New Technology Foundation
|Philosopher Rubric | PRESENTER: ___________________________________ |
| |PROJECT: ___________________________________ |
| |EVALUATOR: ________________ DATE: ___________ |
|CRITERIA |UNSATISFACTORY |PROFICIENT |ADVANCED |
| |(Below Performance Standards) |(Minimal Criteria) |(Demonstrates Superior Performance) |
|Structure and Organization |No formal introduction or introduction had no |Introduction had clear thesis statement and a preview of |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |
|Introduction |clear thesis statement nor offered any preview of|topics to be discussed |Clever attention getting introduction or an |
|Main ideas |topics to be discussed |Main ideas were separated into a logical progression |imaginative thesis and preview |
|Supporting materials |Main ideas were not separated into a logical |Speaker supported important ideas and viewpoints through |Ideas connected by original transitions, logical |
|Conclusion |progression |accurate and detailed references to text or other works |throughout; creative pattern |
|Length requirement |Important ideas were not supported with |Conclusion restated thesis statement and summarized the ideas |Conclusion tied speech together and left audience with|
| |references or data |presented |memorable message |
|TIME: |No conclusion or conclusion did not adequately |Time requirement was met for specific assignment (neither too |Speaker used logical, ethical and emotional appeals |
| |summarize presentation |long or too short) |that enhanced a specific tone and purpose |
| |Presentation did not use time allotted | | |
| |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - -|5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 |8 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 10|
| |- 4 | | |
|Philosopher Content |• Philosopher’s background not clearly |• Philosopher’s background clearly contextualized |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |
|Subject criteria |contextualized |•Main points of philosophy defined |Comprehensive explanation of defining philosophy and |
| |•Philosophy not defined |Clear explanation of philosopher’s view of human nature |implications of how it is seen today |
| |Unclear explanation of philosopher’s view of |Distinct comparison with Golding’s philosophy of human nature |Thorough analysis of human nature in context of |
| |human nature |Accurate implications of philosophy on formulating government |governing systems |
| |No comparison with Golding’s philosophy of human | | |
| |nature | | |
| |Inaccurate implications of philosophy on | | |
| |formulating government | | |
| |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - -|5 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 |8 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - 10|
| |- 4 | | |
|Overall Impact |Speaker appeared bored by the message or |Speaker appeared to believe strongly in message and |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |
|Energy, Enthusiasm, Sincerity |presented without conviction |demonstrated desire to have audience listen, understand and |Overall presentation was creative and exciting |
|Originality/Creativity | |remember | |
| |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - -|7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 |9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10|
| |- 6 | | |
|Features |Materials detracted from content or purpose of |Materials added, did not detract from presentation |In addition to meeting the PROFICIENT criteria … |
|Multimedia, Visuals, Audio |presentation or were of such low quality as to |Materials used were quality products; easy to see and hear |Speaker creatively integrated a variety of objects, |
| |discredit speaker | |charts and graphs to amplify the message |
| |0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - -|7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 |9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10|
| |- 6 | | |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related download
- five educational philosophies introduction
- phil 1010 introduction to philosophy
- need for government philosopher s reading
- new technology foundation
- unit three ideals in ancient greece
- introduction to part ii philosophy of nature philosophy
- the 7 main approaches perspectives to psychology
- enlightenment philosophers graphic organizer
Related searches
- new technology in business world
- new technology used in business
- new technology for education
- new technology article
- best new technology for education
- new technology trends 2019
- new technology articles for kids
- new technology for teachers
- new technology used in education
- new technology etf
- new technology in healthcare articles
- new technology updates