Grade Level Team Meeting Agenda



Grade Level Team Meeting AgendaBefore School Starts (August/September)Purpose: Discuss effectiveness of instruction from previous year and preview data from last year for incoming cohort of students.Discuss Effectiveness of Instruction from Previous School YearReview Summary of Effectiveness Chart from previous year’s students, including information on GOM, MAP, and MCAII dataDiscuss curriculum and instruction effectiveness from previous school year:Did we meet last year’s grade level goals?Where did we start and stop in the curriculum?What chapters/units were completed or skipped?What chapters/units covered skills what were most challenging?What additional materials or programs were used for core instruction?What supplemental supports were available last year?Preview Last Year’s Data for Incoming CohortReview Summary of Effectiveness Chart for Incoming grade level students: Is this group likely to need less/same/more intensity of core instruction than our group last year?Identify modal rit bands for MAP sub-strands, and note score distribution. Review DesCartes Learning Continuum for these: How will these needs be met in the core curriculum?Plan 1-3 standard intervention options that would address common concerns at this grade level.Record these plans as standard treatment protocolsWhat is/are the area(s) of focus for the standard intervention options? (i.e., fluency, word recognition, comprehension, content writing, etc)Who will teach the group?When will the intervention be delivered?What resources are needed?Discuss the basis for selecting students for these interventionsDiscuss logistics of intervention delivery (time, space, people)Discuss what you plan to do this year to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsGrade Level Team Meeting AgendaAfter Fall Benchmark Screening (September or October)Purpose: Review Fall Benchmark Screening Data and Plan InstructionReview Fall GOM benchmark data and Fall MAP dataDo the reports reflect the correct group of students?Is the color coding correct on the reports?Tier 1 and above should be green (At or above Tier 1 target)Tier 2 should be yellow (At or above Tier 2 target but below Tier 1 target)Tier 3 should be red (Below Tier 2 target)What percentage of students fall in Tier 1?What percentage of students fall in Tier 2?What percentage of students fall in Tier 3?Establish an end of year team goal to work toward for the percentage of students you would like to see in each tier based on assessment dataNote that districts also have growth goals for students on MAP in addition to this team goalIf the percentage of students in tier 1 is below 80%, discuss grade level wide opportunities to making core program more robust for this cohort (how to best use core instructional time for all students)Identify the initial list of students who should be monitored more frequently than 3x per year using fluency measures (typically every student scoring below target on fall measuresIdentify the initial list of students who will participate in a standard intervention Make updates as needed to standard treatment protocolsContent covered in intervention?Discuss the basis for selecting students for these interventionsWho will teach the group?When will interventions be delivered? For how much time?What resources are needed?How will intervention integrity be ensured?Match these students with the most appropriate intervention choice based on their similar instructional needsConsider other data you may have regarding these students to assist with decision making (e.g., within curriculum data)Document interventions in AIMSweb and RtI Database (seek administrative support if necessary)Share plans with building administrationDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsGrade Level Team Meeting AgendaOctober, November, December, January(Note alternate agenda for grades K-1 December)Purpose: Determine whether students who began the year below target are making sufficient progress given current intervention supportsReview team goalConfirm that all students who performed below target on fall screening measures have progress monitor graphs using General Outcome MeasuresConfirm that any new student in the building completed screening assessments, and is progress monitored in area(s) that are below targetReview implementation of standard interventionsAre these interventions being implemented as planned? If not, what are the barriers that need to be addressed?Determine the percentage of students who are progress monitored and are making sufficient progress – celebrate!!!!!Review graphs for all students who are making enough progress to warrant possible discontinuation of supplemental interventionRecord decisions about program changes on AIMSweb graphs and in RtI DatabaseReview graphs for all students who are currently not making sufficient progressShare what you know about the student’s instructional needs and ideas for making the current program work better for the studentThis may be adding or changing participation in a standard intervention, or tweaking an individual programRecord decisions about program changes on AIMSweb graphs and in RtI DatabaseDecide if there are students who should be referred to the building level Problem Solving TeamDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsK-1 Grade Level Team Meeting AgendaAfter November Benchmark Screening (December)Purpose: Review November Benchmark Screening Data and Plan InstructionReview November benchmark dataAre these your students?Make sure color coding is correctTier 1 and above should be green (At or above Tier 1 target)Tier 2 should be yellow (At or above Tier 2 target but below Tier 1 target)Tier 3 should be red (Below Tier 2 target)What percentage of students fall in Tier 1?What percentage of students fall in Tier 2?What percentage of students fall in Tier 3?Review team progress toward year end goalIf the percentage of students in tier 1 is below 80%, discuss grade level wide opportunities to making core program more robust for this cohort (how to best use core instructional time for all students)Update list of students who should be monitored more frequently than 3x per year using fluency measures based on winter data (typically every student scoring below target)Update list of students who will participate in a standard intervention Match these students with the most appropriate intervention choice based on their similar instructional needsConsider other data you may have regarding these students to assist with decision making (e.g., within curriculum data)Document interventions in AIMSweb and RtI DatabaseShare plans with building administrationDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsGrade Level Team Meeting AgendaAfter Winter Benchmark Screening (January or February)Purpose: Review Winter Benchmark Screening Data and Plan InstructionReview Winter GOM benchmark data and Winter MAP data as availableDo the reports reflect the correct group of students?Is the color coding correct on the reports?Tier 1 and above should be green (At or above Tier 1 target)Tier 2 should be yellow (At or above Tier 2 target but below Tier 1 target)Tier 3 should be red (Below Tier 2 target)What percentage of students fall in Tier 1?What percentage of students fall in Tier 2?What percentage of students fall in Tier 3?What percentage of students in Tier 1 in the fall scored in the Tier 1 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 1 in the fall scored in the Tier 2 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 1 in the fall scored in the Tier 3 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 2 in the fall scored in the Tier 1 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 2 in the fall scored in the Tier 2 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 2 in the fall scored in the Tier 3 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 3 in the fall scored in the Tier 1 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 3 in the fall scored in the Tier 2 range in the winter?What percentage of students in Tier 3 in the fall scored in the Tier 3 range in the winter?Review team progress toward year end goalNote that districts also have growth goals for students on MAP in addition to this team goalIf the percentage of students in tier 1 is below 80%, discuss grade level wide opportunities to making core program more robust for this cohort (how to best use core instructional time for all students)Update list of students who should be monitored more frequently than 3x per year using fluency measures based on winter data (typically every student scoring below target)Update list of students who will participate in a standard intervention Match these students with the most appropriate intervention choice based on their similar instructional needsConsider other data you may have regarding these students to assist with decision making (e.g., within curriculum data)Document interventions in AIMSweb and RtI DatabaseShare plans with building administrationDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsGrade Level Team Meeting AgendaFebruary, March, April, MayPurpose: Determine whether students who began the year below target are making sufficient progress given current intervention supportsReview team goalConfirm that all students who performed below target on winter screening measures have progress monitor graphs using General Outcome MeasuresConfirm that any new student in the building completed screening assessments, and is progress monitored in area(s) that are below targetReview implementation of standard interventionsAre these interventions being implemented as planned? If not, what are the barriers that need to be addressed?Determine the percentage of students who are progress monitored and are making sufficient progress – celebrate!!!!!Review graphs for all students who are making enough progress to warrant possible discontinuation of supplemental interventionRecord decisions about program changes on AIMSweb graphs and in RtI DatabaseReview graphs for all students who are currently not making sufficient progressShare what you know about the student’s instructional needs and ideas for making the current program work better for the studentThis may be adding or changing participation in a standard intervention, or tweaking an individual programRecord decisions about program changes on AIMSweb graphs and in RtI DatabaseDecide if there are students who should be referred to the building level Problem Solving TeamDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled studentsELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsGrade Level Team Meeting AgendaAfter Spring Benchmark Screening (May)Purpose: Review Spring Benchmark Screening Data and Plan InstructionReview Spring GOM benchmark data and Spring MAP data as availableDo the reports reflect the correct group of students?Is the color coding correct on the reports?Tier 1 and above should be green (At or above Tier 1 target)Tier 2 should be yellow (At or above Tier 2 target but below Tier 1 target)Tier 3 should be red (Below Tier 2 target)What percentage of students fall in Tier 1?What percentage of students fall in Tier 2?What percentage of students fall in Tier 3?What % of students in Tier 1 in the winter scored in the Tier 1 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 1 in the winter scored in the Tier 2 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 1 in the winter scored in the Tier 3 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 2 in the winter scored in the Tier 1 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 2 in the winter scored in the Tier 2 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 2 in the winter scored in the Tier 3 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 3 in the winter scored in the Tier 1 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 3 in the winter scored in the Tier 2 range in the spring?What % of students in Tier 3 in the winter scored in the Tier 3 range in the spring?Review team progress toward year-end goal and celebrate!!!!!Note that districts also have growth goals for students on MAP in addition to this team goalConsider the data found in Summary of Effectiveness Charts that state the number of students who stayed in Tier 1 from fall to spring, and the upward movement of students from tier 2 to tier 1 or tier 3 to tiers 2 or 1. Which students stayed in tier 2, tier 3, or slipped from tier 1 downward?Review growth on MAP by tiers – what percent of targeted growth did students in each tier make? What was the average growth percentage by tiers? How does this inform our work?Review MAP strand data to see areas of strength and weaknessIf the percentage of students in tier 1 is below 80%, discuss grade level wide opportunities to making core program more robust for this cohort and possibly the next one (how to best use core instructional time for all students)Review graphs for all students who are currently not making sufficient progressShare what you know about the student’s instructional needs and ideas for making the current program work better for the studentThis may be adding or changing participation in a standard intervention, or tweaking an individual programRecord decisions about program changes on AIMSweb graphs and in RtI DatabaseDecide if there are students who should be referred to the building level Problem Solving TeamDiscuss what you are doing to challenge your highest skilled students. Consider the data on your students in tier 1. What percentage met their year growth goal on MAP?ELA 2010 StandardsUsing the ELA 2010 Standards discussion page, discuss the assigned standard with your teamMath Curriculum ReviewShare any pertinent announcementsPlanning/discussion about what you want to keep the same or change during next school year for full range of student needsIdentify training interests/needs related to new plansShare ideas with building administration ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download