COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS



STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

REGULAR MEETING

TUESDAY, JULY 13, 2004, 9:00 AM

Board of Supervisors North Chamber

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 310, San Diego, California

MORNING SESSION: - Meeting was called to order at 9:06 a.m.

Present: Supervisors Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman; Pam Slater-Price, Vice Chairwoman; Greg Cox; Ron Roberts; Bill Horn; also Thomas J. Pastuszka, Clerk.

Invocation led by Deacon Tim Barkett, Christ Lutheran Church, La Mesa, California.

Pledge of Allegiance led by Alex Tuthill, Jessica Heilman, Cara Tabor, and Jessica Pease of the Davis-Grossmont YMCA Cameron’s Comets Gymnastic Team.

Approval of Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for Meetings of June 9, 2004; June 15, 2004; and June 22, 2004.

ACTION:

ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors approved the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the Meetings of June 9, 2004; June 15, 2004; and June 22, 2004.

AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn

Public Communication: [No Speakers]

Board of Supervisors’ Agenda Items

|Community Services |1. |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONDUCT BID OPENING: GRANT OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY – |

| | |COUNTY PARCEL 2003-0300-A - BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, VISTA |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |2. |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO ACQUIRE A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCE IS THE FY 2004-05 CAO PROPOSED OPERATIONAL PLAN. |

| | |$3.5 MILLION WAS BUDGETED FOR THIS PURPOSE BY YOUR BOARD ON FEBRUARY 10, 2004 (1). |

| | |THIS AMOUNT WILL BE REDUCED BY $120,000 DUE TO BOARD ACTION ON MAY 18, 2004 (21) TO |

| | |LEASE A HELICOPTER EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2004, LEAVING A BALANCE OF $3,380,000. IF |

| | |APPROVED, THIS REQUEST WILL RESULT IN UP TO $3,380,000 IN FY 2004-05 COSTS. THIS |

| | |REQUEST WILL NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STAFF YEARS.] |

| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/15/04, AGENDA NO. 5) |

| | | |

|Public Safety |3. |OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND POLICY OVERSIGHT FOR THE FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER |

| | |(Time Certain 9:30 a.m.) |

| | | |

|Community Services |4. |CERTIFICATION OF THE PETITION RE: INITIATIVE TO REPEAL THE “GREGORY CANYON LANDFILL |

| | |AND RECYCLING COLLECTION CENTER ORDINANCE” |

| | | |

|Public Safety |5. |FIRST CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE 22, COMMENCING WITH SECTION |

| | |72.400, TO THE SAN DIEGO CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES DECLARING THAT CERTAIN |

| | |PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED ROADS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE VEHICLE CODE |

| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/22/04, AGENDA NO. 8) |

| | | |

| |6. |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS |

| | | |

| |7. |SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF |

| | |COUNTRY BUSINESS |

| | | |

| |8. |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF BODY ARMOR, WEAPONS, AMMUNITION, HOLSTERS AND |

| | |BADGES |

| | | |

| |9. |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: ACCEPTANCE OF TITLE II, PART E, CHALLENGE FUNDS, (FEDERAL |

| | |JUVENILE JUSTICE CHALLENGE FUNDING, CHALLENGE ACTIVITIES) (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCE IS FEDERAL TITLE II, PART E, CHALLENGE FUNDS |

| | |(CHALLENGE ACTIVITIES) DISTRIBUTED BY THE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS. IF APPROVED, |

| | |THE REQUEST WILL NOT RESULT IN INCREASED GENERAL REVENUES AND WILL REQUIRE THE |

| | |ADDITION OF ONE POSITION.] |

| | |(4 VOTES) |

| | | |

| |10. |CHOICE PROGRAM CONTINUATION |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCE IS THE GENERAL FUND.] |

| | | |

|Health & Human Services |11. |CRITICAL HOURS - YOUTH SERVICES CONTINUUM |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCE IS UNSECURITIZED TOBACCO SETTLEMENT FUNDS |

| | |($2,080,350). IF APPROVED, THIS REQUEST WILL RESULT IN NO ADDITIONAL COSTS AND |

| | |REVENUE. THERE IS NO CHANGE TO NET GENERAL FUND COST AND NO ADDITIONAL STAFF YEARS.] |

| | | |

| |12. |REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK ADDITIONAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILD WELFARE |

| | |PROGRAMS |

| | | |

| |13. |REVENUE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO FOR OLDER ADULT MENTAL|

| | |HEALTH SERVICES COORDINATOR |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCE IS THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO, CENTER|

| | |FOR COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH IN OLDER PEOPLE WITH PSYCHOSES. THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE|

| | |IN NET GENERAL FUND COST AND NO ADDITIONAL STAFF YEARS. ADULT AND OLDER ADULT MENTAL|

| | |HEALTH SERVICES WILL DEVELOP A SUSTAINABILITY PLAN FOR THE COORDINATOR POSITION |

| | |BEYOND THE TERM OF THE REVENUE AGREEMENT.] |

| | | |

| |14. |OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS: INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY |

| | |CONFERENCE |

| | | |

| |15. |CONTRACT WITH CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING FOR AGING & INDEPENDENCE SERVICES RADIO |

| | |CALL-IN SHOW |

| | | |

| |16. |SAN DIEGO HIV HEALTH SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL -- AMENDED RESOLUTION AND MEMBER |

| | |APPOINTMENTS |

| | | |

| |17. |LONG TERM CARE INTEGRATION PROJECT |

| | |[FUNDING SOURCE(S): FUNDING SOURCES ARE THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGING ($203,000 |

| | |ANNUALLY) AND THE COUNTY GENERAL FUND ($11,253 IN FY 04-05, $11,134 IN FY 05-06 AND |

| | |$12,149 IN FY 06-07). THE DEPARTMENT OF AGING GRANT REQUIRES A $10,167 ANNUAL MATCH,|

| | |WHICH WILL BE MET IN-KIND BY EXISTING STAFF COSTS. THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE IN NET |

| | |GENERAL FUND COSTS AND NO ADDITIONAL STAFF YEARS.] |

| | | |

|Financial & General Government |18. |DESIGNATION OF THE TRANSNET EXTENSION AS PROPOSITION A |

| | |(Time Certain 10:30 a.m.) |

| | | |

| |19. |A RESOLUTION RELATING TO NOTICE AND REVIEW OF ASSESSMENTS MADE OUTSIDE THE REGULAR |

| | |ASSESSMENT PERIOD |

| | | |

| |20. |SEALED BID SALE 2004 OF TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY |

| | | |

| |21. |RANCHO SANTA FE SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OLBIGATION BONDS, ELECTION OF 2004 |

| | | |

| |22. |RESPONSE TO 2003-2004 GRAND JURY REPORTS |

| | | |

|Communications Received |23. |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED |

| | | |

|Appointments |24. |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS |

| | | |

|Closed Session |25. |CLOSED SESSION |

| | | |

|Land Use & Environment |26. |ESTABLISHING AN ALPINE REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE |

| | | |

|Presentations/Awards |27. |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| | | |

|1. |SUBJECT: |NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING: |

| | |CONDUCT BID OPENING: GRANT OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY – COUNTY PARCEL |

| | |2003-0300-A - BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, VISTA (DISTRICT 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 15, 2004 (18), the Board took action as recommended, on Consent; setting hearing for July 13, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. and |

| |adopting Resolution No. 04-101 entitled: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ENTER INTO AN OPTION TO PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY |

| |AND NOTICE INVITING BIDS. |

| | |

| |This is a request for the Board to take the necessary actions required to enter into an Option to Purchase and Sale of 16.06 |

| |acres of industrial land located at Business Park Drive and Sycamore Avenue in the City of Vista (Thomas Guide, page1107 J6). The|

| |two surplus parcels, Lots UU and VV of the Vista Business Park, were acquired in 1991 for a trash transfer site and are no longer|

| |required for that purpose. This property is considered to be excess to County needs. |

| | |

| |Under the proposed process, the County would seek bids from prospective developers and users for a one-year option to develop the|

| |property for industrial use. It is anticipated that the successful bidder will develop this property in accordance with plans to |

| |be submitted to and approved by the City of Vista. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |If an Option to Purchase is approved, additional current year revenue is estimated to be a minimum of $150,000, with no annual |

| |revenue. If the selected high bidder elects to exercise the option and executes the Option to Purchase with the County, future |

| |one-time revenue is estimated to be a minimum of $8,750,000. No additional staff years will be required as a result of this |

| |action. |

| | |

| |Expenses and staff costs incurred by the Real Estate Services Division of the Department of General Services to process and |

| |manage this General Fund sale will be offset by a real estate management fee in an amount not to exceed $150,000. Such fee shall |

| |be transferred to the Facilities Management ISF – Real Estate Services Division from the Option Payment, after the 90-day Option |

| |Refund period has expired. All remaining proceeds of this sale will be deposited into the General Fund. |

| |BUSINESS IMPACT STATEMENT: |

| |The successful bidder could potentially construct approximately 250,000 square feet of improvements on this combined County |

| |property with a projected total cost of approximately $15 million dollars. The completed project is anticipated to employ 150 to |

| |200 people full-time and an additional 100 to 125 construction workers will be employed during the six to eight-month |

| |construction period. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Conduct the bid opening and approve the granting of an Option to Purchase of County Parcel 2003-0300-A to the highest bidder. |

| |Authorize the Director, Department of General Services, to perform all necessary actions to complete the sale of this property |

| |including the execution of the Option to Purchase Agreement, escrow instructions, and a Grant Deed. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Financial Officer, Auditor and Controller, to deposit all General Fund proceeds of this Option to Purchase |

| |and Sale, less expenses to be credited to the Facilities Management ISF – Real Estate Services Division, into the General Fund. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Horn, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board of Supervisors conducted the bid opening, closed the|

| |Hearing and took action as recommended, accepting bid from Janez Properties in the amount of $10.5 million. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|2. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO ACQUIRE A FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/15/04, AGENDA NO. 5) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 15, 2004 (5) the Board of Supervisors continued the item to July 13, 2004. |

| | |

| |On December 9, 2003 (7), at the request of Supervisor Roberts and Supervisor Horn, your Board directed the Chief Administrative |

| |Officer to explore the creation of a governing body that would oversee the operation of a fire and life safety helicopter. Your |

| |Board also directed the Chief Administrative Officer to explore funding options to acquire, staff and maintain a fire and life |

| |safety helicopter that would be permanently based in San Diego County. |

| | |

| |On February 10, 2004 (1), your Board established the Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council, and directed that the |

| |Council submit, through the Chief Administrative Officer, appropriate recommendations to acquire and operate a fire and life |

| |safety helicopter. The Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council’s preliminary recommendation is contained in this board |

| |letter. The proposed action will competitively procure a fire and life safety helicopter to enhance public health and well being |

| |throughout San Diego County. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted. The funding source is the FY 2004-05 CAO Proposed Operational Plan. $3.5 million was |

| |budgeted for this purpose by your Board on February 10, 2004 (1). This amount will be reduced by $120,000 due to Board action on |

| |May 18, 2004 (21) to lease a helicopter effective July 1, 2004, leaving a balance of $3,380,000. If approved, this request will |

| |result in up to $3,380,000 in FY 2004-05 costs. This request will not require additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER OPERATING COUNCIL: |

| |In accordance with Section 401, Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing |

| |and Contracting to issue a Competitive Solicitation to acquire and refurbish a used, twin-engine, Type II helicopter similar to |

| |and equipped the same as Copter One operated by the San Diego Regional Fire and Rescue Helicopter Program, and upon successful |

| |negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect |

| |changes to services and funding. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board of Supervisors, in accordance with Section 401, |

| |Article XXIII of the County Administrative Code, authorized the Director of the Department of Purchasing and Contracting to issue|

| |a Competitive Solicitation to acquire and refurbish a used, single-engine Type II helicopter with fire and rescue capability and,|

| |upon successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable price, award a contract, and to amend the contract as |

| |needed to reflect changes to services and funding. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|3. |SUBJECT: |OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND POLICY OVERSIGHT FOR THE FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On December 9, 2003 (7), at the request of Supervisor Roberts and Supervisor Horn, your Board directed the Chief Administrative |

| |Officer to explore the creation of a governing body that would oversee the operation of a fire and life safety helicopter. Your |

| |Board also directed the Chief Administrative Officer to explore funding options to acquire, staff and maintain a fire and life |

| |safety helicopter that would be permanently based in San Diego County. |

| | |

| |On February 10, 2004 (1), your Board established the Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council, and directed that the |

| |Council submit, through the Chief Administrative Officer, appropriate recommendations to acquire and operate a fire and life |

| |safety helicopter. On June 15, 2004 (5), the Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council recommended that your Board |

| |authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting, to issue a Competitive Solicitation to acquire and refurbish a |

| |used, twin-engine, Type II helicopter similar to and equipped the same as Copter One operated by the San Diego Regional Fire and |

| |Rescue Helicopter Program. That item was continued by your Board until July 13, 2004. |

| |This board letter from the Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Operating Council contains recommendations regarding operational |

| |control and policy oversight for the County’s fire and life safety helicopter. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The estimated cost to operate the fire and life safety helicopter, as described in the board letter of June 15, 2004 (5), is $2.1|

| |million per year. That amount is included in the FY 2004-05 Operational Plan. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY HELICOPTER OPERATING COUNCIL: |

| |Contingent on approval of the action recommended in the board letter of June 15, 2004 (5), Request for Proposals to Acquire a |

| |Fire and Life Safety Helicopter, which was continued to July 13, 2004: |

| | |

| |Assign operational control of the fire and life safety helicopter to the Sheriff. |

| |Establish a Fire and Life Safety Helicopter Oversight Committee to provide policy oversight regarding the use of this helicopter.|

| |This committee shall consist of seven members as follows: one appointment from each member of the Board of Supervisors; the |

| |Sheriff or his designee; and the President of the San Diego County Fire Chiefs’ Association. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Roberts, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board of Supervisors assigned operational control of |

| |the fire and life safety helicopter, whose primary mission will be fighting fires, to the Sheriff, with the Sheriff, at his |

| |discretion, to form an advisory committee. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|4. |SUBJECT: |CERTIFICATION OF THE PETITION RE: INITIATIVE TO REPEAL THE “GREGORY CANYON LANDFILL AND RECYCLING |

| | |COLLECTION CENTER ORDINANCE” (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Initiative to Repeal the “Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center Ordinance” was filed with the Registrar of |

| |Voters on June 8, 2004. The Registrar examined the petition in accordance with the California Elections Code, found it contains |

| |a sufficient number of valid signatures, and is now certifying the results to the Board of Supervisors. The Board has the |

| |following options in accordance with the law: 1) to submit the measure to the voters at the November 2, 2004 election; or 2) to |

| |order an impact report to be prepared and presented to the Board, at which time the Initiative must be placed on the ballot. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Option One: Place the Measure on the November 2, 2004 Ballot. |

| |Placing this initiative measure on the November 2, 2004 ballot would result in approximately $300,000 one-time costs. Funds are|

| |included in the Registrar of Voters FY 2004-05 budget. |

| | |

| |Option Two: Prepare an Impact Report for the August 3, 2004 Board Meeting. |

| |Your Board could direct that a fiscal analysis, among other analyses, be included in the impact report. Funds for conducting the|

| |impact analysis are not included in the FY 2004-05 Operational Plan. Costs will be absorbed by the General Fund. Placing this |

| |initiative measure on the November 2, 2004 ballot would result in approximately $300,000 one-time costs. Funds are included in |

| |the Registrar of Voters FY 2004-05 budget. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Receive the certification from the Registrar of Voters that the petition, which includes the Initiative to Repeal the “Gregory |

| |Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection Center Ordinance” contains a sufficient number of valid signatures. |

| |Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9118, and subject to the limitations in Elections Code Section 9125, select one of the |

| |following two options: |

| |Option One: Place the Measure on the November 2004 Ballot |

| |Approve the following actions to place the initiative measure to Repeal the “Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling Collection |

| |Center Ordinance” on the November 2, 2004 ballot: |

| |(a) Adopt the Resolution, entitled: |

| |RESOLUTION CALLING AN ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 2, 2004 FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO THE VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO THE |

| |INITIATIVE ORDINANCE TO REPEAL THE GREGORY CANYON LANDFILL AND RECYCLING COLLECTION CENTER ORDINANCE FOR THEIR ADOPTION OR |

| |REJECTION, AND CONSOLIDATING THIS ELECTION WITH THE NOVEMBER 2, 2004 STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION |

| | |

| |(b) Determine whether your Board wants to authorize up to two members of the Board to file a ballot argument (and any rebuttal) |

| |on behalf of the Board in support of, or opposition to, this proposed measure, and further authorize the designated Board |

| |member(s) to determine which other voters or association of voters, if any, may join in signing the argument/rebuttal. |

| | |

| |Option Two: Prepare an Impact Report for the August 3 Board Meeting |

| |Direct staff to prepare an impact report pursuant to Elections Code Section 9111, and present it to the Board on August 3, 2004 |

| |with the necessary Resolution calling for an election to place the Initiative to Repeal the Gregory Canyon Landfill and Recycling|

| |Collection Center Ordinance on the November 2, 2004 ballot. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended and selected |

| |Option Two, and directed that the staff analysis include inconsistencies with GP2020, the dedicated open space issue, regional |

| |traffic air quality impacts, fiscal impacts, evaluation of the linear system, ground water and surface water impacts, and the |

| |traffic impacts to SR 76 and the contributions. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|5. |SUBJECT: |FIRST CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE 22, COMMENCING WITH SECTION 72.400, TO THE SAN DIEGO |

| | |CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES DECLARING THAT CERTAIN PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED ROADS SHALL BE |

| | |SUBJECT TO THE VEHICLE CODE (DISTRICT: 2) |

| | |(CARRYOVER FROM 6/22/04, AGENDA NO. 8) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On June 22, 2004 (8), the Board of Supervisors continued the item to July 13, 2004. |

| | |

| |On December 9, 2003 (35), your Board, at the request of Supervisor Jacob, directed the Chief Administrative Officer to draft an |

| |ordinance that will allow the enforcement of traffic regulations in the Ramona Acres community. |

| | |

| |Ramona Acres is a residential community linked by dirt roads that according to the Sheriff’s Department has seen an escalation in|

| |reckless driving and off road vehicle activity. Some residents have become increasingly frustrated because law enforcement does |

| |not have the authority to enforce the California Vehicle Code on private roads. With the adoption of the recommended Ordinance, |

| |the Sheriff’s Department will be able to enforce traffic regulations on the listed private roads. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this recommendation and no additional staff years will be required to implement this |

| |Ordinance. The Sheriff’s Department currently patrols Ramona Acres and don’t anticipate any additional costs associated with |

| |implementing this ordinance. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Approve the introduction of the Ordinance, (first reading), read title and waive further reading of the following Ordinance: |

| | |

| | |

| |AN ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE 22, COMMENCING WITH SECTION 72.400, TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES DECLARING |

| |THAT CERTAIN PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED ROADS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE VEHICLE CODE |

| | |

| |Submit the Ordinance for further Board consideration and adoption (second reading) on July 27, 2004. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Adding a direction to the Chief Administrative Officer to review the current Off Highway Vehicle Ordinance to see how revisions |

| |to the Ordinance could address the off-roading activities in Ramona Acres and other unincorporated communities, ON MOTION of |

| |Supervisor Jacob, seconded by Supervisor Slater-Price, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, introducing Ordinance|

| |for further Board consideration and adoption on July 27, 2004. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts |

| |NOES: Horn |

| |

| |

|6. |SUBJECT: |DISTRICT ATTORNEY – OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In accordance with Board of Supervisors Policy D-7, this is a request for one International Case Coordinator to travel to |

| |Guadalajara, Mexico to attend a National Bar Association of Mexico conference. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the District Attorney’s Fiscal Year 2004-05 Adopted Operational Plan. If approved, this |

| |request will result in travel costs of approximately $850. There will be no paid overtime as a result of this request. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |DISTRICT ATTORNEY |

| |Approve out-of-country business to Guadalajara, Mexico for one International Case Coordinator for the period July 21, 2004 to |

| |July 24, 2004. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|7. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Section 66 of Administrative Code of the County of San Diego and Board of Supervisors Policy A-112 permits the acceptance of |

| |gifts by the administrative head of each department in the County, subject to ratification by the Board of Supervisors. The |

| |Motorola Trunked Users Group (MTUG) is donating $621 towards airfare and one night’s lodging and the Federal Department of |

| |Justice (DOJ) is donating $199 towards registration for a total value of $820 for one (1) Sheriff employee to attend the MTUG and|

| |Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Conference. |

| | |

| |Per Board of Supervisors Policy D-7, this is a request for four (4) Sheriff employees to travel to Montreal, Canada from August |

| |6, 2004 through August 13, 2004 to attend the MTUG and APCO International Conference. The attendees are staff from the Wireless |

| |Services Division who are responsible for the operation of the San Diego County – Imperial County Regional Communications System |

| |(RCS). On June 16, 2004, the RCS Board of Directors approved recommending to the Board of Supervisors the expenditure of RCS |

| |budgeted travel funds for four Wireless Services Division staff to attend this conference. Since its inception, the RCS Board of|

| |Directors has consistently budgeted travel funds for RCS staff to attend this significant annual conference. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds are budgeted in the RCS for fiscal year 2004/2005 for the MTUG and APCO meetings. If this request is approved, it will |

| |result in a net cost of approximately $7,800. The employees will be receiving their regular salaries and benefits. This request|

| |will result in no future year cost and it will not require the addition of any staff years. No overtime will be generated as a |

| |result of this trip. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SHERIFF |

| |Accept the donation of airfare, lodging and registration valued at $820 from MTUG and DOJ. |

| | |

| |Approve out of country business to Montreal, Canada for four (4) Sheriff employees to attend the MTUG and APCO International |

| |Conference from August 6, 2004 through August 13, 2004. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|8. |SUBJECT: |SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT OF BODY ARMOR, WEAPONS, AMMUNITION, HOLSTERS AND BADGES (DISTRICT: ALL)|

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In law enforcement, one of the major considerations for equipment purchases is standardization. This ensures not only the |

| |quality of proven products, but also the safety of deputies and the public. Body armor, lethal and less lethal weapons, lethal |

| |and less lethal ammunition and holsters all fall within the category of equipment that should be standardized so that all |

| |deputies use the same make and model of equipment. |

| | |

| |The Sheriff’s Department purchases body armor, lethal and less lethal weapons, lethal and less lethal ammunition, holsters and |

| |badges for all sworn personnel on a routine basis. This equipment over the years has been tested and standardized in order to |

| |provide the best equipment to the deputies. Today’s request will allow the Sheriff’s Department to continue to procure top |

| |quality equipment for the deputies. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are budgeted for FY 2004/2005 and are in the Sheriff’s Operational Plan for FY 2005/2006. The approximate|

| |cost for the body armor for each fiscal year will be $175,000; the approximate cost for the Glocks, Remingtons, Rugers and Colts |

| |each fiscal year will be $70,000; the approximate cost for the various types of ammunition each fiscal year will be $350,000; the|

| |approximate cost for the Safariland holsters each fiscal year will be $35,000 and the cost for the uniform and Platiloy flat |

| |badges will be approximately $20,000. This request will not require the addition of any staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, SHERIFF: |

| |Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with an authorized vendor and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price acquire a 5-year contract for the purchase of Type IIIA body armor and Level IIIA Raid Style Vests manufactured |

| |by Protective Apparel Corporation of America (P.A.C.A.). Authorize the Sheriff to change to a different model from the same |

| |manufacturer if an improved model of body armor or raid vest is tested and accepted by the Sheriff’s Department. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with an authorized vendor and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price acquire a 5-year contract for the purchase of, Glock model 22, 40 caliber semi-automatic pistols; Remington |

| |model 870 12 gauge shotguns; Colt law enforcement model M4/AR 15 223 rifles; Remington 870 shotguns, Less Lethal Configuration; |

| |and PepperBall Launcher Systems (and related support mechanisms). Authorize the Sheriff to change to a different model from the |

| |same manufacturer if an improved model of weapon is tested and accepted by the Sheriff’s Department. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with an authorized vendor and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price acquire a 5-year contract for the purchase of specified Pepperball projectiles; and Federal Brand and American |

| |Eagle Brand Cartridges for handguns, rifles and shotguns. Authorize the Sheriff to change to a different model from the same |

| |manufacturer if improved ammunition is tested and accepted by the Sheriff’s Department. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with Combined Tactical Systems, and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and|

| |reasonable price, award a 5-year contract for the purchase of Combined Tactical Systems Bean Bag Model 2581 Super-sock rounds, |

| |and Combined Tactical Systems 40 mm Sponge Rounds, Model 4557. Authorize the Sheriff to change to a different model from the |

| |same manufacturer if an improved model of less lethal ammunition is tested and accepted by the Sheriff’s Department. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with an authorized vendor and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price award a 5-year contract for the purchase of specified Glock Safariland holsters. Authorize the Sheriff to |

| |change to a different model from the same manufacturer if an improved model of holster is tested and accepted by the Sheriff’s |

| |Department. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director of Purchasing and Contracting |

| |to enter into negotiations with Entenmann-Rovin Company; and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and |

| |reasonable price, award a 5-year contract for the purchase of Sterling Silver uniform badges and Platiloy flat badges |

| |manufactured by Entenmann-Rovin Company. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|9. |SUBJECT: |PROBATION DEPARTMENT: ACCEPTANCE OF TITLE II, PART E, CHALLENGE FUNDS, (FEDERAL JUVENILE JUSTICE |

| | |CHALLENGE FUNDING, CHALLENGE ACTIVITIES) (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |On February 27, 2001 (27), your Board approved the implementation of AB1913 - Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (CPA |

| |2000). CPA 2000 provided funds for FY 2000-01 and 2001-02 to enhance and augment existing proven juvenile justice programs with |

| |the goal of preventing and reducing juvenile crime. The State Budget Act of 2002-03 provided continued funding for FY 2002-03 |

| |and FY 2003-04 under the new name Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA). The Fiscal Year 2004-05 allocation of |

| |$8,298,484 plus projected interest of $170,572 is to be divided among two departments as follows: $7,172,373 to the Probation |

| |Department and $1,296,683 to the Health and Human Services Agency, for a total of $8,469,056. |

| | |

| |On April 15, 2004, the California State Board of Corrections (BOC) approved a method of distributing one-year federal Title II, |

| |Part E, Challenge funds (Challenge Activities). The plan allows California counties to augment their JJCPA programs with |

| |additional funds from the federal Challenge Activities. The fiscal year 2004-05 allocation for the County of San Diego Probation|

| |Department is $142,227. |

| | |

| |This is a request to adopt a Resolution to endorse the Application for Challenge Activities Funding Modification to the |

| |Comprehensive Multi-Agency Juvenile Justice Plan (Application), to accept the County of San Diego Probation Department’s spending|

| |plan for these funds, to assure that the County has and will adhere to the requirements of the JJCPA, federal Challenge |

| |Activities, and the BOC, and to authorize the Chief Probation Officer to submit the Application to the State Board of Corrections|

| |and to accept Challenge funds on behalf of the County if the Application is approved. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request are not budgeted. If approved, this request will result in FY 2004-05 costs and revenue of $142,227. |

| |The funding source is federal Title II, Part E, Challenge funds (Challenge Activities) distributed by the State Board of |

| |Corrections. If approved, the request will not result in increased General Revenues and will require the addition of one |

| |position. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt a Resolution to endorse the Application and to assure that the County has and will adhere to the requirements of the JJCPA,|

| |federal Challenge Activities, and the State Board of Corrections. |

| | |

| |Authorize the Chief Probation Officer to submit the Application to the State Board of Corrections and to accept Challenge funds |

| |on behalf of the County if the Application is approved. |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |Establish appropriations and revenue in the amount of $142,227 in the Probation Department’s FY 2004-05 Budget for Salaries and |

| |Benefits ($119,317) and Services and Supplies ($22,910) based on unanticipated revenue from Federal Juvenile Justice Challenge |

| |Funding (Challenge Activities). (4 VOTES) |

| | |

| |Approve the addition of one position to the Probation Department budget. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 04-126, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF PROBATION |

| |OFFICER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR CHALLENGE ACTIVITIES FUNDING MODIFICATION TO COMPREHENSIVE MULTI-AGENCY JUVENILE JUSTICE |

| |PLAN. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|10. |SUBJECT: |CHOICE PROGRAM CONTINUATION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to approve a contract extension and sole source with the San Diego State University Foundation for the |

| |continuation of the CHOICE program. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The funds for this request were included as a FY 2004-05 Budget Change Letter submission. If this request is approved, it will |

| |result in $600,000 in FY 2004-05 costs. The funding source is the General Fund. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement. |

| | |

| |Approve and Authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and Contracting to enter into negotiations with San Diego State |

| |University Foundation/June Burnett Institute, and subject to negotiations and a determination of a fair and reasonable price, to |

| |amend the CHOICE contract (43203) and to extend the contract through June 30, 2005, subject to the availability of funds. |

| |ACTION: |

| |At the request of the Chief Administrative Officer, ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board |

| |of Supervisors continued the item to August 3, 2004, on Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|11. |SUBJECT: |CRITICAL HOURS - YOUTH SERVICES CONTINUUM (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The County’s Critical Hours and Juvenile Diversion programs provide a variety of services to prevent and reduce at-risk behavior |

| |by youth. The Critical Hours program, initiated by the Board in 1996 at the recommendation of Supervisors Cox and Roberts, |

| |provides after school programs for middle school youth during the critical hours between 2:00 pm and 6:00 pm, the times that |

| |research showed the majority of crimes committed by youth occur. |

| | |

| |The initial focus of the Critical Hours program was to prevent youth violence, youth involvement in criminal activity, substance |

| |abuse and other at-risk behaviors. Subsequently, the goals of the program have evolved to include academic and literacy support, |

| |tobacco use prevention, healthy peer relationships and health education. The Critical Hours Program expanded from 26 to 40 sites|

| |in 1999, with technical/consultant services for the program added in June 2000. |

| | |

| |The Juvenile Diversion program has been providing services for over twenty years. The Neighborhood Youth Centers, a component of|

| |the Juvenile Diversion program, are located in 15 high need communities countywide and prevent delinquent or criminal behavior |

| |among youth exhibiting characteristics and behavior typically associated with delinquency. The Neighborhood Youth Centers |

| |provide services to divert youth from more formal action with the juvenile justice and education systems. |

| | |

| |Given the importance of continuing to provide both of these successful programs within existing resource constraints, there is a |

| |need to look at opportunities to better align the services. The Health and Human Services Agency is prepared to move forward |

| |with a comprehensive planning process that would explore the feasibility of stretching resources and strengthening the Critical |

| |Hours and Juvenile Diversion programs by formally aligning them in a youth services continuum. |

| | |

| | |

| |With Board approval, staff will conduct a comprehensive planning process in collaboration with key stakeholders in the juvenile |

| |justice community to develop a youth services continuum service plan that builds on the success of the current programs and |

| |explores the feasibility of alignment with other successful prevention and intervention programs such as the County’s Juvenile |

| |Diversion Neighborhood Youth Center program. Staff will return to Board in Fall 2004 with the results of the planning process, |

| |including recommendations to competitively procure youth prevention and intervention services. The intent is to maintain the |

| |existing purpose and objectives of the Critical Hours and Juvenile Diversion programs while aligning their goals, strategies and |

| |outcomes. |

| | |

| |Board authorization is requested for this planning process and extension of the existing Critical Hours contracts and agreements |

| |to continue services pending completion of planning activities and a subsequent procurement process. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the FY 2004-2005 Proposed Operational Plan. The funding source is Unsecuritized Tobacco |

| |Settlement funds ($2,080,350). If approved, this request will result in no additional costs and revenue. There is no change to |

| |net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Authorize the Health and Human Services Agency to conduct a comprehensive planning process with to develop a program design for a|

| |youth services continuum to include Critical Hours and Juvenile Diversion services. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to|

| |enter into negotiations with the contractors listed below, and subject to successful negotiations and determination of a fair and|

| |reasonable price for youth services continuum program services, extend the terms of the contracts for ten months from September |

| |1, 2004, through June 30, 2005, pending award of new contracts for critical hours program services, and to amend the contracts as|

| |needed to reflect changes in services or funding amounts subject to approval of the Director of the Health and Human Services |

| |Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| | |

| |Contractor Name Contract No. |

| |Alpine Community Center 44414 |

| |Barrio Station 44395 |

| |Borrego Springs Unified School District 4412 |

| |Boys & Girls Club of Inland North County |

| |dba Boys & Girls Club of Greater San Diego 44392 and 44415 |

| |Boys & Girls Club of Ramona |

| |dba Boys & Girls Club of Greater San Diego 44410 |

| |Boys & Girls Club of San Diego |

| |dba Boys & Girls Club of Greater San Diego 44403 |

| |Boys & Girls Club of San Dieguito 44397 |

| |Boys & Girls Club of San Marcos 44400 |

| |Center for Community Solutions 44399 |

| |City of Lemon Grove 44413 |

| |City of Oceanside Library/Recreation Department 44398 |

| |Communities Against Substance Abuse (CASA) 44404 |

| |Greater Golden Hill Community Development 44401 |

| |Harmonium, Inc. 44393 |

| |Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee (MAAC) Project 44407 |

| |North County Lifeline 44396 |

| |San Diego County 4-H Youth Education Foundation 44405 |

| |Sherman Heights Community Center 44402 |

| |Social Advocates for Youth (SAY) 44390 and 44411 |

| |South Bay Community Services 44406 |

| |Union of Pan Asian Communities 44409 |

| |YMCA of San Diego County 44394 |

| |YMCA Youth & Family Services 44391 |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to|

| |enter into negotiations with the San Diego Foundation (Contract No. 46135), and subject to successful negotiations and |

| |determination of a fair and reasonable price for trainer/consultant services for the Critical Hours Program, extend the term of |

| |the contract for nine months from October 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005, pending award of a new contract for trainer/consultant |

| |services, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect changes in services or funding amounts subject to approval of the |

| |Director, Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the advertising requirement of Board Policy A-87. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|12. |SUBJECT: |REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO SEEK ADDITIONAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILD WELFARE PROGRAMS |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Board has demonstrated long-standing support for programs and services which enhance the lives of current and former foster |

| |children and their caretakers and families. Some of these include Adoptions, Options for Recovery, Independent Living Skills, |

| |San Pasqual Academy, the Polinsky Children’s Center, Foster Care Licensing, and others. The Health and Human Services Agency’s |

| |Child Welfare Services seeks to pursue additional funding opportunities to augment these programs and services. Federal and |

| |state grant opportunities exist for child welfare programs but often have a short turn-around time for application (often six to |

| |eight weeks). Therefore, the Health and Human Services Agency requests authority to seek federal, state, and private foundation |

| |grants for child welfare programs. If San Diego County is selected to receive a grant, your Board would be requested to |

| |authorize acceptance of funds and would be apprised of the full conditions of the grant. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact from the requested action to authorize application for grant funds. If any grant applications are |

| |successful, staff will return to the Board to authorize acceptance of the grants and establish funding for programs. There will |

| |be no change in net General Fund costs and no additional staff years associated with this action. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Authorize the Director of the Health and Human Services Agency to seek federal, state, and private foundation grants to augment |

| |Child Welfare Services programs which benefit current and former foster youth and their families and caretakers over the next |

| |three years. Should the County be selected to receive such grants, the Board would be requested to authorize acceptance of |

| |funds. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|13. |SUBJECT: |REVENUE AGREEMENT WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO FOR OLDER ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES |

| | |COORDINATOR (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In 2002, the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) Center for Community Based Research for People with Psychoses received a |

| |five-year grant from the National Institutes for Mental Health to perform research aimed at reducing disability in older adults |

| |with schizophrenia and chronic psychotic disorders. UCSD selected the County’s Adult and Older Adult Mental Health Services as a|

| |primary collaborative partner to develop a community research network for these studies. |

| | |

| |Adult and Older Adult Mental Health Services, as part of the County’s System Redesign Implementation Plan, established an Older |

| |Adult Coordinator position to develop, plan and coordinate the implementation of an older adult system of care with evidence |

| |based practices to serve at-risk older adults with mental disorders. This position works with UCSD to advance the Adult and |

| |Older Adult System of Care throughout the community. The position also works closely with adult stakeholders, the medical |

| |community, advocacy agencies and other mental health practitioners. |

| | |

| |Approval of this action will allow Adult and Older Adult Mental Health Services to establish a revenue agreement with UCSD and |

| |accept funding for this position in order to provide coordination and development activities for older adults with mental health |

| |disorders. This position is contingent upon the availability of funds. Adult and Older Adult Mental Health Services will |

| |develop a sustainability plan for the position beyond the term of the revenue agreement. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds are included in the FY 2004-2005 Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result in FY 2004-2005 cost and revenue |

| |of $127,428 and subsequent years cost and revenue of $127,428. The funding source is the University of California, San Diego, |

| |Center for Community-Based Research in Older People with Psychoses. There will be no change in net General Fund Cost and no |

| |additional staff years. Adult and Older Adult Mental Health Services will develop a sustainability plan for the Coordinator |

| |position beyond the term of the revenue agreement. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29, Fees, Grants and Revenue Contracts – Department Responsibility for Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Ratify and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute a revenue agreement, upon receipt, with the University of California, San |

| |Diego, Center for Community-Based Research in Older People with Psychoses for the provision of Older Adult Mental Health Services|

| |Coordinator in the amount of $127,428 for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, and to execute amendments, renewals, and|

| |extensions as necessary, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency, or designee. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|14. |SUBJECT: |OUT OF COUNTRY BUSINESS: INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY CONFERENCE (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Under Board Policy D-7 (Out of County Business), Board approval is required for a County employee to travel outside the |

| |continental U.S. This item requests approval for one staff person from the Health and Human Services Agency’s Aging & |

| |Independence Services division to participate in the International Society of Aging and Physical Activity’s conference to be held|

| |from August 3, 2004 through August 7, 2004 in London, Ontario, Canada. |

| | |

| |This conference is held on a four-year cycle. Aging & Independence Services has been invited to present on its award-winning |

| |Feeling Fit Clubs program, and all travel costs will be paid by the conference organizers. Staff’s participation will also |

| |provide a valuable opportunity to gather information about other approaches to promote physical activity among seniors, which |

| |will enhance Aging & Independence Services’ ability to promote active and healthy lifestyles for San Diego County’s growing older|

| |adult community. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The recommended action has no current or subsequent year fiscal impact, as all travel costs associated with the conference are |

| |being paid directly by the conference organizers. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |In accordance with Board Policy D-7, Out of County Business and Related Guidelines and Processes, approve travel to London, |

| |Ontario, Canada, for one staff person from Aging & Independence Services for the period August 3, 2004 through August 7, 2004 for|

| |the International Society of Aging and Physical Activity conference. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|15. |SUBJECT: |CONTRACT WITH CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING FOR AGING & INDEPENDENCE SERVICES RADIO CALL-IN SHOW |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |During the last two years, the Health and Human Services Agency’s Aging & Independence Services (AIS) division has had a weekly |

| |call-in radio show, “In-Focus.” This show allows senior and disabled residents to call and speak to a knowledgeable host |

| |regarding issues that affect them. This show also allows AIS to disseminate information regarding programs and services. |

| | |

| |The radio show has been produced under a contract with Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc. that was established by the Department of|

| |Purchasing and Contracting in accordance with Board Policy A-87 (Competitive Procurement). Board action is needed to continue |

| |contracting with Clear Channel, because the cumulative amount of the contract is approaching the maximum amount for which |

| |Purchasing and Contracting has contracting authority. Market research by AIS has documented that of local talk radio stations, |

| |Clear Channel Broadcasting’s KPOP 1360 station reaches the largest local audience of adult and disabled listeners being targeted |

| |by AIS. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Health and Human Services Agency Fiscal Year 2004-05 Operational Plan. If approved, |

| |this request will result in estimated FY 2004-05 and subsequent years costs and revenues of $66,634. The source of funding is |

| |Title IIIE of the Older American Act. The annual cost consists of an estimated $60,000 for the contracted services, and $6,634 in|

| |AIS costs that constitute a required match to the Title IIIE revenue. The AIS match is provided through participation of |

| |individuals as co-hosts and guests on the show. There will be no change in net General Fund cost and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, approve and authorize the Director, Department of Purchasing and |

| |Contracting to enter into negotiations with Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc., and subject to negotiations and determination of a |

| |fair and reasonable price, award a contract for production of the “In-Focus” radio show for Aging and Independence Services, for |

| |one year, with three option years and up to an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as needed to reflect |

| |changes to services and funding, subject to approval of the Director of Health and Human Services Agency. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|16. |SUBJECT: |SAN DIEGO HIV HEALTH SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL -- AMENDED RESOLUTION AND MEMBER APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: |

| | |ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Board of Supervisor’s adopted a Resolution on November 6, 1990 (47) establishing the HIV Health Services Planning Council, a |

| |requirement for the County of San Diego to receive federal Ryan White CARE Act emergency relief funds. These funds are used to |

| |provide health care and supportive services to San Diego residents living with HIV/AIDS. Several amendments have been made to |

| |this Resolution, most recently on July 8, 2003 (8). Also, periodically the Board authorizes appointments and reappointments of |

| |individuals to the HIV Health Services Planning Council. |

| | |

| |Today’s action requests adoption of amendments to the Resolution regarding the HIV Health Services Planning Council attendance |

| |requirements and the filing of conflict of interest statements. Today’s action would also authorize appointment of members to |

| |fill vacancies on the HIV Health Services Planning Council. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The proposal will result in no current year or subsequent year General Fund cost and will not require the addition of staff |

| |years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Adopt the Amended Resolution entitled “A Resolution Regarding the San Diego HIV Health Services Planning Council.” |

| | |

| |Make the following new appointments to the HIV Health Services Planning Council, to complete terms scheduled to expire on |

| |December 31, 2005: |

| |Lorenzo Herman Akanke Celestin-Ramsey |

| |James Patrick Sean Nelson James Yarrell |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |Make the following new Consumer Alternate appointment to the HIV Health Services Planning Council, for a term scheduled to expire|

| |December 31, 2005: |

| |Anthony Gioffre |

| |ACTION: |

| |At the request of the Chief Administrative Officer, ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board |

| |of Supervisors continued the item to August 3, 2004, on Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|17. |SUBJECT: |LONG TERM CARE INTEGRATION PROJECT (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Long Term Care Integration Project has been a multi-year effort approved by the Board of Supervisors to explore options for |

| |integrating acute and long-term care for elderly and disabled county residents. At Board direction, the Health and Human |

| |Services Agency has been working with providers, consumers, caregivers, and advocates to examine three options. |

| | |

| |The first option, the Network of Care strategy, involves improved access to health and social service resources, with a plan for |

| |enhanced communication tools. The second option, the Physician Strategy, would improve the fee-for-service system by |

| |incentivizing providers to improve chronic care outcomes with better resource information, enhanced communication, and consumer |

| |education and empowerment. The third option, Healthy San Diego Plus, is a fully integrated model with capitation of acute and |

| |long term care expenditures to provide flexibility and incentives to substitute home and community-based care for acute services.|

| |This option also would include improved resource information and communication. |

| | |

| |Board action is requested today to proceed with implementing the Network of Care strategy, using a three-year grant available |

| |from the State Department of Aging. Implementing the Network of Care strategy will significantly improve elderly and disabled |

| |consumers’ access to information about availability of health care and social services. While implementing this strategy will |

| |not change service delivery options for elderly and disabled persons, it will empower these consumers by providing easily |

| |accessed, centralized information about services. The Network of Care strategy would complement the Physician Strategy and/or |

| |the Healthy San Diego Plus strategy, should the Board at a later date determine to move forward with implementing either or both |

| |of those service delivery options. |

| | |

| |Board action is also requested to authorize continuation of planning activities for the Physician strategy and the Healthy San |

| |Diego Plus strategy. This item provides a status report on each of those strategies. Staff will continue to update the Board |

| |as further planning work occurs, and will return with recommended actions once the planning phase of each strategy has been |

| |completed. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Funds for this request are included in the Fiscal Year 2004-05 Proposed Operational Plan. If approved, this request will result |

| |in $214,586 current year cost and $203,333 current year revenue, cost of $214,467 and revenue of $203,333 in FY 2005-06, and cost|

| |of $215,482 and revenue of $203,333 in FY 2006-07. The funding sources are the State Department of Aging ($203,000 annually) and|

| |the County General Fund ($11,253 in FY 04-05, $11,134 in FY 05-06 and $12,149 in FY 06-07). The Department of Aging grant |

| |requires a $10,167 annual match, which will be met in-kind by existing staff costs. There will be no change in net General Fund |

| |costs and no additional staff years. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Waive Board Policy B-29: Fees, Grants, Revenue Contracts -- Department Responsibility For Full Cost Recovery. |

| | |

| |Ratify grant application, approve, and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute, upon receipt, the State Department of Aging |

| |revenue agreement in the amount of $610,000 for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2007, for the Network of Care strategy, |

| |and authorize the Clerk of the Board to execute subsequent amendments when those documents are received from the Department of |

| |Aging and do not materially impact or alter either the grant program or funding level. |

| | |

| |In accordance with Board Policy A-87, Competitive Procurement, authorize the Director, Purchasing and Contracting, to enter into |

| |negotiations with Mark Meiners/ SumSal Associates, and upon successful negotiations and determination of a fair and reasonable |

| |price, award a contract for Network of Care grant evaluation activities, for the period August 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, |

| |with two option years and up to an additional six months if needed, and to amend the contract as required to reflect changes in |

| |funding or service requirements, subject to the approval of the Director, Health and Human Services Agency. Waive the |

| |advertising requirement of A-87. |

| | |

| |Receive the Draft Administrative Action Plan for Healthy San Diego Plus. |

| |ACTION: |

| |Authorizing the Chief Administrative Officer to continue seeking State and other external funding for further planning of the |

| |Physician and Healthy San Diego Plus strategies, ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of |

| |Supervisors took action as recommended, on Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|18. |SUBJECT: |DESIGNATION OF THE TRANSNET EXTENSION AS PROPOSITION A (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |In 1987, voters in the San Diego region approved a half-cent sales tax to fund various transportation projects throughout the |

| |region. Known as TransNet, this 20-year, $3.3 billion transportation program is set to expire in 2008. In November of 2004, San|

| |Diego County voters will have the opportunity to consider this TransNet Extension and its companion expenditure plan. If |

| |approved, the TransNet Extension could generate an estimated $14 billion for transportation improvements throughout San Diego |

| |County. Today’s recommendation would designate the TransNet Extension as Proposition A on the November 2, 2004 ballot. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact associated with this proposal. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |SUPERVISOR COX AND SUPERVISOR ROBERTS: |

| |Direct the Chief Administrative Officer to designate the TransNet Extension as Proposition A on the November 2, 2004 ballot in |

| |San Diego County. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Cox, seconded by Supervisor Roberts, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Horn |

| |ABSENT: Roberts |

| |

| |

|19. |SUBJECT: |A RESOLUTION RELATING TO NOTICE AND REVIEW OF ASSESSMENTS MADE OUTSIDE THE REGULAR ASSESSMENT PERIOD |

| | |(DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |During the year, the Assessor is constantly assessing both real and personal property. He is required to notify and inform the |

| |affected taxpayer of the right to file an application for reduction of the assessment and the time in which such an application |

| |must be filed. The Revenue and Taxation Code permits the Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution that permits the tax bill to |

| |serve as this notice. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The resolution carries no fiscal impact. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |ASSESSOR/RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK |

| |Approve the Resolution permitting applications for reduction pursuant to Section 1603 (a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code to be|

| |filed with the Clerk no later than 60 days after the date of mailing printed on the tax bill or the postmark therefore, whichever|

| |is later. |

| |ACTION: |

| |At the request of County Counsel and the Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk, ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by |

| |Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors withdrew the item, on Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|20. |SUBJECT: |SEALED BID SALE 2004 OF TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |This is a request to approve the proposed sale of 141 parcels of tax-defaulted real property, itemized in Exhibit A, by Sealed |

| |Bid Tax Sale on Friday, September 17, 2004 pursuant to Chapter 7, Part 6, Division 1 of the State Revenue and Taxation Code. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |The selling price of each parcel will be used to redeem the defaulted and current year taxes. It will also pay all required fees|

| |and costs of sale. If there are excess proceeds remaining after satisfaction of all redemption costs, fees, and costs of sale, |

| |it will be retained in the defaulted tax sale trust fund for a period of one year following the date of the recordation of the |

| |tax deed to the purchaser of the property. During that period, the proceeds may be claimed by any party of interest having a |

| |recorded lien interest in the property at the time of the sale. Unclaimed excess proceeds shall be escheated into the County’s |

| |General Fund. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR |

| |Adopt the resolution approving the sale by Sealed Bid Auction No. 2004 of San Diego County real estate parcels which became|

| |tax-defaulted on or before June 30, 1998, and are now subject to the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Power to Sell pursuant to State |

| |Revenue and Taxation Code §3691. |

| | |

| |Should a parcel not sell at the initial minimum bid as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code §3698.5, approve the Treasurer-Tax |

| |Collector discretion under Revenue and Taxation Code §3698.5, Subdivision (c), to offer the same property at next scheduled sale |

| |at a minimum price that the Treasurer-Tax Collector deems appropriate in light of the most current assessed valuation of that |

| |property or those interests or any unique circumstance with respect to that or those interests. Any parcel remaining unsold may |

| |be re-offered within a 90-day period in accordance with §3692(e) and any new parties of interest shall be notified in accordance |

| |with §3701. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 04-127, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO REGARDING|

| |THE PROPOSED SEALED BID SALE OF TAX-DEFAULTED PROPERTY. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|21. |SUBJECT: |RANCHO SANTA FE SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OLBIGATION BONDS, ELECTION OF 2004 (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |The Rancho Santa Fe School District (the “District”) received authorization at an election held on March 2, 2004, whereby the |

| |measure received affirmative vote of more than 55% of the voters of the District to issue $4,800,000 of general obligation bonds |

| |(the "Authorization"). |

| | |

| |At this time, the governing board of the District requests the County Board of Supervisors to issue the first of such bonds in an|

| |aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $2,840,000 (the “Bonds”), as well as refunding bonds in an aggregate principal amount|

| |of not to exceed $1,500,000 of Series 1991 Bonds to take advantage of the current low interest rate market (the “Refunding |

| |Bonds”). Following the sale of the Bonds, there will be approximately $1,960,000 principal amount of unissued bonds remaining of |

| |the Authorization. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |These Bonds are general obligations of the District to be paid from ad valorem property taxes and do not constitute an obligation|

| |of the County. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND DEBT ADVISORY COMMITTEE |

| |Adopt the resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the not to exceed $2,840,000 of Rancho Santa Fe School District General|

| |Obligation Bonds, Election of 2004. |

| | |

| |Adopt the resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the not to exceed $1,500,000 of Rancho Santa Fe School District General|

| |Obligation Refunding Bonds Election of 1991series, Series 2004. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent, adopting Resolution No. 04-128, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA,|

| |AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF RANCHO SANTA FE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 2004A GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, ELECTION OF 2004 IN THE |

| |PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,840,000; and Resolution No. 04-129, entitled: RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPVERVISORS OF THE |

| |COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF RANCHO SANTA FE SCHOOL DISTRICT, ELECTION OF 1991, SERIES |

| |OF 2004 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,500,000. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|22. |SUBJECT: |RESPONSE TO 2003-2004 GRAND JURY REPORTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Between March 10 and June 29, 2004, the 2003-2004 San Diego County Grand Jury released 10 reports that contain recommendations |

| |relating to the operation of County programs and departments. On May 18, 2004 (5), your Board approved responses to two of these|

| |reports (Conditions & Management of Detention Facilities in San Diego County and Is There a Need For a Regional Fire Authority & |

| |Rescue Helicopter in San Diego County?). |

| | |

| |This a request for your Board to review draft responses prepared by the Chief Administrative Officer that respond to the findings|

| |and recommendations contained in three of the remaining reports and to authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to transmit |

| |your Board’s responses to the Grand Jury, via the Superior Court Presiding Judge. The attachments to this letter address the |

| |following reports: |

| |Mental Health Services in the County Jails and Impact of the Connections Program |

| | |

| |Public Administrator/Public Guardian: Time To Professionalize? |

| |Touch Screen Voting: The Future or Failure? |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |There is no fiscal impact with this action. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to transmit these responses to the Grand Jury via the Superior Court Presiding Judge. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|23. |SUBJECT: |COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Board Policy A-72, Board of Supervisors Agenda and Related Process, authorizes the Clerk of the Board to prepare a Communications|

| |Received for Board of Supervisors' Official Records. Routine informational reports, which need to be brought to the attention of|

| |the Board of Supervisors yet not requiring action, are listed on this document. Communications Received documents are on file in|

| |the Office of the Clerk of the Board. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |Not Applicable. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Note and file. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|24. |SUBJECT: |ADMINISTRATIVE ITEM: |

| | |APPOINTMENTS (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |These appointments are in accordance with applicable Board Policy A–74, Citizen Participation in County Boards, Commissions and |

| |Committees. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |N/A |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: |

| |Appoint Mark G. Marchand to the Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board to fill the expired term of Steve Castaneda; this term |

| |expired June 30, 2003. Appoint Mr. Marchand to the seat for the remainder of the current three-year term, expiring June 30, 2006,|

| |and appoint him to a full term, July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2009. |

| | |

| |Appoint Donald H. Warfield to the Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board to replace Tom Pocklington, to a full term, July 1, 2004|

| |through June 30, 2007. |

| | |

| |Re-appoint Kourosh Hangafarin to the Citizens’ Law Enforcement Review Board to a full term, July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2007. |

| | |

| |Appoint Linda Broyles, R.N., to the Emergency Medical Care Committee, replacing Lana Brown, R.N., as the primary representative |

| |from the Emergency Nurses Association, for a term to expire July 17, 2007. |

| | |

| |Appoint Linda Rosenberg, R.N., to the Emergency Medical Care Committee, replacing Linda Broyles, R.N., as the alternate for the |

| |Emergency Medical Care Committee, for a term to expire June 28, 2005. |

| | |

| |Appoint Boyd Richardson to replace Bill Grill as an alternate to the County Service Area No. 69 - Heartland Emergency Medical |

| |Services District Advisory Committee. In accordance with the Committee Bylaws "the term of office for each member shall be at |

| |the discretion of the appointing organization." |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|25. |SUBJECT: |CLOSED SESSION (DISTRICT: ALL) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |William Bandt, et al. v. Board of Retirement, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIC 810546 |

| | |

| |B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |The Ray Revocable Declaration of Trust, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIC 819651-1 |

| | |

| |C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |County of San Diego v. Jack C. Yang, M.D., et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIC 807060 |

| | |

| |D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |Riverwatch, et al. v. County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIN 038227 / Pala Band of Mission Indians v. |

| |County of San Diego, et al.; San Diego Superior Court No. GIN 038086 |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| | |

| |E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION |

| |(Subdivision (a) of Government Code section 54956.9) |

| |County of San Diego v. State of California; Sacramento County Superior Court No. 04AS00371 |

| | |

| |F. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Potential Cases – |

| |1) |

| | |

| |G. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Potential Cases – |

| |1) |

| | |

| |H. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| | |

| |I. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION |

| |Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code section 54956.9: (Number of Cases – 1) |

| |ACTION: |

| |Any reportable matters will be announced on Wednesday, July 14, 2004, prior to the Board of Supervisors Planning and Land Use |

| |meeting. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|26. |SUBJECT: |ESTABLISHING AN ALPINE REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE (DISTRICT: 2) |

| |OVERVIEW: |

| |Today’s action will authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to take the necessary steps to establish and activate a |

| |Revitalization Committee for the unincorporated community of Alpine. |

| |FISCAL IMPACT: |

| |This action can be accomplished with existing resources. |

| |RECOMMENDATION: |

| |CHAIRWOMAN JACOB: |

| |Authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to take the necessary steps to establish and activate a Revitalization Committee for |

| |the unincorporated community of Alpine. |

| |ACTION: |

| |ON MOTION of Supervisor Slater-Price, seconded by Supervisor Cox, the Board of Supervisors took action as recommended, on |

| |Consent. |

| | |

| |AYES: Cox, Jacob, Slater-Price, Roberts, Horn |

| |

| |

|27. |SUBJECT: |PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS |

| |Supervisor Bill Horn presented a proclamation in honor of Invasive Weeds Awareness Week. |

| | |

| |Supervisor Bill Horn presented a proclamation to Lorna Kipke, the Volunteer of the Month. |

| | |

| |Supervisor Ron Roberts presented a proclamation to Ashley Stewart, the Volunteer of the Month. |

| | |

| |Supervisor Ron Roberts presented a proclamation honoring the Urban Corps of San Diego. |

There being no further business, the Board adjourned at 4:35 p.m. in memory of Bill Zures and Elbert Smith.

THOMAS J. PASTUSZKA

Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego, State of California

Consent: Fowler/Gomez

Discussion: Hall

NOTE: This Statement of Proceedings sets forth all actions taken by the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors on the matters stated, but not necessarily the chronological sequence in which the matters were taken up.

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download