Philosophy Department Rubric for Papers and Oral …
Department of Mathematics & Statistics Rubric for Papers and Oral Presentations
Key
5 = Well exceeds expectations, 4 = Somewhat exceeds expectations, 3 = Meets expectations, 2 = Somewhat below expectations, 1 = Does not meet expectations
|Mathematical/Statistical Research | | | | | |
|Identifies and cites appropriate primary sources |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Effectively incorporates appropriate primary sources |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Identifies and cites appropriate secondary sources |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Effectively incorporates appropriate secondary sources |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Mathematical/Statistical Writing | | | | | |
| Writing Skills | | | | | |
|The text is well organized |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The writer stays on topic |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The text is clear |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|There are effective transitions between ideas |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The tone is appropriate for the purpose and the intended audience |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The writing conforms to standards of Edited Standard Written English |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
| Mathematical/Statistical Content | | | | | |
|Develops major points that support the central thesis |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Demonstrates ability to communicate complex ideas clearly, succinctly and coherently |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The text has a clear thesis |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The text has an identifiable thesis |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The text has a substantial thesis |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Demonstrates an understanding of major ideas relevant to the topic |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Adequately covers the main issues relevant to the topic |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Details are necessary, relevant and appropriate |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The text accurately and fairly represents the views expressed in primary and secondary |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|sources | | | | | |
| Reasoning Ability | | | | | |
|The analysis is logical |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The analysis is internally consistent |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The analysis is well-developed |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The student draws plausible conclusions from the reasoning presented in the text |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The line of argument anticipates and adequately responds to relevant objections |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
| Revision and Improvement | | | | | |
|Student improves written work in response to comments |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Oral Skills | | | | | |
|Language employed is appropriate to content and audience |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Oral expression is fluent and grammatically correct |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|The speaker orders major points that support the purpose of the presentation in a |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|reasonable manner | | | | | |
|The speaker stays on topic |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Demonstrates ability to communicate complex ideas clearly, succinctly and coherently |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Demonstrates an understanding of questions and an ability to give relevant responses |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|Demonstrates flexibility and creativity in responding to questions by not merely repeating |5 |4 |3 |2 |1 |
|what was said during presentation | | | | | |
Comments:
Overall Evaluation: Pass:
Fail:
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- philosophy department rankings
- fsa rubric for writing
- grading rubric for essay
- rubric for high school essays
- rubric for a personal narrative
- essay rubric for high school
- covid 19 and oral thrush
- college rubric for essay writing
- writing rubric for elementary
- rubric for argumentative essay
- grading rubric for argumentative essay
- rubric for essay question