ERP Template V1-1



[pic]

Pay for Performance Program

ENERGY REDUCTION PLAN

Existing Buildings Component

[pic]

Owner:

Phone:

Application Number:

Audit Date:

Report Prepared by:

Report Date:

Revision #

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv

SECTION I – PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1

Background Information 1

Building Occupancy 2

Energy Suppliers, Metering, and Electrical Systems 2

Envelope 2

Lighting 3

Mechanical Systems 5

Operation and Maintenance 9

Process Equipment and Systems 9

SECTION II – FACILITY SIMULATION 10

Major Assumptions Used to Establish the Baseline 10

Baseline Facility Variables 10

Calibration 10

SECTION III – RECOMMENDED MEASURES 11

Measures Recommended for the Project 14

Energy Efficiency Options Examined But Not Recommended 15

SECTION IV – FINANCING PLAN 16

SECTION V – IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 17

SECTION VI – METERING PLAN 18

List of Tables

Table 1. Summary of P4P Program Metrics iv

Table 2. Summary of Program Incentives v

Table 3. Area Identification 1

Table 4. Occupancy Schedules 2

Table 5. Utility Summary 2

Table 6. Envelope Summary 3

Table 7a. Lighting Detail 4

Table 8. Motors 6

Table 9. HVAC Schedule 7

Table 10. Boiler and Domestic Hot Water 8

Table 11. Chillers and Condensers 8

Table 12. Model Calibration Statistics 10

Table 13. Recommended Measures - Description 12

Table 14. Recommended Measures - Cost and Energy Savings 13

Table 15. Financing Plan 16

Table 16. Implementation Schedule 17

List of Appendices

Appendix A: EPA Portfolio Manager Summary

Appendix B: Simulation Reports

Appendix C: Modeling Assumptions

Appendix D: Supporting Calculations

Appendix E: Pre-Retrofit Metering Results

Appendix F: Combined Heat and Power Application

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In connection with New Jersey’s Clean Energy Pay for Performance Program, this Energy Reduction Plan (ERP) presents the findings of a comprehensive assessment which evaluated potential energy saving measures for in . This ERP details specific steps to be taken by the project owner to achieve or exceed a minimum target source energy savings of 15%. Included in this ERP are energy and cost analyses used in determining the list of recommended energy saving measures. This ERP is prepared in accordance with version 2.0 of the Pay for Performance Program Guidelines and NJ Clean Energy Program Protocols to Measure Resource Savings.

Table 1 illustrates a summary of the project in terms of energy consumption, estimated savings and EPA Portfolio Manager output. Table 2 includes a summary of the Program incentives.

Table 1. Summary of P4P Program Metrics

[pic]

Table 2. Summary of Program Incentives

[pic]

This plan has been developed by at . All questions should be addressed to at or by email at .

SECTION I – PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This ERP addresses the following facility(ies): . On , from visited the project site and conducted a detailed energy assessment of the property.

The project was evaluated using the US EPA’s Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool to examine current energy consumption relative to similar facilities prior to implementation of recommended measures. The facility is included under the in Portfolio Manger and has an initial Performance Rating Benchmark of . Portfolio Manager results can be found in Appendix A.

Background Information

Table 3. Area Identification

[pic]

Building Occupancy

Table 4. Occupancy Schedules

[pic]

Energy Suppliers, Metering, and Electrical Systems

Monthly energy use tables can be found in Appendix A.

Table 5. Utility Summary

[pic]

Envelope

Table 6. Envelope Summary

[pic]

Lighting

Table 7a. Lighting Detail

[pic]

Table7b. Lighting Summary

[pic]

Mechanical Systems

Detailed specifications for the mechanical systems in the project, including HVAC systems, chillers, and motors, are included in the tables below.

Table 8. Motors

[pic]

Table 9. HVAC Schedule

[pic]

Table 10. Boiler and Domestic Hot Water

[pic]

Table 11. Chillers and Condensers

[pic]

Operation and Maintenance

Process Equipment and Systems

Other Energy Consuming Equipment and Systems

SECTION II – FACILITY SIMULATION

This analysis was conducted using the facility modeling software, , by . Simulation results can be found in Appendix B.

Major Assumptions Used to Establish the Baseline

Detailed modeling assumptions can be found in Appendix C.

Baseline Facility Variables

Supporting calculations can be found in Appendix C.

Additional tools were used to evaluate certain measures that could not be fully evaluated by the modeling software. These include . The results of these additional tools were combined with those from the modeling software to fully evaluate interactive effects from the entire set of measures. Supporting calculations for these measures can be found in Appendix D.

Calibration

The simulation model has been calibrated to actual utility bills for the project, resulting in the following accuracy statistics:

Table 12. Model Calibration Statistics

[pic]

SECTION III – RECOMMENDED MEASURES

This section describes the energy efficiency opportunities assessed and recommended for this project. In accordance with version 2.0 of the P4P Program Guidelines, a comprehensive suite of potential energy reduction opportunities has been analyzed for this project.

The estimated annual energy savings based on the list of recommended measures in Table 13 and Table 14 include a natural gas reduction of %, a %, reduction in electricity consumption, and a %, reduction in consumption.

Table 13. Recommended Measures – Description

[pic]

Table 14. Recommended Measures - Cost and Energy Savings

[pic]

Measures Recommended for the Project

Measure #1 -

Description of Improvement

Existing Conditions

Assumptions

Submittal Note: For measures calculated outside of the model, the side calculations must also be submitted. Energy Reduction Plans will be rejected without all applicable calculations.

Measure #2 -

Description of Improvement

Existing Conditions

Assumptions

Energy Efficiency Options Examined But Not Recommended

The following measures were analyzed but not recommended for the reasons discussed below.

1)

2)

3)

SECTION IV – FINANCING PLAN

Table 15 includes a description of the funding sources the Owner will use to finance implementation of the recommended measures. The table presents the estimated costs associated with implementing the recommended measures to achieve the energy savings performance target, along with the sources of funding planned to cover those costs.

Table 15. Financing Plan

[pic]

SECTION V – IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

Table 16 represents the implementation schedule for the recommended measures.

Table 16. Implementation Schedule

[pic]

SECTION VI – METERING PLAN

This section describes pre-retrofit metering activities that were conducted at the facility, performed according to Section 4 of the P4P Program Guidelines. Detailed pre-metering results can be found in Appendix E.

Method:

Assumptions:

Schedule:

Method:

Assumptions:

Schedule:

APPENDIX A:

EPA Portfolio Manager Statement of Energy Performance

APPENDIX B: Simulation Reports

\

APPENDIX C: Modeling Assumptions

Detailed Assumptions

Supporting Calculations for Independent Variables

APPENDIX D: Supporting Calculations

APPENDIX E: Pre-Retrofit Metering Results

APPENDIX F: Combined Heat and Power System

-----------------------

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download