Missouri Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy State ...



[pic][pic]

Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Plan

STATE PROFILE

Missouri

Team Name

|Missouri State Literacy Advisory Team |

Responsible Agency

|Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education |

Team Membership

|Membership Types and Numbers |

|A State that receives a Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy formula grant establishes a Literacy Team comprised of individuals with |

|expertise in literacy development and education for children birth to school entry; kindergarten through grade 5; grades 6 through 8; and |

|grades 8 through 12. Provide the name of the Comprehensive Literacy Team members for each age /grade category and type of expertise. |

|Birth-school entry |Dr. Kathy Thornburg, Jo Anne Ralston, Phyllis Harris, Freda Markley, |

| |Gretchen Berhorst |

|K-5th Grade |Debbie Jameson, Debbie Wood, Glenda Monachino, Heather Myers, Jamie |

| |Domeier, Dr. Mary Weiss-Chittim, Molly Roe |

|6th grade - 12th grade |Donna Johnson, Julie Sheerman, Melia Franklin, Danielle Sellenriek, Dana |

| |Humphrey |

|Managing/implementing literacy programs |Diane Audsley, Sharon Hoge, Donna Alexander, Kathy Parris |

|Evaluation of literacy programs |Eva Trumbower, Rebecca Haseltine |

|Planning and implementing Response-to-Intervention |Thea Scott, Ginger Henry |

|Screening and performance measurement |Sherri Sampson, Jana Schmidt |

|Validated interventions and instruction for struggling readers, |Linda Bradley, Lori Hanna, Dr. Phyllis Wolfram |

|English learners and students with disabilities | |

|Professional development for principals, teachers and coaches |Beth Houff, Carla Wheeler, Carol Gilles, Claire Wallace |

|Teacher preparation and State licensure/accreditation in literacy |Dr. Barbara Crossland, Dr. Barbara Martin, Dr. Laurie Edmondson, Kae |

|development and instruction |Daugherty, Dr. Marty Hawkins, Dr. Anita Lael, Dr. Amy Lannin |

|Other members and/or experts required | |

Add more rows if needed.

Applicable Standards

|Birth – School Entry |Kindergarten – 5th Grade |6th Grade – 12th Grade |

|Missouri Early Learning Standards |Show-Me Standards |Show-Me Standards |

| |Missouri Core Academic Standards |Missouri Core Academic Standards |

| |WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards |WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards |

Add more rows if needed.

Team Activities

|Proposed Implementation Plans |

|The following analysis reflects only priorities cited as program requirements in the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program State |

|Formula Grant Application. Also include any additional priorities addressed as part of a broader plan. (Reference page numbers for each |

|priority in your Plan) |

|U.S. Department of Education Priorities |Satisfied |Details in the Literacy Plan |

|Address the literacy needs and improve the learning outcomes| |Literacy plan and action steps for children age 0- grade 12 |

|of children from birth through Grade 12 | |(14-17 and 46-48) |

| | |Action steps for educators working with children age 0- grade |

| | |12 (22-25) |

|Address the literary needs and improve the learning | |Literacy plan and action steps for all children age 0- grade 12|

|outcomes of disadvantaged students, such as students who | |with differentiation embedded throughout (14-17) |

|are English Language Learners (ELL) and students with | | |

|disabilities | | |

|Include the use of clear content standards in the areas of | |Standards-based instruction aligned to the Missouri Early |

|pre-literacy, reading, and writing. Also use curriculum and | |Learning Standards, the Show-Me Standards, and the Missouri |

|instructional material that align with State standards | |Core Academic Standards (13-17 and 26-41) |

|Enable more data-based decision-making | |Assessment and data analysis inform decision-making at all |

| | |levels (49-54) |

|Provide evidence-based teacher preparation and professional | |Professional development provided to administrators and all |

|development | |staff involved in literacy instruction (63-69) |

|Use coherent assessment and screening systems that are | |A comprehensive assessment system to ensure learner needs are |

|aligned with State standards | |met (49-54) |

|Implement targeted interventions | |Instructional framework based on Response to Intervention (RTI)|

| | |model (42-48) |

|Propose use of technology to address student learning | |The Literacy Plan does not address the use of technology |

|challenges | | |

|Action Plans |

|(List major implementation activities; include page numbers where activities are referenced in Comprehensive Literacy Plan) |

|Missouri has identified action steps at every level for each component of the framework that are embedded throughout the state plan. Page 4-69|

Add more rows if needed.

|Leadership and Sustainability |

|(Activities leadership teams undertake to develop and sustain implementation of their SRCL Comprehensive Literacy Plans. Examples include |

|collaborative partnerships, communication strategies for sharing information with partners, and shared tasks among the leaders.) |

|Examples of activities teams undertake to sustain implementation of the Literacy plan can be found on Page 18-21 |

Add more rows if needed.

State Comprehensive Literacy Plan Website

| |

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download