Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosure - Chicago-Kent College of Law
Rule 26(a) Initial Disclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
)
Mr. Binaza, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
Officer Smith; Kenilworth )
Police Department )
)
Defendants. )
)
PLAINTIFF'S RULE 26(a)(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES
I. INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION THAT MAY BE USED TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS:
Plaintiff’s initial disclosure is made without the benefit of any discovery and prior to Defendants’ answers. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend its disclosures to add additional witnesses.
A. INDIVIDUALS ASSOCIATED WITH PLAINTIFF
1. Dr. Hugh Jackman
123 Marshfield
Chicago, IL 60657
Information Includes: Diagnosis and treatment of Plaintiff's injuries in the early morning of September 22, 2004;
2. Ms. Ima Narc
321 Tattletale Dr.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: knowledge of the events the night of September 21, 2004.
B. INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES AFFILIATED WITH DEFENDANT
1. Mr. Trey Knor
579 Itrain Rd.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: full knowledge of officer training with Kenilworth Police Department employees
2. Mr. Michael Patrick
987 Dispatcher Ln.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: full knowledge of dispute; contact with Officer Smith on the night of September 21, 2004.
3. Kenilworth Police Department
100 Kenilworth St.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: knowledge of dispute; knowledge of officer training for Kenilworth Police Department employees
C. THIRD PARTY WITNESSES
1. Mr. Loghan Hunter
321 Witness Dr.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: knowledge of the events the night of September 21, 2004.
2. Ms. Mattison Lee
789 Spectator Dr.
Kenilworth, IL 60600
Information Includes: knowledge of the events the night of September 21, 2004.
II. CATEGORIES AND LOCATIONS OF DOCUMENTS
1. Documents relating to Officer Training Sessions; including but not limited to material covered at session, attendance lists of Officers attending.
2. Documents related to previous disciplinary action of Kenilworth Officers; including but not limited to names of officers reprimanded and purposes for reprimand.
3. Documents related to standard issue officer equipment; including but not limited to equipment that the officer's carry, including physical specs.
III. COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES
Mr. Binaza has suffered damages as follows:
1) Approximately $10,000 in medical expenses.
2) Approximately $80,000 in pain and suffering.
3) Approximately $10,000 in legal fees incurred this far.
Total Damages: $100,000.
IV. INSURANCE
Plaintiff, at this time, is not aware of any insurance agreement under which any persons carrying on an insurance business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a judgment which may be entered in favor of Plaintiff or to indemnify or reimburse Defendants for payments to satisfy the judgment.
Dated: November 9, 2004 By:
Rachel A. Lynch
LYNCH & SWAIN, LLC
2020 Abbey Road
Chicago, IL 60657
(312) 867-5309
rlynch@lynch&
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
MR. BINAZA
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- university of illinois springfield uis
- levin college of law
- karen swenson
- united states district court chicago kent college of
- jamie doolin college of law depaul university chicago
- illinois plrb claims conference
- assistant teaching professor finance and legal studies
- rule 26 a initial disclosure chicago kent college of law
- kelli a college of law
Related searches
- rule of law in us
- why is the rule of law important
- rule of law examples
- rule of law definition government
- rule of law in constitution
- rule of law pdf
- rule of law government
- rule of law definition for kids
- rule of law principles
- promote rule of law example
- rule of law united states
- rule of law in the united states