Abrams, L. Annette, Ed.; And Others Accountability in Drug ...

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 110 866

CG 009 289

AUTHOR TITLE

INSTITUTION REPORT NO PUB DATE NOTE AVAILABLE FROM

Abrams, L. Annette, Ed.; And Others Accountability in Drug Education: A Model for Evaluation. Drug Abuse Council, Inc., Washington, D.C. HS-1 Nov 73 294p. Drug Abuse Council, Inc., 1828 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (HC $2.25, $1.50 in quantities of 10 or more)

EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS

MF-$0.76 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. Data Analysis; *Drug Education; *Educational Accountability; Educational Objectives; *Evaluation Methods; Measurement Instruments; Models; Program Development; *Program Effectiveness; *Research Needs; Resource Materials; Test Results

ABSTRACT This text is the first in a series of handbook

providing methodology information for drug program planners and administrators. This handbook is designed to address the private sector need for assistance in their consideration of methods, techniques and approaches necessary for effective local program implementation and evaluation. The first section of the handbook describes program objectives, goal setting considerations, pitfalls in data collection, and research designs considered appropriate for the evaluation of drug education programs. The second section presents a number of reliable measures for program evaluation, an orientation for the effective use of the sample instruments, and information for locating additional measures. Drug education measures for use with young children, adolescents, college students and adults are included or described. The third and final section deals with the analysis and interpretation of data, and includes discussions on student evaluation results, the use of computers and the dimensions of program planning. (Author/SJL)

***********************************************************************

*

Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished *

* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort *

* to obtain the best copy available. nevertheless, items of marginal *

* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *

* of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available *

* via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not

*

* responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions *

* supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. * ***********************************************************************

1. 4

8 _...1_.i_dall1

w fri Nuropv..-

. AV. 1 4. .

41.

..

w

W

AP

a. .."

w

...

41.

0,, .a LR

AA,LRO

F

z

s I. a

- F NA

L.

..A1

F oR1HER REPRODO, T.ON OUTSIDE

10E

yv31EFA REU RE PERMS

StON OF THE t.OPYRol,HT OWNER

3

US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.

EDUCATION & WELFARE

NA TsONAL INSTITUTE OF

EDUCATION

C

on,

FC E.

E N

HA, BEEN REPRO EE +EC, 'ROM

1HE pf-POhi

jc,ON OEF

NE.Ek N

P N 11. 1.)F F 5 014 OP Ni OHS

EC X N,

REPRE

sEN, OFF it AL NAT JONA,. NSTITuTE OF

EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY

I el

41)0011148111U

New'

ED.4

;

The Drug Abuse Council, Inc.

NOVEMBER 1973

HS-1

WITADILITY

L. Annette Abrams Emily F. Garfield John D. Swisher

EDITORS

IN

DR-6

moo ON

Council, Inc.

HS-1

11

1

a model

for

evaluation

 ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download