List of Figures - Cloudinary
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Element Title Page
__________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents ii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables vii
List of Acronyms xi
PROJECT INTRODUCTION xiv
PHASE I
ELEMENT 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT
1.1 Introduction 1-1
1.2 Master Planning Context: Regional Setting and Port Environs 1-1
1.3 Land Uses 1-10
1.4 Opportunities and Constraints 1-11
1.5 Facility Inventory 1-14
1.6 Progress on Projects since Approval of the 2006 Port Everglades Master Plan 1-14
1.7 Berthing Analysis 1-22
1.8 Cargo Capacity Analysis 1-22
1.9 Wharf Operations 1-37
1.10 On-Port Traffic Circulation and Parking 1-38
1.11 Intermodal Transportation Network 1-42
1.12 Environmental Conditions 1-60
ELEMENT 2: MARKET ASSESSMENT
2.1 Introduction 2-1
2.2 Summary of Historic Core Cargo and Cruise Operations 2-1
2.3 Containerized Cargo Market 2-9
2.4 Dry Bulk Cargo Market 2-71
2.5 Liquid Bulk Market 2-86
2.6 Cruise Market 2-150
ELEMENT 3: PLAN DEVELOPMENT
3.1 Introduction 3-1
3.2 Conceptual Planning Process and Visioning Goals. 3-2
3.3 Terminal Design Trends 3-2
3.4 Cargo Operational Enhancement Opportunities 3-10
3.5 Facility Needs Assessment 3-15
3.6 Conceptual Planning Studies 3-19
3.7 20-Year Vision Plan 3-48
3.8 Parking 3-65
3.9 Rail and Truck Traffic 3-67
APPENDICES
A Outreach Meetings
B Recommended Alternative, People Mover Map
C Airspace Obstruction Analyses of Proposed Port Cranes and Vessels,
prepared by Jacobs Consultancy
D Existing Traffic Data
E Cruise Projections (Table E-1)
Cruise Berth Scenarios (Table E-2)
F The Local and Regional Impacts of Port Everglades, Fiscal Year 2008 Update
G The Local and Regional Impacts of Proposed Projects
H The Economics of Cold Ironing
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page
____________________________________________________________________________
1.2-1 Core South Florida Region 1-1
1.2-2 South Florida Population Growth over the Planning Horizon 1-2
1.2-3 Port Everglades Jurisdictional Area 1-6
1.3-1 Current Land Use Map 1-10
1.6-1 Concept Plan for By-Pass Road 1-15
1.6-2 Rendering of Expanded Cruise Terminal 18 1-17
1.6-3 Alternative Layout for Reconfigured McIntosh Road 1-20
1.8-1 Container Operations - Unit Berth Capacity 1-28
1.8-2 Container Operations - Unit Yard Capacity 1-33
1.10-1 Current Rail Trackage at Port Everglades 1-41
1.11-1 SIS Components in Broward County 1-42
1.11-2 Congested Corridors in Florida 2025 1-44
1.11-3 The FEC System 1-45
1.11-4 The CSX System 1-47
1.11-5 The CSXT A and S Lines 1-48
1.11-6 The Norfolk Southern System 1-48
1.11-7 Short-sea Shipping Operations 1-52
1.11-8 Freight and Industrial Zones in Broward County 1-55
1.11-9 I-595 Project Improvements Map 1-56
1.11-10 SFECCTA Study Area 1-59
1.12-1 Port Everglades and Inlet Location Map 1-60
1.12-2 ACOE and EPA Map of ODMDS 1-65
1.12-3 Proposed Conservation Easement Alternative Enhancement Project 1-67
1.12-4 Reported Sightings of Listed Species in Vicinity of Port Everglades 1-68
1.12-5 Presence of Acropora Coral Critical Habitat in the Vicinity of Port Everglades 1-73
1.12-6 Estimated Sea Level Rises Resulting from Global Warming 1-78
1.12-7 2006 Seagrass Mapping and Assessment 1-80
1.12-8 Percent Cover of All Dominant Coral Species in All Zones 1-81
2.2-1 Tonnage at Port Everglades FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-2
2.2-2 Comparison of Tonnages at Port Everglades by Cargo Type FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-3
2.2-3 TEU Movements at Port Everglades FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-4
2.2-4 Cruise Passengers at Port Everglades by Cruise Type FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-5
2.2-5 Comparison of Cruise Passengers at Port Everglades by Cruise Type FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-5
2.2-6 Comparison of Ship Calls at Port Everglades by Type FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-6
2.2-7 Port Revenues FY 98/99 - FY 07/08 2-7 2
2.2-8 Port Revenues FY 98/99 2-8
2.2-9 Port Revenues FY 07/08 2-8
2.3-1 Historical TEUs Handled at Port Everglades 2-9
2.3-2 Change in TEUs during the First Six Months of FY 2008 and of FY 2009 2-10
2.3-3 Share of Port Everglades Containerized Cargo by Trade Route-FY 2008 Fully Loaded TEUs 2-11
2.3-4 Share of Port Everglades Containerized Cargo by Trade Route – FY 20068 Short Tons 2-11
2.3-5 Total Containerized Cargo Activity by Port Range (TEUs) 2-14
2.3-6 Percent Change in TEUs by Range Q1/2008-Q1/2009 2-15
2.3-7 Imported Containerized Cargo Tonnage by Overseas Trading Area 2-16
2.3-8 Share of Imported Containerized Tonnage by Detailed Trade Area 2-16
2.3-9 Percent Change in Asian Sources of US Imports 2003-2008 2-17
2.3-10 Imported Containerized Tonnage by Port Range 2-18
2.3-11 Containerized Cargo Activity at North Atlantic Ports (TEUs) 2-22
2.3-12 Imported Asian Containerized Cargo at North Atlantic Ports 2-22
2.3-13 Containerized Cargo Activity at South Atlantic Ports (TEUs) 2-23
2.3-14 Imported Asian Containerized Tonnage at South Atlantic Ports 2-23
2.3-15 Containerized Cargo Activity at Gulf Coast Ports (TEUs) 2-24
2.3-16 Imported Asian Containerized Cargo at Gulf Coast Ports 2-24
2.3-17 Historical Containerized Growth at South Atlantic Ports (TEUs) 2-25
2.3-18 Indexed Container Growth of South Atlantic Ports (TEUs) 2-25
2.3-19 Florida Ports Container Activity (TEUs) 2-26
2.3-20 Indexed Growth of Port Everglades and the Florida Ports
in Comparison with US and South Atlantic Ports (TEUs) 2-26
2.3-21 Container Throughput at the Port of Charleston (TEUs) 2-27
2.3-22 Charleston’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane FY 2008 Loaded TEUs 2-28
2.3-23 Container Throughput at the Port of Savannah (TEUs) 2-29
2.3-24 Savannah’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane FY 2008 Loaded TEUs 2-30
2.3-25 Container Throughput at JAXPORT (TEUs) 2-26
2.3-26 JAXPORT’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane FY 2008 Loaded TEUs 2-27
2.3-27 Container Throughput at the Port of Palm Beach (TEUs) 2-34
2.3-28 Palm Beach’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane - FY 2008 Loaded TEUs 2-34
2.3-29 Container Throughput at the Port of Miami (TEUs) 2-35
2.3-30 Miami’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane FY 2008 Loaded TEUs 2-35
2.3-31 Containerized Throughput at Port of Tampa (TEUs) 2-37
2.3-32 Tampa’s Share of Containerized Cargo by Trade Lane FY 2008 Loaded TEUs) 2-37
2.3-33 Concentration of Distribution Centers of Top Florida Importers 2-39
2.3-34 Concentration of Key Exporter Distribution Center and Consolidation Facilities 2-40
2.3-35 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key ASIA IMPORT Locations 2-42
2.3-36 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key ASIA EXPORT Locations 2-43
2.3-37 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key NORTH EUROPE IMPORT Locations 2-44
2.3-38 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key NORTH EUROPE EXPORT Locations 2-45
2.3-39 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key MEDITERRANEAN IMPORT Locations 2-46
2.3-40 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key MEDITERRANEAN EXPORT Locations 2-47
2.3-41 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key MIDDLE EASTERN IMPORT Locations 2-48
2.3-42 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key MIDDLE EASTERN EXPORT Locations 2-49
2.3-43 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key CARIBBEAN IMPORT Locations 2-50
2.3-44 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key CARIBBEAN EXPORT Locations 2-51
2.3-45 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key CENTRAL AMERICAN IMPORT Locations 2-52
2.3-46 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key CENTRAL AMERICAN IMPORT Locations 2-53
2.3-47 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key EAST COAST SOUTH AMERICAN IMPORT Locations 2-54
2.3-48 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key EAST COAST SOUTH AMERICAN EXPORT Locations 2-55
2.3-49 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key WEST COAST SOUTH AMERICAN IMPORT Locations 2-56
2.3-50 Share of Southeast Port TEUs Serving Key WEST COAST SOUTH AMERICAN EXPORT Locations 2-57
2.3-51 Comparative Voyage Costs/Terminal Costs - Trans-Pacific Trade Lanes 2-59
2.3-52 Comparative Voyage Costs/Terminal - Trans-Atlantic and South American Trade Lanes 2-60
2.3-53 Truck Cost-Effective Hinterland Excluding Rail Competition 2-61
2.3-54 TEU Consumption by County for Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama 2-63
2.3-55 Potential TEUs Consumed by County in the Cost-Effective Hinterland,
Excluding Rail Competition 2-64
2.3-56 Port Everglades and Port of Miami Combined Historical Container Throughput (TEUs) 2-68
2.3-57 Latin America and Caribbean GDP Growth 2-69
2.3-58 Low and High Unconstrained Forecast 2-70
2.4-1 Florida Private Housing Starts 2-72
2.4-2 Cement, Gypsum, Bauxite and Fero 2-75
2.4-3 Limestone and Sand Resource Areas 2-76
2.4-4 Tallow, Steel, Yachts, and Other (Xfile) 2-79
2.4-5 Summary Chart of Base, High, and Low Forecasts 2-82
2-4-6 Baseline Forecast Summary 2-83
2.4-7 High Forecast Summary 2-84
2.4-8 Low Forecast Summary 2-85
2.5-1 Port Everglades Petroleum Throughput 2-87
2.5-2 Tanker Calls at Port Everglades 2-88
2.5-3 Barge Calls at Port Everglades 2-88
2.5-4 LPG Barge Calls at Port Everglades 2-89
2.5-5 Twelve-County Market Served by Port Everglades 2-96
2.5-6 Competitive Port Supply Overlap 2-99
2.5-7 Total Petroleum Products Received 2-100
2.5-8 Estimated Storage Capacity 2-101
2.5-9 Counties Subject to Changed Market Capture 2-104
2.5-10 Port Everglades Throughput 2-115
2.5-11 Power Plant Locations in Florida 2-124
2.5-12 Tanker Calls at Port Everglades 2-136
2.5-13 Barge Calls at Port Everglades 2-137
2.5-14 LPG Barge Calls at Port Everglades 2-138
2.6-1 Conventional Worldwide Cruise Passenger Growth, 1990-2009 2-153
2.6-2 Historic and Projected North American Industry Berth Supply 2-157
2.6-3 Projected North American Passenger Levels, 1995 – 2029 2-158
2.6-4 Cruise Capacity by Cruise Group 2-159
2.6-5 Worldwide Cruise Region Seasonality 2-165
2.6-6 North American Capacity Placement by Region 2-166
2.6-7 Primary Caribbean Cruise Target Sectors 2-169
2.6-8 North American Capacity Placement 2-174
2.6-9 Regions of Importance to Port Everglades, Caribbean, and Bahamas Passengers 2-176
2.6-10 Cruise Revenue Passenger Throughput, FY 2000 - FY 2009 2-181
2.6-11 Cruise Line Activity, FY 2010 2-182
2.6-12 Revenue Cruise Passengers per Vessel, FY2000 - FY2006 2-183
2.6-13 Port Everglades / Port of Miami Passenger Throughput, 2000 - 2009 2-185
2.6-14 Historical Traffic for Port Everglades, 2000 - 2009 2-188
2.6-15 Passenger per Vessel Projections, 2000 - 2029 2-189
2.6-16 Daily / Non-conventional Cruise Call Projections (Most Likely Scenario) 2-191
2.6-17 Daily / Non-conventional Cruise Call Projections (Most Likely Scenario) 2-191
2.6-18 Scenario 1 –Trend Regression Analysis Passengers, 2009 - 2029 2-192
2.6-19 Port Everglades’ Historic Share of Regional Traffic, 2000 - 2009 2-193
2.6-20 Regions of Importance to Port Everglades, Passengers 2-194
2.6-21 Scenario 2 - Multi-Day Traffic Split Projections, 2009 - 2029 2-195
2.6-22 Regional Market Capture, 2000 - 2009 2-196
2.6-23 Scenario 3 Market Capture Revenue Passengers, 2009 - 2029 2-197
2.6-24 Scenario 4 Scenario-Based Projections, 2009 - 2029 2-198
2.6-25 Most Likely Revenue Passenger Projection 2-199
2.6-26 Cruise Vessel Calls, 2000 - 2029 2-201
2.6-27 Passengers per Cruise Vessel 2-202
2.6-28 Combined Vessel Call Projections, 2009 - 2029 2-203
2.6-29 Monthly Passenger Traffic, 2005 - 2009 2-204
2.6-30 Monthly Cruise Call Traffic, 2015, 2020, 2025, 2029 2-205
2.6-31 Port Everglades Daily Passenger Traffic Comparison, 2005 – 2009 2-206
2.6-32 Traffic Split by Percentage, 2005 - 2009 2-207
2.6-33 Berth Demand Scenario 9 Berths, 2009 - 2029 2-208
2.6-34 Berth Demand Scenario 8 Berths, 2009 - 2029 2-209
2.6-35 Berth Demand Scenario 10 Berths, 2009 - 2029 2-210
2.6-36 Berth Demand Scenario 11 Berths, 2009 - 2029 2-211
2.6-37 Berth Demand Scenario 12 Berths, 2009 - 2029 2-212
3.3-1 Vertical Window of Accessibility 3-3
3.3-2 Current Horizontal Window of Accessibility for Pivot Passenger-Boarding Bridges 3-4
3.3-3 Proposed Horizontal Window of Accessibility for Rail/Mobile Passenger-Boarding Bridges 3-4
3.3-4 Passenger Flow Diagram 3-6
3.6-1 The Post-Panamax “S” Class Container Ship 3-19
3.6-2 Lowest Composite Surface over Study Area Proposed Conditions 3-21
3.6-3 Stowed Position of Existing Southport Cranes 3-22
3.6-4 Operating Position of Existing Southport Cranes 3-23
3.6-5 A Concept for a Low-Profile Mega Crane 3-24
3.6-6 Existing Crane Rail Elevations 3-25
3.6-7 Height Limitations Derived from Airspace Obstruction Analyses Report: Not Limited 3-26
3.6-8 Height Limitations Derived from Airspace Obstruction Analyses Report: Limited 3-27
3.6-9 Maximum Feasible Heights at Other Potential Berth Locations: Not Limited 3-28
3.6-10 Height Limits at Midport 3-29
3.6-11 Potential Berthing Configuration “A” for Container Ships 3-30
3.6-12 Potential Berthing Configuration “B” for Container Ships 3-31
3.6-13 Enlarged View of Configuration “A” 3-32
3.6-14 Enlarged View of Configuration “B” 3-33
3.6-15 Configuration “C” 3-34
3.6-16 Configuration “D” 3-35 3-35
3.6-17 Potential Berthing for Dry Bulk and Neo-Bulk Ships 3-36
3.6-18 Potential Berthing for Cruise Ships 3-37
3.6-19 Ferry Slip Layout 3-38 3-35
3.6-20 Potential Berthing for Liquid Bulk Ships 3-39
3.6-21 Northport Ship Berthing 3-40
3.6-22 All Ship Berths 3-41
3.6-23 Concept for Development of McIntosh Road 3-42 3-35
3.6-24 Alternative Enhancement Plan 3-43
3.6-25 Crushed Rock/Aggregate Import Facility and the ICTF with the Concept for the Development of McIntosh Road 3-44
3.6-26 Northport Slip Study: Plan View 3-46
3.6-27 Northport Slip Study: Section View 3-47 3-35
3.7-1 Aerial View of Port Everglades 3-51
3.7-2 Cargo Infrastructure Improvements 3-52
3.7-3 Cruise Infrastructure Improvements 3-53
3.7-4 Conceptual 20-Year Vision Plan 3-54
3.7-5 20-Year Vision Plan for Northport 3-56
3.7-6 By-Pass Road Concept 3-57
3.7-7 20-Year Vision Plan for Midport 3-59
3.7-8 20-Year Vision Plan for Southport 3-61
3.7-9 Proposed Relocation of FPL Power Poles 3-64
3.8-1 Proposed Employee On–Grade Parking 3-65
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page
____________________________________________________________________________
1.2-1 Selected South Florida Economic Characteristics 1-3
1.2-2 Broward County Total Population and Employment in Selected Years 1-5
1.8-1 Unit Berth Capacity of a Terminal with Standard Dock-Side Cranes 1-25
1.8-2 Unit Berth Capacity of a Terminal with Ship-Mounted Cranes 1-26
1.8-3 Unit Berth Capacity of a Terminal with RO/RO Operations 1-27
1.8-4 Container Operations - Unit Berth Capacity Summary 1-28
1.8-5 Container Dwell Times and Inventory Peaking Factors 1-30
1.8-6 Cargo Storage Operations Type and Stacking Height Assumptions) 1-31
1.8-7 Peak Import TGS Required at One Million TEUs 1-32
1.8-8 Slot Density Assumptions 1-32
1.8-9 Container Operations - Unit Yard Capacity Summary (TEUs/Acre) 1-33
1.8-10…Average Dwell Time Impacts on Storage Turnover 1-35
1.8-11 Break-Bulk Cargo (Steel) - Unit Throughput Capacity 1-35
1.8-12 Dry Bulk Cargo (Cement) - Unit Throughput Capacity 1-36
1.8-13 Dry Bulk Cargo (Aggregates) - Unit Throughput Capacity 1-37
1.10-1 Location: McIntosh Road s/o Eller Drive 1-38
1.10-2…Location: Eller Drive e/o Gate 1-38
1.10-3…Location: Spangler Boulevard w/o Miami Road 1-39
1.10-4…Location: Eisenhower Boulevard s/o SE 17 Street 1-39
1.11-1 FLL Passenger, Cargo, and Aircraft Operations 1-50
1.12-1 Listed Species Potentially Present in the Vicinity of Port Everglades 1-70
1.12-2 Acreage of Seagrass by Species in October 2006 1-79
2.2-1 Percent Tonnage Change at Port Everglades by Cargo Type 2-3
2.2-2 Ship Calls at Port Everglades 2-6
2.3-1 Port Everglades FY 2008 Container Throughput by Terminal 2-12
2.3-2 Industrial Lease Rates in Key Florida Markets 2-41
2.3-3 Comparison of Total Logistics Costs to Serve Key Intermodal Hubs on a Hong Kong Routing.. 2-66
2.4-1 Florida Economic Forecasts 2-73
2.4-2 Florida Population Projections 2-73
2.4-3 Summary of Baseline, High, and Low Forecasts Port Everglades Dry Bulk and Neo-Bulk Cargo 2-80
2.4-4 Summary Comparison of Base, High and Low Forecasts Port Everglades Dry Bulk
and Neo-Bulk Cargo 2-82
2.5-1 State and PADD Population Trends 2-92
2.5-2 United States Light Product Demand (Annual Growth Rate) 2-95
2.5-3 United States Light Product Demand (Thousand Barrels per Day) 2-97
2.5-4 Current and Recently Completed Terminal Expansions 2-100
2.5-5 Proposed Terminal Expansions 2-102
2.5-6 Port Canaveral – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-102
2.5-7 Likely Service Area of the Port Canaveral Expansion, Incremental Gasoline, and Diesel Fuel Demand…………………………………………………………………………………………..…....2-103
2.5-8 Potential Impact on Port Everglades from the Canaveral Expansion 2-106
2.5-9 Port of Palm Beach – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-106
2.5-10 Port of Tampa – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-107
2.5-11 Port Manatee – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-108
2.5-12 Port of Miami – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-109
2.5-13 Port of Jacksonville – Total Petroleum Products Received 2-109
2.5-14 US Gulf Coast Major Refinery Projects 2-111
2.5-15 Terminal Operators with US Gulf Coast Refinery Expansions 2-113
2.5-16 Port Everglades Petroleum Throughput Output 2-114
2.5-17 Gasoline and Population Growth Rate Projections 2-116
2.5-18 Gasoline Demand 2-117
2.5-19 Total Diesel and Population Growth Rate Projections 2-118
2.5-20 Total Diesel Demand 2-119
2.5-21 Jet (Excluding Kerosene) and Population Growth Rate Projections 2-120
2.5-22 Kerosene (Excluding Jet) and Population Growth Rate Projections 2-121
2.5-23 Jet and Kerosene Demand 2-122
2.5-24 Jet (Excluding Kerosene) Demand 2-123
2.5-25 Kerosene (Excluding Jet) Demand 2-123
2.5-26 FPL Generation Capacity and Fuel Usage 2-125
2.5-27 FPL Fuel Oil Demand 2-126
2.5-28 Port Everglades Fuel Oil Forecast 2-126
2.5-29 LPG Forecast 2-127
2.5-30 Competitive Waterborne Gasoline Transportation Cost 2-129
2.5-31 Selected Florida Port Charges 2-130
2.5-32 2009 Competitive Port Tariffs and Fees 2-131
2.5-33 2009 Comparison of Waterborne and Port Costs 2-131
2.5-34 Waterborne Gasoline Delivered Cost to Port Everglades, 2008 Average Prices 2-132
2.5-35 Waterborne Gasoline Delivered Cost to Port Everglades, Differential from Houston 2-133
2.5-36 Port Everglades Throughput by Vessel Type 2-139
2.5-37 Port Everglades Average Volume per Call 2-139
2.5-38 Gasoline (Excluding Ethanol) Throughput by Vessel Type 2-140
2.5-39 Gasoline (Excluding Ethanol) Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-140
2.5-40 Gasoline (Excluding Ethanol) Average Volume per Call 2-140
2.5-41 Diesel Throughput by Vessel Type 2-141
2.5-42 Diesel Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-141
2.5-43 Diesel Average Volume per Call 2-141
2.5-44 Jet Throughput by Vessel Type 2-142
2.5-45 Jet Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-142
2.5-46 Jet Average Volume per Call 2-142
2.5-47 Fuel Oil Throughput by Vessel Type 2-143
2.5-48 Fuel Oil Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-143
2.5-49 Fuel Oil Average Volume per Call 2-143
2.5-50 Propane Throughput by Vessel Type 2-144
2.5-51 Propane Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-144
2.5-52 Propane Average Volume per Call 2-144
2.5-53 Asphalt Throughput by Vessel Type 2-145
2.5-54 Asphalt Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-145
2.5-55 Asphalt Average Volume per Call 2-145
2.5-56 Crude Throughput by Vessel Type 2-146
2.5-57 Crude Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-146
2.5-58 Crude Average Volume per Call 2-146
2.5-59 Avgas Throughput by Vessel Type 2-147
2.5-60 Avgas Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-147
2.5-61 Avgas Average Volume per Call 2-147
2.5-62 Biodiesel Throughput by Vessel Type 2-148
2.5-63 Biodiesel Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-148
2.5-64 Biodiesel Average Volume per Call 2-148
2.5-65 Ethanol Throughput by Vessel Type 2-149
2.5-66 Ethanol Total Vessel Calls by Type 2-149
2.5-67 Ethanol Average Volume per Call 2-149
.
2.6-1 Growth by Length of Cruise, North American Operators 2-165
2.6-2 Cruise Capacity Placement by Region, North American Operators 2-167
2.6-3 Fit of Port Everglades within Identified Target Markets (Summary 2-173
2.6-4 Destination Selection: What is Important to the Cruise Lines? 2-178
2.6-5 Large Cruise Vessels on Order Worldwide, August 2009 2-215
2.6-6 Small Cruise Vessels on Order Worldwide, August 2009 2-216
2.6-7 Recommended Design Vessels for Port Everglades 2-217
3.5-1 TEU Throughput per Gross Acre of Container Terminal Yard 3-15
3.5-2 TEU Throughput per Berth 3-16
3.5-3 A Berthing Scenario for Containerized Cargo with Estimated Annual TEU Throughput 3-17
3.5-2 TEU Throughput per Berth 3-16
3.6-1 Related Rail Projects 3-45
3.6-2 Northport Slip Width Analysis 3-46
3.7-1 Summary of Forecasts for Port Everglades’ Master/Vision Plan Milestones 3-49
3.7-2 Cold Ironing Emission Reductions 3-58
3.8-1 Existing Parking Capacity with Peak Parking Parameters 3-66
3.9-1 Estimate of Annual Projected Rail Usage at Port Everglades 3-68
3.9-1 Estimated Truck Traffic through the McIntosh Road Security Gate 3-71
LIST OF ACRONYMS
|Acronym |Meaning |
|AAPA |American Association of Port Authorities |
|ACOE |Us Army Corps of Engineers |
|ADA |Americans with Disabilities Act |
|AMP |Alternative Marine Power |
|AMSL |Above mean sea level |
|APM |Automated People Mover |
|ASC |Automated Stacking Cranes |
|B/D |Barrels per Day |
|Bbl |Barrels |
|BCAD |Broward County Aviation Department |
|BCE&GMD |Broward County Environmental Protection & Growth Management Department |
|BMP |Best Management Practices |
|BOARD |Broward County Board of County Commissioners |
|BSO |Broward Sheriff’s Office |
|CAGR |Compound Annual Growth Rate |
|CBOB |Suboctane blendstock that will meet finished gasoline specifications when blended with 10 percent ethanol |
|CBP |US Customs and Border Protection |
|CCR |Continuous Catalyst Regeneration |
|CIP |Capital Improvement Program |
|CLIA |Cruise Lines International Association |
|CNG |Compressed Natural Gas |
|CSXI |CSX Intermodal |
|CSXT |CSX Transportation Inc. |
|DOE |Department of Energy |
|DR-CAFTA |Central America Free Trade Agreement with the Dominican Republic, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, |
| |Guatemala, and Costa Rica |
|DRI |DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT STATEMENT |
|DWT |Deadweight Ton |
|EIA |Energy Information Agency |
|EISA |Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 |
|EPA |Environmental Protection Agency |
|FAA |Federal Aviation Administration |
|FDEP |Florida Department of Environmental Protection |
|FDOT |Florida Department of Transportation |
|FEC |Florida East Coast Railway |
|FHWA |Federal Highway Administration |
|FLL |Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport |
|FPL |Florida Power And Light |
|FWC |Florida Fish And Wildlife Conservation Commission |
|FY |Fiscal Year |
|GDP |Gross Domestic Product |
|GPA |Georgia Ports Authority |
|GPS |Geographic Positioning System |
|GT |Gross tons |
|HOV |High-Occupancy Vehicle |
|ICTF |Intermodal Container Transfer Facility |
|IMC |Broward County Intermodal Center |
|IMF |International Monetary Fund |
|ISC |Indian Sub-Continent |
|ITB |Integrated Tug-Barge |
|ITS |Intelligent Transportation Systems. |
|JoC |Journal of Commerce |
|JONES ACT |The Merchant Marine Act of 1920.a federal statute that requires US.-flagged vessels to be built in the US, owned |
| |by US citizens, and documented (i.e., registered, enrolled, or licensed) under the laws of the US in addition, |
| |all officers and 75 percent of the crew must be US citizens. Vessels that satisfy these requirements comprise |
| |the "Jones Act fleet.” The Jones Act restricts the carriage of goods between US ports to US- flagged vessels. |
|LO/LO |Lift-On/Lift-Off |
|LOA |Length Overall |
|LPG |Liquefied Petroleum Gas |
|LPP |Locally Preferred Plan |
|LRTP. |Long-Range Transportation Plan |
|MARAD |Us Maritime Administration |
|MBD |Million Barrels per Day |
|MIA |Miami International Airport |
|MOL |Mitsui O.S.K. Lines |
|MPG |Miles per Gallon |
|MPO |Metropolitan Planning Organization |
|MSA |Metropolitan Statistical Area |
|MSC |Mediterranean Shipping Company |
|MSL |Mean Sea Level |
|NCL |Star/Norwegian Cruise Line |
|NS |Norfolk Southern |
|NVOCC |Non-Vessel Operating Common Carrier |
|OCR |Optical Character Recognition |
|ODMDS |Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites |
|OPA 90 |Oil Pollution Act Of 1990 |
|P&G |Purvin and Gertz |
|PADD |Petroleum Administration for Defense District |
|PBI |Palm Beach International Airport |
|PD&E |Project Development And Environmental |
|PEDD |Port Everglades Development District |
|PET |Port Everglades Terminals |
|PLAN |Port Everglades Master Plan |
|PNW |Pacific Northwest |
|POMTOC |Port of Miami Terminal Operating Company |
|POV |Privately Owned Vehicles |
|ppm |Parts per Million |
|PSA |Passenger Services Association |
|RCCL |Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines |
|RF |Radio Frequency Identification |
|RFP |Request For Proposal |
|RLI |Request For Letters Of Interest |
|RMG |Rail-Mounted Gantry Crane |
|RO/RO |Roll-On/Roll-Off |
|RTG |Rubber-Tired Gantry Cranes |
|SEDS |State Energy Data System |
|SEIS |Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement |
|SFECC |South Florida East Coast Corridor Study. |
|SFRC |South Florida Rail Corridor; |
|SFWMD |South Florida Water Management Department |
|SIS |Strategic Intermodal System. |
|SOLAS |Safety of Life at Sea |
|STB |Surface Transportation Board |
|STS |Ship-To-Shore Cranes |
|TEUS |Twenty-Foot Equivalent Container Units |
|TGS |Twenty-Foot Ground Slots |
|TOS |Terminal Operating System |
|TPI |Tons per Inch of Dispersion |
|UK |United Kingdom |
|UMAM |Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method |
|USDA APHIS/PPQ |US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine |
|USFWS |US Fish and Wildlife Services |
|VGO |Vacuum Gas Oil |
|WOA |Window of Accessibility |
|YMS |Yard Management System |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
Related searches
- area of figures calculator
- list of list in java
- list of c list actors
- list of list in python
- sort a list of list python
- list of historical figures women
- apa list of figures example
- list of list java
- convert list of list to numpy array
- transpose list of list python
- list of a list python
- create list of list python