Ritter.tea.state.tx.us



TEA DOCKET NO. 027-LH-1110

DALLAS INDEPENDENT * BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER

SCHOOL DISTRICT *

*

VS. * MASSIE TILLMAN

*

ISAAC OHONBA * STATE OF TEXAS

INDEPENDENT HEARING EXAMINER’S

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

I.

DISCUSSION NARRATIVE

Respondent is a classroom teacher and is assigned to L. G. Pinkson High School (“Pinkston”).

On or about February 4, 2010, in the morning before school began, Respondent arrived in the teacher’s parking lot and began to walk to the school building. Respondent and students were walking behind Pinkston toward the rear entry doors where the metal detectors are located. It was raining. Student A. M. and Respondent were walking on the sidewalk near each other. Then, Student A. M.’s foot slipped, and he began to fall. Student A. M. reached out to Respondent in an attempt to prevent falling to the ground. When Student A. M. grabbed Respondent, both Respondent and Student A. M. fell in the mud.

Immediately after Respondent and Student A. M. fell to the ground, Respondent grabbed Student A. M.’s leg. When Respondent stood up, Respondent then grabbed Student A. M.’s shirt and arm. Respondent pulled Student A. M. to Pinkston’s entry doors where the metal detectors were located. Four (4) Dallas ISD employees observed Respondent and Student A. M. enter Pinkston. None of the four (4) Dallas ISD employees observed any injuries to Respondent or Student A. M. The only observations by the four (4) Dallas ISD employees were that Respondent was angry, and that Respondent and Student A. M. were wet and had mud on their shirts and pants.

They did not see any blood on Respondent, and he told several DISD employees that he had fallen in the mud.

Respondent continued to walk inside Pinkston for approximately ten (1) minutes, and his whereabouts could not be accounted for during this time frame.

Shortly thereafter Respondent was seen with blood on his shirt and was bleeding from his head. Ms. Dinah Marks, an assistant principal, and another Pinkston employee walked with Respondent to the nurse’s office. An ambulance was then called by someone in the nurse’s office for Respondent.

Officer James Ellison, who was a Dallas ISD Police and Security Services Officer assigned to Pinkston asked Mr. McGee, one of the employees assigned to the metal detectors, to examine the bathrooms at Pinkson. Mr. McGee went to the men’s faculty restroom which is usually kept locked. When Mr. McGee entered the restroom, he noticed blood around the sink area and blood on the floor. Also, the trash can was empty except for a chunk of concrete smaller than a fist which appeared to have blood on it. The chunk of concrete was secured in a plastic evidence bag by Detective Jeremy Liebbe for transport to the Dallas ISD Police Station.

Respondent was transported to St. Paul Hospital for medical treatment. Sergeant Simon Tapia from Dallas ISD’s Police and Security Services went to the hospital to obtain a written statement from Respondent. It was stated by Respondent that he was injured and could not write a statement. Ms. Melissa Juarez, who is a Dallas ISD Gang Intelligence Officer, and who was with Sergeant Tapia, volunteered to write the Statement as Respondent described the events. Respondent agreed to this suggestion by Ms. Juarez. Respondent reviewed the statement and made some corrections before he executed his name to it on February 14. 2010.

Respondent alleged in his statement that Student A. M. used profanity toward him and also threatened him outside Pinkston. Then, approximately five (5) Hispanic male students followed Respondent and began hitting him. Respondent then claims that the students pushed him so hard that his head and left shoulder struck a tree while falling to the ground. He then alleges that he remained unconscious for seven (7) minutes When he woke up, he contends that the five (5) students were laughing at him. Respondent approached Student A. M. and requested his student ID badge. Student A. M. gave his badge to Respondent. Dallas ISD Police and Security Services obtained approximately ten (10) statements from students who observed the incident. All the students stated that it was an accident, no one assaulted Respondent, and none of them observed any injuries to Respondent.

Respondent met with Dallas ISD Police Detectives Jeremy Liebbe and Daniel Claxton, Sr., on the same day of the incident in the afternoon. Respondent reiterated verbally and on videotape that he wanted Student A. M. arrested for a felony assault on a public servant.

The investigation of the Dallas ISD Police and Security Services revealed that Respondent knowingly and intentionally made a False Police Report. Respondent fabricated evidence, to wit: a head injury, blood on his shirt, and an old injury on his shoulder in an attempt to create evidence to prove that he was jumped by Hispanic students.

Petitioner alleges that Respondent committed perjury by signing his name to two (2) sworn statements which were false. Respondent signed his first false sworn handwritten statement at St. Paul’s Hospital on February 4, 2010, in the presence of Sergeant Simon Tapis and Ms. Melissa Juarez. Respondent signed his second false sworn typewritten statement on February 5, 2010.

On or about February 5, 2010, Respondent went to Dallas ISD’s Human Development Office and verbally requested to be placed on Assault Leave. On or about February 9, 2010, Respondent submitted a written request to be placed on Assault Leave. Dallas ISD placed Respondent on Assault Leave status retroactive to the date of the alleged assault which was February 4, 2010.

Respondent received full pay and benefits while he remained on Assault Leave from February 4, 2010, through August 12, 2010. On August 13, 2010, Respondent’s leave status was changed to Administrative Leave with Pay because Dallas ISD recommended that Respondent’s employment be terminated. Respondent continues to remain on administrative leave with pay and has maintained all his benefits during this time period.

On or about August 12, 2010, Respondent was arrested for Felony Theft by a Public Servant. On or about August 16, 2010, the Grand Jury of Dallas County, Texas, issued a True Bill of Indictment against Respondent for unlawfully appropriating property, namely United States currency whereby the aggregate value of which was $20,000.00 or more but less than $100,000.00 with the intent to deprive Dallas ISD of said money and without its consent. The Judge of the 265th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, granted on February 21, 2010, the State of Texas’ Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice the Felony Theft case..

On or about August 18, 2010, the Grand Jury of Dallas County, Texas, issued a True Bill of Indictment against Respondent for intentionally and knowingly making a False Report to a Police Officer. On or about September 1, 2010, it was determined by Criminal District Court 7 of Dallas County, Texas, that the criminal case was a misdemeanor. Therefore, the case was transferred to County Criminal Court 3 of Dallas County, Texas. On or about September 1, 2010, Respondent was arrested for making a False Report to a Police Officer.

Respondent failed to notify, in writing, the General Superintendent of Dallas ISD within three (3) work days of his arrest for any felony or any offense involving moral turpitude pursuant to Dallas ISD Board Policy DH (Local).

On May 13, 2011, Judge Doug Skemp issued a “Judgment of Guilty” concerning Respondent’s crime of filing a False Report to a Police Officer. The Court held that Respondent shall be confined for 180 days in a Dallas County Jail which is suspended, serve 12 months of

Community Supervision, and pay a fine of $2,000.00. The Court further held that Respondent must serve 10 days in the Dallas County Jail as a condition of Community Supervision beginning July 20, 2011.

II.

FINDINGS OF FACT

TESTIMONY OF PETE NIELSEN

01. Pete Nielson is the Director of Investigations for Dallas ISD’s Office of Professional Responsibility (TR P. 35, L. 13-16).

02. Mr. Nielson oversees the Office of Professional Responsibility’s Administrative Investigations (TR P. 35, L. 24-25).

03. Dallas ISD employees are required to notify the General Superintendent’s Office in writing within three (3) working days of their felony arrest and crime (TR P. 36, L. 17-25; see also TR P. 41, L. 9-10).

04. The penalty for a Dallas ISD employee failing to report the arrest and crime will involve discipline including termination of employment (TR P. 41, L. 22-23).

05. Dallas ISD’s Exhibit Number 11 is the Office of Professional Responsibility’s Report of Investigation (TR 42 P. 42, L. 2-3).

06. Dallas ISD obtained knowledge that Respondent was arrested for the felony offenses from the newspaper (TR P. 43, L. 25).

07. Respondent was arrested for the second degree felony offense of Theft of a Public Servant Greater Than $20,000.00 but less than $100,000.00 on August 12, 2010 (TR P. 45, L. 21-25; see also TR P. 46, L. 23-24).

08. Respondent was arrested for the misdemeanor offense of Filing a False Report to a Police Officer on September 2, 2010 (TR P. 46, L. 4-14).

09. Dallas ISD’s Office of Professional Responsibility concluded that Respondent did not self-report his arrests as required by Dallas ISD Board Policy (TR P. 47, L. 15-16; see also Dallas ISD Exhibit 11, Page 4).

10. Dallas ISD employees are also required to submit written notification to the General Superintendent if they are arrested for any misdemeanors that involve moral turpitude (TR P. 48, L. 1).

11. Filing a False Police Report is a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude (TR P. 48, L. 4)

12. Respondent was required pursuant to Board Policy DH (Local) to file the written notification to the General Superintendent (TR P. 48, L. 9).

13. Respondent did not timely file the written notification to the General Superintendent within three (3) work days of his misdemeanor arrest which was September 1, 2010 (TR P. 48, L. 14).

14. Dallas ISD employees are required to submit to the General Superintendent in writing their arrest and crime even if they are arrested by Dallas ISD Police (TR P. 50, L. 23; see also TR P. 51, L. 2-5).

15. Dallas ISD Board Policy DH (Local) is made available to employees when they are hired, throughout their training, and it is also provided in the Employee Handbook (TR P. 52, L. 18-22).

TESTIMONY OF STUDENT J. B.

16. Student J. B. will be a senior at L. G. Pinkston High School (“Pinkston”) during the 2011-2012 school year (TR P. 55, L. 23 – P. 56, L. 1).

17. Student J. B.’s grades are primarily A’s and B’s (TR P. 56, L. 5).

18. Student J. B was outside at the side of Pinkston on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 56, L 10-15);

19. Student J. B. observed Respondent fall (TR P. 56, L. 20).

20. Student J. B. stated that it was raining little drops on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 56, L. 25).

21. Respondent was walking on a concrete path; then he went to the side because the kids in front of him were walking too slow (TR P. 57, L. 24 – P. 58, L. 1).

22. Student J. B. did not see anyone push Respondent (TR P. 58, L. 3).

23. Student J. B. did not see anyone assault Respondent (TR P. 58, L. 5).

24. Student J. B. did not hear anyone use profanity toward Respondent (TR P. 58, L. 8).

25. Student J. B. did not see anyone fight with Respondent (TR P. 58, L. 10).

26. Respondent might have slipped when he fell to the ground (TR P. 58, L. 12).

27. Student J. B. did not see anyone jump Respondent (TR P. 59, L. 7).

28. Student J. B.’s statement, which is Dallas ISD’s Exhibit Number 17 is true and correct (TR P. 60, L. 3).

29. Student J. B. did not see any other students on the ground or standing around Respondent except only one student (TR P. 62, L. 22).

30. Respondent was never unconscious when he was on the ground (TR P. 64, L. 7).

31. Student J. B. saw Respondent moving when he was on the ground (TR P. 64, L. 16).

TESTIMONY OF STUDENT V. M.

32. Student V. M. will be a senior at Pinkston during the 2011-2012 school year (TR P. 67, L. 11).

33. Student V. M. recalls that it was raining on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 67, L. 19).

34. Student V. M. was outside and at the side of Pinkston on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 68, L. 8).

35. Student V. M. was walking in front of Respondent on the sidewalk; then Respondent was in front of Student V. M. because Respondent was walking quickly (TR P. 68, L. 25).

36. Respondent was approximately four to five feet in front of Student V. M. (TR P. 69, L. 7).

37. Student V. M. did not hear any students use profanity toward Respondent (TR P. 69, L. 12).

38. Student V. M. did not see any students push Respondent (TR P. 69, L. 15).

39. Student V. M. did not see four to five students assault Respondent (TR P. 69, L. 18).

40. Student V. M. did not see four to five students punch Respondent (TR P. 69 L. 21).

41. Student V. M. believes that Respondent fell by slipping and walking too fast (TR P. 69, L. 24-25; see also TR P. 74, L. 25).

42. Student V. M. did not see Respondent hit his head on a tree before he fell (TR P. 70, L. 3).

43. Respondent was conscious the entire time that he was on the ground (TR P. 71, L.9).

44. Student V. M. did not observe any blood coming from Respondent after he fell on the ground (TR P. 73, L. 4).

45. Student V. M.’s statement, which is Dallas ISD’s Exhibit Number 14, is true and correct (TR P. 73, L. 20).

46. Student V. M. believes that the incident which occurred on February 4, 2010, was an accident (TR P. 74, L. 8).

TESTIMONY OF ANTHONY MCGEE

47. Anthony McGee has been a Dallas ISD employee for eleven (11) years. He is assigned to Pinkston where he has worked in the Youth Action Department with Safety and Security the last five (5) years. Mr. McGee’s job description is a Security Advisor (TR P. 79, L 13-19).

48. Mr. McGee was working the metal detectors on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 80, L. 11).

49. Mr. McGee recalled that it was raining on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 80, L. 16).

50. Mr. McGee observed Respondent entering the door with a young man (TR P. 80, L. 19-20).

51. Respondent told Mr. McGee that he was jumped by some students as they were coming in (TR P. 81, L. 1-2)

52. Respondent’s clothes were wet and muddy (TR P. 81, L. 15-17).

53. Mr. McGee did not see any blood on Respondent when he entered Pinkston (TR P. 81, L. 19; see also TR P. 87, L. 8).

54. Mr. McGee took the student from Respondent and brought him to the Youth Action Center (TR P. 81, L. 22-25).

55. Ten minutes went by from the time that Mr. McGee took the student to the Young Action Center and the time Mr. McGee saw Respondent again (TR P. 85, L. 14).

56. When Mr. McGee saw Respondent ten minutes later he had a lot of blood on his shirt (TR P. 86, L. 23-25).

57. Mr. McGee escorted Respondent to the school nurse after he observed blood on Respondent’s shirt and on the side of his head (TR P. 88, L. 1).

58. Mr. Bruce Weaver requested on February 4, 2010, that Mr. McGee check the restrooms at Pinkston (TR P. 89 L. 1).

59. Mr. McGee checked the male faculty restroom and noticed blood droppings on the floor and sink. Also, a sizeable rock was in the trash can (TR P. 90, L. 17-20).

TESTIMONY OF GREGORY J. TRENT

60. Mr. Trent was assigned as a substitute teacher and to work the metal detectors at Pinkston on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 99, L. 1-7; see also TR P. 101, L. 2).

61. Mr. Tenet heard some students say that Respondent fell in the mud (TR P. 99, L. 22; see also TR P. 101, L. 25).

62. Respondent claimed that a student he brought inside Pinkston jumped him (TR P. 99, L. 24-25).

63. Mr. Trent did not receive any reports from faculty or students that Respondent was jumped by students (TR P. 101, L. 20).

64. Mr. Trent has never had any problems with this student before February 4, 2010 (TR P. 102, L. 13).

65. Mr. Trent described the student as five foot three inches and weighing 120-130 pounds (TR P. 102, L. 21-24).

66. Mr. Trent was surprised when Respondent said the student jumped him because the student was looking like, “What’s going on?” (TR P. 103, L. 21-23).

67. Mr. Trent heard Respondent refuse to go to Youth Action and provide a statement (TR P. 104, L. 10-13).

68. Mr. Trent has never heard of a student at Pinkston jumping a teacher (TR P. 105, L. 1).

69. Mr. Trent did not believe that the student jumped Respondent because the student was scared (TR P. 105, L. 10-11).

70. Respondent was muddy when he entered Pinkston (TR P. 105 L.19).

71. Mr. Trent did not notice any blood on Respondent when he entered Pinkston (TR P. 105, L. 24 – P. 106, L. 3).

72. Respondent did not tell Mr. Trent that he was unconscious outside (TR P. 106, L. 7).

73. Respondent did not tell Mr. Trent that four to five students jumped him (TR P. 106, L. 11).

74. Mr. Trent observed Respondent’s neck and head on both sides and did not observe any blood when he came inside Pinkston (TR P. 106, L. 13-21).

75. Mr. Trent did not observe Respondent to have any physical injuries when he entered Pinkston (TR P. 106, L. 25.

76. Mr. Trent’s statement, which is Dallas ISD’s Exhibit Number 20, is true and correct (TGR P. 111, L. 10).

77. After the accident, Respondent went to the classrooms which are located on the second floor of Pinkston and stated “Look what they did. They jumped me.” (TR P. 112, L. 13-15).

TESTIMONY OF SARAH MURRY

78. Murry is a science teacher who is assigned to Pinkston (TR P. 116, L. 12-22).

79. Ms. Murry saw Respondent at the bottom of the stairs inside Pinkston on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 117, L. 6).

80. Respondent told Ms. Murry that he fell in the mud (TR P. 117, L. 9-13).

81. Ms. Murry’s statement, which is Dallas ISD’s Exhibit Number 22, is true and correct (TR P. 118, L. 1).

82. Ms. Murry did not observe any blood on Respondent’s shirt (TR P. 118, L. 16).

83. Ms. Murry did not observe any blood on Respondent’s face (TR P. 118, L. 18).

84. Ms. Murry did not observe any blood o Respondent’s neck (TR P. 118, L. 20).

85. Respondent did not tell Ms. Murry that some students jumped him or assaulted him (TR P. 118, L. 23 – P. 119, L. 1).

86. Respondent did not tell Ms. Murry that some students used profanity toward him (TR P. 119, L. 4).

87. Respondent did not tell Ms. Murry about the alleged assault that occurred outside Pinkston (TR P. 119, L. 16).

88. Respondent went to the second floor of Pinkston after his discussion with Ms. Murry (TR P. 119, L. 21).

89. Respondent did not have any injuries on his head (TR P. 120, L. 14-15).

TESTIMONY OF JEREMY LIEBBE

90. Detective Liebbe is a certified peace officer (TR P. 125, L. 5).

91. Detective Liebbe has been employed by Dallas ISD for seven years (TR P. 126, L. 3-5).

92. Detective Liebbe and Detective Dan Claxton were assigned by Bruce Weaver to go to Pinkston on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 133, L. 3-4).

93. Detectives Liebbe and Claxton interviewed approximately ten (10) student witnesses and Dallas ISD employees on February 4-5, 2010 (TR P. 135, L. 3).

94. Student V. M. told Detective Liebbe that he accidentally slipped and tried to reach out to grab the nearest person to steady himself, which was Respondent, and they fell in the mud (TR P. 136, L. 2-6).

95. No students reported to Detective Liebbe that multiple students assaulted Respondent (TR P. 138, L. 1).

96. No students reported to Detective Liebbe that any students used profanity toward Respondent (TR P. 138, L. 4).

97. Dallas ISD’s employees’ statements were consistent that no assault on Respondent occurred (TR P. 138-140).

98. Detective Liebbe photographed several drops of recent blood on the floor and sink in the men’s faculty restroom, and a red stain on a white chunk of concrete in the trash can (TR P. 141, L. 17-21).

99. Dallas ISD Exhibit 25 on Page 1 states that, “Based on the investigation I have determined no one assaulted teacher Isaac Ohanba. It appears Ohanba and student M. accidentally fell in the mud. According to witnesses, there were no injuries and Ohanba was not unconscious.” (TR P. 143, L. 20 – P. 144, L. 3).

100. Approximately ten minutes transpired from the time that Respondent entered Pinkston to the time when witnesses observed blood on his shirt (TR P. 145, L. 7-8).

101. Respondent received his injury to his head after he entered the Pinkston building on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 147, L. 1-5).

102. Respondent’s shoulder injury, as shown in Alliance Exhibit No. 3, is scar tissue from a previous injury (TR P. 151, L. 10-11).

103. All of the witness statements were consistent with each other and not consistent with Respondent’s statement (TR P. 152, L. 2-4.

104. Respondent was not assaulted, jumped, or pushed by four students, and Respondent was not unconscious on February 4, 2010 (TR P. 152).

105. Dallas ISD Exhibit 25 on Page 3 stated that, “There is no evidence to indicate A. M. or any other Hispanics attacked or cursed at Ohonba. Based on evidence it appears Ohonba has made a false report and fabricated from some other source or event his injuries. There is no evidence he received the head and shoulder injury from being attacked while walking toward building rear entry and hitting a tree.” (TR P. 153, L. 23 – P. 154, L. 5)

106. No witness supported Respondent’s complaint (TR P. 155, L. 4).

107. The area of Respondent’s white shirt that covered the scar tissue and old bruise on Respondent’s shoulder was completely clean, had no mud, and indicated that the area was never struck by anything (TR P. 159, L. 1-5).

108. Dallas ISD Exhibit 26 on Page v states that, “Based on the investigation it is believed that Isaac Ohonba knowingly and intentionally made a False Police Report. It is believed that Isaac Ohonba knowingly and intentionally fabricated evidence, a head injury, blood on his shirt and an old injury on his shoulder in an attempt to create evidence to prove he was jumped by five Hispanic males, which did not occur. It is believed he Perjured himself on 2 sworn statements.” (TR P. 160-161).

109. Any documents used to show Respondent was injured by being attacked by five Hispanic males outside the rear school entrance of Pinkston are false because the assault did not take place. Any payments he might receive would be due to false documents and false statements (TR P. 162, L. 3-8).

110. Respondent’s account of the events that occurred on February 4, 2010, was not truthful (TR P. 168, L. 15).

TESTIMONY OF DANIEL CLAXTON

111. Detective Claxton is a certified peace officer and has been a Dallas ISD employee for twenty years (TR P. 185, L. 9-21).

112. Detective Claxton was involved with the criminal investigation concerning Respondent (TR P. 186, L. 24).

113. Detective Claxton found that no witnesses saw the assault, and that Respondent fell (TR P. 187, L. 6-7).

114. Respondent’s written statement is not truthful (TR P. 187, L. 17).

TESTIMONY OF DAVID BYNUM

115. Bynum is a Compensation Analyst for Dallas ISD and a thirty-two year employee (TR P. 191, L. 8-12).

116. Respondent remained on assault leave from February 4, 2010, through August 12, 2010 (TR P. 194-196).

TESTIMONY OF ROBERT HERNANDEZ

117. Hernandez is a Manager of Special Programs at Dallas ISD (TR P. 199, L. 12).

118. Respondent violated Dallas ISD Board Policies DF (Local) Numbers 1, 22, 24 and 25 because he submitted false statements to Dallas ISD and obtained compensation for assault leave even though he was not injured by students (TR P. 213-216).

119. Respondent violated Dallas ISD Board Policy DH (Local) because he failed to notify the General Superintendent in writing of his criminal arrest within three work days (TR P. 217-218).

TESTIMONY OF ISAAC OHONBA

120. Respondent did not notify Dallas ISD in writing within three work days of his misdemeanor arrest (TR P. 272, L. 24).

121. Respondent was convicted of the criminal offense of Filing a False Report to a Police Office on May 13, 2011. The Court ordered that Respondent receive one hundred eighty (180) days’ confinement in the Dallas County, Texas, jail which is suspended, a fine of $2,000.00, twelve (12) months of Community Supervision, and serve ten (10) days in the Dallas County, Texas, jail as a condition of Community Supervision beginning on July 20, 2011 (Dallas ISD Exhibit Number 8).

II.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

2.01 Jurisdiction is proper under Texas Education Code, Sec.21.251.

2.02 A timely request was made for the appointment of Independent Hearing Examiner.

Respondent violated the following Dallas ISD Board Policies:

2.03 Failure or refusal to comply with policies, orders, and directives of the Board, Superintendent of Schools, and/or designees (DF-Local #1).

2.04 Falsifying or refusing to give testimony concerning accidents involving school vehicles, job-related injuries, or other accidents. This includes failure to report a personal job-related injury and/or accident to an appropriate supervisor on the day of occurrence, or in any event no later than the next working day following (DF-Local #22).

2.05 Conduct or behavior not otherwise expressly referred to in this policy, either during or off working hours, that could cause the public, students, or employees to lose confidence in the administration and integrity of the District (DF-Local #24).

2.06 Failure to meet acceptable standards of conduct for employees in like or similar positions, which would make retention of the employee detrimental to the best interests of the District (DF-Local #25).

2.07 An employee who is arrested for any felony or any offense involving moral turpitude [see DC (Local)] must report the arrest to the Superintendent of Schools, in writing within three work days of the arrest (DH – Local).

2.08 Respondent’s contract of employment can be terminated for good cause.

III.

RECOMMENDATION

That Respondent’s employment be terminated for good cause.

SIGNED this ________ day of July, 2011.

_________________________________

MASSIE TILLMAN

Independent Hearing Examiner

6805 Vista Ridge Dr. East

Fort Worth, TX 76133

Telephone 817 683 1422

Telefax 817 346 0970

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download