MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
“Expecting Excellence Every Day”
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 4, 2012
TO: File
FROM: Laura Campbell, Contracts Manager
Procurement
SUBJECT: Award Recommendation for Prison-Based Substance Abuse Treatment
RFP-LC-2012-006
GENERAL:
The Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for prison-based substance abuse treatment throughout the State of Michigan. The contract period is three-years with two one-year options.
BIDDERS:
The RFP was posted on Bid4Michigan on May 15, 2012, and 12 vendor responded by the due date of 3:00 p.m. (EST) on June 8, 2012.
1. Apex Downriver Behavioral Health, LLC, Brownstown, MI
2. Catholic Charities of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
3. Choices Counseling Center, Roseville, MI
4. Community Programs, Inc., Waterford, MI
5. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc., Marquette, MI
6. Medical 24 Seven, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI
7. National Behavior Consultants Corporation, Traverse City, MI
8. Partners in Change: Psychological and Community Services, PLC, Midland, MI
9. Saginaw Psychological Services, Inc., Saginaw, MI
10. Self Help Addiction Rehabilitation (SHAR), Detroit, MI
11. West Michigan Therapy, Inc., Muskegon, MI
12. Western Michigan University, Behavioral Health Services, Kalamazoo, MI
JOINT EVALUATION COMMITTEE:
The Joint Evaluation Committee consisted of the following members:
1. Laura Campbell, Contracts Manager, Chair, Voting Member
2. Maurice Hills, Departmental Specialist, Voting Member
3. Sonal Patel, CFA Corrections Programs Manager, Voting Member
4. Julia Hitchingham, Manager, Substance Abuse, Non-Voting Advisor
5. Kevin Weissenborn, Manager, Non-Voting Advisor
EVALUATION PROCESS:
Bids were evaluated based upon the following factors:
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |20% |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5% |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40% |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 and 4.013) |35% |
3.023 Price Evaluation
Only those proposals receiving a score of 80 points or more in the technical proposal evaluation will have its pricing evaluated to be considered for award.
Evaluation Matrix:
1. Apex Downriver Behavioral Health, LLC
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |8 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |34 |
|Total Points Received |87 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module, including cognitive-based therapy. The vendor discussed gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and will abide by the group maximums, including using spreadsheets, schedules, start/end dates, and entrance of new members. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with JCAHO. The vendor provided a project plan, including treatment plans, open door policy, monthly staff meetings, communication, and fiscal oversight.
Weaknesses:
• Although the vendor agreed with the requirements of the Request for Proposal (RFP), it did not provide any detail in the scope, either in general or specific. The vendor did not provide detail about a process for assessment and discharge. The vendor did not provide detail about case notes, progress notes, or a relapse prevention plan. The vendor did not discuss the supervisor’s log or professional development plan. The vendor did not provide detail about billings and reports.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 12 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and will provide LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6.
Weaknesses:
• Although the vendor agreed to the requirements for clinical supervisors, it did not provide any detail.
2. Catholic Charities of Michigan
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |8 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |35 |
|Total Points Received |88 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with COA. The vendor discussed billings and reports, including the due dates for the billings and reports, and provided a project plan, including information about the three partners of the organization that will be providing these services through a Memo of Understanding, with a unit to handle the administrative tasks.
Weaknesses:
• Although the vendor responded to the requirements and agreed to comply, it provided very little detail and in some instances repeated the RFP language as its answer in the scope, both general and specific, the Reintegration Module, Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module, gender-specific programming, offender procedures, and contractor supervisor responsibilities.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 12 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences. The vendor will also have Spanish speaking assistance.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, will provide LEIN checks within 25 days of award of contract, and keep confidential information about staff maintained in locked files. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed to the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
3. Choices Counseling Center
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |4 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |27 |
|Total Points Received |76 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor will not be providing gender-specific programming. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor requested an exception to enroll up to 16 offenders instead of the requested 14. This will be approved on a case-by-case basis with Contract Compliance Inspector permission.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not follow the RFP and some answers could not be found. The vendor stated that it had six years of experience and were well aware of the requirements, but failed to provide detail in almost all requested areas. The vendor requested an exception to having a primary therapist. This will not be allowed and a primary therapist is required. The vendor did not provide a project plan.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business since 2002.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, and credentials. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor requested an exception to have staff in the process of obtaining a CADC be accepted. This exception is approved, as long as the staff person obtains its substance abuse certification within a two-year time period.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not provide details about LEIN checks. The vendor did not address if it will use subcontractors.
4. Community Programs, Inc.
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |19 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |34 |
|Total Points Received |98 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope, both general and specific. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings, will maintain compliance, provide reports, provided a project plan, including oversight, attendance, supervision and communication.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor stated it has been providing gender-specific programming since 1968, but did not provide any details.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 44 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not include detail about duties on one resume for staff.
5. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc.
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |12 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |33 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |35 |
|Total Points Received |85 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not be providing gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings and provided a project plan, including monthly and quarterly meetings, oversight, quality assurance, and monthly client file reviews. The vendor requested an exception to ASAT and that is acceptable.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor had several instances where no detail was provided and wrote the RFP language as its answer. The vendor did not address the group size, and provided no details on assessment, discharge, or planning. The vendor stated it had an established process for collecting statistical data, but did not provide the details.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 30 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided some information of prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor stated it has prison-based substance abuse treatment in place, but provided no details. The vendor did not include costs, no start dates, and no phone numbers for the three qualifying relevant experiences.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed to the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
6. Medical 24 Seven, Inc.
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |11 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |4 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |10 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |25 |
|Total Points Received |50 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor agreed to the billings and reports.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not provide detail throughout the proposal. The vendor did not detail about its accreditation. The vendor did not provide a project plan.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor has been in business for 11 months.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not provide sales volume.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not provide detail about previous prison-based substance abuse treatment services. The vendor did not provide three qualifying relevant experiences.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor agreed to the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor provided no detail. The vendor will be providing services through a subcontractor, but did not submit any information about the subcontractor other than its name and address. No subcontractor’s licenses, accreditations, or staff information was included.
7. National Behavior Consultants Corporation
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |13 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |30 |
|Total Points Received |88 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope, both general and specific. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not be providing gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings and reports, and provided a project plan, including confidentiality, and monthly progress reports.
Weaknesses:
• Much of the proposal was RFP language, and the vendor did not provide its own details. The vendor agrees to accreditation, but provided no details about a plan to become accredited. The vendor did not discuss a duplicate billing process.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 5.5 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors. The vendor requested an exception to licensing for one staff and that is acceptable.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor provided an incomplete resume for staff.
8. Partners in Change: Psychological and Community Services, PLC
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |15 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |35 |
|Total Points Received |95 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope, both general and specific. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not provide gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings and reports.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor stated it will comply with accreditation, but provided no details on its plan to become accredited. The vendor did not provide any details of a project plan.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 12 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
9. Saginaw Psychological Services, Inc.
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |15 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |33 |
|Total Points Received |93 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope, both general and specific. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not provide gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings and reports, and provided a project plan, including utilization, quarterly and annual reviews, and a case tracking system.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor had a few instances of using the RFP language as its answer, rather than providing its own detail.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 40 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not identify where staff will be physically located during contract performance.
10. Self Help Addiction Rehabilitation (SHAR)
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |13 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |30 |
|Total Points Received |88 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor agreed to the requirements of in scope, both general and specific. The vendor agreed to the requirements of the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not provide gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor agreed to the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor agreed to the billings and reports.
Weaknesses:
• Although the vendor agreed to the RFP, very little detail was provided throughout the proposal. The vendor did not outline how it will address issues and changes in its project plan.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business since 1969.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor agreed to the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• One staff resume was outdated, and the license was expired. Although the vendor agreed with the RFP, the vendor provided very little detail.
11. West Michigan Therapy, Inc.
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |8 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |32 |
|Total Points Received |85 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not be providing gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor provided a project plan, including goals, monthly meetings, and policies and procedures.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor provided a 33 page narrative instead of using the response boxes in the RFP, which made it difficult to find the answers to every question. The vendor did not detail successful completion for the Reintegration Module. The vendor did not provide detail for specific State-MDOC procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor did not provide detail for billings and reports.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business for 26 years.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, and credentials. The vendor stated it will not use subcontractors. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not discuss LEIN clearances for staff. Some staff resumes were outdated and some certifications were expired.
12. Western Michigan University
|Criteria |Weight |
|Statement of Work (Article 1) |15 |
|Bidder Information (Section 4.011) |5 |
|Prior Experience (Section 4.012) |40 |
|Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013) |34 |
|Total Points Received |94 |
Statement of Work (Article 1)
Strengths:
• The vendor discussed requirements in scope, both general and specific. The vendor discussed the Reintegration Module and the Advanced Substance Abuse Treatment Module. The vendor will not be providing gender-specific programming. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 1-3. The vendor agreed to provide a primary therapist and group maximums. The vendor stated it maintains a State of Michigan license, as well as accreditation with CARF. The vendor discussed the specific State-MDOC offender procedures and contractor supervisor responsibilities. The vendor discussed billings and reports, and provided a project plan, including accounting, auditing, billing, supervision, evaluation, and communication.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor had some instances of using the RFP language as its answer instead of providing detail.
Bidder Information (Section 4.011)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided all information requested. The vendor has been in business since 1903 and is exempt under the State Constitution.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Prior Experience (Section 4.012)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided detail about its prior experience, including a minimum of three qualifying relevant experiences.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor has no weaknesses in this area of the proposal.
Staffing (Section 1.031 & 4.013)
Strengths:
• The vendor provided information about its staff, including details about education, licensing, credentials, and agreed to LEIN checks. The vendor agreed to Service Level Agreements 4-6. The vendor discussed the requirements for clinical supervisors. The vendor requested an exception for three staff from certain licensing criteria. This has been approved.
Weaknesses:
• The vendor did not discuss subcontractors.
EVALUATION RESULTS:
|EVALUATION |
|Bidder: |Score: |
|Apex Downriver Behavioral Health, LLC |87 |
|Catholic Charities of Michigan |88 |
|Choices Counseling Center |76 |
|Community Programs, Inc. |98 |
|Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc. |85 |
|Medical 24 Seven, Inc. |50 |
|National Behavior Consultants Corporation |88 |
|Partners in Change: Psychological and Community Services, PLC |95 |
|Saginaw Psychological Services, Inc. |93 |
|Self Help Addiction Rehabilitation (SHAR) |88 |
|West Michigan Therapy, Inc. |85 |
|Western Michigan University, Behavioral Health Services |94 |
AWARD RECOMMENDATION:
All vendors who met the 80 point threshold for the technical evaluation will be recommended for award.
APPROVALS:
I agree with the synopsis as written this day, September 4, 2012.
_______________________________ ____________
Voting Member – Laura Campbell Date
_______________________________ ____________
Voting Member – Maurice Hills Date
_______________________________ ____________
Voting Member – Sonal Patel Date
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- som state of michigan
- michigan department of corrections
- exhibit 5 3 acceptable forms of verification
- a guide to prescribing administering and dispensing
- foster home licensing requirements for relative caregivers
- summary of seclusion and restraint statutes regulations
- state requirements for criminal background checks 11 03
- cs 214 position description form
- covid 19 preparedness plan optional template for licensed
Related searches
- north carolina department of corrections lookup inmates
- nc department of corrections prisons
- nc department of corrections inmate search
- department of corrections inmate lookup
- florida department of corrections inmate find
- department of corrections pa jobs
- nyc department of corrections inmate
- nys department of corrections phone number
- department of corrections ny
- ny department of corrections lookup
- department of corrections and supervision
- nys department of corrections employment