CALIFORNIA CORNER - Constangy
CALIFORNIA CORNER
June 7, 2018
CALIFORNIA
OFFICES
Ken Sulzer,
Los Angeles
Barbara Antonucci,
San Francisco
Carolyn Sieve,
Orange County
EDITOR IN CHIEF
Robin Shea
Winston-Salem, NC
USE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK SCHEDULES IN
CALIFORNIA REQUIRES CAREFUL OVERSIGHT
By Nestor Barrero and Matthew Gurnick
Los Angeles Office
California alternative work schedules can be a wonderful thing, but only if employers follow the
procedural requirements for their adoption. Otherwise, they are a trap, especially for out-of-state
employers with California operations who may only have familiarity with the federal Fair Labor
Standards Act and are not accustomed to paying daily overtime.
One California employer recently discovered the importance of following the special AWS
procedural rules during a wage hour class action.
Alternative Work Schedules
What¡¯s an alternative work schedule in California? An alternative work schedule, or ¡°AWS,¡± refers
to a compressed or flexible work schedule. Two common AWSs are the so-called ¡°4/10¡± or ¡°9/80¡±
schedules. Under a 4/10 schedule, employees work 10 hours a day for four days, receive no daily
overtime, but receive an additional day off. A 9/80 schedule compresses 80 hours of work into nine
work days instead of the usual 10 under a regular bi-weekly schedule. Employees do not receive
overtime pay based on the extra eight hours, but they receive an extra day off every two weeks.
California Labor Code Section 510(a)(1) provides that ¡°any work in excess of 8 hours in one day
shall be compensated at the overtime rate of time and a half. This does not apply, however, to an
employee working pursuant to a properly adopted AWS.¡± (Emphasis added.)
Alternative work schedules are popular with employees, who like the flexibility and the extra full
days off, and with employers, who have increased flexibility without overtime liability.
The Catch
Because alternative work schedules require employees to waive their right to receive overtime,
employers may not impose them unilaterally. An employer may adopt an AWS providing for no
more than 10 hours of straight time in one day without the payment of overtime, only if it receives
approval in a secret ballot election by at least two-thirds of the affected employees. (Labor
Code ¡ì 511) Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders provide further requirements applicable
to specific industries, including the following:
Toll free 866.843.9555
?
The proposal must be in the form of a written agreement from the employer.
?
The employer must disclose, in writing, to affected employees, the effects of the proposed
arrangement on the employees¡¯ wages, hours, and benefits (if 5 percent or more of the affected
employees speak a language other than English, the disclosure must also be provided in that
language).
?
A duly noticed meeting must be held at least 14 days prior to the secret ballot vote.
?
Notice of election results must be provided to the California Division of Labor Statistics and
Research.
?
There must be a 30-day waiting period between the election and implementation.
In addition, employers are prohibited from intimidating employees, or forcing them to vote for or
CALIFORNIA CORNER
June 7, 2018
against a proposed AWS.
Maldonado v. Epsilon Plastics, Inc.
This is a publication of
Constangy, Brooks, Smith
& Prophete, LLP. The
information contained
in this newsletter is not
intended to be, nor does
it constitute, legal advice.
The hiring of a lawyer is
an important decision that
should not be based solely
upon advertisements. Before
you decide, ask us to send
you free written information
about our qualifications
and experience. No
representation is made
that the quality of the legal
services to be performed
is greater than the quality
of legal services performed
by other lawyers. No
representation is made that
the quality of the...performed
by other lawyers. This
email could be considered
advertising under applicable
laws.
IRS Circular 230 Notice:
Federal regulations apply
to written communications
(including emails) regarding
federal tax matters between
our firm and our clients.
Pursuant to these federal
regulations, we inform you
that any U.S. federal tax
advice in this communication
(including any attachments)
is not intended or written
to be used, and cannot be
used, by the addressee or
any other person or entity
for the purpose of avoiding
penalties that may be
imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code.
Toll free 866.843.9555
Epsilon employees had a relatively ordinary 48/32-hour work schedule. In other words, they worked
12 hours a day, alternating between four-day workweeks and three-day workweeks. They received
their regular rates of pay for 10 hours of each day, and overtime for the remaining two hours.
The plaintiffs brought a class action under California wage and hour law for unpaid overtime.
Although the trial court found that the Epsilon arrangement would have been a permissible AWS,
it nonetheless ruled that Epsilon was liable for unpaid overtime, interest, waiting time penalties,
inaccurate wage statement penalties, and attorneys¡¯ fees because it failed to establish that it
had complied with California¡¯s procedural requirements for adopting an AWS. On appeal, Epsilon
argued that a predecessor entity had properly adopted the AWS, and that the evidence did not
support the trial court¡¯s ruling.
The Court of Appeal affirmed, holding that ¡°[t]he assertion of an exemption from the overtime laws
is considered to be an affirmative defense, and therefore the employer bears the burden of proving
the employee¡¯s exemption.¡± Thus, Epsilon had the burden of proving that the AWS was properly
adopted, even if the adoption was made by a predecessor entity. Epsilon¡¯s evidence was limited to
some documentary evidence that the AWS was adopted in 1993 and confirmed by votes in 1999;
however, there was no evidence of a pre-adoption election and vote as required by law.
Implications for Employers
Conventional HR wisdom is that employers should encourage better work-life balance through
flexible scheduling, occasional longer days in exchange for predictable days off, or early departure
(like summer hours). However, when it comes to non-exempt employees in California, such
benefits are more easily touted than accomplished.
Both California-based employers and out-of-state employers with employees in California should
carefully consider the disclosure, secret ballot election, and opt-out provisions of the applicable
AWS rules before moving forward with alternative schedules. Failure to do so may result in years
of back overtime liability, and additional penalties and expenses, in the event of a legal challenge.
It is never too early to review AWS policies and procedures in California!
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete offers a wider lens on workplace law. We have
counseled employers exclusively since 1946. With offices in 15 states, we are one of the
largest labor and employment law practices in the U.S. Constangy has been named as a
top firm for women and minorities by organizations including Law360, the National Law
Journal and . Many of our more than 190 attorneys have been recognized by
leading authorities such as Chambers & Partners, Best Lawyers in America? and Martindale
Hubbell. Find out more about us online at or follow us on Twitter @
ConstangyLaw.
Office Locations
Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri,
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- overtime california style ascentis
- calculating back overtime wages in misclassification cases
- seiu bargaining units 1 3 4 11 14 15 17 california
- overtime and compenstory time
- state of california decision of the public employment
- overtime and compensatory time
- in the court of appeal of the state of california division
- overtime excludes units 17 21 seiu local 1000
- overtime pay on dba dbra contracts dol
- how to determine overtime pay eligibility as of 1 1 2021
Related searches
- biology corner photosynthesis worksheet
- white flashes in corner of eye
- flashes of light in corner of eye
- english corner topics for adults
- biology corner answer sheets
- irritation in corner of eyelid
- extruded aluminum corner trim
- corner bathroom shelf unit
- white corner shelf tall
- free standing corner bathroom shelves
- biology corner worksheets
- corner of eye red swollen