Stress at Work Mental Injury and the Law in Canada3
Stress at Work, Mental Injury and the Law in Canada:
A Discussion Paper for the Mental Health Commission of Canada
Respectfully submitted by Martin Shain, S.J.D. with the assistance of Carla Nassar, LL.B. August 15th 2008
[Revised February 21st 2009] Final [amended] Report
Submitted to the Mental Health Commission of Canada via the Advisory Committee on Mental Health in the Workforce
and the Advisory Committee on Mental Health and the Law
June 30, 2009
The Mental Health Commission of Canada (MHCC) is pleased to release the report Stress at Work, Mental Injury and the Law in Canada: A discussion paper for the Mental Health Commission of Canada, prepared and submitted to the MHCC by Dr. Martin Shain in August 2008. The report is the product of an inquiry initiated by the Commission's Advisory Committee on Mental Health and the Workforce in conjunction with the Advisory Committee on Mental Health and the Law.
The workplace is now recognized as an important influence on mental health. Between 10% and 25% of workplaces are characterized by conditions and environments considered mentally injurious. Occupational health physician specialists report that 50 ? 60 % of their caseloads are related directly or indirectly to mental health concerns.
While there is considerable uncertainty in terms of mental health protection in Canadian law and inconsistency across the country in the availability of legal remedies for mental injury, an emerging legal climate has signaled a duty for employers to ensure that the workplace leads to no serious and lasting harm to employee mental health. By definition, a psychologically safe workplace is one that permits no harm to mental health through negligence, recklessness or intention.
The MHCC is hoping that release of this report will stimulate debate on this topic, leading to eventual development of national public health policy for both the protection and promotion of mental health at work.
The Commission is interested in receiving feedback about the report. Please send any comments to info@mentalhealthcommission.ca
Michael Kirby Chair Mental Health Commission of Canada
The views represented herein solely represent the views of the Mental Health Commission of Canada.
Production of this report is made possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada.
Author's Note This study was initiated on behalf of the Mental Health Commission of Canada by Bill Wilkerson who, for the duration of the work, was Chair of the Commission's Workforce Advisory Committee. Throughout the study, Mr. Wilkerson provided the authors with invaluable advice on the structure and flow of the report. Dr. Ian Arnold, current Chair of the WAC, has been instrumental in supporting the advancement of this report to the MHCC Board. We are indebted to him. The authors are grateful also to the Hon. Mr. Justice Edward Ormston, of the Ontario Court of Justice and Chair of the Commission's Mental Health and Law Advisory Committee, for his most helpful reviews of successive drafts of the material. In addition, we wish to thank Catherine Skinner LL.B., Counsel, Law Department, Great West Life, London Life and Canada Life for her helpful and constructive comments on the August 2008 version of this paper.
2
Table of Contents
Principal Findings and Implications for Policy
4
Chapter 1.
Stress at Work, Mental Injury and the Law: legal remedies for mental injury in
Canada. An overview with policy implications
11
Addendum to Chapter 1: toward a standard for Canada: beginning the
conversation
26
Chapter 2.
Drawing the Line: a detailed consideration of developments in the legal
recognition of harm to mental health in the workplace in Canada. Implications for
policy and practice
30
Table of Contents for Chapter 2
31
Appendix to Chapter 2 : Six Illustrations of the Law in Action
91
Chapter 3.
Management Standards and Stress in the UK Workplace: background and
commentary
99
Appendices to Chapter 3
Appendix 1:Background to the Filter Tools
111
Appendix 2 First Pass Filter Tool: Sources of stress at work
115
Appendix 3: Evaluation of the UK's Pilot Study of Psychosocial
Standards for Management? Edited from the HSE website
117
Appendix 4: Considerations for employers in predicting liability for
mental injury to employees: lessons from the U.K. courts
128
3
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- policies information
- bc s mental health act in plain language
- mental health is for everyone durham
- summit on work related traumatic mental stress summary report
- mental health in the workplace
- stress at work mental injury and the law in canada3
- aps return to work guidelines
- best practices for return to work stay at work
- for employees returning from a mental illness
Related searches
- jobs in the law field
- careers in the law field
- jobs in the law profession
- mental health and the workplace
- rule of law in the united states
- reducing stress at work
- the law of sin and death
- every law in the united states
- icd 10 stress at home
- stress and anxiety symptoms in men
- jesus and the woman at the well
- common law in the us