Peer and Self Assessment Tool - Carnegie Mellon University
Group and Self-Assessment Tool
Below are six categories that I would like you to use to assess your peers and yourself for the class project. For each item, rate each person and yourself using the 4-point scale given below. Please think hard and honestly about each of the categories and how you and each group member performed. It is not necessary that everyone get the highest score on each item. Different people will have different strengths and different contributions. Please do your evaluations independently – do not share or discuss your scoring or come to a decision based on a group opinion. I want a rating from each of you, based on your perceptions and experiences. Beside each rating item I have included a space for comments. Please include examples or explanations that will help me understand your ratings.
Submit one form for each person, including yourself, with your name and the assessed person’s name on each form.
h
Group Participation
Attends meetings regularly and on time,
Time Management & Responsibility
Accepts fair share of work and reliably completes it by the required time.
Adaptability
Displays or tries to develop a wide range of skills in service of the project, readily accepts changed approach or constructive criticism.
Creativity/Originality
Problem-solves when faced with impasses or challenges, originates new ideas, initiates team decisions.
Communication Skills
Effective in discussions, good listener, capable presenter, proficient at diagramming, representing, and documenting work.
General team Skills
Positive attitude, encourages and motivates team, supports team decisions, helps team reach consensus, helps resolve conflicts in the group.
Technical Skills
Ability to create and develop materials on own initiative, provides technical solutions to problems.
Scoring
For each category, award yourself and each member of your team a score using the following scale:
3 – Better than most of the group in this respect
2 – About average for the group in this respect
1 – Not as good as most of the group in this respect
0 – No help at all to the group in this respect.
Rater’s Name: _______________________________
Assessment of: ________________________________
Rating Comments, Examples, Explanations, etc
| | |
| | |
|I.______ | |
| | |
| | |
|II.______ | |
| | |
| | |
|III.______ | |
| | |
| | |
|IV.______ | |
| | |
| | |
|V. ______ | |
| | |
| | |
|VI. _____ | |
| | |
| | |
|VII. ______ | |
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- hospice and palliative medicine hpm assessment toolkit
- peer evaluation self assessment form
- peer and self assessment tool carnegie mellon university
- assessment and evaluation angela s
- assessment action plan intel
- peer to peer leadership assessment
- expert registered nurse assessment
- assessment for learning checklist
Related searches
- completed employee self assessment examples
- completed employee self assessment ex
- writing a self assessment examples
- self assessment strengths and weakness
- assessment tool for communication
- self assessment questionnaire and answers
- peer and self assessment
- comprehensive family assessment tool template
- cans assessment tool texas
- cans assessment tool and manual
- family assessment tool examples
- dvt assessment tool for nurses