LEA Summary Statistics and Notes for Homeless ... - NCHE



LEA Summary Statistics and Notes for Homeless Students Enrolled Data School Years 2013-14 to 2015-16January 2018IntroductionThe following reports include summary statistics for publicly released enrollment and demographic data on students experiencing homelessness who were identified by public school districts and for whom counts are reported annually to the U.S. Department of Education (ED) through State educational agencies (SEAs). The data include information collected at the local educational agency (LEA) level and contain suppressed information for counts of students equal to or less than two students. These data may contain duplicates as students may have attended more than one LEA over the course of the academic year.ED began releasing privacy-protected homeless student enrollment files at the LEA level in June 2016; this document is intended to accompany the flat files and technical documentation available for download at . Given the wide variation in the demographics of students experiencing homelessness, these notes are intended to help homeless assistance providers, researchers and other stakeholders interpret the data in relation to national totals and trends. State Coordinators of homeless education may find the LEA overview statistics and listing of the LEAs with the largest counts to be of interest for training purposes.The LEA summary statistics and notes were compiled by Melissa Wilks of Quality Information Partners. National Center for Educational Statistics and ED staff provided further review of the statistics and notes. The notes have been edited and reformatted slightly to appear in one document; new summaries will be added annually to reflect subsequent data releases. Questions about the data files and documentation should be sent to HomelessEd@ or homeless@. LEA Summary Statistics and Notes: School Year 2013-144LEA Summary Statistics and Notes School Year 2014-158LEA Summary Statistics and Notes School Year 2015-1614The summaries include:the number of LEAs reporting students experiencing homelessness; the number of homeless children and youth (HCY) identified as homeless by LEAs;the number of LEAs with 1,000 or more students experiencing homelessness; the number of LEAs that serve approximately half of all homeless students; a list of the 20 LEAs with the highest homeless student enrollment; anda list of the ten states with the highest homeless student enrollment.Table 1. Summary data from the Statistics and Notes for SY 2013-16 releasesIndicatorSY 2013-14SY 2014-15SY 2015-16Number of LEAs reporting students experiencing homelessness12,19812,11412,400Number of homeless children and youth (HCY) identified as homeless by LEAs1,358,8191,289,5981,364,369Number of LEAs with 1,000 or more students experiencing homelessness256239242Number of LEAs that serve approximately half of all homeless students256296290List of the LEAs with the highest homeless student enrollment included in all three yearsCity of Chicago SD 299, Los Angeles Unified, New York City Geographic District #10, New York City Geographic District #9, Clark County School District (NV), San Diego Unified, Santa Ana Unified (CA), Jefferson County (KY), Orange (FL), Houston ISD, Santa Maria-Bonita (CA), Norwalk-La Mirada Unified (CA), New York City Geographic District #8, Long Beach Unified (CA), New York City Geographic District #12, St. Louis City.List of the states with the highest homeless student enrollment included in all three yearsIn order of HCY counts: California, New York, Texas, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Georgia, Washington, Missouri. Additionally, the summaries include information on the type of primary nighttime residence used by students, and the number of homeless students by subgroup. Primary nighttime residence categories include doubled-up, hotel/motel, sheltered and unsheltered. Subgroups of students include students with disabilities as defined by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, migrant students, limited English proficient students, and unaccompanied homeless youth (UHY). Information on data quality issues experienced by states is also noted.It is important to note the impact of duplicated data on the data themselves and the summary statistics. For example, summary statistics show that the number of homeless students with identified disabilities decreased between School Years (SYs) 2013-14 and 2014-15. However, the cause for this decrease is unclear. It could represent an actual decrease in the number of homeless students with disabilities, or it could indicate a decrease in the mobility of the students, resulting in the students being reported by only one district instead of multiple districts. In contrast, increased counts of students in a particular subgroup could also indicate an increase in the number of homeless students in that subgroup or an increase in student mobility that resulted in the student being reported by multiple LEAs.An additional resource, the Federal Data Summary published annually by the National Center for Homeless Education, provides unduplicated enrollment and demographic data that may be used to compare national and state trends. The reports are available at Summary Statistics and Notes Homeless Students Enrolled (C118): School Year 2013-14The following document provides a summary of the SY 2013-14 LEA Homeless Students Enrolled public data file. The public data file contains the data submitted to EDFacts by states in Data Group 655 (Homeless students enrolled table) through the C118 (Homeless Student Enrolled) file at the LEA (district) level for SY 2013-14. LEA Overview12,198 LEAs reported counts of Homeless Students EnrolledThese LEAs reported a total of 1,358,819 homeless students in SY 2013-14256 LEAs reported having more than 1,000 homeless students in their district256 LEAs accounted for about 48% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 256 LEAs reported about 657,608 homeless students.20 LEAs accounted for about 12% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 20 LEAs reported about 159,058 homeless students. [see Table 2 below]Table 2. 20 LEAs with the highest number of homeless students enrolled in SY 2013-14StateLEA NCES IDLEA NameTotal Student CountIllinois1709930City of Chicago SD 29921,610California0622710Los Angeles Unified13,924New York3600087New York City Geographic District #1010,702New York3600086New York City Geographic District # 99,598Nevada3200060Clark County School District9,281California0634320San Diego Unified9,227California0635310Santa Ana Unified8,247Kentucky2102990Jefferson County8,087Florida1201440Orange6,715California0613920Fontana Unified6,565Texas4823640Houston ISD6,256Alabama0102370Mobile County5,874California0605580Santa Maria-Bonita5,595California0627690Norwalk-La Mirada Unified5,548California0609390Colton Joint Unified5,495New York3600085New York City Geographic District # 85,465New Mexico3500060Albuquerque Public Schools5,389California0622500Long Beach Unified5,266New York3600090New York City Geographic District #125,208Missouri2929280St. Louis City5,033LEA Summary by SubgroupStates were expected to submit data for several category sets (i.e. collections of subgroups), including Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence, Disability Status, LEP (Limited English Proficient) Status, Migrant Status, and Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Status. Table 3 below shows the count of students reported in each subgroup.Table 3. SY 2013-14 number of enrolled homeless students reported by subgroupSubgroupStudent CountPercent of the Total Number of Students Reported by Homeless Primary Nighttime ResidenceHomeless Primary Nighttime ResidenceHotels/Motels72,679 5.6Unsheltered (e.g., cars, parks, campgrounds, temporary trailers including FEMA trailers, or abandoned buildings)39,6633.0Sheltered (Shelters, Transitional housing, Awaiting Foster Care)196,20615.1Doubled–up (i.e., living with another family)993,22576.3Children with one or more disabilities (IDEA)214,650NALimited English proficient (LEP) students199,314NAMigrant students15,207NAUnaccompanied Homeless Youth84,847NACounts affected by Privacy ProtectionFor privacy protection purposes, small counts (n ≤ 2 students) were suppressed from the public data file. For this reason, the total counts of students within each subgroup in the public file are smaller than what were reported by states. Table 4 shows the aggregated student counts for each subgroup as shown in both the public data file and the unsuppressed data file. The total number of students removed from the public data file is also included in the table.Table 4. Aggregated student counts by subgroup in the unsuppressed raw data file and the privacy-protected public data file for the SY 2013-14 LEA homeless students enrolled dataSubgroupStudent CountsUnsuppressed Data FilePublic Data FileDifference between Unsuppressed and Public Data FileTotal1,361,1191,358,8192,300Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence1,357,5141,301,77355,741Disability Status (Only)222,734214,6508,084LEP Status (Only)201,763199,3142,449Migrant Status19,10915,2073,902Homeless Unaccompanied Youth Status91,37784,8476,530LEA Summary by StateFive states (CA, NY, TX, FL, and IL) accounted for 51% of the homeless students enrolled. These five states reported 693,212 homeless students. Table 5 below shows the ten states with the highest reported number of Homeless Students.Table 5. Ten States with the highest number of homeless students reported in SY 2013-14StateCount of Homeless Students EnrolledPercentage of the Total Number of Homeless Students EnrolledCalifornia309,88122.8New York145,15710.7Texas111,6208.2Florida71,2415.2Illinois55,3134.1Michigan40,7703.0Georgia37,9572.8Washington32,5202.4Kentucky31,2032.3Missouri29,7182.2Data AnomaliesTable 6 below shows the data anomalies identified during a review of the data. Table 6. Identified data anomaliesSTATESY 2013-14 Enrolled Homeless Students (C118)AlabamaData on subgroups of homeless students includes only those LEAs that received a subgrant.ArizonaAllowed LEAs to include students with an unknown type of primary nighttime residence, which is not allowed by FS118; use data with caution. The SEA also allowed LEAs to include students in more than one grade, which could result in duplicated counts within an LEA.Bureau of Indian EducationNo data submitted.CaliforniaCalifornia did not provide counts of unaccompanied homeless youth.IllinoisNot all LEAs reported data for this state.KentuckyKentucky includes unaccompanied youth as a type of primary nighttime residence, resulting in the loss of data on the primary nighttime residence of any student in the unaccompanied youth subgroup. MississippiNot all LEAs reported data for this state. Does not include data on students who were identified as homeless but declined assistance from the schools.New MexicoThe state indicated that primary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.OregonNot all LEAs reported data for this state.PennsylvaniaNot all LEAs reported data for this state. The state indicated that primary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.WisconsinNot all LEAs reported data for this state.LEA Summary Statistics and Notes Homeless Students Enrolled (C118): School Year 2014-15The following document provides a summary of the SY 2014-15 LEA Homeless Students Enrolled public data file. The public data file contains the data submitted to EDFacts by states in Data Group 655 (Homeless students enrolled table) through the C118 (Homeless Student Enrolled) file at the LEA (district) level for SY 2014-15. SY 2014-15 LEA Overview12,114 LEAs reported counts of Homeless Students EnrolledThese LEAs reported a total of 1,289,598 homeless students in SY 2014-15239 LEAs reported having more than 1,000 homeless students in their district296 LEAs accounted for about 50% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 296 LEAs reported about 644,989 homeless students.20 LEAs accounted for about 11% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 20 LEAs reported about 137,610 homeless students. [see Table 7 below]Table 7. 20 LEAs with the highest number of homeless students enrolled in SY 2014-15StateLEA NCES IDLEA NameTotal Student CountIllinois1709930City of Chicago SD 29919,902Nevada3200060Clark County School District11,240New York3600087New York City Geographic District #1010,040New York3600086New York City Geographic # 99,284Florida1201440Orange6,786California0634320San Diego Unified6,761Kentucky2102990Jefferson County6,475Texas4823640Houston ISD6,295California0635310Santa Ana Unified6,015Alabama102370Mobile County5,713California0627690Norwalk-La Mirada Unified5,483Missouri2929280ST. Louis City5,182California0622500Long Beach Unified5,118California0622710Los Angeles Unified5,048New York3600085New York City Geographic District # 85,018New York3600090New York City Geographic District #124,912California0605580Santa Maria-Bonita4,685Florida1201470Osceola4,665New York3600088New York City Geographic District #114,578North Carolina3702970Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools4,410LEA Summary by SubgroupStates were expected to submit data for several category sets (i.e., collections of subgroups), including Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence, Disability Status, LEP (Limited English Proficient) Status, Migrant Status, and Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Status. Table 8 below shows the count of students reported in each subgroup.Table 8. SY 2014-15 number of enrolled homeless students reported by subgroupSubgroupStudent CountPercent of the Total Number of Students Reported by Homeless Primary Nighttime ResidenceHomeless Primary Nighttime ResidenceHotels/Motels74,0876.0Unsheltered (e.g., cars, parks, campgrounds, temporary trailers including FEMA trailers, or abandoned buildings)35,4713.0Sheltered (Shelters, Transitional housing, Awaiting Foster Care)186,29615.1Doubled–up (i.e., living with another family)941,16376.1Children with one or more disabilities (IDEA)222,298NALimited English proficient (LEP) students180,243NAMigrant students16,576NAUnaccompanied Homeless Youth89,681NACounts affected by Privacy ProtectionFor privacy protection purposes, small counts (n ≤ 2 students) were suppressed from the public data file. For this reason, the total counts of students within each subgroup in the public file are smaller than what were reported by states. Table 9 shows the aggregated student counts for each subgroup as shown in both the public data file and the unsuppressed data file. The total number of students removed from the public data file is also included in the table.Table 9. Aggregated student counts by subgroup in the unsuppressed raw data file and the privacy-protected public data file for the SY 2014-15 LEA homeless students enrolled dataSubgroupStudent CountsUnsuppressed Data FilePublic Data FileDifference between Unsuppressed and Public Data FileTotal1,291,6781,289,5982,080Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence1,289,1541,237,01752,137Disability Status (Only)227,116222,2984,818LEP Status (Only)182,456180,2432,213Migrant Status21,12016,5764,544Homeless Unaccompanied Youth Status97,05289,6817,371LEA Summary by StateFive states (CA, NY, TX, FL, and IL) accounted for about 47% of the homeless students enrolled. These five states reported 609,663 homeless students. Table 10 below shows the ten states with the highest reported number of Homeless Students.Table 10. Ten States with the highest number of homeless students reported in SY 2014-15StateCount of Homeless Students EnrolledPercentage of the Total Number of Homeless Students EnrolledCalifornia229,90017.8New York140,58210.9Texas112,9028.8Florida73,1135.7Illinois53,1664.1Michigan43,8103.4Georgia39,0963.0Washington35,4932.8Missouri30,5852.4Kentucky29,9272.3Prior Year ComparisonsTable 11 below shows the count of homeless students enrolled in SY 2014-15, as compared to the count reported in SY 2013-14.Table 11. Comparison between SY 2013-14 and SY 2014-15 counts by category setSubgroupStudent Counts (Public Files)SY 2013-14SY 2014-15Difference between SY 2013-14 and SY 2014-15Total1,358,8191,289,59869,221Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence1,301,7731,237,01764,756Disability Status (Only)214,650222,298-7,648LEP Status (Only)199,314180,24319,071Migrant Status15,20716,576-1,369Homeless Unaccompanied Youth Status84,84789,681-4,834Tables 12 and 13 below show the five states with the largest increases and decreases (by percent and by count) in total reported homeless students enrolled from the prior year. Table 12. Five states with the largest percentage increases in total reported homeless students from SY 2013-14 to SY 2014-15By PercentBy CountStatePercent (%) Increase from Prior YearCount Increase from Prior YearStateCount Increase from Prior YearPercent (%) Increase from Prior YearHawaii33.9892Michigan3,0407.5West Virginia20.61,528Washington2,9739.1Montana16.5431Nevada2,31315.6Nevada15.62,313Oklahoma1,9848.0South Dakota15.5295Florida1,8722.6Table 13. Five states with the largest decreases in total reported homeless students from SY 2013-14 to SY 2014-15 by percent and by countBy PercentBy CountStatePercent (%) Decrease from Prior YearCount Decrease from Prior YearStateCount Decrease from Prior YearPercent (%) Decrease from Prior YearDelaware-28.9-1,255California-79,981-25.8California-25.8-79,981New York-4,575-3.2Tennessee-23.2-4,008Tennessee-4,008-23.2New Mexico-14-1,674Illinois-2,147-3.9Kansas-6.4-658New Mexico-1,674-14Data AnomaliesTable 14 below shows the data anomalies identified during a review of the data. Table 14. Identified data anomaliesSTATESY 2014-15 Enrolled Homeless Students (C118)ArizonaAllowed LEAs to include students with an unknown type of primary nighttime residence, which is not allowed by FSC118; use data with caution. The SEA also allowed LEAs to include students in more than one grade, which could result in duplicated counts within an LEA.Bureau of Indian EducationNo data submitted.CaliforniaThe SEA encountered significant technical issues during its data collection process, resulting in many students not being accurately recorded. HawaiiHawaii submitted six fewer students for the SEA than for the LEA. Beyond a possible error during data submission, there is no explanation for this data anomaly.IllinoisNot all LEAs, including subgrantees, reported data. Primary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.KentuckyKentucky includes unaccompanied youth as a type of primary nighttime residence, resulting in the loss of data on the primary nighttime residence of any student in the unaccompanied youth subgroup. MississippiDoes not include data on students who were identified as homeless but declined assistance from the schools.New HampshireNew collection processes instituted in New Hampshire may have resulted in under-reporting of students.New MexicoPrimary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.North CarolinaReported more students by primary nighttime residence than by grade. Not all LEAs reported data.OregonNot all LEAs reported data.PennsylvaniaPennsylvania reported fewer students enrolled in the LEAs than they did at the SEA level. “Beyond a possible error during data submission, there is no explanation for this data anomaly. Not all LEAs, including subgrantees, reported data.WisconsinReported more students by primary nighttime residence than by grade. Not all LEAs reported data.WyomingDid not report on the number of UHY.LEA Summary Statistics and Notes Homeless Students Enrolled (C118): School Year 2015-16The following document provides a summary of the SY 2015-16 LEA Homeless Students Enrolled public data file. The public data file contains the data submitted to EDFacts by states in Data Group 655 (Homeless students enrolled table) through the C118 (Homeless Student Enrolled) file at the LEA (district) level for SY 2015-16. SY 2015-16 LEA Overview12,400 LEAs reported counts of Homeless Students EnrolledThese LEAs reported a total of 1,364,369 homeless students in SY 2015-16242 LEAs reported having 1,000 or more homeless students enrolled within their district290 LEAs accounted for about 50% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 290 LEAs reported about 682,281 homeless students.20 LEAs accounted for about 12% of the total number of enrolled homeless students reported. These 20 LEAs reported about 158,792 homeless students. [see Table 15 below]Table 15. 20 LEAs with the highest number of homeless students enrolled in SY 2015-16StateLEA NCES IDLEA NameTotal Student CountIllinois1709930City of Chicago SD 29918,537Nevada3200060Clark County School District14,598New York3600087New York City Geographic District #1012,742New York3600086New York City Geographic District # 911,200California0622710Los Angeles Unified9,334California0634320San Diego Unified7,082California0634170San Bernardino City Unified6,935Florida1201440Orange6,835California0635310Santa Ana Unified6,596New York3600090New York City Geographic District #126,346New York3600085New York City Geographic District # 86,158New York3600088New York City Geographic District #116,143Florida1200390Dade6,079Kentucky2102990Jefferson County6,025California0622500Long Beach Unified6,024California0627690Norwalk-La Mirada Unified5,958Texas4823640Houston ISD5,911California0605580Santa Maria-Bonita5,696Missouri2929280St. Louis City5,451New York3600120New York City Geographic District #195,142LEA Summary by SubgroupStates were expected to submit data for several category sets (i.e. collections of subgroups), including Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence, Disability Status, LEP (Limited English Proficient) Status, Migrant Status, and Unaccompanied Homeless Youth Status. Table 16 below shows the count of students reported in each subgroup.Table 16. SY 2015-16 number of enrolled homeless students reported by subgroupSubgroupStudent CountPercent of the Total Number of Students Reported by Homeless Primary Nighttime ResidencePercent of Total Number of Students ReportedHomeless Primary Nighttime ResidenceHotels/Motels76,5525.9Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence subgroups are expected to equal to the total number of homeless students reported by Age/Grade (Basic).Unsheltered (e.g., cars, parks, campgrounds, temporary trailers including FEMA trailers, or abandoned buildings)41,7253.2Sheltered (Shelters, Transitional housing, Awaiting Foster Care)200,50815.3Doubled–up (i.e., living with another family)987,70275.6Children with one or more disabilities (IDEA)244,829NA17.9Limited English proficient (LEP) students204,869NA15.0Migrant students16,199NA1.2Unaccompanied Homeless Youth106,544NA7.8LEA Summary by StateFive states (CA, NY, TX, FL, and IL) accounted for about 49% of the homeless students enrolled. These five states reported 668,724 homeless students. Table 17 below shows the ten states with the highest reported number of Homeless Students.Table 17. Ten States with the highest number of homeless students reported in SY 2015-16StateCount of Homeless Students EnrolledPercentage of the Total Number of Homeless Students EnrolledCalifornia251,15518.4New York172,52212.6Texas120,4578.8Florida72,7925.3Illinois51,7983.8Michigan41,6683.1Georgia39,6822.9Washington39,1062.9Missouri32,0592.3Ohio30,0052.2Prior Year ComparisonsFrom SY 2014-15 to SY 2015-16, the number of reported homeless students increased about 6%.Table 18 below shows the count of homeless students enrolled in SY 2015-16, as compared to the counts reported in SY 2013-14 and SY 2014-15. Table 18. Comparison between SY 2014-15 and SY 2015-16 counts by category setSubgroupStudent Counts (Public Files)Year to Year Differences Between:SY 2013-14 and SY 2014-15SY 2014-15 and SY 2015-16SY 2013-14 and SY 2015-16SY 2013-14SY 2014-15SY 2015-16Count%Count%Count%Total1,358,8191,2895,981,364,36969,2215.174,7715.85,5500.4Homeless Primary Nighttime Residence1,301,7731,237,0171,306,48764,7565.069,4705.64,7140.4Disability Status (Only)214,650222,298244,829-7648-3.622,53110.130,17914.1LEP Status (Only)199,314180,243204,86919,0719.624,62613.75,5552.8Migrant Status152071657616199-1369-9.0-377-2.39926.5Homeless Unaccompanied Youth Status84,84789,681106,544-4,834-5.716,86318.821,69725.6Tables 19 and 20 below show the five states with the largest increases and decreases (by percent and by count) in total reported homeless students enrolled from the prior year. Table 19. Five states with the largest percentage increases in total reported homeless students from SY 2014-15 to SY 2015-16By PercentBy CountStateCount Increase from Prior YearPercent (%) Increase from Prior YearStateCount Increase from Prior YearPercent (%) Increase from Prior YearDistrict of Columbia3,13387.8New York31,94022.7New York31,94022.7California21,2559.2Alaska92522.5Texas7,5556.7Connecticut68321.7Washington3,61310.2Nevada3,51220.4Nevada3,51220.4Table 20. Five states with the largest decreases in total reported homeless students from SY 2014-15 to SY 2015-16 by percent and by countBy PercentBy CountStateCount Decrease from Prior YearPercent (%) Decrease from Prior YearStateCount Decrease from Prior YearPercent (%) Decrease from Prior YearAlabama-5,271-27.2Alabama-5,271-27.2North Dakota-492-18.1Arizona-3,893-13.2Arizona-3,893-13.2Michigan-2,142-4.9South Dakota-165-7.5Illinois-1,368-2.6Indiana-1,339-7.0Indiana-1,339-7.0Data AnomaliesTable 21 below shows the data anomalies identified during a review of the data. Table 21. Identified data anomaliesSTATESY 2015-16 Enrolled Homeless Students (C118)AlabamaOne non-grantee district failed to report data.ArizonaAllowed LEAs to include students with an unknown type of primary nighttime residence, which is not allowed by FS C118. Bureau of Indian AffairsMore students were enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level. Not all LEAs, including subgrantees, reported data.ConnecticutDoes not have a migrant programDistrict of ColumbiaPrimary nighttime residence was not collected for all students. Does not have a migrant program.IdahoTwo more students were enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level in the following subgroup: UHY.IllinoisNot all LEAs, including subgrantees, reported data. Primary nighttime residence was not collected for all students. More students were enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level: LEP, migrant, and CWD. IndianaAs a result of a change in the exit criteria for limited English proficiency, the state experienced a decrease in the number of homeless students who were limited English proficient.IowaIncreases in counts of homeless students are due in part to increased outreach and technical assistance. KentuckyExperienced an increase in the number of UHY are due to improved data collection methodology. MaineMore students were enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level. Categories with more students enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level include 79 more students reported by grade, 56 more students enrolled by doubled up residence, 10 more students enrolled by hotel/motel residence, 13 more students enrolled by shelter residence, 624 more students enrolled with disabilities, and 464 more student enrolled by UHY subgroup.New JerseyDid not provide UHY data.New MexicoPrimary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.North DakotaOnly 87% of LEAs reported data. Twenty-nine non-grantee districts failed to report data.OregonNot all LEAs, including subgrantees, reported data.PennsylvaniaMore students were enrolled at the SEA level than the LEA level as a result of domestic violence shelters reporting data directly to the SEA: Grades 3 to 5 not KG, 1, 2, 9, 10, 12, and shelters. Only 90% of subgrantee districts reported data. No non-grantee districts reported data.Puerto RicoDoes not have a migrant program.Rhode IslandDoes not have a migrant program.TennesseeIncreases in counts of homeless students from the prior year are due in part to increased outreach and technical assistance. Primary nighttime residence was not collected for all students.TexasIncreases in counts of homeless students from the prior year are due in part to increased outreach and technical assistance.West VirginiaDoes not have a migrant program.WisconsinSix non-grantee districts, or approximately 1% of districts, failed to report data. ................
................

In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.

Google Online Preview   Download