Meeting Minutes
Date: |12/09/08 | |
|Location: |SE Project Lab and SE Team Rooms |
|Participants: |Professor Martinez, Bob J., Stuart Haas, Ryan Kao, Harmon Keener, Daniel Rabess, Michael Dack |
|Meeting Start Time: |4:00 PM (with Martinez) and 4:30 PM (with Bob J.) |
|Meeting End Time: |6:00 PM |
|Scribe: |Stuart Haas |
Meeting Agenda:
|Actual Time (minutes) |Estimated Time (minutes) |Activity |
|40 minutes |30 minutes |Kodak Kiosk Install / demo |
|5 minutes |10 minutes |Questions from demo |
|10 minutes |5 minutes |Team questions |
|10 minutes |15 minutes |Discuss development process |
|25 minutes |30 minutes |Project plan discussion |
|2 minutes |2 minutes |Closings |
Total time: 90 minutes
Meeting Discussion:
|Time Started |Discussion |Time Spent (minutes) |
|4:00 |Professor Martinez discussion of corrections to the way we document and pitfalls to watch out |15 minutes |
| |for. | |
| |Weekly status reports: | |
| |Ensure first and last name is on the time sheet | |
| |Ensure that the complete column is filled out | |
| |Ensure same notation for time period ex.: From 2008-12-1 through 2008-12-8 | |
| |Agenda: | |
| |Start time for each item | |
| |Mention of invitees of the meeting | |
| |Notes | |
| |Put notes into template 2 (this template) | |
| |Last weeks notes should be put in this template | |
| |MS-Project | |
| |If using this, use only for milestone view | |
| |Use of a spreadsheet may be easier to manage | |
| |Not ideal for granular tasks | |
| |Consider scraping this in favor of a new tool or method | |
| |Kodak | |
| |Kodak may have charts that they want, that we need to know about | |
| |Individual Presentations | |
| |Split up research work | |
| |Upon a week or so of research, each participant makes a power-point of what was learned and | |
| |the results | |
| |Suggested topics were: MS-Project vs something else, wpf vs silverlight, and expression blend| |
| |vs using only visual studio 2008 | |
| |Presentations may be useful for any learning that is accomplished | |
|4:15 |Discussion of each individual’s time spent. The following notes on the discussion were made: |4:30 |
| |Licensing issue of expression blend (if we use this, as it expression blend 2 only comes with | |
| |a 30 day trial for free) | |
| |Summarize any findings in ppts and post to the website | |
| |Check out photo-organizers old project which still exists on the se website | |
| |May opt to ditch use of MS Project in favor of a spreadsheet | |
| |Dan’s timesheet was lost: ensure that submissions are made and received | |
| |WPF’s API in Visual Studio 2008 was causing some confusion | |
| | may be useful for schedule’s | |
| |Use the same notation in documents | |
| |Specify items of activity, targets, and associations they may have | |
|4:30 |Demo of the Kiosk hardware, including the install. Notes: |40 minutes |
| |We have the G3 kiosk with a 2.3 ghz processor and 512 mb of ram, and uses Windows 200 | |
| |The G3 may be switched for a G4 or G4x later on that has P4 3.0 ghz processor and 1 gb of ram| |
| |running under Windows XP embedded | |
| |We have the latest 2.0 software sweet including support for the photo book, and greeting cards| |
| |No printing on the kiosk | |
| |Inputs: usb, sd cards, cd’s, floppys, and Bluetooth wireless | |
| |Literature on dry lab and wet lab differences was brought | |
| |Sample photo book was brought | |
| |Sample calendar was brought | |
| |Went through the 4x6 standard workflow | |
| |Went through the photo book workflow | |
| |Went through collage workflow | |
| |Configurable software: only some config options are exposed to kiosk owners, the other config | |
| |options are hidden from them but exist | |
|5:10 |Demo questions |5 |
| |Password creation for setup options and the OS are posted on the private google group | |
| |If we mess up the OS on the kiosk, a snapshot was taken that can restore the kiosk back to its| |
| |original state | |
| |Mention of checking out the target gestures ad for inspiration on UI 3d design ideas | |
|5:15 |Team Questions |10 |
| |Do the panes that pictures are split across always remain the same square shape? | |
| |No, they do not. However, the panes will always be rectangular but the shape of the | |
| |rectangles can change | |
|5:25 |Discuss development process |10 |
| |Schedule with milestones expected by Sunday Evening by Kodak | |
| |Sunday evenings are the due dates of any documents and artifacts that need to be reviewed by | |
| |Kodak | |
| |Holiday schedule: we will most likely need to choose research areas and prepare presentations| |
| |of lessons learned for return | |
| |Get code from previous project for use. Prof Martinez said he would get us the resource cd | |
| |from the last project | |
| |Expression blend 2: licensing issue that was mentioned earlier brought up again | |
| |Spiral Process chosen as plan for its dynamic iterations | |
| |We need to map the phases of spiral to our project | |
| |Prioritizing risks should be done soon | |
| |Complexity of tasks should be noted | |
| |Figure out what goes in what release, core and increments | |
| |May use a large iteration first followed by smaller releases | |
|5:35 |Discuss project plan |25 |
| |Charts that Kodak will need from us should be disclosed soon | |
| |Track tool should be investigated (mike said he would do this) | |
| |Story boards (wireframe, paper prototype, etc) are requested by Kodak by the end of Week 3 | |
| |(next week) | |
| |Website needs to be up this week | |
| |Logins for content on website was questioned by Bob. We will probably not need these. | |
| |Installer discussion through away the possibility of InstallShield because of costs and | |
| |licenscing and we will probably use Visual Studio’s method of packing the project into an | |
| |installer | |
| |Risk management doc should be drafted by next week | |
| |Priorities of release features is in the updated requirements list on the google group | |
| |Should nudging of images nudge the whole image or the individual splits? The whole image was| |
| |the answer. | |
| |The requirements list should have a column for complexity | |
| |Beta testing was mentioned and we may have to deliver a beta or alpha | |
| |Beware that not all nonfunctional reqs should be considered at R1 but may come into play as we| |
| |advance | |
| |The look and feel is up to us. Make this pretty and advanced as this project may be | |
| |inspiration for future kiosk UI designs. | |
| |“Communication goes a long way” --- Bob J. | |
|6:00 |Closings |2 |
| |Meeting with Kodak sponsors at Tuesday 12/16/2008 4:30 pm to 6 pm | |
Team Decisions:
|Decisions | |Date Added |
|Use the 2nd note template emailed to us by Prof Martinez | |12/09/2008 |
|Spiral Model chosen as the methodology | |12/09/2008 |
Action Items:
|Assigned To |Task |Date Added |Estimated Completion|Effort (Estimated) |
| | | |Date | |
|Stuart Haas |Ensure all documents affected by meeting are up to date. |
|10 |Follow up on previous action items. |
|15 |Split up research among team-members |
|45 |Discussion of task assignments and team assignments |
|30 |Any team work |
|10 |Discuss agenda for next meeting. |
Checklist for scribe:
• Tally the total time spent today
• Ensure header at the top is completed
• Check in this and all modified files!!
• Check in agenda.txt with new agenda
• Update documents that are affected by this meeting (i.e. Action Items, Decisions)
................
................
In order to avoid copyright disputes, this page is only a partial summary.
To fulfill the demand for quickly locating and searching documents.
It is intelligent file search solution for home and business.
Related searches
- management review meeting minutes sample
- church meeting minutes outline
- church board meeting minutes template
- church business meeting minutes template
- church meeting minutes format
- church meeting minutes sample
- church meeting minutes template
- blank printable meeting minutes form
- non profit meeting minutes sample
- meeting minutes for non profit
- minutes of meeting attendance sheet
- directors meeting minutes template