Rules Of Parliamentary Procedure



16097255670555th Annual Plymouth State Model United Nations Conference005th Annual Plymouth State Model United Nations Conferencerighttop0100000-3035306415339April 13-14 2013 April 13-14 2013 5308607840980Rules Of Parliamentary Procedure Handbook900007300Rules Of Parliamentary Procedure Handbook1947545180149500WELCOME TO PMUN CONFERENCEDear Delegate, Welcome to the Model United Nations at Plymouth State University (PMUN)! Model United Nations is a rapidly expanding program throughout the world with thousands of delegates participating at conferences as close as Boston, MA, and as far as Beijing, China and Brasilia, Brazil. PMUN is an invaluable experience and one that can shape your future by teaching you vital interactive skills with other people. Of course, nothing can be gained or learned from anything without a little bit of effort, and PMUN is no exception. This guide will narrow down the broad terms of MUN into an understandable form so that you can maximize your learning experience. For many years now, students have benefited from and enjoyed this interactive learning experience that not only involves young people in the study and discussion of global issues but also encourages the development of skills useful throughout their lives; research, writing, public speaking, problem solving, consensus building, conflict resolution, compromise and cooperation. We, Plymouth State Model UN Student Organization members, sincerely hope you have an exciting and educational experience with PMUN Conference.Should you ever need any help with MUN in any way, please do not hesitate to contact us. Good Luck!Plymouth State University Model UNWHAT IS MUN?The United Nations Association of the United States of America defines Model UN as the following:“Model United Nations is an authentic simulation of the UN General Assembly, UN Security Council, or other multilateral bodies, which catapults students into the world of diplomacy and negotiation. In Model UN, students step into the shoes of ambassadors of UN member states, from Bangladesh to Chile to South Africa to debate current issues on the Organization’s vast agenda. The students known as “delegates,” make speeches, plot strategy, negotiate with allies and adversaries, prepare draft resolutions, resolve conflicts, while navigating the UN’s rules and procedure –all in the interest of mobilizing “international cooperation” to resolve problems that affect almost every country on Earth.” Before playing out their ambassadorial roles in a Model UN simulation, students should research the particular global problems that their assigned committee will address. Model UN participants learn how the international community acts on its concerns about topics including peace and security, the environment, human rights, poverty, economic development, health, globalization and more. Model UN delegates also look closely at the needs, aspirations, and foreign policy of the country they will “represent” at the conference. The insights they gain from their exploration of history, geography, politics, culture, economics and science contribute to the authenticity of the simulation when the role playing gets under way. Each year, more than 400,000 middle school, high school and college/university students worldwide participate in Model UN. Many of today’s leaders in law, government, business, and the arts participated in Model UN during their academic careers. You are the future leaders of the tomorrow. CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTSWhat to BringBackground notesDelegate/Background GuideNotebook paper/legal padsPosition papersPen or pencilDress CodeMale Delegate Dress: The best way to go by far is with a business suit, a tie, and dress shoes. Instead of a suit, delegates may wear a jacket and dress pants (no jeans), with a dress shirt, dress shoes, and a tie. Male delegates should at least have on a pair of slacks, a dress shirt, a tie, and dress shoes. Female Delegate Dress: You should wear an outfit that connotes professionalism such as a full length dress or a nice power suit. Skirt length should not be any shorter than just above the knees. A nice blouse or sweater with slacks or a pantsuit would work too. Please also wear dress shoes. Dress tips for all delegates: Use your best judgment in interpreting the dress code. No sneakers, shorts, baseball caps, sweatshirts, and sweatpants. Nothing on you should glow. You need to dress nicely, but again dressing expensively is not necessary. CONFERENCE OVERVIEWConference ProcedureGeneral DebateGeneral Debate is the very first stage of debate that will occur at the conference. It is where all of the general information about a topic and its history are presented to the committee. Only policy may be stated, so do not try and introduce solutions yet. This is where facts and statistics are also stated and verified, so use them in your speech. General Debate proceeds most often by means of a list of speakers. Substantive DebateSubstantive debate is where the real work gets done. It is when delegates may present solutions and discuss resolutions on the topics. You use the ideas discussed in General Debate to form ideas and solutions to the topics. Comments are most often allowed in this debate after a speaker has spoken, and after a yield is made. Call for several caucuses and a formal caucus near the end of debate to present resolutions and to give time for amendment writing. Formal CaucusFormal caucus is called when all of the resolutions are finished and delegates can go up to the front of the room and explain their resolution and convince others that it will work and why it will work. Try to be one of the delegates that go up to talk about this resolution. Voting Bloc This is the final stage of debate on a topic, where the resolutions and amendments have been presented. At this time, votes will be collected on amendments and resolutions to determine which ones will pass and be put into effect by the United Nations. COMMITTEE RULES AND MOTIONSThe system of motions and rules of procedure are a way of keeping conferences from getting out of hand and presenting them in a formalized fashion. RULES OF PROCEDURERULE 1DEBATE AND THE SPEAKERS’ LIST: After the agenda has been determined, one continuously open speakers’ list will be established for the purpose of general debate of the agenda item under consideration. The speakers’ list will be followed for all debate on the agenda item, except when superseded by procedural motions or debate on amendments. Speakers may speak generally on the agenda item being considered and may discuss any resolution or working paper currently on the floor. Separate speakers’ lists will be established as needed for procedural motions and debate on amendments. Any member state or non-member may add its name to the speakers’ list by submitting a request in writing to the Director or, at the discretion of the Director, by raising their placards when asked. Once the end of a speakers’ list has been reached, debate is considered automatically closed. RULE 2UNMODERATED AND MODERATED CAUCUS: A motion to enter either unmoderated or moderated caucus is in order at any time when the floor is open. The delegate proposing the motion must briefly explain its purpose and specify a time limit for the caucus, not to exceed fifteen minutes. A time limit for individual speeches must be mentioned for a moderated caucus. A majority of members’ voting is required for passage. Once the time limit for the caucus has elapsed, a further motion to enter caucus may be considered in order at the discretion of the Director. RULE 3CLOSURE OF DEBATE: A delegate may propose a motion to close debate on the item currently under discussion at any time when the floor is open and it is in order to do so. If closed, debate ends and the committee moves immediately to a vote on the matter currently under consideration. A second is required. Permission to speak may only be granted to two delegates opposing the closure, after which the motion shall be put to a vote. Closure of debate shall require a two-thirds majority of delegates present or present and voting. RULE 4SPEECHES: No delegate may address a session without having previously obtained the permission of the Director. The Director may call a speaker to order if his or her remarks are not relevant to the subject under discussion, exceeds the time assigned to him/her, do not follow correct parliamentary convention, or otherwise discourteous. RULE 5YIELDS: A delegate granted the right to speak in general debate may yield in one of three ways: Yield to another delegate. His/her remaining time will be given to that delegate, who may not make any further yields. Yield to points of information: the Director, who has the right call to order any delegate whose question is rhetorical and leading and/or not designed to elicit information, may select questioners. Follow-up questions will be allowed only at the discretion of the Director. Only answers to questions will be deducted from the speaker’s remaining time. Yield to the Director. Such a yield should be made if the delegate does not wish to yield to questions or another delegate. RULE 6RIGHT TO REPLY: A delegate whose national honor or integrity has been insulted by another delegate may request a right to reply. A right of reply will not be granted solely in order to correct a perceived inaccuracy in speech. A right of reply to a right of reply is out of order. RULE 7POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVELEGE: Whenever a delegate experiences personal discomfort, which impairs his/her ability to participate, he or she may rise to a point of personal privilege. While a point of personal privilege may interrupt a speaker, delegates should only do so with the utmost discretion. RULE 8POINT OF ORDER: A delegate may rise to a point of order to indicate an instance of improper parliamentary procedure. A delegate may not, in rising to a point of order, speak on the substance of the matter under discussion. The Director will immediately rule upon the point of order. Points of order may not interrupt the speech of a delegate or Director. RULE 9POINTS OF PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY: A delegate may rise to a point of parliamentary inquiry to ask the Director for clarification regarding the rules. A point of parliamentary inquiry shall not relate to a substantial issue under discussion, and may never interrupt a speaker. RULE 10WORKING PAPERS: delegates may propose working papers for considerations. Working papers are intended to aid the committee in its discussion and need not be written in resolution format. Working papers require the approval of the director to be copied and distributed. RULE 11DRAFT RESOLUTIONS: A draft resolution may be introduced when it receives the approval of the Director and is sponsored by twenty percent of member states present and voting. Sponsoring a resolution need not indicate support of the resolution and the sponsor has no further obligations or ownership of the resolution. Once a resolution has been approved, it has been copied and distributed, and the agenda has been set, a delegate may propose a motion to introduce a draft resolution. An immediate vote is taken, with a simple majority required for introduction. RULE 12AMENDMENTS: An amendment is a proposal that adds to, deletes from or revises part of a draft resolution. Delegates may amend any draft resolution that has been introduced. Amendments shall normally be submitted in writing and are subject to the approval of the Director. Amendments to amendments are out of order; however, an amended part of a resolution may be further amended. A delegate may motion to introduce an amendment when the floor is open. A vote will be immediately taken. Upon successful introduction of an amendment, the general speakers’ list will be temporarily suspended and a new speakers’ list established for or against the amendment. Once debate is closed on the amendment, the committee will move to an immediate vote. A passed amendment shall be treated as an integral part of the draft resolution under debate. RULE 13 VOTING: Each vote may be a ‘yes’, ‘no’ or ‘abstain.’ Decisions of the Committee shall be made by a majority of the members present or present and voting. A simple majority requires a greater number of ‘yes’ votes than ‘no’ votes. A tie will fail. Voting shall normally be by a show of placards. RULE 14ORDER OF PRECEDENCE1.Parliamentary pointsa. Points that may interrupt a speakeri. Points of personal privilegeb. Points that are in order only when the floor is openi. Point of orderii. Points of parliamentary inquiry2. Procedural motions that are not debatablea. Adjournment of meetingb. Suspension of the meetingc. Unmoderated caucusingd. Moderated caucusinge. Motion to appeal decision of the Chair3. Procedural motions that are applicable to an agenda item, a resolution or amendmenta. Adjournment of debateb. Closure of debatec. Postponement of debate POINTS OF PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDUREPoint of Inquiry:Used to ask a question.Point of Order:Used to clarify procedure or a ruling of the chair.Point of Information:Used to inform the chair or to request information from the chair.Point of Personal Privilege:Used for the personal comfort of the delegates or the committee.Right of Reply:Used to respond to any slander or offensive remark to the national or personal integrity of a delegate. MOTIONSMotion to Open Debate:Used to open debate on the said topic.Motion to Open Speakers’ List:Used to open the speakers list on a certain topic.Motion to Close Speakers’ List: Used to prohibit the addition of any more speakers to the speakers’ list.Motion to Table Speakers’ List: Used to delete the current speakers’ listMotion to be Added to Speakers’Used to add the delegate’s country to the end of the List: speakers’ listMotion to be Removed fromUsed to remove the delegate’s country from the speakers’Speakers’ List:list. Motion to Change Speaking Time:Used to Alter the time allowed for comments or speechesMotion for a Caucus:Used to suspend formal debate for a said amount of time in order to discuss policy in an informal manner. Motion for a Moderated Caucus:Used to suspend formal debate for a said amount of time in order to have a chair-regulated speaking session as a set amount of time for each comment. Motion for a Formal Caucus:Used to suspend debate in order for the sponsors of a resolution to present the proposal to the committee. Cannot be used for amendments. Motion to Suspend Debate:Used to stall the meeting for the purpose of a break or for lunch. Motion to Submit a SubstantiveUsed to submit any kind of resolution, amendment, or Proposal: formal written request. Motion to Move into Voting Bloc:Used once all amendments and resolutions have been submitted so that the committee may vote on the above proposals. Motion to Divide SubstantiveUsed to divide out a clause from an amendment or Proposal resolution to have it voted upon separately. Motion to Re-Consider Used to re-vote on a failed proposal. Cannot be used by the Substantive Proposal:original sponsors of a proposal. Motion to End Debate:Used to end debate on a particular topic. Motion to Adjourn Meeting:Used at the end of the meeting to adjourn the session until the following year. Sometimes during committee you want to say something to the chairs or speak with otherdelegates but don’t quite know which motion to use since it isn’t a part of your every daylanguage. Below is a list of some things you might want to do during committee but getconfused as to how to say it.RULES OF PROCEDURE ‘TRANSLATION’Can I go to the bathroom?Point of Personal PrivilegeI have a question.Point of InquiryHe said something mean to me!Right of ReplyCan we go to lunch?Motion to Suspend DebateI have a resolution.Motion to Submit a proposalCan we vote on that resolution again?Motion to Re-Consider ProposalI think the chair is wrong on this. Point of OrderCan I be put on the speakers’ list?Motion to be added to the Speakers’ ListPREMAMBULATORY CLAUSESAffirmingExpressing its appreciationNoting with regretAlarmed byExpressing its satisfactionNoting with satisfactionAware ofFulfillingNoting furtherBearing in mindFully alarmedNoting with approvalBelievingFully awareObservingConfidentFully deploringReaffirmingContemplatingFully recallingRealizingConvincedGuided byRecallingDecides toHaving adoptedRecognizingDeclaringHaving consideredReferringDeeply concernedHaving considered furtherSeekingDeeply consciousHaving devoted attentionTaking into accountDeeply convincedHaving examinedTaking into considerationDeeply disturbedHaving heardViewing with appreciationDeeply regrettingHaving receivedNoting with deep concernDesiringHaving studiedKeeping in mindEmphasizingExpectingWelcoming OPERATIVE CLAUSESAcceptsEndorsesResolves toAffirmsExpressing its appreciationRequestsApprovesExpressing its hopeSolemnly condemnsAuthorizesFurther invitesSolemnly affirmsCallsFurther proclaimsSupportsCall UponFurther remindsTakes note ofCondemnsFurther recommendsTransmitsConfirmsFurther requestsTrustsCongratulatesFurther resolvesUrgesConsidersHas resolvedRemindsDeclares accordingly NotesEncouragesDeploresProclaimsRegretsDesignatesReaffirmsEmphasizesDraws the attentionRecommendsCaucusingCaucusing is one of the most crucial aspects at a MUN conference. It is where the real work gets done. It is also the perfect time to form allies and obtaining all kinds of information and signatures. Try to find out who has a laptop or BE the person who has the laptop. Introduce yourself to the chairs and as many delegates as possible, and meet delegates in your bloc early so that you can form alliances within your bloc. You need to be open and friendly, even to your country’s enemies. Be flexible, but do not break away from your country’s policies. Always work out a compromise. It is a greater challenge to work out a compromise, than to simply say no or yes, which is why compromising is the best way of any solution. STAY WITHIN POLICY! Do not embrace your enemies, and try not to cosign a resolution with them. If the resolution is in your policy however, do not vote it down just because the writers were your enemies. Try to avoid shouting matches, and always be willing to listen to ideas and use appropriate body language. Try not to intimidate people or they may leave and join up with someone who is more open and diplomatic. It looks much better if you control caucus and allow other delegates to speak than to simply be dominating over everyone and not allowing anyone to speak. Formal CaucusWhen it is time to go up and speak about the resolution, try to be one of those who go up and explain it and answer questions. This will enable you to push the resolution forward as well as gain points for speaking and participating. You need to be able to convince people that your solution is the way to go if you want the problem solved. BlocsWhen people go to a conference, they have a tendency to join up with delegates from their school or their friends. Make new friends and form alliances with your country’s allies. Try to form believable blocks; otherwise you will lose credibility in the eyes of the chairs as well as other delegates. POSITION PAPERS____________________________ FORMAT FOR POSITION PAPERSA Position Paper is a policy statement submitted by each representative of every delegation that will be present at PMUN. Each delegate should submit about one single-spaced, typewritten page for the assigned topic. The position paper is not an exercise in elaborate writing styles or a demonstration of breadth of knowledge on a topic; rather, it is an opportunity to clarify the issues, state a position, and suggest solutions from a certain national perspective for the benefit of fellow delegates and the conference staff. SAMPLE POSITION PAPER: The example below is just one example of a position paper format; while we do not require all papers to be in this format, it has served as a good guideline for position papers in the past. Please ensure to write 1. Committee Name, 2. Topic Area, 3. Country, 4. School at the top. Otherwise, our staff will be unable to identify it properly. Committee: Disarmament and International Security Topic: Nuclear Test Ban Country: The Republic of Sierra LeoneSchool: University of the United States I. General Position Statement The Republic of Sierra Leone believes disarmament to be crucial for the maintenance of worldwide security and considers a nuclear test ban to be an important step in the process of reaching that goal. Sierra Leone is not a nuclear power nor does it aid other countries in producing nuclear weapons. A comprehensive test ban treaty (CTBT), has been long overdue. Nuclear weapon testing allows the arms race to continue and even escalate. The implementation of a test ban would slow down the development of new nuclear weapons and thereby slow down the arms race. Furthermore, a CTBT would not, as some states have claimed, threaten the stability of the policy of nuclear deterrence, on which both superpowers rely. In fact, a CTBT would maintain stability by preventing innovations and developments which could potentially give one nuclear state a unilateral advantage. Moreover, the increasing use of supercomputers has essentially eliminated the need for actual testing. Thus, the Republic of Sierra Leone supports the following proposals for a nuclear test ban treaty. The treaty must be a comprehensive and permanent one. States should rely not only on all national means of verification which are consistent with international law, but also an international verification system. Current seismic monitoring systems, such as the Norwegian Seismic Array (NORSAR), are sufficiently advanced to determine whether states are complying with a CTBT. As per the Ad Hoc Group’s report, Sierra Leone is in favor of an international network of seismic monitoring stations which would send their data to International Data Centers (IDC’s) for analysis. These IDC’s would automatically give out type I data (basic information) with type II data (data subjected to more advanced analysis) available upon request. Regarding compliance, a test ban treaty is of such paramount importance that violators should be punished. Yet the fact remains that embargoes would most likely have little if any effect on most nuclear states. Perhaps compliance measures will eventually rely on first convincing the superpowers, and any other nuclear states, to enter into a CTBT and then getting the superpowers themselves to ensure that their allies abide by the treaty. II. Responses to Questions a Resolution Must Answer The Republic of Sierra Leone believes strongly that the CTBT is the only proper solution to the problems facing this committee. Because of the international impact of any nuclear testing, it is our belief that any regional agreements would be useless without the foundation of a world-wide test ban. Therefore, Sierra Leone cannot support any agreement that relies solely upon the establishment of regional agreements. Funding for a solution for the proposed additional research into seismic monitoring techniques should be drawn from all member states of the UN; however, it is the belief of the Republic of Sierra Leone that the primary source of funding should be the currently recognized nuclear powers, since these powers are responsible for a great deal of nuclear testing to date. The greatest threat to the CTBT is the potential for violations. Therefore, the Republic of Sierra Leone, as indicated above, believes that inspections of monitoring facilities must be permitted, if only to assuage the fears of the nuclear powers. Information gained from these monitoring stations must be globally disseminated to ensure that the international community is aware of any potential violations. CONFERENCE SCHEDULE Saturday, April 13th 8:00 – 9:00 am: Registration ?9:00 – 10:30 am: Opening CeremoniesKeynote Speaker: Doris VoorbraakMs. Voorbraak?is currently working as World Bank consultant on fragile and post-conflict states.? Ms. Voorbraak has most recently served as deputy chief of mission at the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Previously she served as senior governance advisor at the World Bank and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, negotiating, among others, sexual and reproductive health and rights during the Dutch EU Presidency.? She was posted as a first secretary (gender) in Pakistan. Before that she worked as a program officer in UNDP, New York (poverty alleviation) and worked in field offices of the United High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Cameroon, Pakistan and South Africa. She started her career at the EU Commission (Development). She holds a master’s degree in international relations and international law from the University of Amsterdam.10:45 – 12:00 pm: Training Sessions12:00 – 1:30 pm: Lunch ?1:30 – 3:30 pm: Committee Session 2?3:45 – 5:30 pm: Committee Session 3?5:30 – 7:30 pm: Hotel Check-in ?7:30 – 10:30 pm: Social Event??Sunday, April 14th 9:00 – 10:30 am: Committee Session 4?10:45 – 12:20 pm: Committee Session 5?12:30 – 1:30 pm: Lunch/ Closing Ceremonies ? ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download