Enterprise Data Standards Template - Washington
Standard Number 161.02
Geospatial Metadata
Effective Date: February 6, 2003
Revision Date: September 5, 2014
Approved to Rescind: July 26, 2019 Pending final approval of Technology Services Board in September 2019
Related Documents:
• Geospatial Policy & Standards Procedure 162.00
• Waiver Process 101.00
Statutory Authority and Scope
The provisions of RCW 43.105.041 detail the powers and duties of the Technology Services Board (TSB), including the authority to develop statewide or interagency information services and technical policies, standards, and procedures.
This standard applies to state of Washington executive branch agencies, agencies headed by separately elected officials, and institutions of higher education referred to as “agencies” throughout this document. Academic and research applications at institutions of higher education are exempt.
Purpose
This standards establishes and references the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The objective of this standard is to protect state investments in significant location based data/databases and geospatial data holdings through standardized data documentation, and where appropriate, facilitate data reuse and data discovery.
This standard requires metadata development for all existing, new or newly redesigned location based databases and geospatial data sets.
Standard
Washington State adopts the Federal Geographic Data Committee FGDC-STD-001-1998 Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata as the metadata standard to follow when documenting all location based data/databases and geospatial data sets. The use of the complete FGDC Content Standard for Geospatial Metadata is required for all Washington State governmental entities that collect geospatially referenced information. FGDC has adopted ISO 191* standards for metadata development for geospatial datasets. Washington State is currently adopting the full FGDC metadata documentation standard to remain consistent with its previous basic documentation effort established in 2003. However, it is anticipated that within two or three years, a conversion to ISO standard will be necessary. Agencies are encouraged to be familiar with both standards.
Geospatial datasets that meet one or more of the following criteria must create and publish metadata. A significant geospatial dataset is defined as:
• Is mission critical or is required for regulatory purposes;
• Has estimated investment or expected life cycle costs that exceed $500,000
• Is regularly distributed outside of the agency; and/or
• Has been designated significant by an agency CIO/Director or the Technology Services Board.
Metadata created pursuant to this standard will be published on the Washington State Geospatial Clearinghouse which is administered by WAGIC and the University of Washington. Agencies shall download and review their published metadata holdings from the Clearinghouse yearly to ensure it is current and that all new data holdings are published.
This sections of the current FGDC CSDGM standard includes:
[pic]
*graphic taken from FGDC Metadata Workbook
Within each of these sections, there are details about the data that explain what it is to be used for, limitations of use, how the data was assembled and other key information to help the data be used in an appropriate manner. These components make up the metadata documentation. There are a number of components, mandatory and mandatory if applicable. Agencies are recommended to use existing tools which will help complete the information and provide it in a compatible format (XML) for sharing via the Washington State Clearinghouse.
Metadata Development Tools
FGDC Metadata workbook.
Harvest Modudule for GIS Inventory by National State Geographic Information Council.
Metadata and GIS.
References
Washington State Geospatial Clearinghouse:
Federal Geographic Data Committee website:
Contact Information
For questions about this standard, please contact the Office of the CIO.
Revision History
|Date |Action taken |
|September 5, 2014 |Revisions adopted by the state CIO |
|June 5, 2014 |Revisions adopted by the Geographic Information Technology (GIT) Committee |
|April 20, 2012 |Administrative update of existing metadata standard from February 6, 2003 – reformatted to new standards|
| |template and organization |
|July 26, 2019 |Approved to Rescind: July 26, 2019 |
| |Pending final approval of Technology Services Board in September 2019 |
Approving Authority
Chief Information Officer Date
Chair, Technology Services Board
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- data analysis quantitative data importance
- example of data analysis what is data analysis in research
- enterprise data management edm
- data scientist vs data analyst
- data science vs data analysis
- data analysis template for teachers
- key data elements data quality
- key data elements data governance
- data analytics vs data science
- data standards opm
- structured data vs unstructured data examples
- data analysis template excel