Week 4 - University of Washington



Week 4. April 25, 2002

Independent Film

Video examples

Pretty Woman, Working Girls Born in East LA, El Norte.

 

Mainstream film. Economic concerns breed caution in Hollywood.

0. •         Emphasis on opening weekend leads to an emphasis on “feel good” movies.

1. •         Increasing importance of overseas market-- favors action films and high tech blockbusters.

2. •         High cost of making films.

3. •         Eagerness of many studios to make franchise films to merchandise at stores to exploit in theme parks. So less serious, less grown up fare.

4. •         Fear by executives that a risky film or two will fail at box office and they will lose jobs.

5. •         Hefty overhead costs, union rules; coupled with general refusal of stars and film makers to take the same fee cuts they would accept if they worked on an independent film.

6. •         Marketing. Cameron Crowe, a writer and director for Jerry Maguire: "You have marketing and concept testers, advertising people. What you find gets the high numbers is easily appealing subjects: a baby, a big, broad joke, a high concept. Everything is tested. The effect is to lessen the gamble, but in fact you destroy a writer’s confidence and creativity once so many people are invited into the tent.

7. •         Before big budget movies are even given the go ahead, executives, marketers and distributors produce hypothetical figures on how much money a movie will make here and abroad depending on the star and the concept. If the numbers are relatively weak, the project is dropped.

8. •         Studios like Universal prefer to make tepid but derivative action adventure films like DAYLIGHT, which costs about $70m; or DANTE’s PEAK, which cost about $100 million, that may have appeal overseas, rather than a delicate $4 million film like Shine

II. Independent Films: Alternatives to mainstream movies

Is there anything more demanding for adults -- for people searching for something beyond the standard fare of Hollywood? Yes, in independent films. What is an independent film? It used to be a film produced outside of the traditional studios (although the traditional studios have all created divisions that deal with non-traditional types of films). So the best current definition might be this: An independent film is one that appeals to sophisticated audiences, usually produced outside the traditional studio system. Independent movies usually represent a sharp contrast to the large budget movies that represent mainstream movies today.

Several aspects of independent films:

9. •         LIMITED BUDGETS. Limited budgets of anywhere from $100,000 to a few million. e.g., Kevin Smith made CLERKS for $27,575. If Smith were given the $100m that TRUE LIES cost, he could have made 3,626 movies. Independent films: ruining about one third to one fourth cost of a big Hollywood movie.

10. •         FUNDING: Most independent features get funded in three ways: grants, independent investors, self financing.

11. •         COMMERCIAL QUOTIENT LOW: Compared to big Hollywood productions, these are very non commercial usually. There is little or no attention to product placement, opening weekend, overseas sales, merchandising, link to theme parks/promotions at McDonalds, etc.

12. •         CONTENT: Not dictated by LOP considerations.

13. •         DISTRIBUTION: Always a struggle. Key: often times film festivals. Movies that surfaced at film festivals: Spitfire Grill, Sling Blade, Shine, English Patient, Fargo, Secrets and Lies, Spike Lee’s She’s Gotta Have It, Lizzie Borden’s Working Girls and many John Sayles works.

14. •         QUALITY. Academy Awards: In many years, independent films clean up at the Academy Awards. (In 1997, Jerry Maguire was the only big studio film even nominated for best picture; and it didn’t get the award). What’s going on with the studios?

 

III. Distribution: Studios own the key distribution networks; their movies will get shown. How do Independents get into distribution? Three ways:

1.Studio “indies”: The major Hollywood studios have developed their own companies to produce or distribute these lower budget, non-blockbuster movies. Completely ignored these movies until the 1989s -- when SEX LIES AND VIDEOTAPE was a runaway movie and profit-maker. Miramax is owned by Disney; Fine Line part of Time Warner; Gramercy is division of Polygram; Sony Classics is owned by Sony; Fox: Searchlight. (an arm for lower budget, edgier movies); October Films (Secrets and Lies) with Universal.

These produce films with more edge, lower budgets.

2. Alternative routes: Get shown somewhere and get a review (ideally by a publication such as the New York Times, and ideally by a reviewer known to be sympathetic to indie films, such as NYT’s Vincent Canby). Or get shown where people are paying attention to movies – Film Festivals. Some of the MAJOR film festivals include: Sundance (Utah), Telluride, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York and Toronto. Lesser festivals include Seattle, Olympia, Ft. Lauderdale, St. Louis, Indianapolis (Heartland Film Festival), Columbus, Minneapolis, San Luis Obispo, Austin, New Orleans, Chicago, Montreal, Savannah, Denver, Providence and others.

You Can Count on Me.

Film: about a single mother reunited with her troubled brother. Golden Globe nominations for Laura Linney, and for its acreenwriter (Kenneth Lonergon, who is also its director). In December, 2000, the New York Film Critics Circle named Ms. Linney best actress, and Mr. Lonergan, best screenwriter. The attention the film has gotten lately is a big change from the original state the film was in. Its producers, John Hart and Jefffrey Sharp, could not find interest in the film when they tried to find a distributor. The film played to half full houses at Sundance Film Festival in January 2000. “There were no people running up the aisle making offers with checkbooks,” says Mr. Sharp. “and I don’t think anybody knew how to get behind it and market it.” When the film shared the Sundance best picture prize, however, the Paramount Classics Division of Viacom made an offer. It released the film in NY and LA on Nov 10 to rave reviews and strong business. A week later, it opened the film in 8 more cities, boosting is screen count to 53, and then widening it to 149 screens.. After a month, its box office gross was $2.4 million, strong considering its limited release.

3. Internet.

The Internet holds great promise as an alternative to Hollywood distribution.

Growth.

In May 2000, movie producer Stephen Simon released his Quantum Project on the Internet. Billed as the first extended Internet movie with an established crew and cast, including actor John Cleese and director Eugenio Zanetti, the $3m movie marked yet another milestone in the runaway growth of the web. The movie is only 32 minutes long, to keep the files manageable. Distributors decided to make viewers download the entire film before watching, rather than using a “streaming” technology that often means grainy, jerky images. Simon says: his goal is to develop an additional means of delivering movies and to create films specifically for computers. , which financed the film, charged $3.95 per computer.

A. Rise of digital film

Recent breakthroughs in technology have made it possible to capture movies using high definition digital video cameras with fidelity akin to that of 35 millimeter film and to project them digitally in theaters with no loss of image quality. The first major feature to be shot entirely in digital video was Mr. Lucas’ Star Wars: Episode II. And in an unusual cooperative effort, the powers in Hollywood --- hoping to improve movie going for patrons and the bottom line for themselves – have mobilized to bring digital projection to local movie houses, perhaps by 2002 or 2003. (New York Times, Nov 26, 2000)

Lucas helped set off the rush to digital more than 2 years ago, when he converted the film master of Star Wars Episode 1 – the Phantom Menace – to digital data, then ran it for a month at four theaters (two in LA, two in NJ) equipped with high definition video projectors. The New York Times: “Pristine, flicker-free images danced on the screens. There was none of the deterioration in color and vibrancy that occurs when films are transferred from negatives to master prints and then to the third generation copies shown in theaters. Gone was the usual ‘weave’ of film as it passes through a projector, which compromises clarity. And the dirt and scratches that plague the average print after just a few showings were nowhere to be seen. Instead, every run of the digital master had the same superb color, crisp detail and high brightness, along with contrast that fell just short of a good 35-mm print.”

Exit surveys show that audiences liked the product (at these four theaters) and even film projectionists were impressed.

What will this mean?

1.Independent film will be helped greatly. Independent film makers stand to gain ground in the age of digital cinema, as movies become ever cheaper to product and to show. Ben Affleck says, “With digital projection, a film maker can, in fact, directly distribute without having to go through this sort of horizontal monopoly that the movie studios still have.” Affleck believes that digital distribution will allow megaplexes to substitute smaller, independent works for aging blockbusters on slow nights. And digital cinema will also open alternative venues for such films. One company, Emerging Cinemas, is planning a network of digital cinema theaters at performing arts centers and science museums around the country. EC expects to have 120 sites within 3 years.

For all movies – not just independents – digital film will have other results: (1) Better sound. Because today’s film prints must carry both digital and analog soundtracks, which take up space on the print itself, the industry standard has settled at six audio channels of digital sound. But with digital cinema, the industry could go to 12 channels. (2) Better editing. Digital editing much more sophisticated than non digital editing. The Coen Bros’ film “O Brother, Where Art Thou” was transferred into digital at considerable cost to allow the artful application of tings that give the movie an almost hand-painted look. One scene contains about 30 successive dissolves, an affect easily accommodated with digital technology. Shooting films directly in digital will only encourage further innovation. (3) Better quality films/prints. Exhibitors could offer customers and advertisers consistent digital picture quality over the course of a run. And moviegoers in small towns who now wait their turn for new releases and then suffer through worn prints shipped in from major markets could get relief.” Ed Grebow, deputy president of Sony Electronics: “In the digital cinema world, every viewer – whether in a small theater or large theater, a primary market or secondary market, at the beginning of the run or at the end of the run – will get the same high quality.” (4) Big savings for studios. For studios, the savings on digital cinema would be significant. NewYorkTimes (Nov 26, 2000): “If the 39,000 screens in North America were to convert to digital today, film studios and distributors could begin banking most of the estimated $800m they now spend each year making, insuring and shipping bulky film prints.

Studios, theaters all beginning to move this way. But it could take a decade to retrofit all screens. So film and digital production will co exist for some time. Digital cinema systems are expected to sell for about $125k per screen, about five times the cost of a typical film projector. So even if they were eager for the technology, theater chains could hardly afford it. 2000 and 2001 were so-so years, at least until late in the year, for most theaters, and over-building has really hurt the movie theater business.

B. Internet and Access: ease of creating a web site, potential for distribution.

Difficulty for many film makers: Next to impossible to get into distribution.

Gary Zeidenstein and Amine Bitar made an independent movie: Triangle and Tribulations. Typical of many Indies. Couldn’t get Hollywood studios interested in the 84 minute movie, about a man who sacrifices career and family in pursuit of his dream to play the triangle in an orchestra. They tried film festivals but there was so much competition that they were often rejected. So they set up a web site to publicize their film and show it on-line. They also opened the site to other filmmakers and were besieged with submissions. "It just started to snowball" said Zeidenstein. Today, their site: Always Independent Films () offers over 375 movies and trailers. It is one of at least 2 dozen sites showing films as filmmakers flock to what could be a new means of distribution.

Some independent film makers hope the Web will let them bypass Hollywood and reach viewers directly. Or that they can use the web to drum up huge publicity (as the makers of the Blair Witch Project did. BWP was a low budget amateur film that became a blockbuster in movie theaters after generating a buzz with a clever and appealing web site).

C. Web ideal for short films

The Internet could also provide a market for short films, which now have few outlets. Short films are more suitable for the web than full length features because it takes hours to download a long film using a conventional personal computer modem. And many people don’t want to watch a full 2 hour movie at a desktop PC. "Americans don’t know what to do with short films," says William Azaroff, 29, whose first one can be seen at Atomfilms/shockwave (atomfilms.) which specializes in short films.

D. Web provides exposure to film makers (and further contacts, contracts)

For most budding filmmakers, having the film appear on the web is not an end in itself, merely a stepping stone to the more established entertainment world. "At the end of the day, they’d like to be seen on a TV screen or even better in a theater," said Mika Salmi, president of Atom Films, which receives 50 to 100 films a week.

Todd Lincoln, 33 year old from Tulsa, parlayed his exposure on the web into a job making music videos. "There’s a lot of people watching the progress of films on there. It’s just a real kind of digital democracy." Mr. Lincoln made 2 films (Honeypot, Xavier) that are among the most widely watched on , a site in San Francisco.

: while most of its films can be viewed by the public, has also set up a separate site, , that can be seen only by movie industry professionals and is a conduit for filmmakers who are trying to shop their films around. The first film put on that site, Sunday’s Game, is a 9 minute dark comedy about elderly women who gather on a Sunday and play Russian roulette. David Garrett, a writer and producer of the film, said he and his partner, Jason Ward, had received many inquiries since the film appeared and had closed a deal to produce a pilot for Fox TV. "I do think the Internet exposure increased our visibility and got people talking," he aid.

Still, the odds are very long. Ifilm can point to only a handful of success stories among the 1000+ films it shows. Always Independent Films says that 3 films on its site have attracted distributors, including Mr. Zeidenstein’s Triangles and Tribulations. It was licensed by a company that will try to place it in video stores.

E. Video sales

One way around the technical limitations of the Internet is to use it to sell videocassettes. Some fledgling filmmakers in NY -- Sam Sokolow and Rob Lobl ---have sold more than 800 copies of their film The Definite Maybe on . It cost them about $2K to have the cassettes and cover art made and to set up a web site for their film with a link to Amazon. The tape sells for $14.95, and they get about $5 after expenses. so a total so far of over $4k. This has not gone very far toward recovering the $100K it cost to make the movie, but Mr. Sokolow said the exposure helped them land another job directing a sitcom for a web site. "We’re sidestepping the whole movie business, "Mr. Sokolow said. He said that he and Mr. Lobl had not interested big studios in the movie. "I don’t need Hollywood anymore to have 35 million people take a look."

 

F. Some indie sites

Always Independent Films. or alwaysi.



atomfilms.

 

G. Other web sites for indie information

1. Internet magazines: The Film Zone (); Film Threat Weekly (), the Media Channel (), Independent Film magazine ()

2. Independent Film Channel ()

3.

H. Using the net for publicity. Blair Witch Project.

I. Goal for some: Avoid Hollywood entirely

J. Making money?

There is little money – so far -- to be made by showing movies on the Internet. Most web sites do not pay filmmakers for their movies because many are happy just to get the exposure. And most sites do not charge viewers to see the movies, hoping instead to support themselves with advertising. Some of the sites plan pay per view services or offer video cassettes for sale, but it is far from certain that any of the movie sites will be self supporting. One site that does charge viewers, ., allows people to view a film for a day or a few days for a price similar to those at a video store. It’s most popular title, "The Perfect 10 Model of the Year" video is rented about 60 times a month, fewer than a hit movie at a single Blockbuster outlet. In April, 1999, the site offered the movie PI, which had been in theaters, and fewer than 200 people viewed it.

_______________________

Current Problems with Internet and movies

1.Download times, although access to broadband decreasing this issue.

Mark Holcomb, writing recently in : “For much of the world, where analog telephone line connections to computers with slower modems, older processors and limited RAM are the norm, watching even the shortest digitized film on a Web site can be a lesson in tedium. Like other forms of entertainment disseminated over the Internet, movies are best enjoyed by a small, select group of broadband-quipped aficionados, some of whom have the capital and connections to launch filmmaking careers.” This is changing rapidly, but many still find the download times a problem.

2. Poor image quality

3. Viewing comfort: long films at PC?

4. Movie pauses, waiting for signal to arrive

5. Financial concerns

Most sites pay something for the films they post; the independent-film news service indieWIRE reports that filmmakers can make between $500 and $2000 for each film they sell to a site and anywhere from 20 to 40 percent of ancillary sales.

Some shake down still in the business of independent films on the web. Some companies have failed, others merged.

“Two and a half years ago, nobody in traditional media would take film on the Web seriously,” Jason Wishnow (founder of The New Venue, a web distribution site) said last year, “whereas one year ago, everybody from the traditional media was trying to get a piece of the pie.” By spring 2000, however, the Internet bandwagon proved to be significantly less stable than originally hoped for, and the high-profile enthusiasm for some sites (such as ) turned to panicky skepticism. was a high profile enterprise funded by film industry heavyweights DreamWorks, Imagine Entertainment and Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen. It promised to bring Hollywood know-how to Internet film with an ambitious, multi-layered site focused on distribution, exhibition and development of original works by new filmmakers. It fizzled in September 2000, before it ever saw the light of day, leaving 70 employees jobless and dozens of films in distribution limbo. The plug was also pulled on DEN (Digital Entertainment Network), a “content programmer.” It laid off 100 workers and left up to 80 percent of its films unreleased. In late 2000, entertainment site iCast shut its doors and laid off over 70 employees.

Eugene Hernandez, editor in chief and cofounder of indieWIRE: “It’s no surprise that companies like DEN and iCAST and Pop would fail, because right now there is no money to be made from film on the Web. These companies were investing exorbitant amounts of money in get-rich quick schemes and popularity contests, buying public recognition as they went along.”

Some sites have stayed in business (such as IFILM, Creative Planet and Eveo) but less as film distributors or exhibitors and more as online resource portals for producers, distributors and only incidentally for filmmakers. These business-to-business sites (B2B) provide links to services like Script Shark (a feedback site for screenwriters), Hollywood Creative Directory (an industry contact list) and In Hollywood (a database of films and TV shows currently in development). While some of these sites continue to post films, it is their subscription-driven B2B services that promise to keep them afloat.

Will the Internet become commercialized? Mark Holcomb, writing in late 2000 in says: “The sell-to-be-seen/be-seen-to-sell ethnic that drives most sites is not that different from the bottom-line mentality of the Hollywood establishment. It is no surprise then, that most of the films they exhibit are so strikingly similar to what’s playing at your local multiplex.” He adds: “For all their Hollywood-in-miniature flaws, these sites provide a relatively affordable, potentially profiable and undeniably gratifying service for budding filmmakers.”

Mergers Two big names in the nascent world of online entertainment merged in 2001. , a majority owned unit of software firm Macromedia, acquired Atom Corp, owner of the short film web site – and moved the company from Seattle to California. The newly formed company will bring together two of the most popular destinations in online entertainment, putting Atom’s short films together with the animation and games that Shockwave offers. Problems: investors not ready to put big money in this yet, given the shakeout in recent years. Neither company is profitable, but both have drawn enough of an audience to suggest that they could together survive the shakeout in the online entertainment world.

Atom, perhaps best known for some humorous early offerings like the spoof “Saving Ryan’s Privates”, and edgy animations like one showing a frog in a blender, has a catalog of more than 1400 short films. It had 560K users in October 2000. Shockwave: offers an array of games and had signed some high profile deals with well-known creative talents like filmmaker Tim Burton. The site, which also attracts people looking to download Macromedia’s animation software, had about 5 m users in Oct 2000.

Wall Street Journal, Dec 18, 2000: “The problem for the new company, like its smaller competitors, is that it faces the inherent technical limitations of the Internet today. Dragged down by slow Internet connections, most consumers still view online films using software that produces a small, wobbly pictures on their computer screen s—not the most compelling entertainment experience.

6. Film festivals still ideal in the eyes of most filmmakers.

7. Internet being flooded with films. Hard to be noticed

The problem is that the very advantage of the web -- its low barrier to entry -- is also a disadvantage because so many films are being shown there that it is hard for one to rise above the crowd. And having a film freely available on the web can discourage a profit-minded distributor from picking it up. Then there is the image quality. "We don’t want people’s first exposure to it, if we think we can make a sale, to be on the Web." said Mr. Azaroff, commenting on the picture quality. He said he put ‘Checkmating," his short film from 1996 about a woman who sizes up potential boyfriends while playing chess with them, on the web because it was mainly as a calling card and had little chance of commercial success.

Another film maker said that it is mainly kids who contact him after seeing his short film on the web. The inquiries from industry execs have come from film festivals or videocassette mailings.

Making oneself heard on the web can require aggressive marketing. Two first time filmmakers (Terry Keefe and Michael Wechsler, of LA) not only put trailers of their "Slaves of Hollywood" on some movie web sites but they also sent out hundreds of email messages with links to those sites.

 II. How to find independent movies.

1. Reviews on line or in newspaper, magazines.

Look for the less than big budget shows

2. Independent film station (cable)

The Independent Film Channel (IFC) is managed and operated by BRAVO Networks. It is the alternative movie channel on TV. It reaches 30 million homes.

3. Identify a few good directors and watch for their work.

John Sayles (Return of the Secaucus Seven, Lone Star)

Lizzie Borden (Working Girls) Wayne Wang (Chan is Missing; Joy Luck Club, Smoke)

Spike Lee (Get on the Bus) Gregory Nava (El Norte, Mi Familia/My Family)

Kevin Smith (Clerks, Chasing Am, Dogma)

A. John Sayles.

Filmography: Limbo (1999); Men With Guns (1998); Lone Star (1996); Secret of Roan Inish (1994); Passion Fish (1992); City of Hope (1991); Eight Men Out (1988); Matewan (1987); Brother from Another Planet (1984); Baby, It’s You (1983); Lianna (1983); Return of Secaucus 7 (1980)

Born Sept. 28, 1950, Schenectady. "My main interest is making films about people. In the mid 1970s, Sayles joined Roger Corman’s scriptwriter group, working on THE LADY IN RED (1979) and BATTLE BEYOND THE STARS (1980).

Return of the Secaucus 7 His first film as director, RETURN OF THE SECAUCUS 7 (1980) was shot in four weeks during 1978 at a reported cost of $40K. It is witty and poignant look at a reunion of 1960s activists on the verge of adulthood. Won BEST SCREENPLAY from LA Film Critics and was nominated for an Oscar in the same category. 1997: Among 25 films chosen in 1997 for inclusion into the Library of Congress’ NATIONAL FILM REGISTRY. The NATIONAL FILM REGISTRY was started in 1996; the list of films targeted for preservation so far number 225.

In 1983, Sayles won a MacArthur Foundation "genius grant" which provided him with over $30K per year, tax free, for five years. One of the results: THE BROTHER FROM ANOTHER PLANET (1984), an unlikely story of a mute black alien (Joe Morton) adrift in Harlem. It is a captivating look at a variety of issues, including racial prejudice and drug addiction. MATEWAN (1987) explores personal an political dimensions of unions in the W.VA.coal mines of the 1920s. EIGHT MEN OUT (1988): account of the 1919 Black Sox baseball scandal that rocked the baseball world. Examines the controversy through the eyes of individual ball players. Rather than simple caricatures, each man is seen as having complex reasons for agreeing or refusing to throw the World Series. Sayles relies on visuals a lot: impressionistic lighting and scrupulous production design help capture this pivotal period of American history. CITY OF HOPE. 1991. Somber study of life in a mid sized contemporary American town, weaving several story lines together. PASSION FISH (1992) about the relationship between a paralyzed former TV soap star and her live in nurse. Praised for central performances by Mary McDonnell and Alfre Woodard. THE SECRET OF ROAN INISH (1994). Story of a girl living with her grandparents in County Donegal. LONE STAR (1996): deals with present day as well as legends of past lives. Sayles wrote and directed this film, which tells of a Texas sheriff trying to unravel the life and death of his father, who had been sheriff 15 years earlier. LONE STAR was nominated for Oscar for best screenplay (but the COEN BROTHERS’ FARGO won). It was also Sayles’ most financially successful film to date, having grossed more than $14 million in US. Also won a IMAGEN AWARDS; these awards recognize film and TV programming portraying Latinos in positive roles. LONE STAR took top honor in the feature film category. (NYPD Blue took best TV show). Dealt with some tough issues: incest, murder, illegal aliens and interracial relationships.

Nearly 40 years after the mysterious disappearance of brutal Sheriff Charley Wade (Kris Kristofferson), his skeletal remains are unearthed outside the tiny border town of Frontera, Texas. Rio County’s latest sheriff (Sam Deeds (Chris Cooper) begins to suspect not only that Wade was murdered but also that he died at the hands of the late Sheriff Buddy Deeds (Matthew McConaughey), a local hero and Sam’s own father. One Internet movie review site: "This Oedipal mystery serves as the pretext for a much broader investigation of the substance of the American past.... Sayles attempts to show how authority uses history to construct the borders that separate countries, communities and individuals."

MEN WITH GUNS: Spanish language political road movie to be released through Sony Pictures Classics. Debut at Toronto Film Festival; will also be shown at Telluride Film Festival. Fictional Latin American country resembling civil-war torn Guatemala. When a wealthy local doctor goes on a mission to find his protégés, he finds that many of them were killed by government forces.

B. Kevin Smith.

Filmography: Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, Dogma

Independent film maker. Smith refers to his "NEW JERSEY TRILOGY"

I. Clerks (1994): Budget: $27,575; $230K after post production; Gross: $3.2 million (USA). Financed with: funds earmarked for college tuition, sale of extensive comic book collection and federal compensation money he got for losing his car in a flood. Three week filming period. Won Filmmakers Trophy Award at Sundance Film Festival. Got an NC-17 rating by Motion Picture Assn. of Am; but Miramax was interested in distributing it at this point, so got lawyer (Alan Dershowitz) to fight it; changed to an R. Grainy, low budget, black and white movie about low-renting living in a New Jersey suburb. Much of Clerks is extremely funny and dead on; intentionally satirical. The story’s about dirt-talking characters; profanity is knee deep as bored cash register jockeys Dante and Randal , out there customers and other modern eccentrics engage in endless rounds of sexually graphic repartee. Dante (Brian O’Halleran) is an affable college dropout in his early 20s, working at the QUICK STOP. His best friend RANDAL (Jeff Anderson) works next door in the video store. While Dante attempts to get through his unrewarding non-career with as much patience, politeness and dignity as he can muster, Randal is openly abusive of his customers. When the story begins, Dante has been forced to work the a.m. shift on his off day. Things go from bad to worse: the storefront metal shutter can’t be opened because someone jammed chewing gum in the lock. His relief shift never shows. He misses his afternoon hockey game. And there’s a calamitous finale that plunges him into an unfathomable depression. During this time, he attempts to hold his hockey game on the convenience store roof, visits a funeral and goes a few rounds with the women in his life. One’s an old flame (Lisa Spoonauer) who returns to jerk his chain again; the other’s his devoted girlfriend (Marilyn Ghiglioot) who -- Dante discovers -- has an active sexual history. Dante’s basically a gentleman and a pure romantic. And for all his nastiness, Randal’s devoted to Dante. Together they have a scuzzy charm. "You hate people," Dante reminds Randal at one point when Randal expresses a wish to attend a funeral. "But I love gatherings," says Randal. Isn’t it ironic?

Desson Howe, Washington Post: "It’s clearly not for everyone. But for the right crowd (I see Doc Martens, long hair and black coats - I just don’t see Mom), this is going to be a collegiate and post collegiate laugh fest.

Mick LaSalle Detroit Free Press: "The first minutes of Clerks show DANTE opening the store early one morning, and like anything that you know is authentic, these scenes have an intrinsic, though limited fascination. Smith satirizes the various types that come into the convenience store: the fanatic who lectures patrons about smoking, the lady who cleans out the milk case looking for the cartoon with the latest date; and the fellow who checks every egg in he store to make sure its not cracked. None of this is riveting, yet there’s something about seeing life from the distinct angle of the convenience-store clerk that ‘s just new enough to hold you."

.... "Dante’s conversation with his girlfriend about oral sex, for example, is a highlight of the movie - not that it’s brilliant or hilarious (it’s neither) but because it turns the camera on the kind of discussion that could easily happen in life but as yet has never been committed to film.

Roger Ebert: "Hardly anybody ever works in the movies, except at jobs like cops, robbers, drug dealers and space captains. One of the many charms of Kevin Smith’s CLERKS is that it clocks a full day on the job. Its hero, Dante Hicks, is a clerk in a convenience store and his friend Randal works next door in the video store. Both stores are in a strip mall in Asbury Park, N.J.: marginal operations with ill paid and disenchanted employees. The movie has the attitude of a gas station attendant who tells you to check your own oil. It’s grungy and unkempt, and Dante and Randal look like they have been nourished from birth on beef jerky and Cheetos. They are tired and bored, underpaid and unlucky in love, and their encounters with customers feel like a series of psychological tests." ....."Dante’s day begins at dawn. He sleeps in his clothes closet. He drinks his coffee out of a lid of the cookie jar. When the store’s steel shutters won’t rollup, he uses shoe polish to write a big sing: I ASSURE YOU WE ARE OPEN. He gets in desultory conversations with customers who are opposed to cigarettes, or looking for porno magazines or claim the vacant-eye guy leaning against the building is a heavy metal star from Russia.

Randal, next door, is working in the kind of video store with a stock so bad that he goes to another store when he wants to rent a video. He has customers with questions like: Do you have that one with that guy who was in that movie last year? And he discusses deep cinematic questions with Dante, such as: When Darth Vader’s second DEATH STAR was destroyed, it was still under construction, so doesn’t that mean that a lot of innocent workers were killed? Other characters include a guy named SILENT BOB (played by Kevin Smith himself) who seems permanently posted outside the store. He’s allegedly a drug dealer but business seems bad.

II. MALLRATS

III. CHASING AMY

Romantic comedy about a straight guy who falls in love with a lesbian, much to the chagrin of his lifelong best buddy. But it is not all that it seems; they become good friends and when the friendship leads to intimacy, crises of all sizes and stipulations bubble and boil. Holden McNeil (Ben Affleck) and his best pal Banky Edwards (Jason Lee) good pals. They are the creators of a cult comic called BLUNTMAN AND CHRONIC. Their friendship is threatened by the appearance of ALYSSA JONES, a riot grrl comic book artist. Holden falls hard, only to find out that she is a lesbian. "Banky is just flat out angry, figuring Alyssa for a usurper who is getting off playing with Holden’s hapless head. Alyssa is seriously confounded by her attraction to a male, not to mention disturbed by being deserted by her sisterhood support system. But even as Holden finds himself coming to terms with being in love with someone who has heretofore loved only women, and perhaps losing his best friend and collaborator, he is confronted with a revelation that presents an entirely new dilemma. Budget: $250,000. Kevin Affleck: The script....is about men coming to terms with sexual issues, their own and women’s and double standards that exist in relationships. Kevin made it comfortable for everyone who made us feel safe enough to go deeper than we might ordinarily have." Kevin Smith: "Always a thorny issue in any romantic relationship I’ve ever been in, a partner’s sexual past can ruin an otherwise great relationship. And it’s never something as easy as the possible disease angle that get some. No, my insecurities stem from the fear of having to measure up to somebody...or a lot of somebodies.. I spent the better part of my romantic career being the ex boyfriend that someone couldn’t get out of their system. I never wanted to be on that rotten other end (as the guy who has to deal with the memory of someone else’s ex boyfriend.)

 C. Spike Lee

Filmography includes: Bamboozled (2000), Get On the Bus (1996), Clockers (1995), Crooklyn (1994), Malcolm X (1992), Jungle Fever (1991), Mo’ Better Blues (1992), Do the Right Thing (1989), School Daze (1988), She’s Gotta Have It (1986)

Born 1956. Brooklyn filmmaker. Spike Lee represents one of a new breed of black film makers who are seeking alternate routes of distribution, financing, marketing and exhibition to achieve greater control of black on screen images.

She’s Gotta Have It (1986) started a big wave of independently made (as opposed to studio made) black films. Released by Island Pictures in 1986. Lee made it for $175K, gaining financing from grants, loans and donations. Picture earned $7 million, making it one of the year’s most profitable film. Not included in the $7m: the soundtrack, the book and T shirts, etc. Story revolves around the life of NOLA DARLING, an independent, sexy young woman and her romantic entanglements with three men at the same time. Other movies: School Daze cost $6.5 million; made $14m at box office.

Lee feels that the studios -- which have been distribute by majors lately -- don’t do enough. Lee: "It must be understood that Hollywood is now in love with Robert Townsend, Eddie Murphy, Keenen Wayans or myself. The studios are not doing me any favors by giving me money to do my films. They do it because they think they can make money"

Other Lee movies include: . JUNGLE FEVER. 1991. Consequences of inter racial relationships (black architect who has affair with is working class Italian secretary). 2. GET ON THE BUS. 1996. Fictional story of a group of black men making a cross country trek from LA to DC for the Million Man March. Released in Oct 1996, on the first anniversary of the march. $2 million budget. Independently financed by a group of African American investors, including Danny Glover, Wesley Snipes, Johnnie L. Cochran Jr, Spike Lee, Robert Guillaume, Will Smith, San Antonio Spur Charles D. Smith, record mogul Jheryl Busby; chairman and CEO of BET, Robert Johnson. Movie shows: shared commitment and can do energy that suit the purpose. Characters: George (Charles Dutton): a sturdy, supportive group leader; Evan Tomas Sr and his son: Junior. Chained together (Father, absentee parent; son in trouble with law); Half white man who happens to be a cop (Roger Smith); another who confesses to have been a ten age gang member and murder; Gay couple (Isaiah Washington and Harry Lennix) suspend their lovers’ quarrel long enough to discus the role of the gay black men in the larger black community; Egomaniacal actor (Andre Braugher); Ossie Davis as an instantly beloved elderly passenger; Gabriel Casseus as a practicing Muslim; Wendell Pierce as a boastful black Republican (thrown off the bus); Richard Belzer as Rick, a Jewish bus driver Says his parents worked in civil rights, but balks at supporting Farrakhan.

Movie not really about Farrakhan; instead it is about the men who take the bus to D.C. But the film clearly dismisses attacks on Farrakahn. In one scene, at a rest stop, some black women attack the all-male nature of the march. One of the men says; "Please, it’s not about excluding sisters. It’s about gaining your respect and trying to keep it."

One reviewer: "...by the end of the film....so many different points of view had been raised, but I never felt that any one of them was being shoved down my throat. And I ever thought, when one of the characters was speaking, ‘Ahh, that’s what Spike thinks.’ He goes to a lot of trouble to show that a Black man in America can be gay, straight, religious, Republican, Democrat, gang member, father, husband, womanizer, actor, bus driver, thief, teacher, student -- it’s all in the mix. "The travelers of GET ON THE BUS don’t all make it to the march and end up watching the speeches on TV, just like many of us did. The message is pretty clear: the real march for this particular group of men took place on the bus. ...

But stumbled right away, drying a paltry $2.2 million on its opening weekend. In 5 weeks, it made only $5.7 million. One of its producers, Reuben Cannon: "Given how a lot of white people felt about the march, I don’t think it’s surprising they stayed away in droves. But I just don’t understand why blacks rejected this film. It’s disheartening because if you can’t get black people to support a film like that, then you start to wonder what it’s going to take,"

 D. Wayne Wang

Filmography includes: Chinese Box (1999), Anywhere But Here (1997), Smoke (1995), Blue in the Face (1995), Joy Luck Club (1993), Eat a Bowl of Tea (1989), Slam Dance (1987), Dim Sum (1985), Chan is Missing (1982)

Smoke, 1995. Focuses on Brooklyn cigar shop. Shop owner (Harvey Keitel) and his customers: a writer’s block afflicted novelist, a teenager with a different identity for all he meets; a man struggling to start over and the owner’s ex-girlfriend. Harvey Keitel, William Hurt, Forest Whitaker, Stockard Channing, Ashley Judd. Joy Luck Club.1993. Four women of different ages use their varied life experiences to understand and help each other. From Amy Tan novel, THE JOY LUCK CLUB, sensitive story of the complex relationships that can exist between mothers and daughters. DIM SUM: A LITTLE BIT OF HEART (1985). Chronicles the relationships between three generations of a Chinese-American family living in San Francisco.

 E. Julie Dash.

Julie Dash was born and raised in New York City. With the commercial debut of Daughters of the Dust in 1992, Dash became the first African American woman to have her film receive a full-length theatrical release. She has won many awards for her work, which includes music videos and feature films.

F. Gregory(Gregorio) Nava

Director of El Norte, My Family/MiFamilia, Why Do Fools Fall in Love?, Selena.

The independent film El Norte (1983) was the first U.S. feature film in the 1980s to portray believable, well-rounded Latin American characters attempting to take charge of their own troubled lives. In his debut feature, Nava first shows the brother and sister protagonists in violence-torn Guatemala and then follows their adventures as the emigrate north to El Norte, the US., in search of peace and a better standard of living. The original screenplay for El Norte was written by Nava and Anna Thomas, who received an Academy Award nomination for their efforts.

 

El Norte was shot on the very modest budget of $800,000.

They examined the themes of Latin immigration to the US and the Latino family in the New Line Cinema release My Family. The tale begins with a teenager Jose Sanchez leaving his Mexican village in the 1920s in search of his only living relative who, it is said, lives in Los Angeles. After reaching Los Angeles on foot, Sanchez starts his new life and raises a family. The film examines the clan’s problems, triumphs and tragedies from the 1920s to the 1980s.

Nava on My Family: “One more thing I wanted to show: the film is very much about bridges – the bridges that bridge Los Angeles with East Los Angeles. The people from East Los Angeles cross the bridge, but the people on the western side don’t cross into East Los Angeles. And the bridges need to be crossed in both directions. But the image of the bridge extends beyond that. It is the bridges that exist between us and our past, as Latinos, our roots, and the bridges that then, understanding that, lead us to our future….”

................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download