Florida Atlantic University
Florida Atlantic University
Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing
Peer Review of Faculty Teaching Effectiveness
Faculty Member: ____________________________________________________
Course Name & Number: ____________________________________________________
Date & Times of Course Visit________________________________________________
Modules Reviewed_______________________________________________________
Number of Times Instructor has taught the Course ___________
Semester: _______________ Number of Students: ___________
Peer Reviewer: _________________________________________________
Instructions: Please circle the appropriate score for each criterion and include a comment or suggestion for each.
Course Development
1. Uses the Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing philosophy and framework in the development and content of the course.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
2. Goals, objectives and assignment deadlines for the online course are clearly stated, measurable and appropriate to the expected level of knowledge, skill and experience of the learning.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
3. Learning activities and teaching strategies in the course contribute to the achievement of the course objectives.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
Instructor Effectiveness
4. Creates an environment in the online class that is conducive to effective teaching and learning.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
5. Facilitates interaction (e.g. sets welcoming, caring and respectful tone, sharpens discussion focus, incorporates new ideas, deepens dialogue, and develops problem-solving situations.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
6. Demonstrates in-depth and current knowledge of subject being taught and designs challenging assignments to communicate high expectations of students.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
7. The layout and visual presentation of the course facilitates learning. ______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
8. Provide opportunities for student input to shape the course and encourages reflection on the learning process (engage in reflection and self evaluation, develop problem solving strategies, make connections between the classroom and real-world experiences).
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
9. Designs discussion assignments that facilitate meaning cooperation among students and promotes interactivity and active learning.
______________________________________________________________________________
1 2 3 4 5
Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor
______________________________________________________________________________
Comments:
The strengths of this course and instructor are the following:
Areas for growth and further development in course design and teaching include the following: (See Course Site Evaluation Criteria)
OTHER COMMENTS (Include specific focal areas not addressed):
______________________________________________________________________
Signature of Peer Reviewer Date
Approved 1/29/07
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- iii major review procedures
- florida atlantic university
- peer review for annual evaluation rn university of kentucky
- conemaugh school of nursing fisdap
- university of michigan flint
- university of southern maine
- provider competency evaluation and documentation
- peer review for annual evaluation rn
- self evaluation michigan medicine
Related searches
- florida state university education department
- florida state university course catalog
- florida state university online certificates
- florida public university system
- florida state university employee salaries
- florida state university pay scale
- north atlantic university in qatar
- florida state university map printable
- florida state university certificate programs
- florida state university football schedule
- florida state university pictures
- florida state university football roster