CASE REPORTERS 3

UNOFFICIAL (REGIONAL) CASE REPORTER FOR NORTH CAROLINA CASE LAW 3

Case Citations to Official Reporters 3 Parallel Citations3 "Blank" Citations to Cases Not Published

in Official Reporter 3 PUBLISHED IN REGIONAL REPORTER 3 NOT PUBLISHED IN A REPORTER 4

FEDERAL CASES 4 United States Supreme Court 4 Federal District and Circuit Courts 5 CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS 5 DISTRICT COURT 5

GENERAL NOTES ABOUT CASE CITATIONS 6 What to Include/Exclude in Party Names in Citations 6 Jurisdictional Indicators7 Short-Form Citations7 Pinpoint Citations8 PINCITES: FAQS 8

MISCELLANEOUS QUESTIONS RELATED TO QUOTED MATERIAL AND PINCITES 10

Parentheticals, Subsequent and Prior History, and Order of Such Elements in Case Citations 11 PARENTHETICALS11

Weight of Authority Parentheticals 11 Quoting/Citing Parentheticals 12 Explanatory Parentheticals 12 SUBSEQUENT AND PRIOR HISTORY--THE BASICS 13 ORDER OF PARENTHETICALS AND CASE HISTORIES IN CITATIONS 14 Treatment of a Case Name That Is Part of a Sentence 14

STATUTES14 North Carolina Statutes, Session Laws 14

CITATIONS TO THE NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL STATUTES 14

NORTH CAROLINA SESSION LAWS 15 Federal Statutes, Regulations 15

UNITED STATES CODE 15 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS 16 FEDERAL REGISTER 16

? 2018 UNC SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

CONSTITUTIONS16 Federal Constitution16 TEXT REFERENCES 16 CITATIONS IN NOTES 17 State Constitutions17 TEXT REFERENCES 17 CITATIONS IN NOTES 17

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS, OPINIONS, ETC. 17 North Carolina Administrative Code 17 Decisions from State Administrative Bodies 18

NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS (OAH) 18

NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION 18

MISCELLANEOUS CITATION FORMS 19 Pattern Jury Instructions 19 Attorney General Opinions 19 North Carolina State Bar Ethics Opinions 19 North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct 19

CITATIONS TO SECONDARY SOURCES 20 Books20 SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT BOOKS 20 BOOKS FROM OTHER PUBLISHERS 20 TREATISES/MULTI-VOLUME WORKS 20 UNIQUE CITATION FORMS 20 Periodicals20 LAW REVIEW ARTICLES 20 NEWSPAPER ARTICLES 20

Print20 Online20 MAGAZINE ARTICLES 21

Print21 Online21 AMERICAN LAW REPORTS (ALR) ANNOTATIONS/ARTICLES21 AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION (ABA) SECTION REPORTS 21 School of Government Bulletins 21 Websites21 ONLINE-ONLY SOURCE 21 ARTICLE LINKED FROM WEBSITE MAIN PAGE 21 Blogs21 Podcasts21 ENTIRE SEASON 21 SINGLE EPISODE 22

AUGUST 2018|1

GENERAL RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL CITED SOURCES 22 Use of Id.22 Use of Supra and Infra22 SHORT-FORM CITES 22 INTERNAL CROSS-REFERENCES 23 Use of Signals 23 NO SIGNAL NEEDED 23 SIGNAL REQUIRED 24

E.g.24 See24 See also 24

But see 25 Cf.25 OTHER STYLE POINTS 25 Numbers/Numerals, Certain Ordinals 25 NUMBERS/NUMERALS25 CERTAIN ORDINALS 26

In Textual Sentences 26 In Citations 26

INTRODUCTION

With increasing frequency, School of Government legal publications are being written according to the style dictates of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. Some faculty authors (our Bluebook purists) are fully committed to this style scheme, while others modify it to align more with personal preferences. Either approach is acceptable, provided it is followed consistently.

Most authors choose to source their legal material using a combination of superscripted footnote indicators in text and below-the-rule footnotes containing source information, while a few use an inline citation method (see, e.g., North Carolina Crimes: A Guidebook on the Elements of Crime). Again, neither form is better; it's a matter of preference.

The sections below discuss citation forms for sources most commonly referenced in School legal publications. Deviations from Bluebook style are noted, as are trends in the way a particular source is being treated by our authors. Additional information is offered when relevant.

Sample citations are shaded in grey.

NORTH CAROLINA CASES

The North Carolina Court System has two divisions, the Trial Division and the Appellate Division. The Trial Division comprises the District and Superior courts. The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court make up the Appellate Division. Appellate Division cases are the ones most cited in works by School faculty.

In a publication discussing only North Carolina law, after making a first full reference to "the North Carolina Supreme Court," one can use "the supreme court" (lowercase) in subsequent references. In material that covers both state and federal law, to avoid confusion it's helpful to add "state" before references to North Carolina's top-level court ("the state supreme court") if decisions of the United States Supreme Court are also being discussed.

NOTE: Variations of state court names are acceptable.

?? North Carolina Supreme Court/Supreme Court of North Carolina ?? North Carolina Court of Appeals/Court of Appeals of North Carolina

2 | AUGUST 2018

? 2018 UNC SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

Case Reporters

OFFICIAL CASE REPORTERS There are two official reporters in North Carolina (each one's abbreviation, for citation purposes, is in parentheses).

?? North Carolina Reports (N.C.) ?? North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports (N.C. App.)

UNOFFICIAL (REGIONAL) CASE REPORTER FOR NORTH CAROLINA CASE LAW There is one unofficial reporter covering North Carolina's appellate courts (it is referred to as a "regional" reporter because it also includes cases from Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia).

?? South Eastern Reporter (S.E.)

Case Citations to Official Reporters A basic case citation contains the following elements: (1) the case name, (2) the reporter volume number, (3) the abbreviation for the reporter, (4) the page number in the reporter on which the case begins, and (5) the date of the decision.

North Carolina Supreme Court: King v. Town of Chapel Hill, 367 N.C. 400 (2014). North Carolina Court of Appeals: State v. Crow, 175 N.C. App. 119 (2005).

Parallel Citations When a case is published in both an official and an unofficial reporter, some authors choose to include both reporters in the citation of the case. The reference to the regional reporter is called a parallel citation.

State v. Kochuk, 366 N.C. 549, 742 S.E.2d 801 (2013). State v. Coleman, 228 N.C. App. 76, 743 S.E.2d 62 (2013).

NOTE: School faculty used parallel citations as a matter of course for years, but this practice is on the decline. It is neither right nor wrong to include a parallel citation; it is simply a preference. However, if parallels are used in a given publication, every citation should contain a parallel.

"Blank" Citations to Cases Not Published in Official Reporter

PUBLISHED IN REGIONAL REPORTER When a decision is not, or has yet to be, published in an official reporter but is available in a regional reporter, many faculty authors will cite the decision using a "blank" cite, that is, three underscores, followed by the abbreviated official reporter name, followed by another three underscores.

___ N.C. ___

The blank cite is then followed, after a comma, by a regional reporter citation and the date of decision (in parentheses).

State v. Bullock, ___ N.C. App. ___, 785 S.E.2d 746 (2016).

? 2018 UNC SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

AUGUST 2018|3

ALTERNATIVE: Some authors choose to dispense with blank cites and use only the regional reporter cite. This is acceptable, provided the jurisdictional indicator is placed before the decisional year in the parentheses at the end of the citation. The state court of appeals is abbreviated "N.C. Ct. App." and the state supreme court is abbreviated "N.C." for purposes of jurisdictional labeling. Note that the jurisdictional abbreviation for the North Carolina Court of Appeals (N.C. Ct. App.) is not the same as the abbreviation for the official reporter (N.C. App.) for this appellate body used in citations. (Jurisdictional abbreviations are found in Bluebook Table 1. For non? North Carolina cases especially, it's a good idea to verify that an author has used the correct abbreviation.)

State v. Bullock, 785 S.E.2d 746 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016).

NOT PUBLISHED IN A REPORTER When a decision is not, or has yet to be, published in either an official or a regional reporter, some faculty authors choose to use a "double blank" citation.

State v. Huey, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (Sept. 29, 2017).

Such cites often function as placeholders, with the author (or editor) updating them as the production process rolls on and publication of the decision finally occurs.

ALTERNATIVE: If a decision is not published in any reporter but is available on an electronic database (e.g., Westlaw, LEXIS, Bloomberg Law), it is acceptable (and more helpful for readers, I think), in lieu of a double blank cite, to use a database citation. This citation should contain the following elements: (1) case name, (2) docket number, (3) unique number assigned to the case by the database proprietor, (4) jurisdiction and date (including month and day) in parentheses.

State v. Huey, No. 355PA15, 2017 WL 4322611 (N.C. Sept. 29, 2017).

United States ex rel. Customs Fraud Investigations, LLC v. Victaulic Co., No. 13-2983, 2015 BL 103347 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 10, 2015).

FEDERAL CASES United States Supreme Court

United States Reports--abbreviated "U.S."--is the official reporter of U.S. Supreme Court opinions. (Aside: After making a first full reference to "United States Supreme Court," it is common practice to use "U.S. Supreme Court" or "the Court" (capitalized) in subsequent mentions.)

There are several unofficial reporters of U.S. Supreme Court cases (each one's abbreviation, for citation purposes, is in parentheses following the full reporter name): Supreme Court Reporter (S. Ct.); United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition (L. Ed.); and United States Law Week (U.S.L.W.). If an opinion has been published in United States Reports, the citation to it does not require a parallel.

Mich. Dep't of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).

However, if a case has not been published in United States Reports at the time it is cited by an author, the practice at the School has been to use a blank United States Reports cite, followed by a citation to the case in the Supreme Court Reporter.

4 | AUGUST 2018

? 2018 UNC SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

United States v. Bryant, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1954 (2016).

Occasionally, an author will know the United States Reports volume number in which a case is slated to be published but not the page number on which it will appear, and a partial blank cite will result.

United States v. Bryant, 580 U.S. ___, 136 S. Ct. 1954 (2016).

If the case is not available from United States Reports or from the Supreme Court Reporter (uncommon, as the latter tends to publish quickly), use the blank U.S. cite followed by a citation to an unofficial reporter, in this order of preference:

1. Lawyers' Edition--resulting citation following case name: ___ U.S. ___, 123 L. Ed. 2d 456 (2017).

2. United States Law Week--resulting citation: ___ U.S. ___, 123 U.S.L.W. 4567 (2017).

Federal District and Circuit Courts

CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS Decisions from U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal (the intermediate appellate courts at the federal level) are published in the Federal Reporter (abbreviated F.). There are thirteen such courts, eleven carrying sequential ordinal numbers (e.g., 1st, 2d, 3d Cir.) plus the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir.) and the Federal Circuit (Fed. Cir.). North Carolina is located within the Fourth (4th) Circuit. A parenthetical following the case name and reporter cite should contain the jurisdictional abbreviation and the year.

N.C. State Conference of NAACP v. McCrory, 831 F.3d 204 (4th Cir. 2017).

Federal Circuit Court opinions that have not been chosen for publication in the Federal Reporter are published in the Federal Appendix, an unofficial reporter. This reporter is abbreviated F. App'x (note that Westlaw incorrectly abbreviates it as "Fed. Appx.").

Fox v. South Carolina, 668 F. App'x 442 (4th Cir. 2016).

If a case from a federal circuit court has not yet been published in the Federal Reporter but is available on an electronic database, the database cite may be used (and can be updated if publication of the case occurs prior to files being sent to the printer).

Dankam v. Gonzales, No. 06-1277, 2007 WL 2028170 (4th Cir. July 16, 2007).

Faculty authors occasionally use blank cites for federal circuit court citations; the parallel in such instances is the database citation.

Dankam v. Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, No. 06-1277, 2007 WL 2028170 (4th Cir. July 16, 2007).

DISTRICT COURT Decisions of federal district courts (the lower-level federal courts) are reported in the Federal Supplement (abbreviated F. Supp.). A parenthetical following the case name and reporter cite should contain the jurisdictional abbreviation and the year.

United States v. McDaniels, 147 F. Supp. 3d 427 (E.D. Va. 2015).

? 2018 UNC SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT

AUGUST 2018|5

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download