1) Arrange pairwise comparisons from largest to smallest p ...
Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800-802.
1) Arrange pairwise comparisons from largest to smallest p-value
* 3-> 35-49 vs. 50 and older 0.147
* 2-> 18-34 vs. 50 and older 0.005
* 1-> 18-34 vs. 35-49 0.002
----------------------------------------------------------------
2) Look at largest p-value (0.147); if it is 0.05 or lower, then
all pairwise comparisons are significant. In this case, it
is larger than 0.05 so you go to the next step.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Look at next largest p-value (0.005); if it is equal or
less than alpha/(number of total comparisons - rank order + 1), then
this comparison and others with lower p-values are significant.
[Note: rank order is largest for the highest p-value, it goes
3, 2, 1 in this example]
Thus, you compare 0.005 with 0.05/(3 - 2 + 1) = 0.025, and find that 0.005 is less than 0.025.
So, the last two comparisons are statistically significant,
adjusting for multiple comparisons.
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- how to calculate p i payment
- how to calculate p value in statistics
- formula to find p value
- how to calculate p value in excel
- how to find p value ti 84
- how to find p value
- how to calculate p value
- how to get p value
- how to determine p value
- how to calculate p score
- how to calculate p value from z
- states by size largest to smallest