ERP Template V1-1
[pic]
Pay for Performance Program
ENERGY REDUCTION PLAN
Existing Buildings Component
[pic]
Owner:
Phone:
Application Number:
Audit Date:
Report Prepared by:
Report Date:
Revision #
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv
SECTION I – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1
Background Information 1
Building Occupancy 2
Energy Suppliers, Metering, and Electrical Systems 2
Envelope 2
Lighting 3
Mechanical Systems 5
Operation and Maintenance 9
Process Equipment and Systems 9
SECTION II – FACILITY SIMULATION 10
Major Assumptions Used to Establish the Baseline 10
Baseline Facility Variables 10
Calibration 10
SECTION III – RECOMMENDED MEASURES 11
Measures Recommended for the Project 14
Energy Efficiency Options Examined But Not Recommended 15
SECTION IV – FINANCING PLAN 16
SECTION V – IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 17
SECTION VI – METERING PLAN 18
List of Tables
Table 1. Summary of P4P Program Metrics iv
Table 2. Summary of Program Incentives v
Table 3. Area Identification 1
Table 4. Occupancy Schedules 2
Table 5. Utility Summary 2
Table 6. Envelope Summary 3
Table 7a. Lighting Detail 4
Table 8. Motors 6
Table 9. HVAC Schedule 7
Table 10. Boiler and Domestic Hot Water 8
Table 11. Chillers and Condensers 8
Table 12. Model Calibration Statistics 10
Table 13. Recommended Measures - Description 12
Table 14. Recommended Measures - Cost and Energy Savings 13
Table 15. Financing Plan 16
Table 16. Implementation Schedule 17
List of Appendices
Appendix A: EPA Portfolio Manager Summary
Appendix B: Simulation Reports
Appendix C: Modeling Assumptions
Appendix D: Supporting Calculations
Appendix E: Pre-Retrofit Metering Results
Appendix F: Combined Heat and Power Application
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In connection with New Jersey’s Clean Energy Pay for Performance Program, this Energy Reduction Plan (ERP) presents the findings of a comprehensive assessment which evaluated potential energy saving measures for in . This ERP details specific steps to be taken by the project owner to achieve or exceed a minimum target source energy savings of 15%. Included in this ERP are energy and cost analyses used in determining the list of recommended energy saving measures. This ERP is prepared in accordance with version 2.0 of the Pay for Performance Program Guidelines and NJ Clean Energy Program Protocols to Measure Resource Savings.
Table 1 illustrates a summary of the project in terms of energy consumption, estimated savings and EPA Portfolio Manager output. Table 2 includes a summary of the Program incentives.
Table 1. Summary of P4P Program Metrics
[pic]
Table 2. Summary of Program Incentives
[pic]
This plan has been developed by at . All questions should be addressed to at or by email at .
SECTION I – PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This ERP addresses the following facility(ies): . On , from visited the project site and conducted a detailed energy assessment of the property.
The project was evaluated using the US EPA’s Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool to examine current energy consumption relative to similar facilities prior to implementation of recommended measures. The facility is included under the in Portfolio Manger and has an initial Performance Rating Benchmark of . Portfolio Manager results can be found in Appendix A.
Background Information
Table 3. Area Identification
[pic]
Building Occupancy
Table 4. Occupancy Schedules
[pic]
Energy Suppliers, Metering, and Electrical Systems
Monthly energy use tables can be found in Appendix A.
Table 5. Utility Summary
[pic]
Envelope
Table 6. Envelope Summary
[pic]
Lighting
Table 7a. Lighting Detail
[pic]
Table7b. Lighting Summary
[pic]
Mechanical Systems
Detailed specifications for the mechanical systems in the project, including HVAC systems, chillers, and motors, are included in the tables below.
Table 8. Motors
[pic]
Table 9. HVAC Schedule
[pic]
Table 10. Boiler and Domestic Hot Water
[pic]
Table 11. Chillers and Condensers
[pic]
Operation and Maintenance
Process Equipment and Systems
Other Energy Consuming Equipment and Systems
SECTION II – FACILITY SIMULATION
This analysis was conducted using the facility modeling software, , by . Simulation results can be found in Appendix B.
Major Assumptions Used to Establish the Baseline
Detailed modeling assumptions can be found in Appendix C.
Baseline Facility Variables
Supporting calculations can be found in Appendix C.
Additional tools were used to evaluate certain measures that could not be fully evaluated by the modeling software. These include . The results of these additional tools were combined with those from the modeling software to fully evaluate interactive effects from the entire set of measures. Supporting calculations for these measures can be found in Appendix D.
Calibration
The simulation model has been calibrated to actual utility bills for the project, resulting in the following accuracy statistics:
Table 12. Model Calibration Statistics
[pic]
SECTION III – RECOMMENDED MEASURES
This section describes the energy efficiency opportunities assessed and recommended for this project. In accordance with version 2.0 of the P4P Program Guidelines, a comprehensive suite of potential energy reduction opportunities has been analyzed for this project.
The estimated annual energy savings based on the list of recommended measures in Table 13 and Table 14 include a natural gas reduction of %, a %, reduction in electricity consumption, and a %, reduction in consumption.
Table 13. Recommended Measures – Description
[pic]
Table 14. Recommended Measures - Cost and Energy Savings
[pic]
Measures Recommended for the Project
Measure #1 -
Description of Improvement
Existing Conditions
Assumptions
Submittal Note: For measures calculated outside of the model, the side calculations must also be submitted. Energy Reduction Plans will be rejected without all applicable calculations.
Measure #2 -
Description of Improvement
Existing Conditions
Assumptions
Energy Efficiency Options Examined But Not Recommended
The following measures were analyzed but not recommended for the reasons discussed below.
1)
2)
3)
SECTION IV – FINANCING PLAN
Table 15 includes a description of the funding sources the Owner will use to finance implementation of the recommended measures. The table presents the estimated costs associated with implementing the recommended measures to achieve the energy savings performance target, along with the sources of funding planned to cover those costs.
Table 15. Financing Plan
[pic]
SECTION V – IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Table 16 represents the implementation schedule for the recommended measures.
Table 16. Implementation Schedule
[pic]
SECTION VI – METERING PLAN
This section describes pre-retrofit metering activities that were conducted at the facility, performed according to Section 4 of the P4P Program Guidelines. Detailed pre-metering results can be found in Appendix E.
Method:
Assumptions:
Schedule:
Method:
Assumptions:
Schedule:
APPENDIX A:
EPA Portfolio Manager Statement of Energy Performance
APPENDIX B: Simulation Reports
\
APPENDIX C: Modeling Assumptions
Detailed Assumptions
Supporting Calculations for Independent Variables
APPENDIX D: Supporting Calculations
APPENDIX E: Pre-Retrofit Metering Results
APPENDIX F: Combined Heat and Power System
-----------------------
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- bcps erp employee self service
- minecraft apk v1.8.0
- lego education wedo software v1 2
- wedo software v1 2
- windows system32 windowspowershell v1 0 powershell exe
- powershell v1 0
- system 32 powershell v1 0
- windows system32 windowspowershell v1 0 powershell
- icd 705 v1 4
- likert scale template 1 5
- 1 5 circle template printable
- 1 5 circle template word