Introduction - OASIS



IntroductionAll countries are based on the rule of law and all of them have extensive internet sites, Official Journals, for editing and communicating legislation to the general public and businesses. The process of cooperation at the international level has increased the need to identify and exchange legal information. This need is partially met by the digitalization of legal information and the widespread use of the internet. However, the use of legal information is greatly limited by the differences that exist in the various legal systems and in the way in which relevant information is organized and classified or stored in technical systems. It is even further hampered by the amount of legal data available.Citation and exchange of legal information across borders and across different systems, and in particular data relating to international, European or national legislation would be very useful to all. In order to facilitate the further development of interlinked legal data and to serve legal professionals and citizens, we are missing some of the most basic building blocks for interoperability in order to share, cite and link legal data. Benefiting from the emerging architecture of the semantic web and Linked Open Data, this solution would allow a greater and faster exchange of data by enabling an automatic and efficient exchange of information. It would also allow humans and machines to have an improved access to Governments’ legislation, allowing easy referencing, understanding the meaning of the information processed, downloading, analyzing, re-using and interconnecting different information and sources across domains. Parsing or resolving the documents could be a nice side effect, but it should not be the final goal.Constructing a universal pattern, given the differences in national legal systems, would be unnecessary complex and would not cover special cases, therefore almost impossible. But constructing common building blocks for naming and citing legislation documents, with additional structured metadata, that are sufficiently standardized and flexible and that respect each countries unique legislative and legal tradition, would be feasible. It should also take in consideration that this should be a cost-effective implementation on top of existing IT solutions or databases, and it should be designed to work seamlessly on top of existing systems.Building common blocksIn line with the principle of proportionality and the principle of decentralization, each country and company should continue to operate its own national Official Journals, Legal Gazettes or legal databases in the way they prefer. We should therefore carefully construct a system to cite and identify legislation in order to respect the legal and constitutional differences between countries. The trade-off for this flexibility is that implementing such a solution requires a degree of judgment, thought and experience and that we agree and accept that there will be some differences in the solutions found by different countries or entities.Identification and citation of legal documentsDepending on the legal environment, users identify or cite legislation differently, some use the type (Law, constitution etc.), othersinclude date references (date of signature, date of publication, date of consolidated act etc.), other use common names for a given act of legislation.For the identification and citation of legislation, simple general blocks should be used.Out of these blocks a simple unique identifier could be constructed which is recognizable, readable and understandable by both humans and computers, and which is compatible with existing technological standards. In addition, a common set of standardized metadata elements to describe legislation in compliance with a recommended ontology could be presented in order to guarantee interoperability.In summary, three elements could compose the solution, and could be implemented step by step:HTTP Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)built out of simple common building blocks1413510945515Set of descriptive metadataData model - Ontology16910055462905URIBuilding your identifiers you should keep in mind different considerations: Build HTTP URIs for humans and computers think in terms of data identifiers, not in terms of pagesask yourself if bringing the structure FRBR model into the URI does bring any real benefitdocument your URI schemause information that don’t change over time to build the URIIdentify your first order objects and make them addressableUse user-friendly, readable, reliable and hackable URIsask yourself how the users cite your legislationhave tasteful user-friendly URIsput forward the social considerations and not the technical function of the URIuniquely identify legislation in a unique manner, depending on what is unique - to identify your legislative actsAdd additional informationyou may want to add in the metadatacorrelate with external identifier schemescreate parallel data services using other standardsThe goal of achieving something that could work consistently in all countries and legal data publishers is unattainable in that sense. It is important to have good schema for each country and institutions that share some common principles. The publishers should have complete freedom to create their own identifiers with a set of building blocks out of a common toolbox.URI should not only have a technical consideration, but also a social consideration. Identifiers for our legislation should be user-friendly and popular in its terms of use. Any additional information you may want to add could be added to the metadata which you will receive when you dereference the identifier. For this, one essential requirement is that you have an HTTP URI.In essence, it is important that the URI is flexible and user-friendly with well-defined consistent metadata. Finding the minimum level of agreement on the basis of common building blocks, will enhance interoperability, and therefore would be feasible and could be implemented by many.Flexible because the Official Journals, Legal Gazettes and legal publishers have their own specificities and a need for ease of implementation is an imperative requirement. Of course, stable and unique in order to easily reference it over time (legal reference certainty).ELI URI Template componentsCountries and legal publishers could choose their own building blocks out of a common set of blocks and should be able to construct their own URIs in whatever order they want.To enable the exchange of information the chosen URI template must be documented using the URI template mechanism (e. g. example below):/eli/ {jurisdiction}/{agent}/{sub-agent}/{year}/{month}/{day }/{type}/{Natural identifier}/{Level 1…}/{Point in Time}/{Version}/{language}NameCommentseliJurisdictionJurisdictionUse of DCTERMS.ISO3166 : 2 alpha country codes, e.g. ‘LU’For international organisations, the registered domain name can be used: e.g. ‘EU’ or ‘WTO’This component can correspond to the property “relevant_for” of the ELI ontologyAgentAdministrative hierarchical structure, e.g. Federal States, constitutional court, parliament, etc.This component (and Sub-agent) can correspond to the property “passed_by” of the ELI ontology.Sub-agentAdministrative hierarchical substructure, e.g. the responsible ministryThis component (and Sub-agent) can correspond to the property “passed_by” of the ELI ontologyReferenceYearYYYYVarious interpretations allowed depending on countries’ requirements, e.g. date of signature or date of publication, etc.This component (and Month, Day) can correspond, depending on the interpretation, to the properties “date_document”, “date_publication”, “first_date_entry_into_force”, or “version_date” of the ELI ontology.MonthMMDayDDTypeNature of the act (law, decree, draft bill, etc.)Various interpretations depending on countries’ requirementsThis component (and Sub-type) can correspond to the property “type_document” of the ELI ontology.Sub-typeSub-category of an act depending on countries’ requirements (e.g. corrigendum)DomainCan be used if acts are classified by themes, e.g. codesThis component can correspond to the property “is_about” of the ELI ontology.Natural identifierReference or number to distinguish an act of same nature signed or published on the same dayThis component can correspond to the property “id_local” of the ELI ontology.SubdivisionLevel 1Reference to a subdivision of an act, e.g. Article 15This component (and Level 1, Level 2, Level 3, Level n) can correspond, depending on the interpretation, to the organisation of legal resources using the “has_part” and “is_part_of” properties of the ELI ontology.Level 2Reference to a smaller subdivision than level 1,e.g. Article 15.2Level 3Reference to a smaller subdivision than level 2Level nReference to a smaller subdivision Point in timePoint in timeYYYYMMDDVersion of the act as valid at a given dateThis component can correspond, depending on the interpretation, to the properties “date_document”, “date_publication”, “first_date_entry_into_force”, or “version_date” of the ELI ontology.This component could also correspond to a date directly entered by the user to retrieve a (consolidated) version of the act in force at the given date. In that case it will not correspond directly to one of the property of the ELI ontology.VersionVersionTo distinguish between original act or consolidated versionThis component can correspond to the property “version” of the ELI ontology.LanguageLanguageTo differ different official expressions of the same actUse of DCTERMS.ISO3166 : 3 alphaThis component can correspond to the property “language” of the ELI ontology.Akoma Ntoso URI Template componentsTo be developed Other URI template componentsTo be developed METADATAWhile a structured URI can already identify acts using a set of defined components, the attribution of additional metadata established in the framework of a shared syntax will set the basis to promote interchange and enhance interoperability between legal information systems. By identifying the metadata describing the essential characteristics of a resource, publishers will be able to reuse relevant information processed by others for their own needs, without having to put into place additional information systems.Therefore, while legal publishers are free to use their own metadata schema, they are encouraged to follow and use common metadata standards with shared but extensible authority tables which permit to meet specific requirements. The metadata schema is intended to be used in combination with customised metadata schemas.For the data exchange to become more efficient, ELI metadata elements may be serialized in compliance with the W3C recommendation ‘RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing’. (Maybe the technical sub-group could say why RDFa is better … one reason is already the multi-lingual …).It should be stated that consistent metadata is very important. Even a simple URI Identifier, without a complicated FRBR structure, with structured common Metadata would be a big way forward.List of ELI MetadataProperties (version 1.0)?is_part_ofA related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included (definition from Dublin Core). Cover the case of legal resources included in an Official Journal and the case of legal resources grouping other legal resources across time.has_partInverse of "is_part_of"is_realized_byRelates a legal resource to a legal expression of this resource in the form of a "sequence of signs" (typically alpha-numeric characters in a legal context). (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "realizes".realizesRelates a legal expression to the legal resource realised through that expression. (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "is_realized_by".is_embodied_byRelates a legal expression to a physical format of that expression (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "embodies".embodiesRelates a physical format to the legal expression embodied in that format (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "is_embodied_by".uri_schemaSchema describing the URI of an ELI instance. ELI uses URI template specifications (IETF RFC 6570). Schemes should be associated with member states and will be published in a registry.id_localThe unique identifier used in a local reference system to maintain backwards compatibility. For examples the CELEX at EU level, or the NOR in Francetype_documentThe type of a legal resource (e.g. "Directive", "Règlement grand ducal", "law", "règlementministeriel", "draft proposition", "Parliamentary act", etc.). Member states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the corresponding concept scheme. EU Publications Office provides a list of values for EU resource types at to a place or an area associated with the resource. This covers the notions of jurisdiction, sovereignty, applicability or administrative area. The place identifier should be based on ISO3166-2. See: states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the corresponding concept scheme. EU Publications Office provides a list of places at group notes the limitations of what can be said with a single property; member states can refine this notion by declaring specific sub properties.passed_byThe agent that originally passed or made the law. The relationship between current and any former law making body should be represented in the description of the agent itself.Member states are encouraged to make their own list of Agents. EU Publications Office provides a list of corporate bodies at individual, organisational unit or organisation that has some kind of responsibility for the legislation.is_aboutA subject for this legal resource. The use of Eurovoc () is encouraged to select values for this property. Member states are encouraged to align local values to Eurovoc.date_documentDate of adoption or signature (of the form yyyy-mm-dd)date_publicationDate of publication of the official version of the legislation, in hard copy or online, depending on what the official publication is, and when it was published. Publication dates at the level of legal expressions can be separately asserted, using standard Dublin Core properties.in_forceA value indicating the legal force of a legal resource or a legal expression. A set of values is defined by ELI in the corresponding concept scheme. These values are : - in force - partially in force - not in forcefirst_date_entry_in_forceThe first date any part of the legal resource or legal expression came into force (can be seen as the start date of a dc:valid range for this resource)date_no_longer_in_forceIf the date is known, it is when the legal resource or legal expression is no longer in force (can be seen as the end date of a dc:valid range for this resource)related_toIndicates a somehow related other document, not necessarily a legal resource. Note that citation links should use the cites property.changesLegal resource changing (amending or replacing) another legal resource This may be a direct change (textual or non-textual amendment) or a consequential or indirect change. Note, the property is to be used to express the existence of a change relationship between two acts rather than the existence of a consolidated version of the text that shows the result of the change. For consolidation relationships, use the "consolidates" and "consolidated_by" properties.changed_byInverse of "changes"basis_forLegal resource (typically constitution, treaty or enabling act) that empowers the creation of another legal resource (secondary legislation)based_oninverse of "basis_for"citesCitation in the text of the legislation. This may be at the legal resource or legal expression level, as required by the implementation context. This includes verbatim citation and citations in referrals.cited_byInverse of "cites"consolidatesLink between a consolidated version, which is the product of an editorial process that revises the legislation to include changes made by other acts, and the original or previous consolidated version and the legislation making the change.consolidated_byInverse of "consolidates"transposesTo be used for precise statements of transposition, at act or article level, from the original version of a national implementing measure to the legal resource Directive as published in the EU Official Journal. Can be used for transposition tables, once EU Publication Office has introduced ELI support down to the article level.Note that this should point to the legal resource of the Directive itself, not to one of its language-specific legal expression.transposed_byInverse of "transposes".Note that this property is expressed on a legal resource, not on one of its language-specific legal expression.implementsTo be used for more general statements about the relationship between domestic and EU legislation, e.g. between consolidated versions of national implementing measures and consolidated versions of Directives.Note that this should point to the legal resource of the Directive itself, not to one of its language-specific legal expression.implemented_byInverse of "implements".Note that this property is expressed on a legal resource, not on one of its language-specific legal expression.languageThe language of an expression.EU Publications Office provides a list of languages at . This list is large enough so that member states should not have to declare local values.Note that, if needed, a language can also be stated on a legal resource using the DublinCore "language" property.titleThe title, or name, of an expression. Note that, if needed, a title can also be stated on a legal resource using the Dublin Core "title" property.title_shortEstablished short title of the expression (if any)title_alternativeAn alternative title of the expression (if any).Note that, if needed, an alternative title can also be stated on a legal resource using the Dublin Core "alternative" property.published_inReference to the Official Journal or other publication in which the legal resource is published, identified by a suitable mechanism. Preferably to be expressed as a URI to a given resource, in the absence of such a URI as a descriptive string.publishesInverse of "published_in". Note this property does not link a publisher with a resource, but rather a specific Format of a resource with a specific Format of another resource, indicating that the subject Format publishes the object Format.descriptionAn account of the resource (definition from Dubin Core), e.g a summary.is_exemplified_byLink to a concrete file URL.Relates a format to a single exemplar or instance of that format (definition adapted from RDA). publisherAn entity responsible for making the resource available (definition from Dublin Core)formatThe file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource (definition from Dublin Core).Possible URIs values should be taken from (e.g. ), and can serve as a basis for content negotiation for the server to return the appropriate file based on the client preference.versionA version status for the resource. Member states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the Version concept scheme. Example of such values can be "Official Journal", "made", "consolidated", "proposed", "prospective", etc.version_dateA date associated with the version.rightsInformation about rights held in and over the resource (definition from Dublin Core)rightsholderA person or organisation owning or managing rights over the resource (definition from Dublin Core)licenceA legal document giving official permission to do something with the resource (Definition from Dublin Core)legal_valueThe legal value associated with a specific format of a resource. A set of values is defined by ELI in the corresponding concept scheme. These values are : - unofficial : no particular or special standing; - official : published by an organisation with the public task of making the information available (e.g. a consolidated version of a EU directive) ; - authoritative : the publisher gives some special status to the publication (e.g. "the Queens Printer" version of an Act of Parliament, or the OJ version of a EU Directive); - definitive : the text is conclusively what the law says, (e.g. the digitally signed version of an OJ).OntologyOntology is an ‘explicit, formal specification of a shared conceptualisation’ and represents a formal description of a set of concepts and the relationships in a given domain. By describing the properties of legislation and their relationships between different concepts, a shared understanding is made possible and ambiguities between terms can be avoided. Being a formal specification, it is directly machine-processable.The ontology should build on the well-established model for ‘Functional requirements for bibliographic records’ (FRBR, ), aligned with other current standardisation initiatives in the field. FRBR distinguishes between the concepts of ‘work’ (distinct intellectual or artistic creation), ‘expression’ (the intellectual or artistic realisation of a work) and the ‘manifestation’ (the physical embodiment of an expression).Even though, not all will implement a ontology or a FRBR based model, it would be important to keep in mind a structure while building URI for your data.ELI OntologyELI describes legal resources following the same abstraction. The Excel Sheet and diagrams below could give some examples for thought.v1.0Based onDomainRangeCardinalityDefinitionClasses?????LegalResourceRDA Workn/an/an/aA distinct intellectual creation (i.e., the intellectual content). (definition adapted from RDA - Resource Description and Access, see ).For example, the abstract concept of the legal resource; e.g. "act 3 of 2005" (adapted from Akoma Ntoso)Legal resource can be linked together using properties defined in the model.A legal resource can represent a legal act or any component of a legal act, like an article.Note that ELI ontology accommodates different point of view on what should be considered a new legal resource, or a new legal expression of the same resource. Typically, a consolidated version can be viewed, in the context of ELI, either as separate legal resource (linked to original version and previous consolidated version using corresponding ELI relations), or as a different legal expression of the same legal resource.LegalExpressionRDA Expressionn/an/an/aThe intellectual realisation of a legal resource in the form of a "sequence of signs" (typically alpha-numeric characters in a legal context) (definition adapted from RDA)For example, any version of the legal resource whose content is specified and different from others for any reason: language, versions, etc.;Note that ELI ontology accommodates different point of view on what should be considered a new legal resource, or a new legal expression of the same resource. Typically, a consolidated version can be viewed, in the context of ELI, either as separate legal resource (linked to original version and previous consolidated version using corresponding ELI relations), or as a different legal expression of the same legal resource.FormatRDA Manifestationn/an/an/aThe physical embodiment of a legal expression, either on paper or in any electronic format (definition adapted from RDA).For example, any electronic or physical format of the legal expression (XML, TIFF, PDF, etc.) ; e.g. PDF version of act 3 of 2005. (adaptedfromAkoma Ntoso)??????Properties?????is_part_ofdcterms:isPartOfLegalResourceLegalResource0…*A related resource in which the described resource is physically or logically included (definition from Dublin Core). Cover the case of legal resources included in an Official Journal and the case of legal resources grouping other legal resources across time.has_partdcterms:hasPartLegalResourceLegalResource0…*Inverse of "is_part_of"is_realized_byRDA P10078 ("has expression of Work")LegalResourceLegalExpression0…*Relates a legal resource to a legal expression of this resource in the form of a "sequence of signs" (typically alpha-numeric characters in a legal context). (definitionadaptedfrom RDA). Inverse of "realizes".realizesRDA P20231 ("has work expressed")LegalExpressionLegalResource1…1Relates a legal expression to the legal resource realised through that expression. (definitionadaptedfrom RDA). Inverse of "is_realized_by".is_embodied_byRDA P20059 ("has manifestation of expression")LegalExpressionFormat0…*Relates a legal expression to a physical format of that expression (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "embodies".embodiesRDA P30139 ("has expression manifested")FormatLegalExpression0…*Relates a physical format to the legal expression embodied in that format (definition adapted from RDA). Inverse of "is_embodied_by".uri_schema?LegalResource; LegalExpression; Formatowl:Thing0...1Schema describing the URI of an ELI instance. ELI uses URI template specifications (IETF RFC 6570). Schemes should be associated with member states and will be published in a registry.id_localdcterms:identifierLegalResource; LegalExpression; Formatxsd:String or xsd:AnyURI0...*The unique identifier used in a local reference system to maintain backwards compatibility. For examples the CELEX at EU level, or the NOR in Francetype_documentdcterms:typeLegalResourceeli:ResourceType, corresponding to a local concept scheme.1...*The type of a legal resource (e.g. "Directive", "Règlement grand ducal", "law", "règlementministeriel", "draft proposition", "Parliamentary act", etc.). Member states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the corresponding concept scheme. EU Publications Office provides a list of values for EU resource types at ; LegalExpressioneli:AdministrativeArea, corresponding to a local concept scheme which values should be based on ISO3166-20...*Refers to a place or an area associated with the resource. This covers the notions of jurisdiction, sovereignty, applicability or administrative area. The place identifier should be based on ISO3166-2. See: states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the corresponding concept scheme. EU Publications Office provides a list of places at group notes the limitations of what can be said with a single property; member states can refine this notion by declaring specific sub properties.passed_bydcterms:creatorLegalResourceeli:Agent0...*The agent that originally passed or made the law. The relationship between current and any former law making body should be represented in the description of the agent itself.Member states are encouraged to make their own list of Agents. EU Publications Office provides a list of corporate bodies at ...*An individual, organisational unit or organisation that has some kind of responsibility for the legislation.is_aboutdcterms:subjectLegalResourceskos:Concept (Eurovoc or a locally defined scheme)0...*A subject for this legal resource. The use of Eurovoc () is encouraged to select values for this property. Member states are encouraged to align local values to Eurovoc.date_documentdcterms:dateLegalResourcexsd:Date0...1Date of adoption or signature (of the form yyyy-mm-dd)date_publicationdcterms:issuedLegalResourcexsd:Date0...1Date of publication of the official version of the legislation, in hard copy or online, depending on what the official publication is, and when it was published. Publication dates at the level of legal expressions can be separately asserted, using standard Dublin Core properties.in_force?LegalResource or LegalExpressioneli:InForce, corresponding to a local concept scheme0...1A value indicating the legal force of a legal resource or a legal expression. A set of values is defined by ELI in the corresponding concept scheme. These values are : - in force - partially in force - not in forcefirst_date_entry_in_force?LegalResource or LegalExpressionxsd:Date0...1The first date any part of the legal resource or legal expression came into force (can be seen as the start date of a dc:valid range for this resource)date_no_longer_in_force?LegalResource or LegalExpressionxsd:Date0...1If the date is known, it is when the legal resource or legal expression is no longer in force (can be seen as the end date of a dc:valid range for this resource)related_todcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionowl:Thing0...*Indicates a somehow related other document, not necessarily a legal resource. Note that citation links should use the cites property.changesdcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Legal resource changing (amending or replacing) another legal resource This may be a direct change (textual or non-textual amendment) or a consequential or indirect change. Note, the property is to be used to express the existence of a change relationship between two acts rather than the existence of a consolidated version of the text that shows the result of the change. For consolidation relationships, use the "consolidates" and "consolidated_by" properties.changed_bydcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Inverse of "changes"basis_fordcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource0...*Legal resource (typically constitution, treaty or enabling act) that empowers the creation of another legal resource (secondary legislation)based_ondcterms:relationLegalResourceLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*inverse of "basis_for"citesdcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionowl:Thing0...*Citation in the text of the legislation. This may be at the legal resource or legal expression level, as required by the implementation context. This includes verbatim citation and citations in referrals.cited_bydcterms:relationxsd:AnyURILegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Inverse of "cites"consolidatesdcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Link between a consolidated version, which is the product of an editorial process that revises the legislation to include changes made by other acts, and the original or previous consolidated version and the legislation making the change.consolidated_bydcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Inverse of "consolidates"transposesdcterms:relationLegalResource; LegalExpressionLegalResource0...*To be used for precise statements of transposition, at act or article level, from the original version of a national implementing measure to the legal resource Directive as published in the EU Official Journal. Can be used for transposition tables, once EU Publication Office has introduced ELI support down to the article level.Note that this should point to the legal resource of the Directive itself, not to one of its language-specific legal expression.transposed_bydcterms:relationLegalResourceLegalResource; LegalExpression0...*Inverse of "transposes".Note that this property is expressed on a legal resource, not on one of its language-specific legal expression.implementsdcterms:relationLegalResourceLegalResource0...*To be used for more general statements about the relationship between domestic and EU legislation, e.g. between consolidated versions of national implementing measures and consolidated versions of Directives.Note that this should point to the legal resource of the Directive itself, not to one of its language-specific legal expression.implemented_bydcterms:relationLegalResourceLegalResource0...*Inverse of "implements".Note that this property is expressed on a legal resource, not on one of its language-specific legal expression.languagedcterms:languageLegalExpressioneli:Language, corresponding to the list of languages published by EU Publications Office.1...*The language of an expression.EU Publications Office provides a list of languages at . This list is large enough so that member states should not have to declare local values.Note that, if needed, a language can also be stated on a legal resource using the DublinCore "language" property.titledcterms:titleLegalExpressionxsd:String1...*The title, or name, of an expression. Note that, if needed, a title can also be stated on a legal resource using the Dublin Core "title" property.title_shortdcterms:alternativeLegalExpressionxsd:String0...*Established short title of the expression (if any)title_alternativedcterms:alternativeLegalExpressionxsd:String0...*An alternative title of the expression (if any).Note that, if needed, an alternative title can also be stated on a legal resource using the Dublin Core "alternative" property.published_in?Formatxsd:String or xsd:AnyURI0...*Reference to the Official Journal or other publication in which the legal resource is published, identified by a suitable mechanism. Preferably to be expressed as a URI to a given resource, in the absence of such a URI as a descriptive string.publishes?FormatFormat0…*Inverse of "published_in". Note this property does not link a publisher with a resource, but rather a specific Format of a resource with a specific Format of another resource, indicating that the subject Format publishes the object Format.descriptiondcterms:descriptionLegalResource; LegalExpressionxsd:String0...*An account of the resource (definition from Dubin Core), e.g a summary.is_exemplified_byRDA P30103 ("has exemplar of manifestation")Formatowl:Thing0...*Link to a concrete file URL.Relates a format to a single exemplar or instance of that format (definition adapted from RDA). publisherdcterms:publisherLegalExpression; Formatxsd:String0...*An entity responsible for making the resource available (definition from Dublin Core)formatdcterms:formatFormatowl:Thing1...1The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource (definition from Dublin Core).Possible URIs values should be taken from (e.g. ), and can serve as a basis for content negotiation for the server to return the appropriate file based on the client preference.version?LegalResource; LegalExpressioneli:Version, corresponding to a local concept scheme0...*A version status for the resource. Member states are encouraged to make their own list of values in the Version concept scheme. Example of such values can be "Official Journal", "made", "consolidated", "proposed", "prospective", etc.version_datedcterms:dateLegalResource; LegalExpressionxsd:Date0...1A date associated with the version.rightsdcterms:rightsFormatxsd:String or xsd:AnyURI0...1Information about rights held in and over the resource (definition from Dublin Core)rightsholderdcterms:rightsholderFormatxsd:String or xsd:AnyURI0...*A person or organisation owning or managing rights over the resource (definition from Dublin Core)licencedcterms:licenceFormatowl:Thing0…*A legal document giving official permission to do something with the resource (Definition from Dublin Core)legal_value?Formateli:LegalValue, corresponding to a local concept scheme including proposed values.0...1The legal value associated with a specific format of a resource. A set of values is defined by ELI in the corresponding concept scheme. These values are : - unofficial : no particular or special standing; - official : published by an organisation with the public task of making the information available (e.g. a consolidated version of a EU directive) ; - authoritative : the publisher gives some special status to the publication (e.g. "the Queens Printer" version of an Act of Parliament, or the OJ version of a EU Directive); - definitive : the text is conclusively what the law says, (e.g. the digitally signed version of an OJ).Other Ontology examples: Use Cases:LuxembourgPublisher: Government - Official JournalMark-up is done manually and the URI links are added to the XML structured data.References or citations to other acts are mainly mentioned by “Type” and “Date”. the short title is also added in citations.Example:??Loi du 29 mars 2013 relative àl'organisation du casier judiciaire et aux échanges d'informations extraites du casier judiciaire entre les états membres de l'union européenne et modifiant??Law of 29 March 2013 concerning (in French: “relative à”) the organization of …URI structure would be Details for building the URI out of the informationLoi have the uniqueness I need to add something: By building the final Uri I had the possibility to choose a unique number from the database eg 123456 or something else, but none of this the final users could have found or known it.So I kept it simple Number 1 number 2 = n1 n2 …easier to remember !And for the moment it is the order of publication in the PDF.Original Text from the introduction text in the law:Details of the above introduction below:Modification?du Code de la consommation,?de la loi modifiée du 14 ao?t 2000 relative au commerce électronique,?de la loi modifiée du 30 mai 2005 relative aux dispositions spécifiques de protection la personne àl'égard du traitement des données àcaractère personnel dans le secteur des communications électroniques et portant modification des articles 88-2 et 88-4 du Code d'213instruction criminelle,?de la loi modifiée du 8 avril 2011 portant introduction d'un Code de la consommation;This law modifies?:Different CodesThe law of August 14 2000 regarding electronic commerceEtc.Remarks:Does not mention what exactly is modifiedabrogation de la loi modifiée du 16 juillet 1987 concernant le colportage, la vente ambulante, l'étalage de marchandises et la sollicitation de commandes.Repeals law and all the modifiers of 16 July 1987 actNous Henri, Grand-Duc de Luxembourg, Duc de NassauSigned by Grand Duc HenriDe l'assentiment de la Chambre des DéputésWith the assent of the Parliament: no exact referenceVu la décision de la Chambre des Députés du 11 mars 2014 et celle du Conseil d'Etat du 25 mars 2014 portant qu'il n'y a pas lieu àsecond voteReference to consent of Parliament and “Conseil d’Etat”–only date no exact reference?Art. L. 211-7. (1) Lorsque du fait du choix des parties le droit d’un pays tiers est applicable au contrat, le ……suivantes:–la directive 1999/44/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 25 mai 1999 sur certains aspects de la vente et des garanties des biens de consommation;Lorsque le droit applicable au contrat est celui d’un pays tiers, le règlement (CE) n°593/2008 s’applique afin de déterminer si le consommateur continue de bénéficier de la protection garantie par la directive 2011/83/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 25 octobre 2011 relative aux droits des consommateurs, modifiant la directive 93/13/CEE du Conseil et la directive 1999/44/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil et abrogeant la directive 85/577/CEE du Conseil et la directive 97/7/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil.?Cites EU Directives and Regulations Remarks?:Which version in time??URI Structures are based on how users cite legislationURI structure: {type}/{year}/{month}/{day}/{id}Legilux.public.lu Luxembourg official Journal websitePublicin Luxembourg we have for all official Government internet sites in the URL the Word “public”lufor Luxembourgelito show that it is a European Legislation Identifierleg or adm“LEG” for Legislation?“ADM” for administrate circulars for exampleTypeNature of the act (law, decree, draft bill, etc.)Year / Month / dayDate of signature of the act (not date of Publication)IdUnique identifier{type}/{year}/{month}/{day}/{id}{type}/{year}For example?: would give all the laws of 2013{type}/{year}/{month}For example?: would give all the laws of March 2013{type}/{year}/{month}/{day}For example?: would give all the laws of 29 March 2013{year}For example?: would give all kind of acts for 2013Use case for Constitutional Court is a reference to an article of a law“L'article 29 point 2?de la loi modifiée du 30 juin 1976 portant 1Reference to an article, but points to the initial law.Remarks:Which point in time for the article is to be used? Future draft URI structure with more detailed informationReference to point in time and consolidated versionIn Luxembourg it is not possible, for the moment, to refer, technical wise, to a point in time of a given act. The below draft URI structure is ready but not implemented. {type}/{year}/{month}/{day}/{Sub-Level}/{id}/{version}{Point in Time}/{Language}Version To distinguish between original act or consolidated version Point in TimeYYYYMMDD Version of the act as valid at a given dateSub Level e.g. Art section etc.Reference to a subdivision of an act, e.g. Article 15LanguageTo differ different official expressions of the same act Use of DCTERMS.ISO3166: 3 alphaExample: be redirected to the latest consolidated version e.g. 2 January 2013 KingdomSources: –Reference to legislation in academic work or publicationThe way in which legislation should be referred to in academic work and publications depends on the referencing style adopted by the academic institution or publishing house in question. For example, many universities use style guides based on the Harvard Referencing Style. The particular style requirements of each institution or publisher may differ, however, and you should always check with your faculty or publisher how they expect you to refer to legislation in your work. Bearing this in mind, you may find the following information useful: Title, year and numberThe formats described here reflect generally accepted practice among legislators and legal practitioners.Public General Acts of the UK ParliamentThese may be cited by the short title (which includes the year) and chapter number (bracketed), e.g. Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4).Citations of pre-1963 Acts may also contain a reference to the 'regnal year' (that is, the year of the sovereign's reign) of the session of parliament in which the Act was passed, e.g. Statute of Westminster 1931 (22 and 23 Geo. 5 c. 4). This means that the Act was passed in 1931 during the session of Parliament spanning the 22nd and 23rd years of the reign of King George the Fifth.Local Acts of the UK ParliamentThese may be cited by the short title (which includes the year) and chapter number in Roman numerals (bracketed), e.g. London Local Authorities Act 1996 (c. ix)Acts of Earlier ParliamentsThese may be cited in exactly the same way as UK Public General Acts except that, in the case of Acts of the old Scottish or Irish parliaments, there might also be a letter 'S' or 'I' as appropriate in square brackets at the end of the citation, e.g. Writs Act 1672 (c. 16 [S])Acts of the Scottish ParliamentThese may be cited by the short title (which includes the year) and 'asp' number (bracketed), e.g. Human Tissue (Scotland) Act 2006 (asp 4).Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly (and other primary legislation for Northern Ireland)These may be cited by the short title (which includes the year) and chapter number (bracketed), e.g. Social Security Act (Northern Ireland) 2002 (c. 10).Acts of the Parliament of Northern Ireland (1921 to 1972) and Measures of the Northern Ireland Assembly (1974 only) are cited in exactly the same way as Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly.For the citation of Northern Ireland Orders in Council, see under 'Statutory Instruments' below.Church MeasuresThese may be cited by the short title (which includes the year) and Measure number (bracketed), e.g. Clergy Discipline Measure 2003 (No. 3).Statutory InstrumentsThese may be cited by the title (which includes the year) and Statutory Instrument (S.I.) number (bracketed), e.g. The Detergents Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/2469).Northern Ireland Orders in Council (which are in the form of Statutory Instruments), will be cited similarly, but with the addition of the 'N.I'series number, e.g. The Budget (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/860) (N.I. 3.).Scottish Statutory InstrumentsThese may be cited by the title (which includes the year) and Scottish Statutory Instrument (S.S.I.) number (bracketed), e.g. The Tuberculosis (Scotland) Order 2005 (S.S.I. 2005/434).Statutory Rules of Northern IrelandThese may be cited by the title (which includes the year) and Statutory Rules (S.R.) number (bracketed), e.g. The Quarries Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 (S.R. 2006/205).Church InstrumentsThese instruments do not have any series numbers, perhaps because there are so few of them. They are generally cited by date in the style: Instrument dated 14.12.2000 made by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York or, occasionally: Archbishops' Instrument dated 14.12.2000.AuthorThere is no readily identifiable 'author'of an Act or Statutory Instrument in the same way as there is an author of a book or article. If there could be said to be an 'author'it would be the Crown. Check with your faculty or publisher whether this information is really needed in the reference and, if so, how they want it to be expressed.PublisherThis information can be found on the printed Act or instrument, or in the bound volume. Except for very old legislation (before 1889), the publisher will either be His or Her Majesty's Stationery Office ('HMSO') or. since 1996 (1997 for Acts).'The Stationery Office Limited' (a private company which publishes legislation under the authority and superintendence of HMSO under contract).Place of PublicationThe 'place of publication' is only ever given as 'UK' on printed copies of legislation. If a more particular location is really required, the place of publication can generally be taken to depend on the legislature from which the legislation originated: London (for Acts of the UK parliament and Statutory Instruments made under them); Edinburgh (for Acts of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Statutory Instruments); Belfast (for Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly and Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland made under them); or Cardiff (for Measures of the National Assembly for Wales or Statutory Instruments made by the Assembly).How to cite the revised version of an ActYou would cite a revised version of an Act in exactly the same way as you would cite the Act as originally enacted (i.e., in this case, the XXX Act YYYY (c. NN)) but, by convention, you might then add "(as amended)" to indicate that you are referring to the revised version.Other UK Citation StylesThe citation styles listed above are those generally followed however there are some variations which are also often used. It’s common for citations to legislative documents to exclude either the title or the series number, e.g. “Superannuation Act 1972” or “1972 c. 11” rather than “Superannuation Act 1972 (c. 11)”. Sometimes the missing part of the reference is provided in an accompanying footnote (you can see an example in ). It’s also common for documents to include definitions of abbreviated citations that have a limited reference scope, e.g. “In this Act, “ALDA 1979” means the Alcoholic Liquor Duties Act 1979” and “the 1986 Act” means the Insolvency Act 1986” (see for some examples).It should also be noted that most UK legislation contains a provision that specifies how it should be cited (i.e. it defines the document’s short title) e.g. see and for examples.URI structure reflecting UK legislation: levels of URIs are definedidentifier URIs; for example, "The Transport Act 1985", URIs; for example, "The current version of The Transport Act 1985" (as opposed to a previous version), ; for example, "The current version of The Transport Act 1985 in XML" (as opposed to an HTML document), recommend that you link to identifier URIs.When you request an identifier URI, the response will usually be a 303 See Other redirection to a document URI. When you request a document URI, you will usually get a 200 OK response and a Content-Location header that will point to an appropriate representation URI based on the Accept headers that you use in the request.Identifier URIs generally follow the template:{type}/{year}/{number}[/{section}]However, legislation is often quoted without a chapter number, which can make it hard to automatically construct these URIs. If you don’t know the chapter number for a piece of legislation, you can use a search URI of the form: {title}If the title is recognized, this will result in a 301 Moved Permanently redirection to the canonical URI for the legislation.For example, requesting: result in a 301 Moved Permanently redirection to occasion, items of legislation have very similar titles, and the title search will result in multiple possibilities. In this case, the response will be a 303 Multiple Choices containing a simple XHTML document.For example, requesting result in a document containing multiple results The Disability Rights Commission Act 1999 (Commencement No.3) Order 2006The Disability Rights Commission Act 1999 (Commencement No. 2 and Transitional Provision) Order 2000The Disability Rights Commission Act 1999 (Commencement No. 1 and Transitional Provision) Order 1999Disability Rights Commission Act 1999(repealed)Interesting approach: User testing has shown that users want an updated in force version of an act. redirects to the latest in force version shows a timeline with different point in time versions act with a point in time as 1 April 2007 UK example: site for UK legislationUkpgaDocument type: in this case United Kingdom Public GeneralAct2002Year: 30Chapter 30ScheduleSubdivision … like a paragraph 7Schedule number 7 in force on 1 April 2007Publications Office of the European UnionCaveat : this section gives the current state of thinking about the ELI identifiers at the Publications Office of the European Union, and should not be considered definitive. Anything described here may evolve in the future.General structure of the identifiersThe Publications Office will use URIs to refer to 4 different levels of abstraction of a legal resource (from most generic to most specific):Abstract Legal ResourceAnact, independently of one of its temporal version (e.g. without specifying if we refer to the original version as published in the OJ or to one of the consolidated version), independently of its language, and independently of the file format.Such URIs are said to be “abstract” identifiers, and can be used to make a reference to an act without specifying explicitly to which version. In other words, the abstract legal resource “contains” all the versionsof the same piece of legislation.Legal ResourceA legal resource can represent a specific temporal version of an act, that is either :The original version as published in the OJ;The consolidated versions of the legal resource that were in force atparticular points in time;Corrigenda and modifiers amending the basic act are also legal resources, although they are not considered to be part of the “abstract legal resource” of the act they are correcting or modifying. Corrigenda and modifiers are rather linked to the specific resource they are correcting or modifying with a link of type “changes/changedBy”.Legal ExpressionA specific linguistic version of a legal resource (an original version, a consolidated version, a corrigenda or a modifier)FormatA specific file format of one of the specific linguistic version of a legal resource.The descriptions of the identifiers for these 4 levels of abstraction are given in the sections below.Identifying abstract legal resources (Directives and Regulations in a first stage)Description of the URIA root uri () followed by the type of document, year and natural numberURI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}Example address for ELIs published by the Publications Office{typedoc}A code for the type of document which comes from the Resources types authority table (MDR). Codes are abbreviations for the English word indicating the type of document. Possible codes include, amongst others :dir (“directive”)reg (“regulation”)dec (“decision”)res (“resolution”)etc.Full list of codes can be found at {year}The year in which the legal resource was published.{natural_number}The sequence number in the number assigned by the Publications Office at the moment of the publication of the documents in the Official Journal (restarts at 1 each year)Dereferencing a URI corresponding to an abstract legal resource would return its latest consolidated version, or, if such a version does not exist, the original version as published in the OJ.Adding the suffix “/all” to the URI of an abstract legal resource (e.g. ) would list all of the documents pertaining to the act : the original version, the consolidated versions, the corrigenda and the modifiers (including the modifiers in this list is an open question, it may be decided not to include them)Identifying a specific legal resource pertaining to an actThere are distinct identifiers schemes to identify original versions of legal resources as published in the OJ, corrigenda to them, or their consolidated versions.Identifying a legal resource as published in the OJDescription of the URIThe URI of the abstract legal resource followed by “/oj”URI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/ojExample{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}The URI for the abstract legal resource/oj“oj” stands for “Official Journal”, indicating that the ELI identifies the legal resource as it was published in the official journal.Identifying a corrigendumThe URI template described here is still under discussion and may evolve in the future.Description of the URIThe URI of the abstract legal resource, followed by “/corr”, followed by the publication date of the corrigenda, followed by the corrigenda sequence number, and with a final “/oj”.URI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/corr/{pubdate}/{seqnumber}/ojExample{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}The URI for the abstract legal resource/corrThe fixed value “corr” indicates this ELI corresponds to a corrigendum{pubdate}The date of publication of the official journal that published the corrigendum{seqnumber}The sequential numberof the corrigendum related to the same act../oj“oj” stands for “Official Journal”, indicating that the ELI identifies the legislation as it was first published in the official journal.Identifying a consolidated versionConsolidated versions of a legal resource have 2 types of ELI identifiers : a canonical identifier (unique for each consolidated version), and “aliases” identifiers allowing to access the up-to-date state of the legislation in force at a given point in time.Canonical identifiers for consolidated versions are structured as follow :Description of the URIThe URI of the abstract legal resource, followed by the date which indicates the date of entry into force of the last amendment introduced in the act, , followed by the date of publication of the last actor involved in correcting or modifying this act.URI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{date_entry_into_force}/{date_of_publication}Example{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}The URI for the abstract legal resource{date_entry_into_force}The date of entry into force of the last amendment introduced in the act{date_of_publication}The date of publication of the last actor (typically a corrigendum) correcting or modifying the act.“Point-in-time aliases“ for consolidated versions are structured as follow :Description of the URIThe URI of the abstract legal resource, followed by a date at which we would like to have the consolidated version of the text.URI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{point_in_time}Example{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}The URI for the abstract legal resource{point_in_time}The date at which we would like to have the consolidated version of the text, taking into account modifiers entering into force up until that date, including corrigenda.Identifying a subdivision within a Legal Resource (typically an article)Identifiers for subdivisions within a Legal Resource will be introduced at a later stage, typically to make it possible to reference specific articles. While not definite, it is envisioned that these identifiers will be for example (the identifier for the legal resource, followed by ??/article??, followed by the article number).Identifying a specific linguistic version of a legal resource (a “LegalExpression”)Any of the ELI described above (for original versions, for corrigenda and for consolidated version) can be further refined to ask for a specific linguistic version of the corresponding legal resource.Description of the URIThe URI of the legal resource, followed by a language codeURI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/oj/{lang}or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/corr/{pubdate}/{seqnumber}/oj/{lang}or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{date_entry_into_force}/{date_of_publication} /{lang} (canonical version for a consolidated version)or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{point_in_time}/{lang} (point in time version for a consolidated version)Example (point in time example for a consolidated version)Details…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/ojor…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{pubdate}/{seqnumber}/ojor…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{date_entry_into_force}/{date_of_publication}or…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{point_in_time}The URI for the legal resource{lang}The ISO639-3 language code for which we want to have a representation of the legislation. A list of these codes is published in MDR at a specific format of a specific linguistic version of a legal resourceAny linguistic version can then be retrieved in a specific file format (XML, HTML, etc.)Description of the URIThe URI of the linguistic expression, followed by a format codeURI template{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/oj/{lang}/{format}or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/corr/{pubdate}/{seqnumber}/oj/{lang}/{format}or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{date_entry_into_force}/{date_of_publication} /{lang}/format (canonical version for a consolidated version)or{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{point_in_time}/{lang}/{format} (point in time version for a consolidated version)Example (point in time exemple for a consolidated version)Details…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/oj/{lang}or…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{pubdate}/{seqnumber}/oj/{lang}or…/eli/{typedoc}/{year}/{natural_number}/{point_in_time}/{lang}The URI for the legal expression{format}An identifier for a format, including :pdf;html;xhtml;etc.Incomplete identifiers for search purposesIt will be possible to use incomplete ELIs to list all the texts having the characteristics given in the URIs. For example, would give the list of all the directives of 2014. would give the list of all corrigenda for the given directive?;It will also be possible to add query parameters to the incomplete ELIs, to give additional criteria that are not strictly speaking part of one of the ELI schemes described above. For example /eli/dir/2014?author=com would return all the directives of 2014 for which the author is the European Commission. Distinguishing the query parameters from the incomplete ELIs would allow to use these parameters at any level of the identifiers, for example, without the {year} part : /eli/dir?author=com would return all the directives for which the author is the European Commission.It is also envisioned that adding “/all” after the ELI of an abstract resource (for example ) would list all the legal resources pertaining to the act : original OJ version, corrigenda, modifiers (to be confirmed in the future), and all consolidated versions. Other identifiers for other types of legal resourcesFurther identifiers will be introduced at a later stage to identify:TreatiesInternational agreementsDecisionsOpinion and recommendations in OJ-LUnited States In the United States, the laws are not copyrighted—they are public property—but they have not always been easy to access due to lack of publication. The government now publishes the law more consistently online; many commercial publishers publish the law online behind paywalls; and there is a strong open access movement, too. The use cases presented here compare the same document published by two government sources: the Government Publishing Office (GPO), which uses public key infrastructure (PKI) to authenticate the documents, and the House Office of the Law Revision Counsel, which publishes the codified laws in XML format for easy access and use. Then, the same document is presented again from the Cornell LII, the U.S.A.’s leading open access legal publisher.As is evident, the URI format used varies greatly among just these three publishers, with the Cornell LII URI being the most human-readable.Sources:U.S. GPO: Office of the Law Revision Counsel: LII: of documents and their citationU.S. legal documents are cited according to several citation systems. The most common in legal practice isThe Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation, Nineteenth edition, proprietary, published by the journal editors of the Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and the University of Pennsylvania Law journals. A typical citation is shown for each.The primary legislative documents issued by the federal legislature are:United States ConstitutionThe U.S. Constitution is cited without a date. It is named, and the article, section, and clause are given. In the case of an amendment or the preamble, that is stated (although by abbreviation). U.S. Const. art.I, § 9, cl. 2.U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 2.U.S. Const. pmbl.United States Code (codified, current/in-force legislation)The Title of the U.S. Code, U.S. Code, and the section number are the basic elements in a citation. It is presumed that the current version is being cited. Better citations include the popular name of the law and the year.Necessary: 28 U.S.C. § 1291.Better: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (2006).Public LawPublic laws are typically referred to by Public Law + Congressional term + sequential number. A year could be given, but is redundant because of the inclusion of the congressional session.Pub. L. No. 91-190Interestingly, however, these have historically been published in a set of books called United States Statutes at Large, and many citations to a public law will be to that set instead of directly to the public law.Pub. L. No. 91-190, 83 Stat. 852.Private LawPriv. L. No. 94-75, 90 Stat. 2985 (1976)Secondary legislative documents issued by the federal legislature are:BillA bill is an introduced piece of legislation which may or may not be eventually approved and issued as law. A bill is named by stating which of the two bodies (House or Senate) it originated + the congressional session + sequential number. A year may be provided, though it is redundant of the Congressional session.S. 516, 105th Cong. (1997)H.R. 422, 106th Cong. (1999)The following documents are produced during the process of a bill moving through houses, committees, and to a final vote. Typically, the congressional session and sequential number are used to identify the mittee ReportH.R. Rep. No. 101-524 (1990)Committee PrintThese are cited by a very long, descriptive title and a year.Legislative Debate123 Cong. Rec. 17,147 (1977)Hearing TranscriptThese are cited by a very long, descriptive title and a year.Use case 1: United States ConstitutionHere, we see that only Cornell LII builds a URL that matches a user’s expectation. The House and GPO build a URL that is akin to a roadmap of finding the document on their servers. House Law Revision Counsel LII case 2: United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 924Preliminary information provided at the top of the text in GPO version:18 U.S.C. United States Code, 2012 EditionTitle 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDUREPART I - CRIMESCHAPTER 44 - FIREARMSSec. 924 - PenaltiesGPO site for the GPO document repository PkgI believe this tells us that the public key infrastructure is used to ensure authenticityUSCODEThe source we are using (a part of a standard citation)2012The yearTitle 18Title of the code (a part of a standard citation)HtmlFRBR manifestationUSCODE-2012-title18-Repeat of information already providedpartI-chap44Subdivisions of the work that are not used by users or in a citationSec924The relevant section number (a part of a standard citation)A more meaningful URI to a user would be: source for the U.S. Codeview.xhtml?req=granuleid:USCThe source we are using (a part of a standard citation)Prelimtitle 18Title of the code (a part of a standard citation)Section924The relevant section number (a part of a standard citation)&num=0&edition=prelimCornell LII source for this free version of the U.S. Code UscodeThe source we are using (a part of a standard citation)Text18Title of the code (a part of a standard citation)924The relevant section number (a part of a standard citation)Use case 3: Public Law, Pub. L. No. 113-1This is only available from the GPO, not the House or Cornell LIIGPO site for the GPO document repositoryPkgI believe this tells us that the public key infrastructure is used to ensure authenticityPLAWPublic law (a part of a standard citation)but ambiguous with Private law113Congressional session (a part of a standard citation)Publ1Sequential number of the public law (a part of a standard citation)pdf or htmlThe FRBR manifestationPLAW-113publ1.pdfRepeated informationA more user-friendly citation would be: case 4: Private Law, Priv. L. No. 112-1This is only available from the GPO, not the House or Cornell LIIGPO site for the GPO document repositoryPkgI believe this tells us that the public key infrastructure is used to ensure authenticityPLAWPrivate law (a part of a standard citation)but ambiguous with Public law112Congressional session (a part of a standard citation)pvtl1Sequential number of the private law (a part of a standard citation)pdf or htmlThe FRBR manifestationPLAW-112pvtl1.htmRepeated informationA more user-friendly citation would be: is legislation cited in Ireland? An Act may be cited in any enactment or other document:by the long title or short title of the Act,where appropriate, by the consecutive number of the Act in the calendar year and by the calendar year in which it was passed, orwhere the Act was passed prior to the enactment of the Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Eireann) Act 1922, by its regnal year and chapter number and, where there was more than one parliamentary session in the same regnal year, by reference to the session concerned.A citation of or a reference to an enactment shall be read as a citation of or reference to the enactment as amended (including as amended by way of extension, application, adaptation or other modification of the enactment), whether the amendment is made before, on or after the date on which the provision containing the citation or reference came into operation.In citationan Act by its short title, orany other enactment by its citation (if any), a comma immediately before a reference to a year and a comma immediately after such a reference that is not required for the purpose of punctuation may be omitted.Based on this information we have constructed, see below, a user friendly URI schema.How will it affect the access to the electronic Irish Statute Book?Access to the electronic Irish Statue Book (eISB) will not change. Where information is linked to the eISB using the old addressing system a redirection process will automatically provide access to the legislation at the new address. Following the implementation of the ELI URI standard, all new linked references to legislation on the eISB will use the new standard.URI building blocks for Ireland:Using common building blocks the following schema has been retained for Ireland./eli/{year}/{type}/{Natural identifier}/{Level 1…}/{Version}/{Point in Time}/{language}nameformatvaluecommentsYearyyyy2014Typeact prv ca siconsPublic Act Private ActConstitutional Amendment Statutory Instrument ConstitutionNatural IDnnnn9, 23, 850Number of Act or SI or Constitutional amendmentLevel 1contents section/nnnn schedule schedule/nnnn article/nnnncontents section/1 schedule schedule/2 article/16Contents (TOC to Long Title), Section number and Schedule for Acts only. Article number for Constitution onlyVersionenacted made revisedEnacted Made RevisedPoint in Timeyyyy-mm-dd2013-02-22For Revised Acts & ConstitutionLanguageen gaEnglish IrishExamples:Name of Act: MOTOR VEHICLE (DUTIES AND LICENCES) ACT 2012 (10/2012)Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2012act10enactedenFull URI: of Act: MOTOR VEHICLE (DUTIES AND LICENCES) ACT 2012 (10/2012) Section 4Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2012act10section/4enactedenFull URI: of Act: MOTOR VEHICLE (DUTIES AND LICENCES) ACT 2012 (10/2012) ScheduleApplied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2012act10scheduleenactedenFull URI: schedule /enacted/enName of Act: MOTOR VEHICLE (DUTIES AND LICENCES) ACT 2012 (10/2012) Contents*(* Table of Contents, Acts Referred to and Long Title)Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2012act10contentsenactedenFull URI: of Act: Health Identifiers Act 2014 (15/2014) Schedule 2Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2014act15schedule/2enactedenFull URI: schedule/2/enacted/enName of Act: An tACHT UM AN SEACHT? LEAS? IS FICHE AR AN mBUNREACHT 2004Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2004ca27enactedgaFull URI: of SI: S.I. No. 201/2012 — Value-Added Tax (Refund of Tax) (Flat-rate Farmers) Order 2012Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{year}{type}{Natural identifier}{Level 1…}{Version}{language}2012si201madeenFull URI: : Full Constitution as at 01-11-2013 (Irish language)Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{type}{Level 1…}{Point in Time}{language}consYYYYMMDDgaFull URI: : {Point in Time} component relates to date of last amendmentConstitution: Article 16 of the Constitution as at 01-11-2013 (English language)Applied eISB Unique Resource Identifier (URI) standard{type}{Level 1…}{Point in Time}{language}consArticle/16YYYYMMDDenFull URI: : {Point in Time} component relates to date of last amendmentFrancexxx ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download